Terpene

April 18[edit]

File:The Wolverine posterUS.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. plicit 13:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Wolverine posterUS.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jdremix540 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This poster's role of identifying The Wolverine (film) can be achieved with c:File:The Wolverine Trailer Exclusive (2013).webm, a freely-licensed promotional trailer on Commons. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • In what way does a trailer better achieve a quick visual identification of the movie than an image of the poster? Poster images are the standard way of identifying movies in this top image. If you feel the trailer is worth including in the article consider imbedding it further down the page, underneath the quick facts side bar for example. I am not convinced there is any legitimate argument for replacing the poster image with a video file as a quick identifying image. AJRitchieCreates (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose and speedy close Eh? Please read WP:FILMPOSTER. And how is this thumbnail image of the trailer recognizable or representative of the film?? InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. If a poster exist, it should be used/prioritized. Don't use the technicalities of any rule to make an article worse. WP:COMMONSENSE. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. S5A-0043Talk 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Champaign Urbana Mass Transit District Logo.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Champaign Urbana Mass Transit District Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CasualmaleXL (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The image was designed in Illinois, USA, and the design is too simple to meet the threshold for copyright protection. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OTMA.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTMA.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Miguelemejia (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, superseded by File:OTMA in 1914.jpg on Commons. plicit 14:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 02:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frisianlonghouse.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frisianlonghouse.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JanKeizer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, superseded by File:Langhuis.jpg on Commons. Ineligible for speedy deletion due to different file formats. plicit 14:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anguilla Commonwealth Games.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anguilla Commonwealth Games.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is the logo of the Anguilla Commonwealth Games Association, not of the participating country of Anguilla, which uses the country's flag as the primary emblem. As such, it's not a logo of the entity in question (and the association doesn't have a Wikipedia article), and so fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bahamas Commonwealth Games.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahamas Commonwealth Games.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is the logo of the Bahamas Commonwealth Games Association, not of the participating country of Bahamas, which uses the country's flag as the primary emblem. As such, it's not a logo of the entity in question (and the association doesn't have a Wikipedia article), and so fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anitta's anal tattoo.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anitta's anal tattoo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RodRabelo7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violation of privacy. According to the article, this photo was leaked rather than made public by the subject. Kk.urban (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kangaroo Bay.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kangaroo Bay.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 42° South (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A painting which from the State Library of Tasmania which they variously credit to artist F.J. Lloyd (d. 1956) (for instance on this instagram post) or treat as the work of an unknown artist (as on this blog entry). Since the latest attribution to F. J. Lloyd is from 8 weeks ago, I would tend not to treat it as an anonymous work but as a work by Lloyd, which would then be under copyright in Australia until 2026 inclusive. Whether it is still in copyright in the US would depend on its publication history, and thus whether it was catalogued or exhibited somewhere where copies could be made freely. Unfortunately, I was unable to find anything on its exhibition history, and it is unlikely to be common knowledge given the present uncertainty about its authorship. Felix QW (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kearley Calcutta.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kearley Calcutta.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Majormax (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Painting by Dacre Smyth (1923-2008). While the exact date of creation is not given, it will certainly have been after 1928, and Australian copyright will still run until 2078 inclusive. While the file is in use in three articles, I doubt that a modern depiction of a historical event over 200 years ago satisfies the criteria for non-free content. Felix QW (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kearney 1953.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kearney 1953.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sticks66 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

US copyright in this 1953 Australian image was restored by the URAA restoration in 1996. It is in use at Ken Kearney, together with File:Ken Kearney.JPG, another non-free (URAA-restored) image. Presumably, either of them is sufficient for identification, so unless this file is deemed preferable to File:Ken Kearney.JPG for some reason, it would probably have to be deleted. Felix QW (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undertale-sans-fight.gif[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 04:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Undertale-sans-fight.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kung Fu Man (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a disputed CSD F7 nomination. This GIF depicts a final boss battle in Undertale (2015). Its usage in the article "Megalovania" — the soundtrack for this section of the game — does not meet criterion 8 (contextual significance) of the NFCC. I also feel that a 15-second clip is too excessive to meet criterion 3b (minimal extent of use). The NFCI criteria allow for images which "are themselves the subject of sourced commentary" (emphasis mine); the article's commentary mostly pertains to the music and not the visual aspects. Delete. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creator Keep A significant part of the reception for the Undertale version of the track, as stated, is due to the intensity of the Sans Genocide Route fight in the game. Given the tendency for the track to be associated with that, and by extension this character, it serves as the best means to convey to the reader what exactly that part of the subject is.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above as my watchlist alerted me. It should be fine with the first paragraph commentaries. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd urge you to explain why you believe the first paragraph is fine. As I mentioned in my nomination statement, there is no significant discussion of the actual battle nor any of its visuals in the article's prose, which naturally focuses on the music. The only text that could be considered related is the image's caption, which is a circular argument for keeping, not even to mention that it's unsourced. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others. The Reception discusses Megalovania in association with the intensity of the fight. The GIF displays the opening portion of Sans's fight, which is probably the best method of actually showing the intensity visually, and how Megalovania works alongside it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. No specific discussion of the mechanics of the Sans fight is present on that article - merely saying the fight is "all-out" or "intense" is not sufficient. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NFCC#8 as per Pppery. This GIF is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not meet WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. Upon reviewing the text of the article, I found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -Fastily 21:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leave a Reply