Hello, Hansmuller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
'. Retrieved 2 September 2011.</ref> was passed by the Uganda parliament on December 20, 2013<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25463942 BBC News 20 December 2013</ref>.
life imprisonment. Not reporting gay people is also made a crime punishable with imprisonment.<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25463942 BBC News 20 December 2013</ref>
'. Retrieved 2 September 2011.</ref> was passed by the Uganda parliament on December 20, 2013<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25463942 BBC News 20 December 2013</ref>.
life imprisonment. Not reporting gay people is also made a crime punishable with imprisonment.<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25463942 BBC News 20 December 2013</ref>
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oudenaarde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Farnese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, Hansmuller. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban resilience, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absorption. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eighty Years' War (1566–1609), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Antwerp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
left|thumb|Hellburners against Farnese's pontoon bridge during the [[Siege of Antwerp (1584-1585))|siege of Antwerp]], 1584-1585. Print from [[Famiano Strada]].]]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Is West (1922 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidney Franklin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eddie Lyons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Eddie Lyons Lee Moran 1920 Universal-EYE FLM8337 OB 685721.ogv|thumb|left|''Some shimmiers'' (1920, Eddie Lyons and [[Lee Moran]]. Length: 15:11]]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anna Alma-Tadema may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
[File:Anna Alma-Tadema Self Portrait.jpg|thumb|Self portrait by Anna Alma-Tadema)]]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Sullivan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EYE Film Institute Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Sullivan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cândido de Faria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montpelier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First-wave feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello! I was just reviewing File:Anna Roemers Visscher02.jpg and I wanted to follow-up with you. For the future, it's better to create a new image if you're uploading something completely different with a different licensing history, as you were in this case. Also, I visited [1] but nothing there made it clear to me that the museum's high-quality image was in the public domain. Could you please direct me to where that declaration is? Thanks, Mackensen(talk)14:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it is the same object, just a free photo from https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/en/collection/BK-NM-8186 as i mentioned, click there on "More details". I didn't want to create many similar images as separate files, my upload was just an upgrade. Besides, there is an ongoing donation from the Rijksmuseum to wikimedia, already ~ 100.000 images transferred.
The time sequence was the other way around: at the English wp i found a small image File:Anna Roemers Visscher02.jpg with the wrong "fair use" license. Next day i solved the problem on Commons by the upload. Now there is a small image with the wrong license - you checked? - at File:Anna Roemers Visscher02.jpg. No "fair use" complications needed there! Could you please redress the license and image? Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
and court physician to the Empress in 1882. She died at court in 1903.<ref name="Binsbergen"/><ref>[http://www.unterstein.net/Toyoashihara-no-Chiaki-Nagaioaki-no-Mitsuho-no-Kuni/SieboldGED/g0000001-x.
Hi Hansmuller! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
@GiantSnowman You see i added a global reference, Eindhoven, the main biographer of Oudemans, isn't that ok? Referencing once is customary in academic texts. Regards, Hansmuller (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dutch roll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yaw. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geertruidenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D66. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aniene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tivoli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, Hansmuller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
My name is David Alves (User:Horadrim~usurped), and I'm an Wikipedian in Residence at RIDC NeuroMat (User:Horadrim). I've reach your contact through the Wikimedian in residence page in Outreach. As you may know, Wikimania 2017 is coming! I am here because, as a fellow WiR, I believe this would be a great opportunity for us to share experiences, discuss difficulties and exchange solutions, creating a community among us capable of supporting in other projects that would benefit from residents.
In that sense, I have submitted a proposal of a Birds of a Feather activity to Wikimania that you can check out here. I hope to count with your support in this project and would like to invite you to join us if you participate in Wikimania. In case of any doubts, please feel free to contact me, either in my talk pages or by e-mail at david.alvesoutlook.com.
Hello, Hansmuller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Hansmuller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
@TommyBoy Thanks for your interest! Yes, i support renaming them, i could do it (* do you want me to? or do you do it, ok of course) but then in that case i need to be sure that i am not going to mess things up, so could you please state (again) what the correct name is, you are expert on this subject? Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 09:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that you renamed the main article to The Hague Academy of International Law, the List of Hague Academy of International Law people article should be similarly renamed. With regard to renaming, we may need to check with another user more familiar with Wikipedia category naming conventions.--TommyBoy (talk) 01:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TommyBoy I trust myself with category conventions after creating lots of categories etc. without protests or hassle, so that does not need to be a problem. To other users it will be clear what we are doing and why. Good day, Hansmuller (talk) 10:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for clarifying! I was playing it safe because the article said nothing about waterfalls, barely even suggesting that laminar flow could occur in nature, it's all plates and pipes and aircraft wings. If waterfalls are a schoolbook case of laminar flow, the article should definitely give that some text and sources. I had a brief look for sources to write something up myself, but was only finding artificial indoor waterfalls which are designed to produce a curved sheet of water. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Lord Belbury . It is just that laminar flow is the simplest slow flow anywhere, for instance immediately under your water tap. Soon turbulence sets in as the water drops from your tap and accelerates downward: the transparency of the laminar flow is lost. I hope your blood flow too is laminar ;-) (of course blood is a complicated fluid, unlike the simple water in the Victoria Falls.) Hansmuller (talk) 17:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closeup of Horseshoe Falls
Thanks for updating the article there. I've had a look through Commons for some clearer photographs of waterfall edges, but once you get a decent close-up (eg. the one to the right here) you can see that the surface of the water is very rough. I suppose it's all relative, but maybe a photo of a running tap would be better to open the article with. I haven't found a good one of those yet. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure I see the need for a date on the photo. It'd be vital in an article that was specifically about the waterfall, but for an illustration of laminar flow the reader doesn't need to know how recent a waterfall photo is. For the opening image that shows a close-up of a waterfall edge I wouldn't even think it was necessary to name the waterfall! --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've got a two page document in Dutch with the following bibliographic information:
Title: Nieuw Nederlandsch biografisch woordenboek, Leiden, A. W. Sijthoff's uitgevers-maatschappij, 1911-37.
Article Title: The entry on "Petrus [or Peter] Serrarius"
Volume: 10, Pages: 911-913.
I was wondering if you could help me translate it into English? If you can, I can send you the PDF document I've got through my Inter Library Loan via email. I'd really appreciate your help with this, since I've read it over 10 times already, but most of it I simply don't get. I haven't gotten some Dutch-English electronic dictionary setup on my computer yet, but before I do that, I thought I'd ask you for some advice, or if possible, for some help too. Thanks a lot. Regards, warshy(¥¥)20:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @warshy , yes, you're welcome, making a (not too large) translation is fun to me. If you just copy your text as plain text (.pdf is not necessary isn't it?) into a mail using the mail function (menu in the left column "Email this user" or similar) i can have a look. Probably i attack using Google Translate (GT got much better lately, is great), correct the GT results and send them to you. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 07:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS I see "Petrus [or Peter] Serrarius" (Serrurier = lockmaker in French, so he could be called "Slo(o)temaker" in Dutch) was part of Spinoza's group. I happen to be working on a detailed summary of Spinoza's Ethica, first in Dutch, later to be translated in English i hope, at https://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Spinoza_Ethica . Perhaps that's how you found me. Do well (do good deeds) and be happy, Hansmuller (talk) 07:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wow!↓ Thank you SO MUCH, Hansmuller! You have really helped me A LOT with this. I was able to clarify a very important point just with the first paragraph of your translation! I will explain to you later in more detail the importance of your contribution to my research on this character and on his work. Thank you so much again for taking the time to help me with this document. Regards, warshy(¥¥)17:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @warshy , if you need a translation for presentation / publication, i can brush my previous version up (it was just a quick attempt, correct in the meaning but of course it can still be improved stylistically, quoting the publications correctly etcetera.). Please let me know if you need a better text. Carpe diem, Hansmuller (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hansmuller, your translation is great and it is fine for my needs right now. Since the main modern researchers of Serrarius do not use this source, and since it is used by an indirect researcher, about whom I am myself writing, I needed to see the document he is referring to and what it says. Your translation has determined that this secondary, indirect researcher did not understand the document correctly, and therefore (based incorrectly on it), gave in his book the birth year of Petrus Serrarius as 1580. As your translation has shown, the document does not purport to know or to provide Serrarius' birth year with certainty. It only mentions in parenthesis that there was a certain Antoine Serrurier in Antwerp in 1580. It does not say that Petrus Serrarius was born in 1580, as the secondary researcher concluded erroneously. So, your translation has clarified the error of the researcher, and I can now explain his error in my own research. As I progress with my own work I will give you more details, such as the names and works of these three researcher I refer to above. But on the meantime, as I wrote, you have already helped me clarify and explain the researcher's mistake about the birth year of Petrus Serrarius. Thanks a lot for all your help so far. When I get the work of Ernestine G. E. van der Wall about Petrus Serrarius in Dutch through my Interlibrary loan I intend to ask you some more questions, if it is OK with you again. But thank you so much again for your help with this so far. Carpe Diem, warshy(¥¥)18:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I had requested the following item through interlibrary loan here in the US:
van der Wall, Ernestine G. E., De mystieke chiliast Petrus Serrarius (1600-1669) en zijn wereld, Leiden, Ph. D. Leiden Universiteit, ICG, 1987 (diss.).
