Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Balik R-41 • Talk:North Kosovo crisis (2011–2013) • en.wikipedia.org

Suntingan artikel teratas
Semua suntingan yang dibuat pada suatu halaman oleh satu pengguna, berdasarkan urutan waktu.

Suratan Talk:North Kosovo crisis (2011–2013) (Log · Riwayat Halaman)
Pengguna R-41 (Pencacah Suntingan· Suntingan Teratas)
Total suntingan 178
Suntingan kecil 1 (0.6%)
Suntingan (semi-)otomatis 1 (0.6%)
Suntingan dibalikkan 0 (0%)
atbe1 1.1
Kadagingin (bita)2 33860
Kausap (bita) -1731
Suntingan kecil · 1 (0.6%)
Suntingan besar · 177 (99.4%)
Suntingan (semi-)otomatis · 1 (0.6%)
Suntingan manual · 177 (99.4%)
Suntingan dibalikkan · 0 (0%)
Suntingan tak dibalikkan · 178 (100%)
1 Rerata galah ri antara uahan (dina)
2 Teks tertambah adalah semua penambahan positif yang tidak dibalikkan (kirang langkung)
Tanggal Pranala Ukuran Uah ringkesan
2012-06-07 01:17 Beda · Babad 86 →Requested move:
2012-02-18 13:56 Beda · Babad 4 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:56 Beda · Babad -22 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:54 Beda · Babad 102 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:52 Beda · Babad 89 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:49 Beda · Babad 187 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:46 Beda · Babad -37 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:45 Beda · Babad 1 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:43 Beda · Babad 415 →Dubious and racist statement:
2012-02-18 13:40 Beda · Babad 503 →Dubious and racist statement: new section
2012-01-09 00:27 Beda · Babad 198 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-09 00:25 Beda · Babad 362 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 21:03 Beda · Babad -1 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 21:02 Beda · Babad 53 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 21:01 Beda · Babad 113 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 21:00 Beda · Babad 7 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 20:59 Beda · Babad 270 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 20:57 Beda · Babad 36 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 20:56 Beda · Babad 185 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 17:15 Beda · Babad 50 →Deletion of this article:
2012-01-08 17:13 Beda · Babad 957 →Deletion of this article: new section
2012-01-08 17:01 Beda · Babad 600 →Look everyone, legally KFOR along with EULEX is part of UNMIK that is officially neutral and recognized by the Serbian government:
2012-01-04 12:08 Beda · Babad 42 →Look everyone, legally KFOR along with EULEX is part of UNMIK that is officially neutral and recognized by the Serbian government:
2012-01-04 12:08 Beda · Babad 555 →Look everyone, legally KFOR along with EULEX is part of UNMIK that is officially neutral and recognized by the Serbian government: new section
2011-12-30 04:55 Beda · Babad 0 moved Talk:2011 Kosovo–Serbia border clashes to Talk:2011 North Kosovo clashes: The issue of the ROK's sovereignty being disputed has been addressed in regards to the title "border clashes" being a POV in favour of recognition of the ROK's so...
2011-12-12 11:23 Beda · Babad 35 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 11:22 Beda · Babad 63 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 11:12 Beda · Babad 27 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 11:12 Beda · Babad 38 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 11:11 Beda · Babad 696 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 11:02 Beda · Babad 785 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 04:06 Beda · Babad 4 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 04:05 Beda · Babad 180 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-12 03:57 Beda · Babad 34 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 03:49 Beda · Babad -7 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 03:47 Beda · Babad 127 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:57 Beda · Babad 226 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:44 Beda · Babad 186 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:41 Beda · Babad 410 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:31 Beda · Babad 40 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-12 01:30 Beda · Babad 319 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:22 Beda · Babad 6 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:15 Beda · Babad 313 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:13 Beda · Babad 5 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 01:12 Beda · Babad 537 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 00:59 Beda · Babad -10 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 00:53 Beda · Babad 252 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 00:44 Beda · Babad 19 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 00:40 Beda · Babad 51 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-12 00:33 Beda · Babad 2600 →Onward slightly:
2011-12-11 21:52 Beda · Babad 30 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 21:51 Beda · Babad 111 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 21:43 Beda · Babad 21 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 21:42 Beda · Babad 57 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 21:41 Beda · Babad 23 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 21:40 Beda · Babad 1710 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 20:06 Beda · Babad 598 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:52 Beda · Babad -75 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:48 Beda · Babad -20 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:46 Beda · Babad 11 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:43 Beda · Babad 85 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:43 Beda · Babad 5 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:42 Beda · Babad 491 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:37 Beda · Babad -13 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:36 Beda · Babad 12 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:36 Beda · Babad -11 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:35 Beda · Babad 24 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:34 Beda · Babad 6 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:33 Beda · Babad 94 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:31 Beda · Babad 90 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 19:29 Beda · Babad 1083 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 18:00 Beda · Babad 6 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 17:48 Beda · Babad 116 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 17:47 Beda · Babad 61 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 17:44 Beda · Babad 814 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 00:03 Beda · Babad 40 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 00:02 Beda · Babad -12 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-11 00:01 Beda · Babad 26 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:59 Beda · Babad 60 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:53 Beda · Babad 10 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:52 Beda · Babad 38 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:51 