Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Novichok (Log · Page History) |
| User | Fitzcarmalan (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 5 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 18.1 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 1,362 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -599 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
5 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
5 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
5 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-25 14:04 | Diff · History | 13 | Actually, this probably isn't the right place for it. Moving to the "Disclosure" section and renaming it accordingly. |
| 2019-02-25 13:56 | Diff · History | -599 | →Design objectives: Rewrite; tagged |
| 2019-02-25 00:55 | Diff · History | 1,325 | Gross POV edit. The text, which is backed by excellent sources, clearly says that it "may" have been influenced by disinformation and makes no attempt to deviate from what the source says. But, even if there were issues here (there aren't), your solution is to leave this paragraph uncited? |
| 2018-11-27 11:16 | Diff · History | 12 | Per the second source |
| 2018-11-26 21:44 | Diff · History | 12 | →Design objectives: Clarify that it wasn't real; wikilink; ce |
All times are in UTC.