Terpene

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
revert - see talk - Medvedev and Gorbachev are the most well known of the included people. Why should Reichman be in the lede? He might not even be talking about neo-Stalinism
PasswordUsername (talk | contribs)
5,580 edits
Rvt. No evidence to support that Medvedev is generally most well-known: Copleston would sooner be the household name, really. I've pointed out the problems with Gorbachev without reply.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{POV|date=May 2009}}
{{POV|date=May 2009}}
⚫
'''Neo-Stalinism''' is a political term used in various ways. The American historian Henry Reichman, critical of the usage of "Stalinism" and "neo-Stalinism" as vacuous labels, writes that "in scholarly usage 'Stalinism' describes here a movement, there an economic, political, or social system, elsewhere a type of political practice or belief-system...." the offshoot "neo-Stalinism" likewise muddled in similar trouble.<ref>Reichman, Henry. "Reconsidering 'Stalinism'. ''Theory and Society'' Volume 17, Number 1. Springer Netherlands. January 1988. Pp. 57-89.</ref>{{clarify}}
⚫
'''Neo-Stalinism''' is a political term used in various ways. According to the [[dissident]] [[Category:Russian historians|Russian historian]] [[Roy Medvedev]] the term describes [[Political rehabilitation|rehabilitation]] of [[Joseph Stalin]], identification with him and the associated political system ([[Stalinism]]), nostalgia for the Stalnist period in Russia's history, restoration of [[Stalinism|Stalinist policies]], and a return to the administrative [[state terror|terror]] of the Stalnist period while avoiding some of the worst excesses.<ref>Ferdinand Joseph Maria Feldbrugge, "Samizdat and political dissent in the Soviet Union", Brill, 1975, pg. 30, [http://books.google.com/books?id=a2mt8_9UF-8C&pg=PA30&dq=neo-Stalinism+rehabilitation&lr=&as_brr=3#v=onepage&q=neo-Stalinism%20rehabilitation&f=false]</ref>

According to former [[General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union]], [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], the term refers to moderated [[Stalinism|Stalinist state]], without large-scale [[repression]]s but with persecution of political opponents and total control of all political activities in the country <ref> [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10369289 Outrage at revision of Stalin's legacy] </ref><ref> For example, Katerine Clark defines Neo-Stalinism as praising "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor", see ''The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual'', By Katerina Clark, Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [http://books.google.com/books?id=kvgPcmtuf5YC&pg=PA236&dq=Neo-Stalinism+definition&ei=ZFkHSrnrO4fCM63X4O8I&client=firefox-a].</ref>


==History of the term==
==History of the term==
Line 21: Line 19:
During the 1960s, the CIA distinguished between Stalinism and neo-Stalinism in that "The Soviet leaders have not reverted to two extremes of Stalin's rule{{ndash}}one-man dictatorship and mass terror. For this reason, their policy deserves the label 'neo-Stalinist' rather than -Stalinist."<ref>[http://www.faqs.org/cia/docs/61/0000234137/NEO-STALINISM:-WRITING-HISTORY-AND-MAKING-POLICY.html "Neo-Stalinism: Writing History and Making Policy." Intelligence Report. Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence. ''CIA Released Documents''. ''FAQs.org''.]</ref>
During the 1960s, the CIA distinguished between Stalinism and neo-Stalinism in that "The Soviet leaders have not reverted to two extremes of Stalin's rule{{ndash}}one-man dictatorship and mass terror. For this reason, their policy deserves the label 'neo-Stalinist' rather than -Stalinist."<ref>[http://www.faqs.org/cia/docs/61/0000234137/NEO-STALINISM:-WRITING-HISTORY-AND-MAKING-POLICY.html "Neo-Stalinism: Writing History and Making Policy." Intelligence Report. Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence. ''CIA Released Documents''. ''FAQs.org''.]</ref>


