Barek is tired of wikidrama, and has chosen to spend more time in the real world; but may still wander back online occasionally. During this time, replies to queries may be greatly delayed.

Please click here to start a new message at the bottom of this page.
	If you post a message to me here, I will usually reply here - if you want a {{talkback}} notice, please request it. If I left a message for you on your talk page, I have it on my watchlist and will see replies made on your talk page. Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right at my discretion to remove uncivil comments from this page, as well as threads which are perceived by me to be disruptive. My alternate talkpage can be used to contact me if Wikipedia indicates that this page is protected due to vandalism.	Please note: This talk page is known to be monitored by talk page watchers. This means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot respond to quickly is appreciated. Server time (update): June 26, 2024 22:46 (UTC)

purge cache

My talk page archives
• 2007  • 2008  • 2009  • 2010  • 2011  • 2012  • 2013  • 2014  • 2015  • 2016  • 2017  • 2018  • 2019  • 2020  • 2021  • 2022  • 2023

My apologies - I was merely going by what I saw in a number of other ship infoboxes. Being bold, as it were. Didn't mean to step on any toes. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 19:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem ... there are a lot of commercial ship articles that need fixed, and due to the confusion over this, they often get re-added after the article is fixed. Just wanted to mention it so that you knew for next time. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danke much. I'll keep off the high seas and stick to art history in future. :-) --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 19:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really wish to hap contacted me before you went to the help desk but not worries. I think we need to move the page to Little Tahoma Peak as this is the name at GNIS and it is the policy of WikiProject Mountains to use official names. I quess that the content has to be moved back and then the destination page needs to be deleted so that a move will work. I have to stop editing now as I have an appointment. If you would like to take care of it that would be fine or I'll check to see what has happened after I get back to my computer. --DRoll (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why you want it moved, no worries. My main concern was to get the edit history moved. I'll submit the request at WP:AN. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An admin took care of it, so the article history has been moved now to the new article name. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good work. --DRoll (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a web log to cite the personal recommendation of various editors. Instead of edit warring when there is controvesy and presuming what would be fine use the talk facility, which is what it is therefore, it would be better to discuss these edits. Once something is agreeD (sic) upon in the talk then change can happen. You have good intentions on the recent edit, but discuss it first. Lihaas (talk) 12:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BOLD. I posted my reasons on the talk page. I also notice that I am not the only one to remove the redundant information. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed that you appear to have been reported for 3RR over your edit warring over your version which appears to have no consensus on the talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite that of newb. Welcome stuff is a bit strange. And I did ask an administrator about the link and the answer was, that is not a spam. So I added that again.

Warrington (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for templating then. However, on the issue of the link, please see the discussion that was started at Talk:List of Christmas dishes#External links. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I do not have to add that link, that is not such a big issue. But this December 2008 makes me look a bit criminal... Which I am not, I really asked an admin in order to ~don t make any mistakes. Warrington (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove it, it's your talk page - you have the option. Wikipedia policy/guidelines permit it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

But it looks like external links is not going to be a problem any more because the article will be deleted...

Warrington (talk) 21:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I based my edit of naval ship articles and didn’t realize that different standards applied to civilian ships. – Zntrip 22:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Excellent Userpage Award
		I hereby present you with the Excellent User Page award, for the look and accessibility of your user page DanSand (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]