![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Multiple Issues
[edit]This article frankly needs to be rewritten. It reads more like a manifesto rather than an encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.212.153.188 (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. This article lacks encyclopedic standards of objectivity and neutrality. The article contains unsubstantiated comments, hyperbole and makes claims of illegal/unethical activity without providing any reference other than the organization's own website. This article needs to be added watchlist for possible deletion unless basic editorial standards are met. Lslong427 (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)