Cannabis Ruderalis

Back SNUGGUMSScarlett Johansson • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Article Scarlett Johansson (Log · Page History)
User SNUGGUMS (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 112
Minor edits 2 (1.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 1 (0.9%)
Reverted edits 4 (3.6%)
atbe1 31.2
Added (bytes)2 2,275
Deleted (bytes) -5,507
Minor edits · 2 (1.8%)
Major edits · 110 (98.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 1 (0.9%)
Manual edits · 111 (99.1%)
Reverted edits · 4 (3.6%)
Unreverted edits · 108 (96.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -1 reword
Diff · History 1 typo fix
Diff · History 58 other copyedits, reduce instances of "she"
Diff · History 1 rework, too much "she"
Diff · History -3 reword, avoid one-sentence paragraph
Diff · History 13 adjust
Diff · History -331 unnecessarily repetitive to list awards twice within lead, also parents and birth location don't seem particularly lead-worthy
Diff · History -5 "several" is an understatement, also calling this a "nickname" incorrectly implies it's something she at some point went by
Diff · History 39 tag uncited bit
Diff · History -128 consolidate
Diff · History 6 starting three consecutive sentences with "She" feels repetitive
Diff · History 1 better word choice
Diff · History -59 Franco only needs to be linked once here
Diff · History 5 Reword
Diff · History -9 remove subjective term
Diff · History -6 adjust
Diff · History -379 Another formatting correction, also delete WP:BLP violation when "Reportedly" [what this article uses] isn't good enough for including a personal claim on living people that neither has yet confirmed, and Page Six [what it uses as a basis] is an untrustworthy gossip rag that should be avoided
Diff · History 64 Ref fixes, and instead of lazily having an otherwise empty section that solely consists of referral links [which is uninformative and useless], let's move these to the article body where her career is discussed
Diff · History -26 Reverted 1 edit by Vitopavlovivit (talk): Not officially confirmed as far as I know
Diff · History 0 "several" is an understatement
Diff · History -3 Actually, let's not use "she" so much here
Diff · History 17 Reword, split sentence
Diff · History -53 Don't cut off article titles like that, also move because having otherwise empty sections that solely consist of referral links is lazy, uninformative, and flat out useless for readers
Diff · History -49 Not convinced this is lead-worthy
Diff · History 0 Capitalize first word of section title
Diff · History 0 Split overly long sentences
Diff · History 2 Starting two consecutive sentences with "Johansson" is repetitive
Diff · History -4 tweak
Diff · History 6 less repetitive use of "she"
Diff · History -4 already linked earlier
Diff · History 6 starting three consecutive sentences with "she" is repetitive
Diff · History 1 [Dummy edit] meant to say "listed in infobox" in previous edit summary
Diff · History -40 don't link nationality per WP:OVERLINK, also this is redundant when we already have both of her citizenships listed in in
Diff · History -519 not in given source
Diff · History -132 once again, also MOS:QUOTEMARKS
Diff · History -35 same as before [Marvel is already a given with MCU standing for Marvel Cinematic Universe]
Diff · History -46 trim, and no need to repeat Marvel in this sentence
Diff · History 22 move citation to article body
Diff · History 6 less repetitive use of "she"
Diff · History -6 tweak
Diff · History -77 Not supported within article text, and you cannot just presume somebody is one solely based on support for Democratic candidates
Diff · History -37 WP:OVERLINK
Diff · History -41 trim, reword a bit
Diff · History -24 inappropriate date format, and EPs are just italicized
Diff · History 202 reword, cite release date
Diff · History -45 on second thought, too soon when it's been less than a year with no engagements or pregnancies, try again once one of those happens or maybe when it's been longer than 2 years
Diff · History 2 dash fix
Diff · History -40 adjust ref, reword, "the great-niece" incorrectly implies only great-niece
Diff · History 4 link grandfather
Diff · History -28 (reverted)  "nickname" is a misleading term as that incorrectly implies it's something she uses herself
