Cannabis Ruderalis

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Article Talk:Birthright citizenship in the United States (Log · Page History)
User Richwales (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 55
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 62.5
Added (bytes)2 64,488
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 55 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 55 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 55 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 988 Public Opinion running 2:1 Against Current U.S. Birthplace Citizenship Policy is Relevant to Topic: comment on what "consensus" means
Diff · History 1,891 correct birthright citizenship in America: must respect WP:RS, WP:NOV, and WP:NPOV; must acknowledge solidly reliable sources on both sides, not just remove existing material because you think it's wrong
Diff · History 594 Merger proposal: weak support; the rewrite isn't going to be easy; this merger would not involve Natural-born-citizen clause
Diff · History 523 More on 14th Amendment: and this isn't the place anyway for in-depth discussion of "natural born citizen"; go see the article dedicated to this subject
Diff · History 382 More on 14th Amendment: no, that conjectured definition of "natural born citizen" is not obvious, is not based on reliable sources, and doesn't belong in the article
Diff · History 1,643 "Legal history" section of article: new section
Diff · History 835 More on 14th Amendment: brief (VERY brief) mention of Berger is appropriate here
Diff · History 1,630 More on 14th Amendment: POV issues remain even after adding Finkelman's rebuttal to Berger
Diff · History 583 More on 14th Amendment: problem continuing; reported on EW/3RR noticeboard
Diff · History 441 More on 14th Amendment: need input from more editors on a content dispute
Diff · History 1,005 More on 14th Amendment: new section
Diff · History 466 Birthright generation and proposed merger: new section
Diff · History 411 Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: I added some of the deleted material to the "Current controversy" section of the article
Diff · History 547 Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: I deleted the stuff in question
Diff · History 738 Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: OK, but . . .
Diff · History 553 Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: take the extraneous stuff out
Diff · History 2,205 Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: agree, with details
Diff · History 639 Political bias in article: found a second source (Time.com article)
Diff · History 404 Political bias in article: the CNN story is confusing on "birth certificate" vs. "US citizen"
Diff · History 281 Plyler v. Doe: I'll try to find a secondary source
Diff · History 1,025 Plyler v. Doe: Plyler's comments on jurisdiction are as relevant here as other comments already in the article
Diff · History 464 Plyler v. Doe: new section
Diff · History 1,018 Embassies and jurisdiction: embassies can't help illegal immigrants avoid the US justice system
Diff · History 654 current controversy section: maybe section title should be changed?
Diff · History 1,124 Expatriation Act of 1868: WP:OR does not require us to abandon common sense
Diff · History 2,043 Expatriation Act of 1868: I don't think Erler is using the same definition of "birthright citizenship" as this article is using
Diff · History 1,689 Expatriation Act of 1868: discussion of the actual text of this law
Diff · History 1,984 Expatriation Act of 1868: what about birthright citizenship are these sources calling "feudal"?
Diff · History 2,230 Expatriation Act of 1868: new section
Diff · History 627 Undoing Foofighters edit: about creating an account
Diff · History 1,002 Undoing Foofighters edit: please create an account
Diff · History 2,196 Definition of "jurisdiction"?: I still think we need more secondary sources regarding meaning of "allegiance" and "jurisdiction"; can't directly cite primary sources like Locke
Diff · History 386 Definition of "jurisdiction"?: I believe I '''am''' using the talk page for a legitimate purpose
Diff · History 3,741 Definition of "jurisdiction"?: new section
Diff · History 393 Natural Born Citizen: where did you get this??
Diff · History 21 added WikiProject Law template
Diff · History 5,267 Redraft, version 3: RayAYang's and Jkatzen's suggestions; olive branch
Diff · History 5,299 Redrafting of sentences regarding the American-born children of nonresident aliens: room for discussion about using the term "nonresident alien"
Diff · History 806 RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: good proposal; we should mention permanent residence as the presumed initial goal of the parents in question
Diff · History 604 RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: minimal use of term, clearly marked as controversial, may be advisable in order that readers will understand it
Diff · History 1,432 RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: no valid analogy between "anchor baby" and "gay"; real question here is intent behind the use of a term
Diff · History 1,443 RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: it's one person using multiple IP addresses
Diff · History 695 Anchor Baby: I've posted a RfC on this topic
Diff · History 932 RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: new section
Diff · History 749 Anchor Baby: use of a derogatory/pejorative term is POV
Diff · History 1,725 Anchor Baby: reasons why I still don't think we should say "anchor babies" here
Diff · History 683 Anchor Baby: I don't agree that offensiveness or availability of an alternate term are irrelevant questions
Diff · History 357 Anchor Baby: see what the "Anchor baby" article says
Diff · History 736 Anchor Baby: I don't like the term either
Diff · History 314 U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: RfC on Plyler v. Doe page re: relevance of Verdugo-Urquidez cite there
Diff · History 1,592 U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: need further indications that "substantial connections" phrase does apply to birthright citizenship before mentioning it here is justified
Diff · History 1,902 U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: I still don't see the connection between this case, Plyler v. Doe, and birthright citizenship
Diff · History 1,385 U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: new section
Diff · History 951 Proposed reversion of Revision as of 07:58, 9 February 2007: NPOV concerns re: Wong Kim Ark case and his parents' legal resident status
Diff · History 260
All times are in UTC.

Leave a Reply