Cannabis Ruderalis

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

ⴰⵎⴳⵔⴰⴷ 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities (Log · Amazray n usebter)
User Netoholic (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 40
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ 9 (22,5 %)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0 %)
Reverted edits 13 (32,5 %)
atbe1 0,6
Yettawrna(iṭamḍanen)2 1 112
ⵉⵜⵜⵓⴽⴽⵙ (ⵉⴱⴰⵢⵜⵏ) -14 875
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ · 9 (22,5 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵇⵔⴰⵏⴻⵏ · 31 (77,5 %)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵡⴼⵓⵙⵏ · 40 (100 %)
Reverted edits · 13 (32,5 %)
Unreverted edits · 27 (67,5 %)
1 Tanzagt talemmast ger sin ibeddilen
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
ⴰⵙⴰⴽⵓⴷ ⵉⵙⵖⵏⴰⵏ Tiddi Ẓreg agzul
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -135 image discussion is on-going on the talk page. It is clearly inappropriate for Wikipedia to use this image until permission is granted.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -135 (reverted)  rmv image. it's a copyvio, and is out of place in the intro section, being too large.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -200 rmv boston globe image. its a copyvio
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 1 totallydisputed tag - previous tag refers to articles listed on Wikipedia:List of controversial issues, of which this article is not.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 14 Discrepancies map: {{dubious}}
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 12 Exit polls vs. machine tallies, by state (9 states): {{dubious}} still
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 1 Misrepresentation of exit poll data:
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 11 Misrepresentation of exit poll data: {{dubious}} still
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 14 marked {{TotallyDisputed}} since concerns about the factual basis of certain sections has not been resolved
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -4 436 (reverted)  Misrepresentation of exit poll data: rmv. dubious section. No verifiable source has been identified for these images, potential for fakery is high.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -151 Nov. 14: rmv "About Those Election Results" opinion piece
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -4 137 Misrepresentation of exit poll data: remove analysis based on unverfied images. Before replacing, a valid source must be identified.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -92 (reverted)  Result Plots - Florida: ustogether is a free hosting service, not a source. see talk
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -734 Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): provided links do not indicate ownership of the source image.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -4 283 Manipulation of exit poll data: rmv section as unverfiable, per talk
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 954 vfd
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 21 (reverted)  restoring. both seem appropriate
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 42 {{TotallyDisputed}}
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 25 do not remove tags without addressing the concerns
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -92 (reverted)  Result Plots - Florida: rmv. We are not a collection of external links.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 10 Discrepancies Map: mark dubiousImage:2004 us discrepancy.gif
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 12 Manipulation of exit poll data: dubious
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 13 Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): dubious
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 879 (reverted)  rvt. I am here to protect WP's data integrity
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 721 (reverted)  rvt. do not re-insert un-verified data. source it in the Talk, and then re-add
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -403 (reverted)  Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): moved to talk. unsourced and based on unverifiable data
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 289 (reverted)  Manipulation of exit poll data: moving section to Talk
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 692 (reverted)  rvt. do not edit war over obviously unverifiable data
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 692 (reverted)  rvt. do not edit war over obviously unverifiable data
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -3 289 Manipulation of exit poll data: rmv section. all conclusions based off jpg files taken from a non-reliable source website
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -324 Voting machines: rmv "20004 us voting machine problems" image. It only shows that higher population states reported more problems, as one would expect. no source for data.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -34 188 (reverted)  Sorry, but this "number crunching" is our own invention. Only when reliable sources have concluded anything, can we incorporate it.
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -4 bolding or italicizing like this is not according to the Manual of Style
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -6 bolding seems inappropriate
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -1 075 rvt. last version is self-referential (in that it defines a scope for "this article")
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 3
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -442 intro should be a summary of the article to come, not include any specific POV
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 0 W
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ -95 NPOV the intro, remove the Rubin quote (Manual of Style issue)
Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ 21 (reverted)  {{totallydisputed}}
All times are in UTC.

Leave a Reply