Diff · History -47 Not worth including per WP:Overcategorization#Non-defining characteristics when this isn't a trait she's prominently noted for
Diff · History -674 (reverted)  superfluous
Diff · History -34 rework; it makes no sense to say she rose to fame with one role while calling another her breakthrough
Diff · History 17 grammar fix
Diff · History -622 remove per WP:Overcategorization#Non-defining characteristics when these aren't traits she's prominently noted for
Diff · History 0 capitalize character name
Diff · History 26 not a commercial failure when it earned more than budget
Diff · History 1 tweak
Diff · History 16 introduce full name upon first article body mention
Diff · History -13 trim, and Favreau has already been linked in previous section
Diff · History -64 better for movie article
Diff · History 5 fix spacing
Diff · History 8 adjust since she has three brothers [including a half-brother], though feel free to specify which one if known
Diff · History -355 specify
Diff · History -32 false; a film is only a box office bomb when it fails to gross its budget or higher, which definitely isn't the case here
Diff · History -5 not sure "husky" is appropriate tone, sounds like a fan's opinion
Diff · History -15 reword; "nickname" is misleading as that would imply it's something she actually ever went by
Diff · History 8 page was renamed
Diff · History -45 far too short to stand on its own without any text outside of referral note as it doesn't inform reads of anything [therefore making such a section flat out useless], so move to acting career when most [if not all] of her awards came from that
Diff · History -11 reword
Diff · History -2 specify
Diff · History -4 grammar fix
Diff · History 4 oops
Diff · History -76 trim
Diff · History 89 same as before
Diff · History 348 reword if necessary, but some mention of MCU needs to be here
Diff · History 1 perhaps better here for chronology
Diff · History 1,050 that's absurd; unless it was cancelled, there's no good reason to remove something she stars in AND serves as executive producer for
Diff · History -160 remove; not really worth including when Scarlett isn't a politician
Diff · History 0 she didn't appear in the MCU until Iron Man 2, which came out in 2010, not 2008
Diff · History -4 band names aren't supposed to be italicized
Diff · History -20 same as before
Diff · History -38 better for article body if anywhere
Diff · History 2 per consensus at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=731874769#WP:DATERANGE_ambiguity_and_stylistic_concerns
Diff · History -19 too much detail for lead; while having one character name or the other is fine, using both at once is overkill
Diff · History -10 Imperial measurements first [since she's American and America tends to use those] before metric
Diff · History -251 that ref doesn't even suggest she is 5' 3", and other citation [which does indicate her height] is enough on its own anyway
Diff · History -10 restore metric conversion; not everyone is familiar with imperial measurements
Diff · History -221 too much detail for lead; while having one character name or the other is fine, using both at once is overkill, and overall MCU franchise is enough to summarize
Diff · History 8 add
Diff · History -414 trivial
Diff · History -36 WP:RELTIME
Diff · History -221 remove deprecated persondata
Diff · History -63 keep focus on what she won
Diff · History -3 more neutral
Diff · History -134 focus on what she won
Diff · History -9 not needed
Diff · History -56 Removing link(s) to "Phoenix Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress": deleted. (TW)
Diff · History -4 remove rowspans per WP:FILMOGRAPHY
Diff · History 1 split
Diff · History -18 not enough for own section
Diff · History -17 Generally not used as EL
Diff · History -5 separate links
Diff · History -181 how is this reliable?
Diff · History -834 (reverted)  completely trivial
Diff · History 6 full title
Diff · History -4 WP:OVERLINK
Diff · History 39 Referral links aren't really enough to fill sections, though. It would help to have a paragraph or two discussing major achievements.
Diff · History 38 (reverted)  tag
Diff · History -12 slight trim
Diff · History -170 Relationships: CNN by itself is sufficient
Diff · History 190 Relationships: provided better source
All times are in UTC.

Leave a Reply