Terpene

Content deleted Content added
Closing cmt
Closed/archived
Line 26: Line 26:


'''Closing comment''' -- sorry Curly but this nom seems to have been a bit of a non-starter; given the lack of commentary I wouldn't object if you brought it back for a fresh try without waiting the usual two weeks. Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) 23:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
'''Closing comment''' -- sorry Curly but this nom seems to have been a bit of a non-starter; given the lack of commentary I wouldn't object if you brought it back for a fresh try without waiting the usual two weeks. Cheers, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) 23:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

{{FACClosed|archived}} [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) 23:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:49, 31 July 2015

Binky Brown Meets the Holy Virgin Mary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator(s): Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 06:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As Wikipedia's resident expert on penis comics, I hereby present the grandaddy of all penis comics—and the work on whose shoulders squarely lays the blame for the 40+-year fad in confessional comics that at times threatens to glut and drown the whole field of English-language arts comics. The work's protagonist-author unknowingly suffers from an obsessive–compulsive disorder which results in intrusive thoughts that make him see everything even vaguely phallic—including his own fingers—blasting every religious object in sight with sinful "pecker rays". This editor's last "penis comics" nomination somehow survived an initial onslaught of sensible opposition—hopefully the sheer proliferation of penises in this one will ensure the community will not allow another such error. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 06:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by bluerasberry

This seems close to being an FA.

I do not wish to review this further, but after reading the article for fun, it seems to me to meet Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. Another reviewer should do fact checking and think about what could have been added but is not present. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Closing comment -- sorry Curly but this nom seems to have been a bit of a non-starter; given the lack of commentary I wouldn't object if you brought it back for a fresh try without waiting the usual two weeks. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply