Terpene

thcscience_admin

April Fools' MfDs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was April fools day is over, these are all joke noms, speedy keep, non-admin closure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close, Kept (April Fools). Avicennasis @ 14:26, 21 Kislev 5777 / 14:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jimbo Wales[edit]

Because it will make a very good April Fools Joke, and his Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales is also being discussed for deletion because it's a hoax. Techman224Talk 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, wheel warred, and do it all over again as many people still believe in Jimbo Wales. Techman224Talk 16:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close as exceeding maximum page title limit. Page titles with more than three slashes must be approved by the process committee. filetS (atlk) 12:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales[edit]

Page title is far too long. Steve Crossin :  Chat  11:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Redirect on wheels. Stifle (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion[edit]

I'm nominating RFD for deletion. Redirects are cheap, and there should never be any need to remove them unless they point to a nonexistent page or are attacks, which is covered by speedy deletion. Also, I propose to speedy close any deletion review of redirects as an abuse of process. tleSif (atlk) 08:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NAC, wrong forum/forum shopping, discuss at the mfd

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales[edit]

srs mfd is srs bzness. Mr.Z-man 04:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

  • Delete but not speedy delete until April 2, a minute after midnight, GMT. -- Noroton :  Chat  04:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deskana would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Deskana to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
Thank you Deskana! I'm flattered that you think I'm ready for the mop, but don't you think I'm too inexperienced? --Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales (talk) 04:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - User:Jimbo Wales has too many mainspace edits to be an admin... - jc37 15:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fire - for repetitive breaching of Wikipedia policy and inability to slur words properly. --candle•wicke 19:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep :  Delete  . (I deliberately sat this one out so I could say that.) Arguments on both sides were better. The next admin is hereby empowered to do what would normally be done in these cases, which I believe is to do nothing. Also the subject page will be promoted to an essay. Non-Jimbo close. JJB 08:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC) {{essay}}

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales[edit]

This is a serious nomination, this nomination is a ridiculous distraction. Delete as per WP:NOTMYSPACE Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ipatrol (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you are saying this nomination is a ridiculous distraction? KnightLago (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Made me spit up my drink. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 04:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You know... people who learn English as a foreign language sometimes don't get the difference between "this" and "that" darkweasel94 (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I'm at a loss for words. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep - per noduh. J.delanoy :  Chat  04:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keepz but den deleet dis wun - Dis iz srs distraction frum srs mfd bzness. Mr.Z-man 04:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    mother-whating bzness?... - jc37 04:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the beard - Per W. G. Grace. Lucifer (Talk) 04:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Oh come on" keep. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 04:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good one, Ipatrol. Well done -- hilarious! You had me until I saw the multiple sigs. -- Noroton :  Chat  04:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, he accidentally signed using two signatures. I think he only meant to put one on. I "fixed" it for him. He may well have been serious. --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes 04:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Meh, it's been a good run. Would anyone else like to take over as founder? --Jimbo Wales (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, put that on the wrong page. but seriously (ok, not seriously), keep for the sake of the day Valley2city‽ 05:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. NAC close by Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/123MFL[edit]

Erm... seems to have been a joke... or perhaps not... either way, this needs deleting. flaminglawyer 02:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • G3/G10 I'll call it vandalism/attack. "I'd like to beat the [bad word] out of them". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. Yes, yes, very funny. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jimbo Wales[edit]

Userpage of non-notable internet guy. NFL Freak -SINCE 2011- (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NAC, wrong forum, discuss inactivation on WT:MFD instead to inactivate

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion[edit]

Page seems to exist for the purpose of deleting itself, according to the instructions -- Simply south (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete because I'm a mad deletionist and Simply south beat me to this joke. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Transwiki to Commons as they don't seem to have enough to do over there. Nanonic (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Mergers for Discussion and delete via MFD.

    Wait... what? –Drilnoth (T • C) 02:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because TenPoundHammer is a mad deletionist. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It wasnt really a process that anyone paid any attention to anyway. DGG (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Am modifying the debate for no good reason, even though it was blue-backgrounded and archived. In other words, neener neener. — Rickyrab | Talk 05:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/temp2009

Leave a Reply