Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Talk:Birthright citizenship in the United States (Log · Page History) |
User | Richwales (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 55 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 62.5 |
Added (bytes)2 | 64,488 |
Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
55 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
55 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
55 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2016-07-04 06:22 | Diff · History | 988 | →Public Opinion running 2:1 Against Current U.S. Birthplace Citizenship Policy is Relevant to Topic: comment on what "consensus" means |
2016-05-17 21:23 | Diff · History | 1,891 | →correct birthright citizenship in America: must respect WP:RS, WP:NOV, and WP:NPOV; must acknowledge solidly reliable sources on both sides, not just remove existing material because you think it's wrong |
2015-07-19 03:54 | Diff · History | 594 | →Merger proposal: weak support; the rewrite isn't going to be easy; this merger would not involve Natural-born-citizen clause |
2011-08-12 00:33 | Diff · History | 523 | →More on 14th Amendment: and this isn't the place anyway for in-depth discussion of "natural born citizen"; go see the article dedicated to this subject |
2011-08-11 23:47 | Diff · History | 382 | →More on 14th Amendment: no, that conjectured definition of "natural born citizen" is not obvious, is not based on reliable sources, and doesn't belong in the article |
2011-05-23 17:05 | Diff · History | 1,643 | →"Legal history" section of article: new section |
2011-05-22 18:48 | Diff · History | 835 | →More on 14th Amendment: brief (VERY brief) mention of Berger is appropriate here |
2011-05-22 15:31 | Diff · History | 1,630 | →More on 14th Amendment: POV issues remain even after adding Finkelman's rebuttal to Berger |
2011-05-22 06:21 | Diff · History | 583 | →More on 14th Amendment: problem continuing; reported on EW/3RR noticeboard |
2011-05-21 23:26 | Diff · History | 441 | →More on 14th Amendment: need input from more editors on a content dispute |
2011-05-19 16:31 | Diff · History | 1,005 | →More on 14th Amendment: new section |
2010-12-29 06:09 | Diff · History | 466 | →Birthright generation and proposed merger: new section |
2010-08-11 05:42 | Diff · History | 411 | →Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: I added some of the deleted material to the "Current controversy" section of the article |
2010-08-11 00:54 | Diff · History | 547 | →Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: I deleted the stuff in question |
2010-08-10 03:08 | Diff · History | 738 | →Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: OK, but . . . |
2010-08-10 02:16 | Diff · History | 553 | →Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: take the extraneous stuff out |
2010-08-09 18:56 | Diff · History | 2,205 | →Ridiculous bias in Wong Kim Ark section: agree, with details |
2010-06-16 01:20 | Diff · History | 639 | →Political bias in article: found a second source (Time.com article) |
2010-06-16 01:04 | Diff · History | 404 | →Political bias in article: the CNN story is confusing on "birth certificate" vs. "US citizen" |
2010-03-28 02:16 | Diff · History | 281 | →Plyler v. Doe: I'll try to find a secondary source |
2010-03-27 15:45 | Diff · History | 1,025 | →Plyler v. Doe: Plyler's comments on jurisdiction are as relevant here as other comments already in the article |
2010-03-27 01:47 | Diff · History | 464 | →Plyler v. Doe: new section |
2009-03-30 00:27 | Diff · History | 1,018 | →Embassies and jurisdiction: embassies can't help illegal immigrants avoid the US justice system |
2009-03-08 18:38 | Diff · History | 654 | →current controversy section: maybe section title should be changed? |
2009-03-08 02:44 | Diff · History | 1,124 | →Expatriation Act of 1868: WP:OR does not require us to abandon common sense |
2009-03-07 18:44 | Diff · History | 2,043 | →Expatriation Act of 1868: I don't think Erler is using the same definition of "birthright citizenship" as this article is using |
2009-03-06 21:53 | Diff · History | 1,689 | →Expatriation Act of 1868: discussion of the actual text of this law |
2009-03-06 18:18 | Diff · History | 1,984 | →Expatriation Act of 1868: what about birthright citizenship are these sources calling "feudal"? |
2009-03-06 03:04 | Diff · History | 2,230 | →Expatriation Act of 1868: new section |
2009-03-05 17:25 | Diff · History | 627 | →Undoing Foofighters edit: about creating an account |
2009-03-04 17:51 | Diff · History | 1,002 | →Undoing Foofighters edit: please create an account |
2009-03-04 17:38 | Diff · History | 2,196 | →Definition of "jurisdiction"?: I still think we need more secondary sources regarding meaning of "allegiance" and "jurisdiction"; can't directly cite primary sources like Locke |
2009-03-03 23:30 | Diff · History | 386 | →Definition of "jurisdiction"?: I believe I '''am''' using the talk page for a legitimate purpose |
2009-03-03 17:44 | Diff · History | 3,741 | →Definition of "jurisdiction"?: new section |
2009-03-01 06:14 | Diff · History | 393 | →Natural Born Citizen: where did you get this?? |
2008-08-07 01:44 | Diff · History | 21 | added WikiProject Law template |
2008-08-05 21:35 | Diff · History | 5,267 | →Redraft, version 3: RayAYang's and Jkatzen's suggestions; olive branch |
2008-08-05 17:50 | Diff · History | 5,299 | →Redrafting of sentences regarding the American-born children of nonresident aliens: room for discussion about using the term "nonresident alien" |
2008-08-04 19:12 | Diff · History | 806 | →RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: good proposal; we should mention permanent residence as the presumed initial goal of the parents in question |
2008-08-04 17:50 | Diff · History | 604 | →RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: minimal use of term, clearly marked as controversial, may be advisable in order that readers will understand it |
2008-07-27 21:27 | Diff · History | 1,432 | →RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: no valid analogy between "anchor baby" and "gay"; real question here is intent behind the use of a term |
2008-07-26 05:32 | Diff · History | 1,443 | →RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: it's one person using multiple IP addresses |
2008-07-22 21:51 | Diff · History | 695 | →Anchor Baby: I've posted a RfC on this topic |
2008-07-22 21:39 | Diff · History | 932 | →RfC regarding appropriateness of "anchor babies" in this article: new section |
2008-07-22 20:43 | Diff · History | 749 | →Anchor Baby: use of a derogatory/pejorative term is POV |
2008-07-22 01:18 | Diff · History | 1,725 | →Anchor Baby: reasons why I still don't think we should say "anchor babies" here |
2008-07-21 20:13 | Diff · History | 683 | →Anchor Baby: I don't agree that offensiveness or availability of an alternate term are irrelevant questions |
2008-07-16 20:29 | Diff · History | 357 | →Anchor Baby: see what the "Anchor baby" article says |
2008-07-15 14:56 | Diff · History | 736 | →Anchor Baby: I don't like the term either |
2008-03-19 06:31 | Diff · History | 314 | →U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: RfC on Plyler v. Doe page re: relevance of Verdugo-Urquidez cite there |
2008-03-18 16:13 | Diff · History | 1,592 | →U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: need further indications that "substantial connections" phrase does apply to birthright citizenship before mentioning it here is justified |
2008-03-18 04:46 | Diff · History | 1,902 | →U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: I still don't see the connection between this case, Plyler v. Doe, and birthright citizenship |
2008-03-17 22:24 | Diff · History | 1,385 | →U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez: new section |
2007-02-11 19:13 | Diff · History | 951 | →Proposed reversion of Revision as of 07:58, 9 February 2007: NPOV concerns re: Wong Kim Ark case and his parents' legal resident status |
2007-02-02 05:10 | Diff · History | 260 |
All times are in UTC.