ⴰⵖⵓⵍ
Netoholic
•
2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities
•
en.wikipedia.org
Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
ⴰⵎⴳⵔⴰⴷ | 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities (Log · Amazray n usebter) |
User | Netoholic (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 40 |
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ | 9 (22,5 %) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0 %) |
Reverted edits | 13 (32,5 %) |
atbe1 | 0,6 |
Yettawrna(iṭamḍanen)2 | 1 112 |
ⵉⵜⵜⵓⴽⴽⵙ (ⵉⴱⴰⵢⵜⵏ) | -14 875 |
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ
·
9 (22,5 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵇⵔⴰⵏⴻⵏ
·
31 (77,5 %)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵡⴼⵓⵙⵏ
·
40 (100 %)
Reverted edits
·
13 (32,5 %)
Unreverted edits
·
27 (67,5 %)
1 Tanzagt talemmast ger sin ibeddilen
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
ⴰⵙⴰⴽⵓⴷ | ⵉⵙⵖⵏⴰⵏ | Tiddi | Ẓreg agzul |
---|---|---|---|
2004-12-03 17:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -135 | image discussion is on-going on the talk page. It is clearly inappropriate for Wikipedia to use this image until permission is granted. |
2004-12-03 17:12 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -135 | (reverted) rmv image. it's a copyvio, and is out of place in the intro section, being too large. |
2004-12-03 08:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -200 | rmv boston globe image. its a copyvio |
2004-11-18 03:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | totallydisputed tag - previous tag refers to articles listed on Wikipedia:List of controversial issues, of which this article is not. |
2004-11-17 22:58 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 14 | →Discrepancies map: {{dubious}} |
2004-11-17 22:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 12 | →Exit polls vs. machine tallies, by state (9 states): {{dubious}} still |
2004-11-17 22:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →Misrepresentation of exit poll data: |
2004-11-17 22:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 11 | →Misrepresentation of exit poll data: {{dubious}} still |
2004-11-17 22:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 14 | marked {{TotallyDisputed}} since concerns about the factual basis of certain sections has not been resolved |
2004-11-15 02:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -4 436 | (reverted) →Misrepresentation of exit poll data: rmv. dubious section. No verifiable source has been identified for these images, potential for fakery is high. |
2004-11-14 22:24 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -151 | →Nov. 14: rmv "About Those Election Results" opinion piece |
2004-11-14 22:21 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -4 137 | →Misrepresentation of exit poll data: remove analysis based on unverfied images. Before replacing, a valid source must be identified. |
2004-11-12 00:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -92 | (reverted) →Result Plots - Florida: ustogether is a free hosting service, not a source. see talk |
2004-11-11 22:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -734 | →Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): provided links do not indicate ownership of the source image. |
2004-11-11 22:35 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -4 283 | →Manipulation of exit poll data: rmv section as unverfiable, per talk |
2004-11-11 20:02 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 954 | vfd |
2004-11-11 17:48 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 21 | (reverted) restoring. both seem appropriate |
2004-11-11 17:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 42 | {{TotallyDisputed}} |
2004-11-11 17:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 25 | do not remove tags without addressing the concerns |
2004-11-11 15:22 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -92 | (reverted) →Result Plots - Florida: rmv. We are not a collection of external links. |
2004-11-11 15:02 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 10 | →Discrepancies Map: mark dubiousImage:2004 us discrepancy.gif |
2004-11-11 07:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 12 | →Manipulation of exit poll data: dubious |
2004-11-11 07:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 13 | →Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): dubious |
2004-11-11 07:24 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 879 | (reverted) rvt. I am here to protect WP's data integrity |
2004-11-11 07:16 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 721 | (reverted) rvt. do not re-insert un-verified data. source it in the Talk, and then re-add |
2004-11-11 07:08 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -403 | (reverted) →Exit Polls vs. Machine Tallies, by State (9 States): moved to talk. unsourced and based on unverifiable data |
2004-11-11 06:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 289 | (reverted) →Manipulation of exit poll data: moving section to Talk |
2004-11-11 06:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 692 | (reverted) rvt. do not edit war over obviously unverifiable data |
2004-11-11 06:28 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 692 | (reverted) rvt. do not edit war over obviously unverifiable data |
2004-11-11 06:23 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 289 | →Manipulation of exit poll data: rmv section. all conclusions based off jpg files taken from a non-reliable source website |
2004-11-11 05:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -324 | →Voting machines: rmv "20004 us voting machine problems" image. It only shows that higher population states reported more problems, as one would expect. no source for data. |
2004-11-11 04:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -34 188 | (reverted) Sorry, but this "number crunching" is our own invention. Only when reliable sources have concluded anything, can we incorporate it. |
2004-11-11 02:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -4 | bolding or italicizing like this is not according to the Manual of Style |
2004-11-11 02:43 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -6 | bolding seems inappropriate |
2004-11-11 00:02 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -1 075 | rvt. last version is self-referential (in that it defines a scope for "this article") |
2004-11-10 23:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 | |
2004-11-10 23:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -442 | intro should be a summary of the article to come, not include any specific POV |
2004-11-10 23:34 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | W |
2004-11-10 23:33 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -95 | NPOV the intro, remove the Rubin quote (Manual of Style issue) |
2004-11-10 22:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 21 | (reverted) {{totallydisputed}} |
All times are in UTC.