The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. and move to Miss Prissy (disambiguation) with Miss Prissy (Looney Tunes) being the primary topic. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Prissy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:TWODABS. Hardly there is something to disambiguate here that requieres a DAB page and a hat note could not serve for such purpose (see page views). © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 23:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (see below) PamD 09:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC): perfectly legitimate dab page. WP:TWODABS says "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed", so is irrelevant and not "failed". No evidence here to suggest that either of these is the primary topic, so a dab page is correct. PamD 08:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you are misunderstanding your own quote: "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed—it is sufficient to use a hatnote on the primary topic article, pointing to the other article." In simply terms, if you have two topics, and one of them is primary than the other, you don't need a dab page to do what a hat note can do. The Looney Tunes character is primary than the dancer, because 1, it has its own article (the dancer is just a redirect I created to see page views); 2, the multiple links the character is linked to; 3, the multiple external sources that are about the character; and 4, Rize is the only film the dancer has appeared, making her a WP:BLP1E case. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 15:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At present, until your statement above, neither topic has been asserted to be the Primary Topic. So what you should perhaps do is to request a move of Miss Prissy (Looney Tunes) to the base name Miss Prissy, as you are asserting that it is the primary topic, rather than AfD-ing this dab page. Then add a hatnote to that page to point readers interested in the dancer to the film. PamD 11:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's now a respectable little stub at Miss Prissy (dancer) - she caught my interest and seems notable - but I'd be quite happy to see the Looney Tunes character moved to the base name as primary topic, with a hatnote pointing to the dancer. PamD 11:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – I think it's safe enough to delete. Add a hat to the other articles. It find it evident that the looney tunes one is the primary one as someone said above. NikolaiHo 21:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: "Miss Prissy" also has had cultural meaning prior to the 20th century, I added some relevant instances to the article.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as there are still only two instances of the term as article titles. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• No, Tpdwkouaa, you are required to write articles on those new subjects I added. Kthxsbye. (I am joking but my point is that it is silly to think "Miss Prissy" has only been used notably two times in all of human history.)--Milowent • ^hasspoken 11:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that scared me, In my alerts all I saw was Someone mentioned you: "No, Tpdwkouaa, you are required to write articles on those new subjects" I was so confused lol. I guess as far as your point goes, I agree, but I would think that the creation of those articles (by me or otherwise heh) would predate the creation of a disambiguation page distinguishing them. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 13:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Move Miss Prissy (Looney Tunes) to Miss Prissy and dab page to Miss Prissy (disambiguation); dab page has several legitimate entries which justify its existence. PamD 09:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with PamD's suggestion. There's enough for a standalone disambiguation page, but the Looney Tune character is likely primary topic. older ≠ wiser 11:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Move as mentioned two comments above mine by PamD. SwisterTwister talk 23:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the disambiguation page in existence. And possibly make moves suggested by PamD, but I am not familiar with Looney Tunes and don't have opinion about whether the Looney Tunes one is primary usage. The main thing is to keep a dab page, now with several entries. Even with just two entries, it was okay. wp:TWODABS states that a dab is not necessary, but it is okay to have one. And good to have one in fact if there is any possibility items will be added. --doncram 07:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and Move valid dab - more than two valid entries. Dab expanded since listed, and needs previous delete !voters to revisit. Agree with the primary topic above, so move. Widefox; talk 12:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move per Widefox above, valid dab but agree the Looney Tunes character should be primary & a hatnote to this dab. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 12:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.