Cannabis Ruderalis

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Maqola Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations (Qaydnoma · Sahifa tarixi)
Foydalanuvchi Geometry guy (Tahrir hisoblagichi· Top Edits)
Jami tahrirlar 586
Kichik tahrirlari 40 (6,8%)
(Yarim)avtomatik tahrirlash 4 (0,7%)
Reverted edits 4 (0,7%)
atbe1 4,4
Qoʻshildi (bayt)2 356 313
O‘chirilgan (bayt) -3 515
Kichik tahrirlari · 40 (6,8%)
Katta tahrirlar · 546 (93,2%)
(Yarim)avtomatik tahrirlash · 4 (0,7%)
Qoʻlda tahrirlash · 582 (99,3%)
Reverted edits · 4 (0,7%)
Unreverted edits · 582 (99,3%)
1 Tahrirlashlar orasidagi oʻrtacha vaqt (kunlar)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (taxminiy)
Sana Havolalar Hajmi Tahrir izohi
Farq · Tarix 1 226 Another solution? Co-nominations: Amplify idea and potential benefits
Farq · Tarix 369 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
Farq · Tarix 0 Oppose: fix numbering
Farq · Tarix 558 Oppose: Not in spirit of GA: suggest alternative below: co-nominations
Farq · Tarix 282 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
Farq · Tarix 1 994 Another solution? Co-nominations: new section
Farq · Tarix 626 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Failing without a hold is an option that should be used more widely in preference to quickfails
Farq · Tarix 242 Harvard citations: Thanks and comment
Farq · Tarix 205 Some problems after Chris G's change: GAN error issue
Farq · Tarix 135 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Great - watchlisted
Farq · Tarix 1 179 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: With tears in my eyes, options for GA, and this article
Farq · Tarix 510 Category Splitting: Comment
Farq · Tarix -298 RFC to make FA leaders elected, not appointed: rm
Farq · Tarix 450 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Reply to Aircorn
Farq · Tarix 1 109 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Oppose limits on nominations, obviously, and reply to Imzadi, Czarkoff
Farq · Tarix 401 30 day limit proposal: Great idea
Farq · Tarix 328 30 day limit proposal: Not just needing clarification, but completely wrong-headed
Farq · Tarix 262 30 day limit proposal: Bad law makes for bad implementation
Farq · Tarix 49 Jerem43's reviews: Hard cases make bad law
Farq · Tarix 326 Jerem43's reviews: Er, what?
Farq · Tarix 1 817 Is suggestion (review Artcile X by editor A, and he may return the favor by reviewing your article) ok?: It isn't about appearances, but good reviewing
Farq · Tarix 2 Withdrawing nominations:
Farq · Tarix 339 Withdrawing nominations: Add reminder of GA no-buro principle
Farq · Tarix 154 Withdrawing nominations: Done
Farq · Tarix 913 Withdrawing nominations: new section
Farq · Tarix 246 Reviewing templates: Reply to WAID
Farq · Tarix 9 Reviewing templates:
Farq · Tarix 294 Reviewing templates: Replies to WAID
Farq · Tarix 109 Tony Blair: Hopefully resolved
Farq · Tarix 234 Renaming an article while undergoing GA process: Reply
Farq · Tarix 1 060 Picture licensing question: Reply
Farq · Tarix 161 How to classify a medieval fair?: Suggestion
Farq · Tarix 737 Wrongly failed GA's: Use GAR, but make clear that your preferred outcome is restoring the nomination
Farq · Tarix 271 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: Fixed
Farq · Tarix 783 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: reply
Farq · Tarix 192 GAN Statistic: Reply
Farq · Tarix 389 Bot glitch: Now fixed, and how to avoid this in future
Farq · Tarix 424 Bot glitch: Back "on hold", problem recurs.
