Cannabis Ruderalis

Back PopoDameronChatGPT • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Article ChatGPT (Log · Page History)
User PopoDameron (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 67
Minor edits 10 (14.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits 4 (6%)
Reverted edits 1 (1.5%)
atbe1 6.9
Added (bytes)2 4,497
Deleted (bytes) -16,072
Minor edits · 10 (14.9%)
Major edits · 57 (85.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 4 (6%)
Manual edits · 63 (94%)
Reverted edits · 1 (1.5%)
Unreverted edits · 66 (98.5%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 20 more specific
Diff · History 62 can't quite see how that might be considered a reliable source, but I'll replace with a better one for the date
Diff · History -249 (reverted)  spam. almost made it through
Diff · History -242 Undid revision 1210532273 by Oalexander (talk) unsourced, unfactual, and redundant
Diff · History -2 Reverted edit by 2601:300:4900:4950:182E:22:E05E:E413 (talk) to last version by Alexeyevitch
Diff · History 1,057 Training: readded improved version of context that was previously removed and didn't make sense without.
Diff · History 24 Training: wikilink for more detail
Diff · History -749 Reverted 1 edit by StellaQuan441 (talk): This doesn't mean anything
Diff · History -1 random new line
Diff · History 2 Reverted 1 edit by Pritam Shaw (talk): Old image is better. this one appears to be using a dark theme
Diff · History -41 Reverted 1 edit by Abdullah Ayub Wiki (talk): Useless wikilinks and bad grammar
Diff · History 8 grammar
Diff · History -1,121 Reverted 1 edit by Quentizir (talk): This is an ad (a bad one)
Diff · History -676 Reverted 1 edit by Alleoscar (talk): Not notable information. the fact that people are talking about it is hardly worth mentioning.
Diff · History 653 Why is "no product currently" reason to remove this? It seems well sourced and quite relevant to me | Undid revision 1147321142 by Rolf h nelson (talk)
Diff · History 64 not an improvement. stuff like "powered by ai" is less clear.
Diff · History -607 Training: this sentence really doesn't mean anything. also removed blog source
Diff · History 12 Training: using 'and' makes the two seem equal, which is a bad representation
Diff · History -3 clarification
Diff · History -37 Reverted good faith edits by LOSBY2 (talk): Not an improvement
Diff · History 92 Features: a couple more notable companies
Diff · History 1 Features: ce
Diff · History 1,072 Features: plugins
Diff · History -79 Reverted 1 edit by Codex Cosmos (talk): Unsourced
Diff · History 1 plural
Diff · History -39 Reverted 1 edit by Abobeck11 (talk): This is not accurate. openai never refer to it as "chatgpt-3" (unless you have a source that says otherwise?)
Diff · History -101 Undid revision 1145133319 by Siddarthkoushik (talk) unsourced
Diff · History 15 moved info about gpt-4 from training to service because it's not really related to training as written. happy to discuss.
Diff · History -81 Jailbreaking: so irrelevant
Diff · History 70 wikilinks
Diff · History -8,968 Challenge in Search Engine Marketing: all of this content is already in the 'competition' section, and this is written like a bad ad
Diff · History 17 Training: old link was hardly relevant
Diff · History -7 Training: link
Diff · History 295 Training: improved training section
Diff · History 44 source
Diff · History -86 External links: a general tutorial video is not relevant to this article
Diff · History -25 move citation
Diff · History 259 So you removed a source and added unsourced info because 'use it yourself'? That's just not how it works. Find a source that says this. | Undid revision 1140460441 by Jishiboka1 (talk)
Diff · History -78 Reverted 1 edit by Gluo88 (talk): That's GPT-3, not chatgpt, so it's not really relevant
Diff · History -23 removed spam
Diff · History -30 Reverted 1 edit by FlyingOctopusFish (talk): Added factual inaccuracies, random redlinks, and unnecessary links
Diff · History -140 External links: already in the references
Diff · History 18 grammar/incomplete sentence
Diff · History -19 Service: simplified link
Diff · History -659 Jailbreaking: Not at all credible and does not add anything. It's just a specific prompt.
Diff · History -2 grammar
Diff · History 6 Bold secondary name
Diff · History 42 We should still have the word 'chat' in the expansion, and changed to a link that's more relevant
Diff · History 21 more accurate to the source
Diff · History -199 Undid revision 1135598540 by Wz.sarah (talk) it... doesn't know about its own architecture. you need an actual source for that.
Diff · History 0 Undid revision 1134812347 by X-factor (talk): ungrammatical
Diff · History 12 Ethical Concerns: renamed section
Diff · History 224 Implications for Data Labeling: fixed up writing and inaccuracies
Diff · History 10 Features and limitations: minor fix
Diff · History 20 it does not use chatgpt against itself; chatgpt does not even have a public api yet
Diff · History -555 Training: this has nothing to do with training
Diff · History 255 added source about transfer learning/fine-tuning
Diff · History 22 fine-tuning is an approach of transfer learning
Diff · History -8 Reverted 1 edit by Djwt921 (talk): Ungrammatical and doesn't add anything
Diff · History -161 Service: source broken
Diff · History -241 Jailbreaks: The source doesn't mention this being one of the "best" ways or anything of that sort (which isn't exactly quantifiable to begin with)
Diff · History -1,011 Service: not relevant to this section in particular, and doesn't add much to the article as a whole
Diff · History 15 split into more accurate sections
Diff · History 22 "Based on" is the wrong word. It isn't based on it: it is it, just further fine-tuned on dialogue
Diff · History -81 Reception: clarified anecdotes and removed an unhelpful one
Diff · History 16 the model does not remember previous conversations/threads, only the current one
Diff · History 46 mainly corrected some false info
All times are in UTC.

Leave a Reply