Terpene

thcscience_admin
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Malik-Al-Hind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.


Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Recent edits

[edit]

Need to talk about your recent edits. What is the point of changing “Delhi sultanate victory” to “Delhi” victory? You already admitted that it doesn’t benefit the articles. If that’s the case, then there is no reason to be making this change. The purpose of an edit is to improve an article which this doesn’t do.

There’s no point in shortening it to “Delhi victory”. You’ve given zero reasons for this. Someguywhosbored (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why the full part of the message isn’t showing up in the edit summary, so I’ll show it here.
“Parts of my message didn’t get fully sent so I decided to rewrite my edit summary because this is important.
Normally I would wait until the discussion in the talk page clears to avoid the 4th revert rule, but this seems to be a form of vandalism. Reverting vandalism is an exception to the edit warring rule. Quote from the vandalism page.
“Removing encyclopedic content without any reason, or replacing such content with nonsense.” There is no legitimate reason for removing “sultanate” from victory section in the infobox. It’s not even cluttered so shortening it doesn’t make the page look better.
If for whatever reason I made a mistake and this is not a form of vandalism, then anyone can feel free to let me know and I’ll revert my own edit. My concerns would still stand though. If you disagree Malik, then please respond to me on your talk page to find a resolution and avoid any edit warring.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism
It’s for these reasons that I added the term “sultanate” back. Again, if you disagree, you’re free to use the talk page. Avoids edit warring that way. But please provide legitimate reasons for your changes so your position can be considered. Someguywhosbored (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shortening it to "Delhi victory" makes it look clean and less clumsy, Makes it simpler as well. If I give you my opinion, then for me this discussion isn't even worthy of a discussion and is unnecessary because whether you write "delhi victory"' or "Delhi sultanate victory" it is literally still the same. Delhi sultanate itself means "Sultanate/Empire of delhi".
Again, By the 3 revert rule, You can't really revert anyone's edit. Unless someone is commiting serious vandalism. I hope you know what that means. What you think of vandalism can be subjective, Which could be discussed in the talk page. Reverting it for the 4th time wasn't really a good move. Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 09:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“Shortening it to "Delhi victory" makes it look clean and less clumsy, Makes it simpler”
How? The info box is not even cluttered. Shortening it by one word doesn’t benefit anything. And if you really didn’t care about this discussion and thought that “Delhi” is the same as “Delhi sultanate”, then you wouldn’t be reverting back these changes.
“Again, By the 3 revert rule, You can't really revert anyone's edit. Unless someone is commiting serious vandalism. I hope you know what that means. What you think of vandalism can be subjective, Which could be discussed in the talk page.”
What’s the difference between “serious vandalism” and “vandalism”? Vandalism is always grounds for removal per Wikipedia:Vandalism. And I’ve showed you how you vandalized the article through those page quotes so it’s not exactly subjective. And I’ve already stated that I’m willing to revert myself back if it’s not actually vandalism but we would still have to dish this out on the talk page.
Just to let you know, you’ve actually already broke the 4th revert rule on the article. I reverted several times too but the difference is you weren’t reverting vandalism, so you’re the one who’s actually edit warring.
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1228072987”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1237750664”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1237766675”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1237946675” Someguywhosbored (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, “manual revert” is considered a “revert” Someguywhosbored (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1228072987”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=next&oldid=1231721269&diffonly=1”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=next&oldid=1237755756&diffonly=1”
“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=next&oldid=1237842415&diffonly=1”
I made a mistake with adding the wrong links and weirdly I can’t edit the right ones back in so I had to make a new comment which oddly works. Oh well pitfalls of editing on a mobile phone I guess. Someguywhosbored (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay for some reason the first link leads to one of my other edit summaries. I have to make a new comment once again to fix that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1297%E2%80%931298)&diff=prev&oldid=1228072987 Someguywhosbored (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mughal-Safavid War of 1638 has been accepted

[edit]
Mughal-Safavid War of 1638, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malik-Al-Hind

Leave a Reply