在條目上的最多編輯
由一位使用者對頁面做出的所有編輯，依時間排序。
| 條目 | Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) (日誌 · 頁面歷史) |
| 使用者 | Ned Scott (編輯計數器· 最多編輯) |
| 總編輯數 | 9 |
| 小修改 | 0 (0%) |
| （半）自動編輯數 | 0 (0%) |
| 被回退編輯數 | 4 (44.4%) |
| atbe1 | 6.2 |
| 已新增（位元組）2 | 238 |
| 刪除（位元組） | -492 |
小修改
·
0 (0%)
大修改
·
9 (100%)
（半）自動編輯數
·
0 (0%)
手動編輯數
·
9 (100%)
被回退編輯數
·
4 (44.4%)
撤銷回退編輯數
·
5 (55.6%)
1 平均編輯間隔時間（天）
2 添加文字是指未被回退的增加內容 (大致估計)
| 日期 | 連結 | 內容大小 | 編輯摘要 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-11-18 03:59 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 238 | if you want a dispute note, then lets make it accurate |
| 2006-11-18 01:53 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -19 | (已回退) rv, no playing games |
| 2006-11-18 00:39 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -19 | (已回退) they will always dispute it, they've made that clear, consensus is not 100%. |
| 2006-11-06 23:06 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -19 | remove, per that same discussion. consensus does not equal 100% support |
| 2006-10-28 03:12 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -291 | →Episode articles: if you wish to include something that has no consensus in the first place then bring it to discussion first |
| 2006-10-27 22:04 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -85 | →Episode articles: this is causing more harm than good |
| 2006-10-03 03:10 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -85 | (已回退) need to keep examples generalized and I can't seem to find the discussion supporting this naming convention for star trek anyways |
| 2006-09-26 04:38 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -97 | rv, then explain that on the star trek project pages. Guidelines need to be generalized, and people assume guidelines have exceptions or else they'd be policy |
| 2006-09-23 07:06 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -97 | (已回退) →Episode articles: removing Star Trek "exemption". If they want to do that, then fine, but it shouldn't be an example to others. |
所有時間為 UTC 標準。