![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 Marlboro 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 18:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Well referenced to reliable sources, no evidence of OR. Spotchecks show that online sources support statements, assumme good faith for off-line sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Excellent coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Suitable images, licensed and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A pleasure to review this excellent article. It meets the GA criteria outright, so I'll list it now. Well done! JAGUAR 18:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Basic copyedit
[edit]Thanks for the request, well done! Finished the ce. MasterSloper516 (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)