Kemmoù pennañ d'ur pennad
An holl gemmoù graet war ur bajenn gant un implijer, dre renk gant an amzer.
| Pennad | User:MarshalN20/sandbox (Marilh · Istor ar bajenn) |
| Implijer | MarshalN20 (Konter ar c'hemmoù· Kemmoù stank) |
| Hollad ar c'hemmoù | 39 |
| Kemmoù dister | 3 (7,7 %) |
| Kemmoù (dam)emgefreek | 2 (5,1 %) |
| Kemmoù nullet | 2 (5,1 %) |
| atbe1 | 59,3 |
| Ouzhpennet (oktedoù)2 | 40 267 |
| Dilamet(oktedoù) | -33 082 |
Kemmoù dister
·
3 (7,7 %)
Kemmoù bras
·
36 (92,3 %)
Kemmoù (dam)emgefreek
·
2 (5,1 %)
Kemmoù gant an dorn
·
37 (94,9 %)
Kemmoù nullet
·
2 (5,1 %)
Kemmoù dizistaolet
·
37 (94,9 %)
1 Pad keitat etre daou gemm(deizioù)
2 Un destenn ouzhpennet zo un ouzhpennadenn bozitivel n'eo ket bet nullet gant ar c'hemm war-lerc'h (well-wazh)
| Deiziad | Liammoù | Ment | Diverradenn eus ar c'hemmoù |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 14:36 | Diforc'h · Istor | 8 482 | |
| 2014-07-24 02:12 | Diforc'h · Istor | 143 | →Points to address: rewording misunderstood edit. |
| 2014-07-23 03:45 | Diforc'h · Istor | 97 | →Points to address: |
| 2014-07-19 19:24 | Diforc'h · Istor | 227 | →Summary by MarshalN20: |
| 2014-07-18 17:17 | Diforc'h · Istor | 149 | →Points to address: |
| 2014-07-18 12:58 | Diforc'h · Istor | 428 | →Points to address: |
| 2014-07-18 12:46 | Diforc'h · Istor | 0 | →Summary by MarshalN20: |
| 2014-07-18 12:46 | Diforc'h · Istor | 583 | →Summary by MarshalN20: |
| 2014-07-16 21:48 | Diforc'h · Istor | -39 | →Statement by Kww (and others favoring this perspective): |
| 2014-07-16 21:48 | Diforc'h · Istor | 231 | |
| 2014-07-16 21:40 | Diforc'h · Istor | -27 679 | ←Blanked the page |
| 2012-12-11 20:28 | Diforc'h · Istor | -16 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Removing quote, per Gaba suggestion. Keeping the "greater force" quote given its ambiguity. |
| 2012-12-11 16:33 | Diforc'h · Istor | 0 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: "Argues" to "claims". They're synonyms, please see: http://thesaurus.com/browse/argue |
| 2012-12-11 16:07 | Diforc'h · Istor | -41 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: After a moment of enlightenment...I think this may be it! |
| 2012-12-10 04:00 | Diforc'h · Istor | -5 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Minor edit. |
| 2012-12-10 03:15 | Diforc'h · Istor | -10 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Minor edit. |
| 2012-12-10 02:44 | Diforc'h · Istor | -3 592 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Following Wee, Langus, and MarshalN20 suggestions: Applying suggestions from Gabba & Wee. Hopefully this finally makes everyone agree with the text of "Proposal #1". |
| 2012-12-09 16:23 | Diforc'h · Istor | -160 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Following Wee, Langus, and MarshalN20 suggestions: Eliminating repetition (United Kingdom -> UK). Rewording the paragraph. |
| 2012-12-09 15:32 | Diforc'h · Istor | 13 | →Part that needs further editing and sources: |
| 2012-12-09 15:24 | Diforc'h · Istor | -14 | →Sovereignty Dispute Proposal #1: Following Wee, Langus, and MarshalN20 suggestions: |
| 2012-12-09 15:21 | Diforc'h · Istor | 11 977 | Adding Proposal #1. Includes suggestions from Langus, Wee Curry, and myself (MarshalN20). |
| 2012-12-08 17:19 | Diforc'h · Istor | -36 | Undid revision 527046952 by MarshalN20 (talk) |
| 2012-12-08 17:18 | Diforc'h · Istor | 36 | (distaolet) Proposal |
| 2012-12-08 16:46 | Diforc'h · Istor | 121 | →UK Position, Argentina counter-arguments: Limit 1 paragraph: Improving Cawkell position with Langus suggestion & Cawkell's own words. |
| 2012-12-08 16:41 | Diforc'h · Istor | 0 | →Sovereignty dispute: Mary Cawkell fits best in the UK position paragraph. Her statement responds to the Argentine self-determination position. |
| 2012-12-08 16:21 | Diforc'h · Istor | 13 | →UK Position, Argentina counter-arguments: Limit 1 paragraph: Changing "argues" to "alleges" (sounds more professional; "argues" is somewhat repetitive). Agree with Wee that claim of Argentine expulsion is disputed (adding "purportedly" behind it). |
| 2012-12-08 02:05 | Diforc'h · Istor | 86 | →Islanders' Position and (possibly) short analysis of what may happen in the future: Limit 1 paragraph: Removing "nonetheless". The referedum has a sole objective. |
| 2012-12-08 01:48 | Diforc'h · Istor | 0 | →Islanders' Position and (possibly) short analysis of what may happen in the future: Limit 1 paragraph: islanders -> Islanders |
| 2012-12-08 01:22 | Diforc'h · Istor | -270 | Removing repetition. One paragraph for Islanders' position. Incorporated some information from "possibly important text". Moved 2012 letter situation to a better spot. |
| 2012-12-08 00:04 | Diforc'h · Istor | -477 | →Islanders' Position and (possibly) short analysis of what may happen in the future: Limit 1 paragraph: Removing extra sources that do not work with this sentence. |
| 2012-12-07 23:56 | Diforc'h · Istor | 306 | Undid revision 526947099 by MarshalN20 (talk) Restoring text for sample diff. |
| 2012-12-07 23:55 | Diforc'h · Istor | -306 | (distaolet) →Background (brief history): Limit 2 paragraphs: Making a sample diff. |
| 2012-12-07 20:59 | Diforc'h · Istor | -421 | →Sovereignty dispute: ce. Splitting up the different people. Paragraph getting a bit confusing. |
| 2012-12-07 20:20 | Diforc'h · Istor | 14 | →UK Position, Argentina counter-arguments: Limit 1 paragraph: adding "nevertheless" to show it's an opposite view. |
| 2012-12-07 20:18 | Diforc'h · Istor | 40 | →UK Position, Argentina counter-arguments: Limit 1 paragraph: ce. Need citation for Argentine position. |
| 2012-12-07 17:01 | Diforc'h · Istor | 359 | →Argentine Position, UK counter-arguments: Limit 1 paragraph: |
| 2012-12-07 16:57 | Diforc'h · Istor | -322 | →Background (brief history): Limit 2 paragraphs: |
| 2012-12-07 16:42 | Diforc'h · Istor | 6 | →Sovereignty dispute: |
| 2012-12-07 16:41 | Diforc'h · Istor | 16 992 | ←Created page with '{{User sandbox}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> '''PLEASE NOTE''': Although I have divided the "Sovereignty dispute" into sub-sections, the sub-headings shall be ...' |
En UTC eo an holl eurioù