Farq · Tarix -97 Bot glitch: Still not fixed
Farq · Tarix 260 Bot glitch: Update reply to Wizardman
Farq · Tarix 551 Bot glitch: Reply to Wizardman
Farq · Tarix 438 GAN Statistic: Suggested location
Farq · Tarix 404 Bot glitch: Bot is adding a blank line
Farq · Tarix 698 Bot glitch: Possible causes
Farq · Tarix 550 Abandoned GAR: Fixed - suggested process
Farq · Tarix 398 Clarification please?: Template name is historical, article history is more clear
Farq · Tarix 455 Karma system: Data can be helpful, but can also be misused
Farq · Tarix 153 Taking over a GA review: Thanks for reporting it here
Farq · Tarix 782 Karma system: GA depends upon its integrity and goal: to list precisely those articles which meet the GA criteria
Farq · Tarix 622 Good article nominations: Two comments
Farq · Tarix 458 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: Comment on reevaluation
Farq · Tarix 906 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: new section
Farq · Tarix 1 281 10,000 GAs: a time to celebrate and refocus on our mission: new section
Farq · Tarix 441 Time to limit nominations: And this is the wrong time to decide so
Farq · Tarix 104 StatisticianBot back up and running: Thanks you again
Farq · Tarix 946 Are IPs allowed to nominate articles?: Disentangle complicated story
Farq · Tarix 2 673 Proposal to change the broadness criteria: Long comment
Farq · Tarix 304 Since this is automated: Done long ago: here's the link
Farq · Tarix 281 Editors are still doing things manually: Comment
Farq · Tarix 403 Glitch on the project page: Precedent
Farq · Tarix 345 New bot and Template:ArticleHistory: Good question, partial answer
Farq · Tarix 445 Operation Paula: Heads up
Farq · Tarix 356 Operation Paula: Not nominated - try again
Farq · Tarix 278 automated GAN updates: Availability
Farq · Tarix 287 automated GAN updates: Suggest start date/time
Farq · Tarix 725 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
Farq · Tarix 39 224 Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Edge3
Farq · Tarix -39 814 (reverted)  Propose live trial
Farq · Tarix 590 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
Farq · Tarix 157 Page numbers for magazine articles: Added lines at WP:GACN
Farq · Tarix 721 Page numbers for magazine articles: Comment based on GA criteria
Farq · Tarix 1 261 Backlog = cap?: Comments on this topic and proposal
Farq · Tarix 1 079 Section break: Relative status of various pages
Farq · Tarix 587 Section break: Ideas so far
Farq · Tarix 1 310 Approval from GA Director: Two replies
Farq · Tarix 1 017 Approval from GA Director: Reply re GA-Class
Farq · Tarix 1 049 Approval from GA Director: Replies in 3 places
Farq · Tarix 1 458 Approval from GA Director: Agree with two ideas
Farq · Tarix 1 336 Approval from GA Director: Explanations of processes and comments
Farq · Tarix 642 GAN backlog drive: Another motivation: 10000 GAs
Farq · Tarix 41 Add archive box link
Farq · Tarix 189 Ann Romney nomination reopened without prejudice
Farq · Tarix 475 GAR for September 11 attacks: new section
Farq · Tarix 1 010 Community GAR reminder: new section
Farq · Tarix 138 Frequently Asked Questions infobox: Updated
Farq · Tarix 429 Review closing bot: Reply To Xtzou
Farq · Tarix 1 504 Review closing bot: Remarks and a question about automating WP:GAN
Farq · Tarix 170 Review requested: Done and thanks
Farq · Tarix 14 Collapse FAQ as reviewers primarily need to get to the TOC easily
Farq · Tarix 405 WP:Good article reassessment/Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)/2: new section
Farq · Tarix 115 Troubling trend?: WP:RGA
Farq · Tarix 519 Criterion 2b: Comment
Farq · Tarix 1 678 Criterion 2b: Comment
Farq · Tarix 1 398 Is this an article or a list?: eligibility vs passableness
Farq · Tarix 495 Is this an article or list?: Quote
Farq · Tarix 1 143 Is this an article or list?: Reply to dabomb
Farq · Tarix 226 Some strange GA reviews: PS to request
Farq · Tarix 403 Some strange GA reviews: Fixes, and request to check I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song); review page Talk:I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)/GA1
Farq · Tarix 273 Some strange GA reviews: What you do have to check
Farq · Tarix 313 Report bot: GAN/Status
Farq · Tarix 7 Some strange GA reviews: Brad Follmer returned to the nominations list and the review moved to /GA1/archive
Farq · Tarix 645 Some strange GA reviews: Concur plus comments
Farq · Tarix 423 Comment on new subtopics and current GAs
Farq · Tarix 133 GA Review transcluding multiple times: Blocked
Farq · Tarix 905 Bot is almost there: Page to watchlist and comment on
Farq · Tarix 223 Reviewer instructions on review page's edit box: Will do
Farq · Tarix 815 Things that still need to be accomplished: Comment
Farq · Tarix 1 Post-automation guidelines draft: Typo
Farq · Tarix 1 073 Post-automation guidelines draft: Support and flexibility for reviewers is the key
Farq · Tarix 581 Premature GAN: Comment
Farq · Tarix 629 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Suggest a back-up operation
Farq · Tarix 200 Further issues: That would help - good luck with the challenge!
