Terpene

thcscience_admin
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have excluded the opinion from the paid editor. Also note that not disclosing your client is a TOU violation. Spartaz Humbug! 05:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Rosenstein[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Eddie Rosenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of sources, virtually none that speak to notability. The few that are reliable and independent do not have much at all in the way of detail. Pretty clearly a WP:GNG fail. Also fails WP:NCREATIVE, as we have no major awards, no seminal body of work, no major reviews of any of the works and no indication that he is considered a leader in his field, by anyone else besides himself and the editor he paid to write this. John from Idegon (talk) 19:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as failing WP:GNG. For all the references on this article I was unable to find any with GNG passing coverage. That said, it looks like his documentary, The Freedom to Marry is notable if anyone wants to go write that (not that it matters here as notability is not inherited). Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: sources are nice, but don't substantiate notability in this case. — Javert2113 (talk; please ping me in your reply on this page) 22:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Obviously, fails the WP:GNG and WP:FILMMAKER. -- LACaliNYC✉ 22:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Re: his notability, under WP:FILMMAKER, notability is defined as "3) The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews; 4) The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention..." Unless there is a caveat to this guideline of which I'm unaware (and, if so, please educate me), this guideline confers notability to a creator by virtue of his role, and Rosenstein was the creator and producer of a significant and well-covered body of work.
    • The collective body of work, his role in those works, and the coverage conveys notability. TK FoOC (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Note the above user is accepting compensation from someone who he has not disclosed for his edits related to the article that is being discussed here. John from Idegon (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eddie_Rosenstein

Leave a Reply