Katerina Clark, describing an anti-Khrushchevite, pro-Stalin current in Soviet literary world during the 1960s, described the work of "neo-Stalinist" writers as harking back to "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor."<ref>Clark, Katerina. ''The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual'' Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [http://books.google.com/books?id=kvgPcmtuf5YC&pg=PA236&dq=Neo-Stalinism+definition&ei=ZFkHSrnrO4fCM63X4O8I&client=firefox-a].</ref>
Katerina Clark, describing an anti-Khrushchevite, pro-Stalin current in Soviet literary world during the 1960s, described the work of "neo-Stalinist" writers as harking back to "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor."<ref>Clark, Katerina. ''The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual'' Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [http://books.google.com/books?id=kvgPcmtuf5YC&pg=PA236&dq=Neo-Stalinism+definition&ei=ZFkHSrnrO4fCM63X4O8I&client=firefox-a].</ref>


⚫
According to the [[dissident]] [[Category:Russian historians|Russian historian]] [[Roy Medvedev]] the term describes [[Political rehabilitation|rehabilitation]] of [[Joseph Stalin]], identification with him and the associated political system ([[Stalinism]]), nostalgia for the Stalnist period in Russia's history, restoration of [[Stalinism|Stalinist policies]], and a return to the administrative [[state terror|terror]] of the Stalnist period while avoiding some of the worst excesses.<ref>Ferdinand Joseph Maria Feldbrugge, "Samizdat and political dissent in the Soviet Union", Brill, 1975, pg. 30, [http://books.google.com/books?id=a2mt8_9UF-8C&pg=PA30&dq=neo-Stalinism+rehabilitation&lr=&as_brr=3#v=onepage&q=neo-Stalinism%20rehabilitation&f=false]</ref>
⚫
The American historian Henry Reichman, critical of the usage of "Stalinism" and "neo-Stalinism" as vacuous labels, writes that "in scholarly usage 'Stalinism' describes here a movement, there an economic, political, or social system, elsewhere a type of political practice or belief-system...." the offshoot "neo-Stalinism" likewise muddled in similar trouble.<ref>Reichman, Henry. "Reconsidering 'Stalinism'. ''Theory and Society'' Volume 17, Number 1. Springer Netherlands. January 1988. Pp. 57-89.</ref>{{clarify}}


Scholar Dmitry Furman, director of the Commonwealth Of Independent States Research Center at the Russian Academy's of Sciences Institute of Europe, sees Russian neo-Stalinism as a "non-ideological Stalinism" that "seeks control for the sake of control, not for the sake of world revolution."<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,189499,00.html Zakharovich, Yuri. "Can the U.S.-Russian Alliance Last?" ''TIME''. 21 Dec. 2001.]</ref>
Scholar Dmitry Furman, director of the Commonwealth Of Independent States Research Center at the Russian Academy's of Sciences Institute of Europe, sees Russian neo-Stalinism as a "non-ideological Stalinism" that "seeks control for the sake of control, not for the sake of world revolution."<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,189499,00.html Zakharovich, Yuri. "Can the U.S.-Russian Alliance Last?" ''TIME''. 21 Dec. 2001.]</ref>

Revision as of 15:23, 14 August 2009

Neo-Stalinism is a political term used in various ways. The American historian Henry Reichman, critical of the usage of "Stalinism" and "neo-Stalinism" as vacuous labels, writes that "in scholarly usage 'Stalinism' describes here a movement, there an economic, political, or social system, elsewhere a type of political practice or belief-system...." the offshoot "neo-Stalinism" likewise muddled in similar trouble.[1][clarification needed]

History of the term

The American Trotskyist Hal Draper used "neo-Stalinism" in 1948 to refer to a a new political ideology–new development in Soviet policy, which he defined as a reactionary trend whose beginning was associated with the Popular Front period of the mid-1930s, writing that "The ideologists of neo-Stalinism are merely the tendrils shot ahead by the phenomena – fascism and Stalinism – which outline the social and political form of a neo-barbarism”[2]

Frederick Copleston, S.J. portrays neo-Stalinism as a "Slavophile emphasis on Russia and her history": "what is called neo-Stalinism is not exclusively an expression of a desire to control, dominate, repress and dragoon; it is also the expression of a desire that Russia, while making use of western science and technology, should avoid contamination by western 'degenerate' attitudes and pursue her own path."[3]