Farq · Tarix 514 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment on templates
Farq · Tarix 364 Review by consensus: We don't need more of this, we need less of this
Farq · Tarix 1 141 Further issues: Edit summaries
Farq · Tarix 90 Green boxes: Agree with Diderot's dreams
Farq · Tarix 489 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Trim comment and start subsection on other issues
Farq · Tarix 2 203 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies
Farq · Tarix 268 another major issue with automated the GAN page: Different issue but would also be helpful
Farq · Tarix 621 Green boxes: Agree
Farq · Tarix 1 912 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies to Dr. Cash
Farq · Tarix 322 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment
Farq · Tarix 983 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Reply
Farq · Tarix 0 Update archive number
Farq · Tarix 998 Review by consensus: Comments
Farq · Tarix 805 Retitle and reply
Farq · Tarix 1 530 Bot is ready to take over: Further comments and issues
Farq · Tarix 763 Bot is ready to take over: Replies
Farq · Tarix 648 Bot is ready to take over: Benefit worth the effort
Farq · Tarix 173 Bot is ready to take over: Reply
Farq · Tarix 893 Review by consensus: 2.5 million articles are still crap; we need to fix them, not more bureaucracy
Farq · Tarix 574 Something to bring up when we reconsider putting the GA sign on article pages: Comment
Farq · Tarix 34 Link to new archive
Farq · Tarix 975 Bot is ready to take over: Comments
Farq · Tarix 636 Order of reviewing articles: Reply
Farq · Tarix 434 Order of reviewing articles: Encouraging editors who work on older nominations
Farq · Tarix 693 Neutral title and reply
Farq · Tarix 696 Question about recent quick fail: Looks like the workings of the anti-Pastafarian cabal to me
Farq · Tarix 173 Enforcement of seven day grace periods of articles on hold: FAQ would indeed help
Farq · Tarix 162 Proposal: Consensus
Farq · Tarix 156 Nomination restrictions: Refer to FAQ :
Farq · Tarix 133 Nomination restrictions: With what benefit?
Farq · Tarix 186 Nomination restrictions: Evidence please
Farq · Tarix 184 Nomination restrictions: May be a good idea; wikilink suitable page
Farq · Tarix 2 177 Nomination restrictions: Standard reasons and explanations
Farq · Tarix -85 Question on procedure, and perhaps templates: Fix double sig typo
Farq · Tarix 1 096 Any registered editor?: Summary: excellent advice above on when to ignore the rules
Farq · Tarix 1 705 Question - Theatre: Current set-up and general replies
Farq · Tarix 159 Question - Theatre: Problem?
Farq · Tarix 674 How short may a GA be?: Suggestions on TNA Legends Championship
Farq · Tarix 217 I agree. Move along please...
Farq · Tarix 322 milestone reached: Reply to Dr C
Farq · Tarix 207 milestone reached: Point of fact
Farq · Tarix 509 milestone reached: WP:GA/S
Farq · Tarix 887 milestone reached: Comments
Farq · Tarix 210 Reviewing guidelines: new section
Farq · Tarix 509 protection and stability.: Comment
Farq · Tarix 963 GA Process: Explain role of GA and its motivations
Farq · Tarix 190 GA1 template: If there is demand
Farq · Tarix 86 Any mathematicians about?: No probs
Farq · Tarix 424 Get on Your Boots withdrawing: Advantage of ArticleHistory
Farq · Tarix 426 Stability of section headings: new section
Farq · Tarix 786 Any reason why the peer review bot isn't reviewing GAN?: Comment
Farq · Tarix 187 Sweeps running gag :
Farq · Tarix 146 Content noticeboard: Not much
Farq · Tarix 1 085 Focus on main issues and provide some resources
Farq · Tarix 1 003 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Improving the encyclopedia
Farq · Tarix 131 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Strong point
Farq · Tarix 386 Homosexual transsexual: Reply
Farq · Tarix 1 444 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Yes
Farq · Tarix 1 253 Homosexual transsexual: Suggestion
Farq · Tarix 301 Good articles which are found wanting at FAC: new section
Farq · Tarix 362 Reassessment: point of GAN
Farq · Tarix -176 Oops my bad
Farq · Tarix 176 (reverted)  Fatbeard (South Park): GAN
Farq · Tarix 310 7 minute review: Comment on GAR
Farq · Tarix 86 An underused resource: No worries
Farq · Tarix 109 An underused resource: Transclusion
Farq · Tarix 243 An underused resource: Go for it
