Hello there, I wanted to use "apple.com" as my citation but I was worried its a broad web page and doesn't cover only the iPad, even in the iPad subsection... By the way, what are canned edit summaries? Dulton100 (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dulton100 Please stop copy pasting comments on your talk page to mine. It just makes it more irritating. I have replied on your own talk page. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop commenting at the Talk pages of blocked socks. It's not helpful, and in some cases what you say is incorrect. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 Thank you for the explanation. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to do this after this message, as well as inappropriately tagging an unblocked user as a sock. Please stop. You are not experienced enough to be dealing with these sorts of issues. Spicy (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy Okay. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is very similar to what I was getting at in the ANI thread where you continued to post on an indefinitely banned user's talk page, requiring that user's talk page access to be revoked. It's unhelpful and disruptive and would be used against you in any RfA. BoldGnome (talk) 02:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is utterly confusing. Even another admin said there was nothing wrong with it. Please mind your own business, I will work this out with Spicy and Bbb23. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempts to demonstrate your abilities as an administrator hopeful are disruptive and not isolated to commenting on the pages of blocked sock puppets. BoldGnome (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accept how my recent edits could be viewed as disruptive, but I don't see how the Lkomdis edit was disruptive. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just very confused because I was told by an experienced admin in the case of Lkomdis that there was nothing wrong with my edits, please stop blaming a user who is just trying to help this encylopedia, regardless of account age. The Blade of Northern Lights clearly said: I don't see anything wrong with what TheTechie did here, it was Lkomdis who made things weird. Who knows what I might do next, I might just leave Wikipedia, all things considered. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 @Spicy Sorry about the mishap today, for both writing on a sock talk page (I should've done it on the sockmaster) and the template thing (I got confused as the template "an editor has raised a concern"). My bad. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue isn't that you posted on the sock's talk page instead of the sockmaster's. You should not be making a habit of commenting on the talk pages of blocked users. Spicy (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I added it to the talk page, can you see if it’s right please? Ninacaliente (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky, per Binksternet. @Binksternet: How did you find this out, please explain. Why are you saying this and how do you know? thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was your rationale for removing the posts from Liz's talk page? I'll note that Liz had restored some of it when the original editor removed other's edits(diff). – 2804:F14:80B7:8201:C4DC:E500:5610:A60F (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]