Searching on WorldCat and on Google books I was able to determine that the ISBN for this dissertation/publication is 9789090015569 and the OCLC number is 46001165.
Intelibrary loan here is telling me that no Library in the US or Canada is willing to lend this item through interlibrary loan. Would you have access to it, to have a first look at it, to see what the table of contents is, how many pages total, how many chapters it has and what these chapters are? It would certainly have a bibliography section (how many pages?), but I am not sure it would have an index also, probably not.
I would really appreciate it if you could may be take a first look at this book or Ph. D. dissertation and could maybe answer some of these initial questions about it. Thanks a lot again for all your help with my research so far. Hope everything is well with you over there in Utrecht. Warm regards, warshy(¥¥)16:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Huis te Warmond = Huys te Warmond = Warmond Castle near LeidenDear @Warshy , you target an interesting book from an interesting emeritus professor - apparently she still has many ongoing PhD students. This book is available in the Netherlands through various university libraries (list on Worldcat). On the internet everywhere it is stated that it has "Dutch text, English summary."
You will have found this discussion in French of her thesis in the column at the right. It states that this book was published "with the author, Huys te Warmond", so she lived or had an office there?! (Perhaps that was the very first printing, not yet commercially available, just internally for the university etc. The location is sociologically interesting, i am just a commoner you see. Picture at the right)
Leiden University should scan all PhD theses. I could as yet not find a scan of this van der Wall 1987 thesis.
You wanted
number of pages: UBU (Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht) says "825 p. ; 23 cm". Still to be answered: table of contents, bibliography, index (yes there is!)? I hope to find this book. Of course I assume you want that summary in English. A presto! Hansmuller (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hansmuller,
Thanks a lot for your thorough research on my inquiry, just from one day to the next! I have read the French review of the book and it helps a great deal also! I have looked at her page which you found and sent. I did not know if she was still alive and active, but it definitely looks like she is. This is great news, and I will try to contact her still today. I am sure that through her I should be able to get a copy of the main parts of her dissertation some time soon. Nice picture of her, and nice picture of the "Huys te Warmond". It looks like this is the place/building where her office is located at Leiden University. I have a pretty large collection of her articles already, but for my research I also need to be sure I reviewed her initial Ph.D. thesis very thoroughly. The interlibrary loan people are saying they could request photocopies of chapters or pages of the book, so having a table of contents and the index would be very helpful to begin with. I will let you know as soon as I make more progress, and if I get a reply directly from her too. You have helped me a great deal again, and I am very grateful for all your help. I hope your own work on the Ethica's logic is also progressing nicely. warshy(¥¥)17:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Hansmuller. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Sent you a long message about your scanned file, your help, your translations, your pages, and my research. Thank you so much again for all your help. Sincerely, warshy(¥¥)18:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just sent you a question from a German Wikipedia page here, but I don't know if you got the message. Look at the talk page there for my question. Do you think you can help with this translation task for the English Wikipedia? After all he taught at Groningen and Leiden, and I think he does need his own page on the English Wikipedia also. Thanks! Regards, warshy (¥¥) 19:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)“
@Warshy : Interesting fellow this Hülse or Hulse perhaps?, the German article can be translated using Google Translate plus some tweaking afterwards. You know English is a creole language of French and say Dutch/German, so if you add the German and French articles for Hulsius and divide by 2, the result will be just about right! If you want me to, I can try, but otherwise i don't want to steal your pleasure of starting the English article on Hulsius. Ave et vale, Hansmuller (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am very sorry for the mess with all the notification messages, must have been pretty confusing at first. I tried to fix it dozens of times, and I can't believe I never came up with the right combination. Just look at the history of all my attempts at trying to fix the mess! I came pretty close, but apparently did never get myself to the winning combination - "|}" - in a new, separate line. What a mess, and I can't believe that with all the tries I just never got it it myself... It is frustrating to me, but sorry for the mess again!
