Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | .NET Framework (Log · Page History) |
| User | Hervegirod (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 110 |
| Minor edits | 22 (20%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 5 (4.5%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (0.9%) |
| atbe1 | 18.4 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 9,383 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -20,521 |
Minor edits
·
22 (20%)
Major edits
·
88 (80%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
5 (4.5%)
Manual edits
·
105 (95.5%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (0.9%)
Unreverted edits
·
109 (99.1%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-25 23:54 | Diff · History | -25 | →Memory management: |
| 2012-01-25 23:53 | Diff · History | -21 | →Memory management in Dot net Framework: the article is avbout .NET, therefore the footer is not useful |
| 2011-08-02 12:55 | Diff · History | 397 | why removoing the |
| 2011-06-25 11:48 | Diff · History | 0 | better to rename versoins as history, and put it more up the page |
| 2011-06-25 11:38 | Diff · History | 60 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:34 | Diff · History | -17 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:33 | Diff · History | 9 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:32 | Diff · History | 45 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:30 | Diff · History | 1 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:28 | Diff · History | -28 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2011-06-25 11:26 | Diff · History | -88 | →Alternative implementations: removed some text, which is better found in the Mono article. |
| 2011-03-08 00:11 | Diff · History | 20 | →Principal design features: too many mistakes. need to go to bed ! |
| 2011-03-08 00:10 | Diff · History | 11 | →Principal design features: sorry for the mess, I used "{" instead of "[[". I should know better |
| 2011-03-07 22:31 | Diff · History | 10 | (reverted) →Principal design features: we need to sources the paragraph properly, and attribute it to Microsoft if they marketed it. |
| 2011-02-12 12:00 | Diff · History | -11 | remove a leading ''''' on a title that appears to have been added by mistake |
| 2011-02-08 23:01 | Diff · History | 167 | →Memory management: |
| 2011-02-08 22:58 | Diff · History | 8 | →Memory management: "explicit double-call" should be sourced |
| 2010-12-19 13:25 | Diff · History | 180 | →Versions: |
| 2010-12-19 11:56 | Diff · History | -19,098 | →Versions: removed the version list, which clutters the article, keeping only an overview, and linking to a new .NET Framework version history article |
| 2010-12-19 11:54 | Diff · History | -86 | →External links: Download .NET framework is not an encyclopedic link |
| 2010-12-19 11:46 | Diff · History | 27 | →See also: |
| 2010-12-04 14:38 | Diff · History | -6 | Undid revision 400478196 by 122.164.159.132 (talk) |
| 2010-04-25 15:30 | Diff · History | 25 | |
| 2010-04-25 15:29 | Diff · History | -6 | |
| 2010-04-25 15:29 | Diff · History | -4 | |
| 2010-03-08 01:40 | Diff · History | 9 | |
| 2010-01-30 16:05 | Diff · History | 47 | →Principal design features: |
| 2009-08-09 13:41 | Diff · History | -25 | Undid revision 306973130 by 116.72.117.196 (talk) |
| 2009-08-03 13:09 | Diff · History | -247 | →Standardization and licensing: |
| 2009-08-03 13:07 | Diff · History | 186 | →Standardization and licensing: |
| 2009-08-03 13:07 | Diff · History | 5 | →Standardization and licensing: |
| 2009-08-03 13:06 | Diff · History | 669 | →Standardization and licensing: |
| 2009-05-21 10:57 | Diff · History | -42 | rv vandalsim by Special:Contributions/122.168.195.15 |
| 2009-04-05 09:39 | Diff · History | -48 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: the sources all state Windows as a requirement |
| 2009-02-22 15:00 | Diff · History | -6 | →.NET Framework 4.0: |
| 2009-02-22 14:59 | Diff · History | 522 | →.NET Framework 4.0: |
| 2009-02-22 13:45 | Diff · History | 9 | →.NET Framework 4.0: |
| 2009-02-21 12:35 | Diff · History | 28 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: clearer |
| 2009-02-15 10:49 | Diff · History | -4 | →Criticism: |
| 2009-02-15 10:49 | Diff · History | 31 | →Criticism: |
| 2009-02-15 10:46 | Diff · History | 366 | →Service Pack 1: |
| 2009-02-15 10:36 | Diff · History | 27 | →Service Pack 1: |
| 2009-02-15 10:30 | Diff · History | -56 | rm link spam |
| 2008-12-06 12:48 | Diff · History | 16 | →Standardization and licensing: be clear about the fact that the reference license is not open-sourc |
| 2008-09-21 10:05 | Diff · History | 7 | →Alternative implementations: fix license |
| 2008-09-21 10:01 | Diff · History | 62 | →Alternative implementations: link to the right license |
| 2008-09-21 10:00 | Diff · History | 1 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2008-09-21 10:00 | Diff · History | 8 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2008-09-21 09:59 | Diff · History | 68 | →Alternative implementations: |
| 2008-09-11 21:07 | Diff · History | 156 | Undid revision 237729168 by 142.176.124.17 (talk) |
| 2008-07-14 12:15 | Diff · History | -14 | Undid revision 225552652 by 59.96.71.239 (talk) |
| 2008-07-05 12:52 | Diff · History | 31 | →.NET Framework 3.5: |
| 2008-07-05 12:51 | Diff · History | 97 | →.NET Framework 3.5: |
| 2008-06-29 16:21 | Diff · History | 5 | better better phrasing ;-) |
