Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) (Log · Page History) |
| User | Ned Scott (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 9 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 4 (44.4%) |
| atbe1 | 6.2 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 238 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -492 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
9 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
9 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (44.4%)
Unreverted edits
·
5 (55.6%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-11-18 03:59 | Diff · History | 238 | if you want a dispute note, then lets make it accurate |
| 2006-11-18 01:53 | Diff · History | -19 | (reverted) rv, no playing games |
| 2006-11-18 00:39 | Diff · History | -19 | (reverted) they will always dispute it, they've made that clear, consensus is not 100%. |
| 2006-11-06 23:06 | Diff · History | -19 | remove, per that same discussion. consensus does not equal 100% support |
| 2006-10-28 03:12 | Diff · History | -291 | →Episode articles: if you wish to include something that has no consensus in the first place then bring it to discussion first |
| 2006-10-27 22:04 | Diff · History | -85 | →Episode articles: this is causing more harm than good |
| 2006-10-03 03:10 | Diff · History | -85 | (reverted) need to keep examples generalized and I can't seem to find the discussion supporting this naming convention for star trek anyways |
| 2006-09-26 04:38 | Diff · History | -97 | rv, then explain that on the star trek project pages. Guidelines need to be generalized, and people assume guidelines have exceptions or else they'd be policy |
| 2006-09-23 07:06 | Diff · History | -97 | (reverted) →Episode articles: removing Star Trek "exemption". If they want to do that, then fine, but it shouldn't be an example to others. |
All times are in UTC.