Thanks to the tips on how to proceed with the creation of the new page and the translation process. I thought there was a wiki template that could help in the process, but I understand from you that I just have to translate it myself using Google translate, not a wiki template. OK. With some time in the near future I will try/do it. Thanks again! Ave et vale, warshy(¥¥)16:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Warshy Don't worry be happy. Perhaps i'm simply old-fashioned, there might now be a real AI translation helper, i'm just not aware of any as yet... Si vales, valeo Hansmuller (talk) 12:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hallo, Thank you for creating Tireli, Mali . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Tireli), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page - or, in this case, by creating a disambiguation page as there was a person with the surname. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one.
Please also note that {{stub}} goes at the end, not the top - see WP:ORDER. It makes life easier for editors sorting stubs if (a) they know where to find the stub tag, and (b) it doesn't have to be moved. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD18:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PamD Thank you for noticing this stub and for your edits! I know but just ran out of time, and was almost thrown out of a closing university building last night :-)). We can't do everything on our own in one go. I was more worried about the lack of a source... Successive improvement, like you practiced, is the essence of Wikipedia. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 06:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is There a God?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
I helped a bit with the draft, did a mention of both versions while keeping the original one first and accepted the draft to a proper title (no need for a disambiguation since there's only this book with such a title). If you have some time in the future, please add a Reception section (how the reviewers found the book, as in what they did/didn't like and a short summary of their opinions, common thing with most book articles). Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change redirects to red links, so they point to a blank page or they will just be deleted. Do not change a redirect until there is an article to point it to. LizRead!Talk!20:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Liz, I'm sorry to have caused a hiccup. However, a link from a page to a redirect back to that page itself, as was the case, is not useful. Then a red link would be better, signaling a missing article.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunterstein Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hothouse. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
The complete mathematical formula for the Standard Model as a Lagrangian. Contributors to this formula were Chen Ning Yang, Robert Mills, Chien-Shiung Wu, Sheldon Glashow, Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam.
This picture really is humongous and quite difficult to read. Could we at least have a list of symbols and their meanings? :) Not sure what it adds to the page really, except that "it's possible to write the equation on a page, if the font is small enough". Also notice the discussion on the talk page for the inclusion of a much simpler equation. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 23:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rembrandt's Nightwatch with a crowd, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, 2016 Dear @Omnissiahs hierophant , Thanks for noticing.
You are right, of course the formula is indeed humongous and quite difficult to read: that is perhaps an understatement, it is quite beyond high school physics material. For instance, there are 26 constants involved. The image immediately brings to light how complicated the Standard Model is.
Could we at least have a list of symbols and their meanings..: yes, we could, but perhaps that goes beyond the scope of Wikipedia, but you are welcome. The formula is now given as it stands, like a painting. We don't need a full list in the article, as the picture is not part of the text, it is an image only. In the metadata of the image at Wikimedia Commons we could provide a list etcetera. Wikipedia as an encyclopedia is not a textbook for detailed advanced physics, but should provide "the summary of all knowledge" (Jimmy Wales) and can show as we do here. You don't really want that list here, isn't it? But we could do it in some way.
Not sure what it adds to the page really..: well, here you have it, the large formula as the - my - physics community of the Netherlands has published it recently in a commemorating issue of its monthly magazine. This formula is essential.