Beda · Babad 0 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:48 Beda · Babad 8 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:45 Beda · Babad 56 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:44 Beda · Babad 230 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:42 Beda · Babad 57 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:41 Beda · Babad 4 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 23:39 Beda · Babad 1041 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 14:28 Beda · Babad 168 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 14:25 Beda · Babad 306 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 04:17 Beda · Babad 12 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 04:05 Beda · Babad 0 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 04:03 Beda · Babad 9 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:55 Beda · Babad 2 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:54 Beda · Babad 50 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:50 Beda · Babad 43 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:47 Beda · Babad 132 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:44 Beda · Babad 30 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:43 Beda · Babad 324 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:39 Beda · Babad 720 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:28 Beda · Babad 15 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:26 Beda · Babad 14 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-10 03:25 Beda · Babad 1233 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:15 Beda · Babad -290 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:14 Beda · Babad 3 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:12 Beda · Babad 241 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:08 Beda · Babad 36 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:07 Beda · Babad 209 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 07:05 Beda · Babad -136 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 06:52 Beda · Babad 18 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 06:51 Beda · Babad 2 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 05:18 Beda · Babad -3 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 05:16 Beda · Babad 330 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 00:34 Beda · Babad 128 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 00:34 Beda · Babad 612 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 00:27 Beda · Babad 125 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 00:03 Beda · Babad -1 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-08 00:01 Beda · Babad 293 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-07 23:56 Beda · Babad -3 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-07 23:55 Beda · Babad 217 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-07 23:53 Beda · Babad 136 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-07 23:51 Beda · Babad 838 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:48 Beda · Babad 874 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:37 Beda · Babad 30 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:35 Beda · Babad -13 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:33 Beda · Babad -14 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:25 Beda · Babad -482 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:18 Beda · Babad 482 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:11 Beda · Babad 6 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:10 Beda · Babad 80 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:09 Beda · Babad 113 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:07 Beda · Babad 10 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:06 Beda · Babad 27 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 23:06 Beda · Babad 677 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 00:35 Beda · Babad -143 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-12-06 00:34 Beda · Babad 705 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-12-06 00:24 Beda · Babad 44 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.:
2011-12-06 00:23 Beda · Babad 616 →NPOV still isn't resolved. The tone is very anti-RoK and anti-KFOR in this article.: new section
2011-11-29 16:36 Beda · Babad 2 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:34 Beda · Babad 95 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:27 Beda · Babad 13 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:26 Beda · Babad -1 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:21 Beda · Babad 10 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:20 Beda · Babad 0 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:17 Beda · Babad 31 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-29 16:17 Beda · Babad 933 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:53 Beda · Babad -17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:53 Beda · Babad 193 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:50 Beda · Babad -1 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:50 Beda · Babad -290 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:47 Beda · Babad -17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:47 Beda · Babad 28 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:46 Beda · Babad 17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:46 Beda · Babad 95 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:41 Beda · Babad 10 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:39 Beda · Babad 1 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:39 Beda · Babad 77 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:38 Beda · Babad 327 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:35 Beda · Babad 60 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:34 Beda · Babad 17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:28 Beda · Babad 144 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:26 Beda · Babad -6 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:24 Beda · Babad 35 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:23 Beda · Babad 321 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:20 Beda · Babad 212 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:17 Beda · Babad 21 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 23:16 Beda · Babad 1028 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:30 Beda · Babad 17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:28 Beda · Babad 303 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:10 Beda · Babad -1 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:10 Beda · Babad -17 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:10 Beda · Babad 10 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 21:09 Beda · Babad 522 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 20:58 Beda · Babad 28 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 20:57 Beda · Babad 108 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 20:56 Beda · Babad 21 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 20:37 Beda · Babad -88 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces:
2011-11-28 20:37 Beda · Babad 485 →KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces: new section
Semua waktu dalam UTC.

Leave a Reply