| 2008-06-25 00:25 | Diff · History | -21 | I don't think there is any difference between compiled JIT and compiled dynamically |
| 2008-05-23 21:29 | Diff · History | 134 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: clarify Microsft License for .NET |
| 2008-04-26 22:48 | Diff · History | 0 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: |
| 2008-04-26 22:47 | Diff · History | 30 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: |
| 2008-03-09 17:35 | Diff · History | -12 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-03-08 23:37 | Diff · History | -65 | wz talk about 3.5, not 3.0 , and there is not only Vista in the world of Windows OS |
| 2008-02-24 20:31 | Diff · History | -12 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-02-24 20:30 | Diff · History | -202 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-02-24 20:29 | Diff · History | 2 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-02-24 20:29 | Diff · History | 0 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-02-24 20:28 | Diff · History | 357 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-02-03 11:30 | Diff · History | 8 | →Design goals and principal features: |
| 2008-02-03 11:28 | Diff · History | 82 | →Design goals and principal features: |
| 2008-02-03 11:16 | Diff · History | 281 | →Disadvantages: |
| 2008-01-12 16:53 | Diff · History | 8 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: |
| 2008-01-12 14:55 | Diff · History | -30 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: the reference says nothing about the use of non-java JVM languages |
| 2007-11-18 18:11 | Diff · History | -57 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: the Mono website does not say anything about "96% support", so I changed the wording |
| 2007-11-02 10:03 | Diff · History | 36 | Undid revision 168679795 by JAnDbot , this bot seems to have a problem |
| 2007-10-31 23:39 | Diff · History | 27 | →Assemblies: link to VB.NET for clarification |
| 2007-10-31 23:38 | Diff · History | -8 | →Assemblies: rm 2nd Private |
| 2007-10-28 09:43 | Diff · History | 183 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: |
| 2007-10-28 09:37 | Diff · History | 0 | →.NET vs. Java and Java EE: support for .NET 2.0 is planned for Mono 2.2 |
| 2007-10-28 09:28 | Diff · History | 56 | link to Microsoft_Reference_License |
| 2007-10-09 20:20 | Diff · History | -19 | rm the part about .NET on MAC OSX. The ref i about Silverlight, and Silverlight is not .NET, just a part of it. For the moment, the MS .NET stack is only available on MS |
| 2007-07-13 20:47 | Diff · History | 1 | →Design goals and principal features: at par with the end of the sentence |
| 2007-06-17 16:31 | Diff · History | -106 | →Criticism: rm the part about forcing or allowing programmers to make assumptions about OS, does not have anything to do with the rest of the bullet |
| 2007-06-17 09:26 | Diff · History | 0 | →Criticism: mv part about .NET ties to Windows, best near the part about system requirements |
| 2007-06-17 09:22 | Diff · History | 7 | →Criticism: |
| 2007-06-17 09:22 | Diff · History | 157 | →Criticism: |
| 2007-05-19 10:59 | Diff · History | 19 | wiki link |
| 2007-03-25 14:21 | Diff · History | 32 | add POV tag on the two sections that seems to arise most neutrality problems (see talk) |
| 2007-03-25 14:18 | Diff · History | -66 | fix layout problem with wikitable |
| 2007-02-10 10:08 | Diff · History | 14 | →Design goals and principal features: clarify |
| 2007-02-04 19:51 | Diff · History | -6 | →Criticism: typo |
| 2007-02-04 11:14 | Diff · History | 1,263 | →Criticism: try to add facts about .NET patents and Microsoft / Novell deal |
| 2007-02-03 10:53 | Diff · History | 112 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-11-19 18:53 | Diff · History | -45 | →.NET vs Java and the J2EE: delete incomprehensible sentence |
| 2006-11-19 18:52 | Diff · History | 255 | →.NET vs Java and the J2EE: |
| 2006-11-05 14:27 | Diff · History | 48 | →Design goals and principal features: |
| 2006-11-05 14:25 | Diff · History | 47 | →See also: |
| 2006-10-25 21:28 | Diff · History | 27 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-10-25 21:23 | Diff · History | 102 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-10-25 21:22 | Diff · History | 2 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-10-25 21:21 | Diff · History | 276 | →Criticism: backwrd breaking changes |
| 2006-10-14 09:26 | Diff · History | 53 | →.NET vs. Java: languages support |
| 2006-10-08 21:07 | Diff · History | 17 | interwiki link |
| 2006-10-08 18:16 | Diff · History | 926 | →Standardization and Licensing: |
| 2006-10-01 22:34 | Diff · History | -40 | .NET vs. Java EE : the two things don't differentiate .NET from Java : Java is cross-platform, so also cross-windows-versions, and there are more than the Java language for the JVM |
| 2006-09-15 19:36 | Diff · History | 27 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-07-23 09:29 | Diff · History | 1 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-07-23 09:21 | Diff · History | 354 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-07-14 23:14 | Diff · History | 6 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-07-14 23:06 | Diff · History | 1 | →Standardization and Licensing: |
| 2006-07-14 23:05 | Diff · History | 441 | licensing |
| 2006-07-14 22:55 | Diff · History | 45 | →Criticism: |
| 2006-07-14 19:59 | Diff · History | 646 | criticisms |
All times are in UTC.