Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Template:Rajput Groups (Log · Page History) |
| User | Mahensingha (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 95 |
| Minor edits | 17 (17.9%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 22 (23.2%) |
| Reverted edits | 7 (7.4%) |
| atbe1 | 23.6 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 134 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -1,058 |
Minor edits
·
17 (17.9%)
Major edits
·
78 (82.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
22 (23.2%)
Manual edits
·
73 (76.8%)
Reverted edits
·
7 (7.4%)
Unreverted edits
·
88 (92.6%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-01 13:22 | Diff · History | -12 | Invalid addition. Not Rajputs |
| 2017-11-19 10:36 | Diff · History | -57 | Reverted edits by 27.57.139.14 (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2017-11-12 20:38 | Diff · History | -14 | Redlink removed. |
| 2017-10-22 18:43 | Diff · History | -13 | A self made claim. No source. Even the linked article is struggling for notability |
| 2017-10-22 18:37 | Diff · History | -23 | Traditionally gokdsmith community claiming yo be Rajputs but different altogather like Lodi Rajput who also make the similar claim |
| 2017-08-25 19:24 | Diff · History | 14 | Reverted to revision 790995454 by Sitush (talk): {{good faith}} Linked articles donot confirm this. No sources. (TW) |
| 2017-07-07 21:16 | Diff · History | 0 | Reverted edits by 146.196.35.215 (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2017-07-06 11:15 | Diff · History | -13 | bad link |
| 2017-06-18 20:12 | Diff · History | -13 | Reverted edits by 182.76.12.122 (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2017-05-28 19:06 | Diff · History | -32 | The given source is fake which has no mention of the title |
| 2017-05-28 18:52 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article does not prove them chandravanshi |
| 2017-05-10 19:33 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article does not prove them chandravanshi |
| 2017-03-12 20:20 | Diff · History | -9 | Reverted to revision 766007564 by Sitush (talk): Undiscussed Additions/deletions. (TW) |
| 2017-01-28 17:37 | Diff · History | 36 | Corrected Link to Yaduvanshi Rajputs |
| 2016-09-09 19:00 | Diff · History | -12 | Not recognized as Rajputs. It is a different caste categorized as OBC |
| 2016-08-22 14:43 | Diff · History | -13 | Rv- redlinks |
| 2016-08-02 19:30 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article does not say that they are Chandravanshi |
| 2016-07-09 19:08 | Diff · History | -12 | The linked article projects controversial origin of caste and their Rajput claim has no source for verification. |
| 2016-06-27 21:34 | Diff · History | -14 | Rv- redlinks |
| 2016-04-26 23:09 | Diff · History | -16 | Reverted good faith edits by 14.140.253.129 (talk): Yet to be verified. Sources needed in the article. (TW) |
| 2016-04-24 21:39 | Diff · History | -16 | (reverted) Reverted edits by 14.140.253.129 (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2016-04-24 20:05 | Diff · History | -16 | (reverted) Reverted good faith edits by 14.140.253.129 (talk): Unverified claim. Linked article does not support it. (TW) |
| 2016-04-18 19:36 | Diff · History | 0 | Spelling/grammar correction |
| 2016-04-17 21:47 | Diff · History | -19 | Reverted edits by 14.140.253.129 (talk) to last version by 103.37.201.88 |
| 2016-01-01 23:45 | Diff · History | 0 | Target article does not mention them to be Agnivanshi |
| 2015-12-09 13:11 | Diff · History | 5 | wikilink title correction |
| 2015-12-09 13:08 | Diff · History | 6 | Target article claims none. Added to others. Find a source for the claims made |
| 2015-12-09 13:05 | Diff · History | 1 | Word "Rajput" not needed. All are Rajputs only |
| 2015-11-14 20:02 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article does not give any information to its lunar race affiliations |
| 2015-10-17 18:58 | Diff · History | 6 | Citation needed: Linked article dpes not claim Agnivansh ties |
| 2015-05-31 23:04 | Diff · History | 36 | (reverted) Reverted edits by Ogress (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2015-05-24 12:14 | Diff · History | -13 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-24 11:48 | Diff · History | -13 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-24 11:46 | Diff · History | -28 | They are Bhati branch. Bhati already included. The linked article has no chandravansh claim |
| 2015-05-24 11:42 | Diff · History | -12 | Punjabi rajputs already added here. however the linked article makes a Jat claim |
| 2015-05-24 11:39 | Diff · History | -32 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not explicitely claim a suryavansh |
| 2015-05-24 11:14 | Diff · History | 0 | linked article does not support Surya cat |
| 2015-05-24 11:11 | Diff · History | 0 | uncategorised. Linked Article has no claim |
| 2015-05-24 11:07 | Diff · History | 0 | linked article has a sourced statement doubting their origin |
| 2015-05-24 11:03 | Diff · History | -13 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not claim a suryavansh |
| 2015-05-24 11:01 | Diff · History | -14 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not make any other specific claim |
| 2015-05-22 20:22 | Diff · History | -12 | Duplicate Entry, corrected |
| 2015-05-18 22:03 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article claim a solar origin |
| 2015-05-18 22:01 | Diff · History | -22 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not claim an agnivansh exclusively |
| 2015-05-18 21:59 | Diff · History | -21 | Linked article does not claim an agnivansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:58 | Diff · History | -14 | Linked article does not claim a agnivansh. However both punjabi and muslim rajputs already added. |