Farq · Tarix 493 An underused resource: new section
Farq · Tarix 166 What has happened with GA reviewing?: Pride for high quality reviews
Farq · Tarix 812 California Proposition 8 (2008): Link to similar recent case and similar solution
Farq · Tarix 44 New archive needed
Farq · Tarix 1 126 Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics: Comments and suggestion
Farq · Tarix 635 Quality of reviews: One review is not the end of the story
Farq · Tarix 240 Reviewing articles that you've reviewed before: Fine, the main issue is significant prior contribution to the article
Farq · Tarix -1 055 I said, enough
Farq · Tarix 1 055 (reverted)  Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Pyrotec
Farq · Tarix -1 055 (reverted)  Undid revision 277528672 by Pyrotec (talk)
Farq · Tarix 1 009 Using inappropriate criteria for quick fail reviews: Enough
Farq · Tarix 483 What should I do if an article I'm reviewing doesn't satisfy notability?: Reply
Farq · Tarix 1 143 Curious:
Farq · Tarix 178 Asking advice for GA category: Look to WP:GA
Farq · Tarix 324 Proposal to merge GAN & PR: Comment
Farq · Tarix 168 Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ruth Martin (Lassie)/1: Community reassessment - comments appreciated
Farq · Tarix 164 Being "broad", even when there are no references: a copy of raw data is still a primary source
Farq · Tarix 1 428 Being "broad", even when there are no references: Comment and address real issue
Farq · Tarix 345 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Suggest individual reassessment
Farq · Tarix 608 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Agree
Farq · Tarix 192 award for backlog cleaning:
Farq · Tarix 383 Is this a list?: "Should this be a list" is actually a better question
Farq · Tarix 615 Slow/unresponsive reviewer: Timescales
Farq · Tarix 178 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
Farq · Tarix 1 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
Farq · Tarix 186 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Transclusion onto talk page may have been the problem
Farq · Tarix 213 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Comment
Farq · Tarix 229 This process is broken: Add point of information
Farq · Tarix 612 This process is broken: Please slow down
Farq · Tarix 0 Break: Serious thought needed (typo)
Farq · Tarix 392 Break: Serious thought needed
Farq · Tarix 3 092 Break: Add to copy
Farq · Tarix 249 Problematic review: Please provide links, thanks
Farq · Tarix 950 Problematic review: Three short comments
Farq · Tarix 608 Problematic review: Replies
Farq · Tarix 13 How to handle the cricket nominations?: My own comment was unclear
Farq · Tarix 212 How to handle the cricket nominations?: Been meaning to comment on this, but too busy! SFB has the clearest answer for JRP!
Farq · Tarix 3 Problematic review:
Farq · Tarix 58 Problematic review:
Farq · Tarix 1 161 Problematic review: Then we need a proper review
Farq · Tarix 1 669 Is there a limit to how many noms you have?: Replies
Farq · Tarix 1 143 Question about offering tit for tat incentive: Helping the helpful is part of collegiate editing, but tit for tat is dangerous ground
Farq · Tarix 206 Just playing Devil's advocate: Best practice like this needs to encourage others
Farq · Tarix 608 Just playing Devil's advocate: When you are the lead reviewer, it is your call
Farq · Tarix 170 Just playing Devil's advocate: Even if it doesn't happen, there is no harm in encouraging it
Farq · Tarix 942 WP:Notability (fiction): Issue
Farq · Tarix 700 Just playing Devil's advocate: This is a nice idea in the context of open review
Farq · Tarix 639 WP:Notability (fiction): new section
Farq · Tarix 289 Mac OS X: Concise comment
Farq · Tarix 783 Question on comprehensiveness: Reply
Farq · Tarix 621 Question on comprehensiveness: This is a serious issue
Farq · Tarix 610 Question on comprehensiveness: WP:BLP
Farq · Tarix 1 661 Is there a limit to how many times this thread crops up?: Number of articles at GAN is irrelevant - indeed it provides reviewers with more choice - need to encourage more nominators to review
Farq · Tarix 282 GA guides: Links
Farq · Tarix 829 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Failing without a hold, but with a review should be encouraged