Political geographer Denis J.B. Shaw considers the Soviet Union as neo-Stalinist until the post-1985 period of transition to capitalism. He identified neo-Stalinism as a political system with planned economy and highly developed military-industrial complex[4]

During the 1960s, the CIA distinguished between Stalinism and neo-Stalinism in that "The Soviet leaders have not reverted to two extremes of Stalin's rule–one-man dictatorship and mass terror. For this reason, their policy deserves the label 'neo-Stalinist' rather than -Stalinist."[5]

Katerina Clark, describing an anti-Khrushchevite, pro-Stalin current in Soviet literary world during the 1960s, described the work of "neo-Stalinist" writers as harking back to "the Stalin era and its leaders... as a time of unity, strong rule and national honor."[6]

According to the dissident Roy Medvedev the term describes rehabilitation of Joseph Stalin, identification with him and the associated political system (Stalinism), nostalgia for the Stalnist period in Russia's history, restoration of Stalinist policies, and a return to the administrative terror of the Stalnist period while avoiding some of the worst excesses.[7]

Scholar Dmitry Furman, director of the Commonwealth Of Independent States Research Center at the Russian Academy's of Sciences Institute of Europe, sees Russian neo-Stalinism as a "non-ideological Stalinism" that "seeks control for the sake of control, not for the sake of world revolution."[8]

Alleged neo-Stalinist countries

Some socialist groups describe modern China as "neo-Stalinist."[9]

21st-century North Korea has been described by Western sources as a "neo-Stalinist state"[10], although it has completely replaced Marxism-Leninism with Juche since first adopting it as the official ideology in the 1970s, with references to Marxism-Leninism altogether scrapped from the revised state constitution in 1992.[11]

By the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century, Turkmenistan’s Saparmurat Niyazov regime was sometimes considered a neo-Stalinist one[12][13] (esp. regarding his grotesque cult of personality[14]). Islam Karimov's non-communist authoritarian regime in Uzbekistan has also been widely described as "neo-Stalinist."[15][16]

Soviet Union

In February 1956, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev denounced the cult of personality that surrounded his predecessor, Joseph Stalin, and condemned crimes committed during the Great Purge. In 1956 Khrushchev gave a four-hour speech condemning the Stalin regime, however it was criticized for fabricating information and exaggerating claims hugely. [17] Historian Robert V. Daniels holds that "neo-Stalinism prevailed politically for more than a quarter of a century after Stalin himself left the scene,"[18] Following the Trotskyist comprehension of Stalin's policies as a deviation from the path of Marxism-Leninism, George Novack described Khrushchev's politics as guided by a "neo-Stalinist line," its principle being that "the socialist forces can conquer all opposition even in the imperialist centers, not by the example of internal class power, but by the external power of Soviet example,"[19] explaining that

"Khrushchev’s innovations at the Twentieth Congress. . . made official doctrine of Stalin’s revisionist practices [as] the new program discards the Leninist conception of imperialism and its corresponding revolutionary class struggle policies."[19]

American broadcasts into Europe during the late 1950s described a political struggle between the "old Stalinists" and "the neo-Stalinist Khrushchev."[20][21][22]

In October 1964, Khrushchev was replaced by Leonid Brezhnev, who remained in office until his death in November 1982. During his reign, the truth about Stalinism was suppressed. Andres Laiapea connects this with "the exile of many dissidents, most notably Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,"[23] though whereas Laiapea writes that "[t]he rehabilitation of Stalin went hand in hand with the establishment of a personality cult around Brezhnev,"[23] the political sociologist Victor Zaslavsky characterizes Brezhnev's period as one of "neo-Stalinist compromise," as the essentials of the political atmosphere associated with Stalin were retained without a personality cult.[24] According to Alexander Dubček, "The advent of Brezhnev’s regime heralded the advent of neo-Stalinism, and the measures taken against Czechoslovakia in 1968 were the final consolidation of the neo-Stalinist forces in the Soviet Union, Poland, Hungary, and other countries."[25] Brezhnev described the Chinese political line as "neo-Stalinist."[26] American political scientist Seweryn Bialer has described Soviet policy as turning towards neo-Stalinism after Brezhnev's death.[27]

