Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Chain-of-thought prompting (Log · Page History) |
| User | PopoDameron (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 8 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (12.5%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 11,771 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -20 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
8 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (12.5%)
Manual edits
·
7 (87.5%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
8 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 22:44 | Diff · History | -16 | Reverted 1 edit by John Abbe (talk): Should not have redlinks in the see also section |
| 2023-03-31 19:56 | Diff · History | 95 | good edits, but I believe it's important to keep this term since it's rather common. added a wikilink with more elaboration about it. |
| 2023-03-19 00:11 | Diff · History | 630 | Reverted 1 edit by 2603:8081:6440:FC:B93C:AC8B:AFCF:2FB0 (talk): Don't remove information that has a clear and trustworthy source. If you disagree with the terminology, find sources that agree with your viewpoint and use them to qualify what is written. |
| 2023-03-15 00:08 | Diff · History | 30 | wikilink |
| 2023-03-13 15:03 | Diff · History | 3 | while this phrasing may seem more awkward, searching both alternatives reveals a few hundred results for one and zero for the other, so I think it's best to stick with what's actually used in the literature |
| 2023-03-13 15:01 | Diff · History | -4 | changed back because it's a direct quote from the paper |
| 2023-03-10 18:49 | Diff · History | 97 | +Category:Natural language processing; +Category:Machine learning; +Category:Linguistics using HotCat |
| 2023-03-10 18:48 | Diff · History | 10,916 | Started article on chain-of-thought prompting |
All times are in UTC.