This is it, the Standard Model, the real thing! In a way it is like Rembrandt's The Night Watch (real name: De Nachtwacht): too? complicated but illuminating for some who want to read it and can do so... Of course you can add the other interpretations and images if you like.
Please don't be shocked by some now classical physics, thanks!
Yeah.. Yea. Why not. Regarding explaining exactly everything on Wikipedia - Why not? It's not limited in space like oldskool paper-encyclopedias, so there is actually nothing beyond the energy of the wikipedia authors that stop wikipedia from elaborating extensively upon everything. Especially the physics pages could go a lot deeper into the subjects, imho! Not sure what Jimmy Wales says about that, but whatever, i am autonomous from him :) · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 04:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Omnissiahs hierophant, Thanks for your reaction.
A relevant physics book is say Cliff Burgess: The Standard Model. A Primer, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Dear @Omnissiahs hierophant - Thanks! (By the way, "also not a physicist"? i have a Dutch style PhD in experimental physics and a Dutch MSc in astrophysics from Utrecht University, was fun, for the most part.) Cheerio - or it that corny?, Hansmuller (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
@Lotje Beste Lotje, Mijn Uteregse antwoord behelsde tevens een nieuwe vraag, dus was tegelijk dom + ondom = dom? Is dit (g)een vraag? Met vriendelijke groet,...BUT perhaps we should politely stick to English on en.wikipedia, right? Hansmuller (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lotje Thanks, but no, it is i who apologises for my joke in dialect. Misschien inderdaad een goed idee om een categorie aan te maken. Groetens, Hansmuller (talk) 13:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would you take a look at the (2) categories I created. Not sure which one should be used to link. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your article on Martin A. Klein! I am not sure if you know, but there is a utility to find opportunities to link articles. See find link. I found about ten or so more articles to link to. Happy editing!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Paul Roux (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.
If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Thank you for your interest. I ventured to follow up your suggestion, and expect to welcome the original Paul Hendrik Roux soon on Wikipedia. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but I see the disambiguation page has been deleted already, it can of course be re-created after the Biographical article is live on Wikipedia (disambiguation pages that link to only one existing page are almost always deleted per WP:G14) - Happy editing Josey WalesParley19:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nijenhuis (Diepenheim) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.komoot.com/highlight/1056181. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
@Lotje Beste Lot, zorrie znap ek ff nie. Huus Heeckeren enne Museum Henriette Polak ? Museum Henriette Polak (waz ek foarige maond noch) iz in hut sentrum fan Zutphen, nie in hut Huus Heeckeren. Omgekeerd bevindt zich wie weet wél een afbeelding van het Huis Heeckeren in het Museum Henriette Polak in Zutphen? Groetens, Hansmuller (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bedoel je deze afbeelding ? Op de voorgevel staat, als ik het goed kan lezen, onde rmeer: Musea Zutphen, en Henriette Polak. Als het fout is, haal je het er maar weer af. Grts. Lotje (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!05:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:My Observations During the Explosion at Trinity on July 16, 1945 - E. Fermi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Car speed and energy consumption until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
@Hansmuller I see that you are making edits to the "Car speed and energy consumption" article. I want to encourage you to reply to the comments in Talk:Car speed and energy consumption. In my opinion, the edits you are adding are increasing the overlap of the article with other existing Wikipedia articles. That will not resolve the issues raised by other editors. Every article needs a unique ('notable') reason to be; two articles with substantial overlap will be merged. So again I would encourage you to help find that unique reason or to help improve another article most closely aligned. I believe that is Energy-efficient driving. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately despite our arguments and attempts to improve, the article will be merged in to Energy-efficient driving.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Hansmuller, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia Lotje (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi, there's something strange going on here. The ISSN 0001-9720 is listed with the dab on top of the Africa (Rome) article as belonging, to the CUP journal Africa (journal), but on MIAR it leads to Africa (Rome) and is cited as such in the reference to MIAR, but not in the infobox. If what I'm writing is a bit confused, that's because I am confused... :-). Perhaps you can have a look at this. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)