Mikhail Gorbachev took over in March 1985. He introduced the policy of glasnost in public discussions  – in order to liberalize the Soviet system. The full scale of Stalinist repressions was soon revealed, and the Soviet Union fell apart. Still, Gorbachev admitted in 2000 that "Even now in Russia we have the same problem. It isn't so easy to give up the inheritance we received from Stalinism and Neo-Stalinism, when people were turned into cogs in the wheel, and those in power made all the decisions for them." [28] Gorbachev's domestic policies have been described as neo-Stalinist by various Western sources.[29][30][31]

Post-Soviet Russia

As of 2008, nearly half of Russians view Stalin positively, and many support restoration of his monuments dismantled in the past.[32][33] In 2005, Communist politician Gennady Zyuganov said that Russia "should once again render honor to Stalin for his role in building socialism and saving human civilization from the Nazi plague."[34]

In 2009, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev announced plans to criminalize criticism of Stalin's actions before, during and after World War II. In May 2009, Medvedev described the Soviet Union under Stalin as "our country."[35]

See also

References

  1. ^ Reichman, Henry. "Reconsidering 'Stalinism'. Theory and Society Volume 17, Number 1. Springer Netherlands. January 1988. Pp. 57-89.
  2. ^ Draper, Hal. "Neo-Stalinism: Notes on a New Political Ideology".
  3. ^ Copleston, Frederick, S.J. A History of Philosophy: Russian Philosophy. Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. ISBN 0826469043, ISBN 9780826469045. P. 403.
  4. ^ Shaw identifies as features of the "political geography" of "neo-Stalinism" the following criteria:
    • 1. A well developed core-periphery structure, reflecting marked differences in levels of economic development and living standards. This is in part the product of a tendency towards 'incrementalism'–seeking to gain economies by allocating a considerable proportion of resources to those regions which have benefited most from previous investment...
    • 2. The inbuilt conservatism of the system and the bias towards heavy industry [ensuring] the continuing importance of traditional industrial regions with 'smokestack' industries, such as the Donets-Dnepr region of eastern Ukraine and the Urals.
    • 3. 'Extensive' (ie, resource-demanding) rather than 'intensive' (resource-saving) development, leading to waste of resources and environmental deterioration in the core, growing dependence of the core on the resources of the periphery and pressure to develop the latter in the cheapest and often most short-sighted manner.
    • 4. Administration of the economy by sectors and tendencies towards 'narrow departmentalism' [leading] to the development of a series of ministerial 'empires', lacking intelinkages, reducing the scope for scale economies, encouraging excessive transportation and leading to the economic overspecialization of many cities and regions, especially peripheral ones...
    • 5. The relative neglect of agriculture, transportation, consumer welfare and numerous services...
    • 6. A well developed hierarchy of well-being in the settlement structure, whereby, in general terms, the best endowed settlements were the biggest ones with major administrative and political functions...conditions [deteriorating] as they became smaller.
    • 7. The development of regional economies...greatly influenced by the 'military-industrial complex' with the progress of individual cities, groups of cities and even entire regions (including peripheral ones) very much bound up with the needs of the military machine.
    • 8. Continental and inward-looking development induced by the longstanding tendency towards economic autarky. Isolation from the world economy...Only from the 1960s were autarkic tendencies modified, encouraging further economic development along land frontiers, on coasts and at ports., see Shaw, Denis J.B. Russia in the Modern World: A New Geography. Wiley-Blackwell, 1999. ISBN 0631181342, ISBN 9780631181347. Pp. 81-84.