Farq · Tarix 885 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Comment
Farq · Tarix 188 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Ukraine and Slovakia
Farq · Tarix -7 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
Farq · Tarix 291 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
Farq · Tarix 950 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Anacronisms
Farq · Tarix 88 GA review not updating on article Talk page: WP:PURGE would be the usual answer
Farq · Tarix 1 313 As a review: Comment on reviewer levels and flexibility
Farq · Tarix 1 778 Poor quality articles:
Farq · Tarix 756 Poor quality articles: Reply
Farq · Tarix 703 Poor quality articles: Comment
Farq · Tarix 546 Request re section titles
Farq · Tarix 826 Drive-by fail: Simpler solution
Farq · Tarix 903 Drive by promotion of Zarqa River: Reply
Farq · Tarix 288 Drive-by nomination:
Farq · Tarix 356 Drive-by nomination: Reply
Farq · Tarix 889 Drive-by nomination: Done, but add general comment on quick-failing, administrative removal and failing without a hold
Farq · Tarix 580 Biology and medicine: Explain levels
Farq · Tarix 1 527 Criticism, not review: Confusion, query, and comment
Farq · Tarix 756 Biology and medicine: Reply and comment
Farq · Tarix 295 Model GA reviews: Request for more
Farq · Tarix 462 Model GA reviews: new section
Farq · Tarix 153 Question on how to disengage: Welcome, as responses demonstrate
Farq · Tarix 903 Quid pro quo and backlog: Comments
Farq · Tarix 211 Closing of nomination page: Set-up
Farq · Tarix 304 Quid pro quo and backlog: Agree
Farq · Tarix 360 Closing of nomination page: Comment
Farq · Tarix 250 GA and peer review: Fine
Farq · Tarix 476 GAN reviewer of the month, graph and comment
Farq · Tarix 949 Support: Support with comments
Farq · Tarix 399 Neutral: Comment
Farq · Tarix 304 Questions: Those cases were not typical
Farq · Tarix 246 Will add my own views in due course
Farq · Tarix 544 Questions: GAR can cope
Farq · Tarix 470 Neutral: Comment on reviewer numbers
Farq · Tarix 446 Oppose: Comment: I think this actually reduces instruction creep
Farq · Tarix 217 Please help with the ASCB workshop: What can we do to help?
Farq · Tarix 978 Plagiarism and reliable sources: new section
Farq · Tarix 52 new archive started; restructure slightly; 7->10d archiving
Farq · Tarix 0 A broken process?: Sigh, I should know how to sigh
Farq · Tarix 586 A broken process?: Nostalgia and elimination drives
Farq · Tarix 141 Please help with the ASCB workshop: UTC
Farq · Tarix 615 Limiting nominations?: Statistics
Farq · Tarix 118 Please help with the ASCB workshop: Count me in. UTC times would be helpful
Farq · Tarix 180 Community GAR reminder: Pretty please, and maybe alternative meaning of GAR would not meet with universal approval :
Farq · Tarix 167 User:Dr pda/Good article statistics: Reply
Farq · Tarix 301 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: Community reassessment opened
Farq · Tarix 1 094 Community GAR reminder: new section
Farq · Tarix 367 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: Reply
Farq · Tarix 1 169 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: new section
Farq · Tarix 563 Rule to make only established editors review for GA status?: Nothing to see here :
Farq · Tarix 1 401 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: I fail to see any signs of instability and not reviewing it goes against basic GA principles and considerable precedent
Farq · Tarix 215 Pressure of work: Reply
Farq · Tarix 70 Backlog update: Add
Farq · Tarix 149 Backlog update:
Farq · Tarix 545 Backlog update: new section
Farq · Tarix 255 Moving up nominations: New (albeit experimental) resource
Farq · Tarix 161 Withdraw a GAN - how to handle - Talk:Article/GA1: Agree
Farq · Tarix 200 Icons!: Confuses WikiProject ratings and community assessments
Farq · Tarix 2 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Fix link to featured topic criteria
Farq · Tarix 5 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: copyedit replies
Farq · Tarix 492 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Broadness and structural weaknesses
Farq · Tarix 423 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: The FTC need to be fixed methinks
Farq · Tarix 1 133 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Merge or even nominate for deletion!