| 2015-05-18 21:49 | Diff · History | -12 | Unsourced and challenged claim of being Yadu (Chandravanshi) in the linked article. |
| 2015-05-18 21:45 | Diff · History | -28 | Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:43 | Diff · History | -14 | Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:41 | Diff · History | -24 | They are jat as per the linked article. being related to Rajputs does not make them chandravanshi |
| 2015-05-18 21:38 | Diff · History | -30 | Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:36 | Diff · History | -11 | Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:34 | Diff · History | -11 | Linked article Gaur is an animal, not a human or Suryanashi |
| 2015-05-18 21:30 | Diff · History | -13 | A muslim rajput(already added), Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:28 | Diff · History | -14 | Muslim Rajputs already added. Linked article does not claim a chandravansh |
| 2015-05-18 21:25 | Diff · History | -13 | A punjabi rajput, who are already added |
| 2015-05-18 21:24 | Diff · History | -13 | Linked article says that they are muslim rajputs, which is already added among others category |
| 2015-05-18 21:23 | Diff · History | -13 | Linked article says that they are muslim rajputs, which is already added among others category |
| 2015-05-18 21:20 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article does not claim. Unclassified. Placing among Others |
| 2015-05-18 21:15 | Diff · History | 0 | Linked article claims a Suryavansha for them |
| 2015-05-18 21:11 | Diff · History | -13 | Disputed Shudra caste named Kachchi, Linked article does not prove them Suryavanshi |
| 2015-05-18 21:06 | Diff · History | -30 | Linked article says that they are Jat or Bisnoi, who are no way a rajput caste |
| 2015-05-17 21:19 | Diff · History | -16 | The linked article does not even mention that they are suryavanshi or rajputs |
| 2015-05-17 21:17 | Diff · History | -12 | Lniked article redirects to Gahlot, already present here |
| 2015-05-17 21:13 | Diff · History | -12 | Linked article says that they are Jadaun rajputs of chandravansh, which is already included |
| 2015-05-17 21:04 | Diff · History | -13 | Linked article says they are Gurjar and not claiming for any category |
| 2015-05-17 21:00 | Diff · History | -2 | typo fix |
| 2015-05-17 20:59 | Diff · History | 2 | The linked article shows they are suryavanshi, however the article is fully unsourced |
| 2015-05-06 12:31 | Diff · History | -28 | {{good faith}}, Sorry, the linked articles does not support the inclusion. |
| 2015-04-27 18:34 | Diff · History | -13 | Duplicate terms pointing to the same article |
| 2015-04-26 09:19 | Diff · History | -22 | {{good faith}}, Sorry, the linked articles does not support the inclusion. |
| 2015-04-26 09:15 | Diff · History | -12 | {{good faith}}, it has been discussed previously. Follow the talk page please |
| 2015-04-21 13:46 | Diff · History | -14 | Reverted edits by 122.129.84.84 (talk) to last version by Sitush |
| 2015-04-04 19:13 | Diff · History | -12 | Reverted 1 edit by Decentscholar (talk): Please refer the edit history and dont repeat the controversial things . (TW) |
| 2015-04-04 13:23 | Diff · History | -67 | Reverted to revision 654314126 by Redrose64 (talk): Disruptive edits leading to deface. reverting to previous best. (TW) |
| 2015-03-30 20:08 | Diff · History | 13 | Let this be included to avoid 50 more entries claiming this origin. |
| 2015-03-29 11:17 | Diff · History | -10 | Reverted to revision 653783998 by Sitush (talk): Not required as they claim to be from the Bhatti/ Jadaun stock and both Bhati and Jadaun are already on the listi. (TW) |
| 2015-03-27 12:22 | Diff · History | -117 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 651384249 by Mahensingha (talk): Unsourced claims. (TW) |
| 2015-03-14 20:54 | Diff · History | -28 | Reverted edits by Nawabmalhi (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2015-03-14 20:24 | Diff · History | -28 | (reverted) Reverted edits by Nawabmalhi (talk) to last version by Mahensingha |
| 2015-03-14 12:57 | Diff · History | -24 | Reverted to revision 646937317 by Sitush (talk): A lot of unsourced information making template misinformative. Removed. (TW) |
| 2015-03-10 15:49 | Diff · History | -57 | (reverted) Reverted edits by 73.162.148.115 (talk) to last version by Noq |
| 2015-02-10 11:30 | Diff · History | -24 | (reverted) Reverted 1 edit by 1.22.73.39 (talk) to last revision by Rubbish computer. (TW) |
| 2015-02-09 11:22 | Diff · History | -12 | Reverted 1 edit by 1.22.187.118 (talk): Goodfaith, none of the source proves them as Rajput . (TW) |
| 2015-01-20 17:18 | Diff · History | -25 | Reverted to revision 629027704 by Noq (talk): Please express genuinity of addition on the talk page with reliable sources. (TW) |
| 2014-09-20 16:02 | Diff · History | -10 | Reverting unexplained content removal: Also the link refers not to a Rajput clan but to a video technology |
| 2012-12-29 14:13 | Diff · History | -5 | Fixing style/layout errors |
| 2012-10-20 19:29 | Diff · History | 5 | Tag correction |
| 2012-06-05 17:27 | Diff · History | 11 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:42 | Diff · History | 6 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:38 | Diff · History | -11 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:35 | Diff · History | -5 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:34 | Diff · History | 4 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:31 | Diff · History | 1 | |
| 2012-02-14 20:28 | Diff · History | 24 |
All times are in UTC.