Pronouns[edit]
Pronouns allow writers to refer back to a noun without repeating it. However, this can confuse the reader if it is not clear what the pronoun is standing in for.
In Joseph Biden's article:
Wrong: Palin was picked as his running mate. (Whose?) [1] Better: John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.
In the Salton Sea article:
Wrong: For decades they have contaminated the lake. (What?)
Better: It became apparent that the possibility of pesticides contaminating was long standing, perhaps even through decades past.
This essay describes ways in which writing is often considered to be vague, and then discusses strategies to avoid such problems.
Numbers without things[edit]
When describing quantities of things or repetitions of events or trying to convey statistical information in prose, specify the unit. Imagine that someone who has no idea what the subject is and sees the sentence out of context: they should be able to work out what you are talking about without the context.
Imagine some hypothetical sports reporting:
- John Smith ran three for three but struck out seven.
He ran three whats? And the striking out—is that specific jargon or is that just metaphorical? And three for three—does that mean three out of three or is the second three a different variable entirely? This can be avoided entirely by specifying what you are talking about by using a noun: talk about balls, wickets, throws, catches, hits, serves, passes, goals, tries and so on.
This isn't a traditional form of vagueness and isn't even intended as vagueness—but to the uninitiated reader, it comes out as somewhere between vague and impenetrable. This can be avoided by specifying what the things are that you are counting.
"A word without a meaning" and also "a sentence without its story"; so is to conclude with numbers without its objects.
Vague words and incorrect statements[edit]
When used by the merely clueless, vague words make an article confusing and possibly cause readers to misinterpret or even miss important information altogether. In the hands of those with more sinister intents, they can be used to make articles that are readable enough to impart wrong or biased information, but confusing enough to prevent readers from questioning the reliability or factuality of the article. Vandals can also vandalize an article by replacing specific information with vague statements. Always use citations, especially when – for whatever reason – you must use somewhat vague words. Doing this helps Wikipedia become more reliable and accurate.
| Tag | Template that will be shown (and correct usage) |
|---|---|
| {{cleanup-confusing}} |
|
| {{vague}} |
[vague]
|
| {{Specific time}} |
[Specific Time?]
|
| {{when}} |
[when?]
|
See also[edit]
- Chronological Items, Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Vagueness, Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Avoid weasel words
- md mahin safin
[[|thumbnail|none]]