The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

K. S. Lewkowicz[edit]

K. S. Lewkowicz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER. No coverage in secondary sources, prodded shortly after its creation in 2015. SparklyNights 18:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Bands and musicians, Arts, and United Kingdom. SparklyNights 18:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are secondary sources for K. S. Lewkowicz. Here is an article on the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2011/nov/29/goodbye-barcelona-review — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.222.21.210 (talk) 23:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need more than just one source. Besides, this guardian article clearly fails WP:SIGCOV. Also, you geolocate pretty close to London, are you associated to Lewkowicz in any way? SparklyNights 23:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No sourcing found for this person, even using the full name given in the article. What's used for sourcing are trivial mentions and non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Nothing much to find other than the above mentioned theguardian.com source which fails SiGCOV. dxneo (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.