  5. ^ "Neo-Stalinism: Writing History and Making Policy." Intelligence Report. Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence. CIA Released Documents. FAQs.org.
  6. ^ Clark, Katerina. The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual Indiana University Press, 2000, ISBN 0253337038, 9780253337030, page 236 [1].
  7. ^ Ferdinand Joseph Maria Feldbrugge, "Samizdat and political dissent in the Soviet Union", Brill, 1975, pg. 30, [2]
  8. ^ Zakharovich, Yuri. "Can the U.S.-Russian Alliance Last?" TIME. 21 Dec. 2001.
  9. ^ "Stalinist China at 50: Where is neo-Stalinist China Going?" Workers Liberty 58.
  10. ^ Working, Russel. "An Open Door to North Korea". Business Week, June 4, 2001.
  11. ^ By Sŭng-hŭm Kil, Soong Hoom Kil, Chung-in Moon. Understanding Korean Politics: An Introduction. SUNY Press, 2001. ISBN 0791448894, ISBN 9780791448892P. 275.
  12. ^ Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic, 2005
  13. ^ Freedom House, United States, 2006
  14. ^ The Independent, United Kingdom, 2006
  15. ^ Juergensmeyer, Mark. The Oxford Handbook of Global Religions. Oxford University Press US, 2006. ISBN 0195137981, ISBN 9780195137989. P. 460.
  16. ^ Thornton, William H. New world empire: civil Islam, Terrorism, and the Making of Neoglobalism. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005. ISBN 074252941X, ISBN 9780742529410. P. 134.
  17. ^ Tim Whewell (2006-02-23). "The speech Russia wants to forget". BBC. Retrieved 2009-94-29. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  18. ^ Daniels, Robert Vincent. The Rise and Fall of Communism in Russia. Yale University Press, 2007 ISBN 0300106491, ISBN 9780300106497 P. 339.
  19. ^ a b Novack, George. International Socialist Review, New York, Volume 22, No. 3, Fall 1961. Pp. 107-114. Marxists Internet Archive. 2005. Cite error: The named reference "Novack" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  20. ^ "Khrushchev's Neo-Stalinism". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 55-1-222. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  21. ^ "The Specter of Suslov". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 55-1-296. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  22. ^ "Khrushchev and the Presidium (VIII)". Records of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Institute (RFE/RL RI): Box-Folder-Report 56-3-307. The Open Society. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  23. ^ a b Laiapea, Andres. "Putin's Neo-Stalinism in Historical Perspective". American Chronice. 26 Feb. 2007. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  24. ^ Sakwa, Richard. Soviet Politics in Perspective. Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0415071534, 9780415071536P. 66.
  25. ^ Alexander Dubcek Recollections of the Crisis: Events Surrounding the Cierna nad Tisou Negotiations
  26. ^ Simonov, Vladimir. "Who are Russia's Enemies?" Russian News and Information Agency Novosti. 21 Jun. 2005. EN.RIAN.ru. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  27. ^ Eberstadt, Nick. The Poverty of Communism. Transaction Publishers, 1990. ISBN 0887388175, ISBN 9780887388170. P. 85.
  28. ^ Mikhail Gorbachev Interview - page 3 / 3 - Academy of Achievement
  29. ^ [http://www.heritage.org/research/russiaandeurasia/bg451.cfm Tsypkin, Mikhail. "Moscow's Gorbachev: A New Leader in the Old Mold"]: Backgrounder #451–August 29, 1985. The Heritage Foundation.
  30. ^ Åslund, Anders. How Russia Became a Market Economy. Brookings Institution Press, 1995 ISBN 0815704259, ISBN 9780815704256. P. 29.
  31. ^ Pilon, Juliana Geran. "The Crisis of Marxist Ideology in Eastern Europe". National Review. 7 April 1989. ArticleArchies. Retrieved 9 August 2009.
  32. ^ “The Glamorous Tyrant: The Cult of Stalin Experiences a Rebirth,” by Mikhail Pozdnyaev, Novye Izvestia
  33. ^ http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru/newstext/news/id/1208902.html.
  34. ^ What Gulag? Russia's government shamefully refuses to face up to the horrors of communism. by David Satter
  35. ^ "Russia panel to 'protect history'". BBC. 2009-05-19. Retrieved 2009-08-06.

External links

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neo-Stalinism&diff=prev&oldid=307951427

Leave a Reply