Farq · Tarix 1 194 GAN - GA links
Farq · Tarix 302 Citation styles - MoS question: Beautifully formatted unreliable sources do not a GA make
Farq · Tarix 325 Links and reports: Well spotted
Farq · Tarix 365 Time for a purge: Provide member info from cats
Farq · Tarix 308 Time for a purge: Try asking Giggy
Farq · Tarix 379 Time for a purge: Advertising needed
Farq · Tarix 201 Review Page: Testing
Farq · Tarix 180 Review Page: Links added (new reviews only)
Farq · Tarix 1 273 Time for a purge: Comments and graph
Farq · Tarix 88 Strange transclusion problem: WP:PURGE
Farq · Tarix 186 Time for a purge: Link to previous drives
Farq · Tarix 429 "Featured short articles": Proposal added to encourage cross-process thinking
Farq · Tarix 218 GA review of Horse: Comment
Farq · Tarix 191 Confusing redirect question: Comment
Farq · Tarix 90 Confusing redirect question: Fixed
Farq · Tarix 164 5000 GAs! Congratulations to all
Farq · Tarix 402 A-Class: No hey banda
Farq · Tarix 362 0.7 DVD: Oh ye of little faith :
Farq · Tarix 538 0.7 DVD: Please help if you can
Farq · Tarix 834 Information is always a good thing, so I've updated the graphs :
Farq · Tarix 566 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: EC
Farq · Tarix 580 Help!: Reviewers have different styles; plus mention Template:GATable
Farq · Tarix 802 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: Issues and fixes: are there other examples?
Farq · Tarix 446 Screw up article talk page: All help with instructions is most welcome
Farq · Tarix 315 Screw up article talk page: Fixed, but are the instructions clear enough?
Farq · Tarix 428 GA review pages: Thought of that - comments?
Farq · Tarix 765 GA review pages: Comments
Farq · Tarix 1 518 Individual reassessment: new section
Farq · Tarix 469 Unappropriate delist: Comment on changes in process
Farq · Tarix 443 Backlog under 100: Good work, and request for help at WP:GAR
Farq · Tarix 323 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Another clue :
Farq · Tarix 453 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Attention folks... :
Farq · Tarix 243 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Coward! :
Farq · Tarix 203 GAN for 4X: Moved comments
Farq · Tarix 53 New archive and improve format
Farq · Tarix 774 How long is the backlog, typically?: Replies
Farq · Tarix 463 How long is the backlog, typically?: Float right updated backlog, and comment
Farq · Tarix 446 How long is the backlog, typically?: Don't see the point of GAN directors
Farq · Tarix 331 How long is the backlog, typically?: Something to watchlist
Farq · Tarix 347 Article history: Don't waste time with oldids
Farq · Tarix 126 Article history: Subpage system should help
Farq · Tarix 429 Article history: Yes, or maybe no
Farq · Tarix 313 New system: Clarifications always welcome
Farq · Tarix 96 New system: Reply to Peanut4
Farq · Tarix 193 New system: Reply to Peanut4
Farq · Tarix 160 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Okay in principle
Farq · Tarix -79 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Shorter reply
Farq · Tarix 582 Sphinx Head was removed from the nomination in an out-of-process manner.: All GAN actions need a permanently linkable review, however brief
Farq · Tarix 396 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Unnecessary
Farq · Tarix 18 Review page headers: Indent
Farq · Tarix 348 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
Farq · Tarix 1 235 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
Farq · Tarix 1 416 New system: Reply to VT
Farq · Tarix 201 new GA review programme.: Comment
Farq · Tarix 119 Template maintenance...: Asked
Farq · Tarix 36 new GA review programme.: Add that Gwinva is the main user applying the first technique
Farq · Tarix 956 new GA review programme.: Reply ec, and post ec
Farq · Tarix 1 052 Template maintenance...: Replies
Farq · Tarix 1 029 Request: don't make up subpage names: Comment on plans to improve the quality of individual reassessment reviews
Farq · Tarix 437 Request: don't make up subpage names: Reply to Malleus
Farq · Tarix 15 Request: don't make up subpage names: Tweak for clarity
Farq · Tarix 1 427 Request: don't make up subpage names: new section
Farq · Tarix 0 Transition to review subpages: Fix redlink
Farq · Tarix 0 Transition to review subpages: Typo
Farq · Tarix 294 Transition to review subpages: Not a fan but don't object as long as it is not required
Farq · Tarix 350 Subpage problem: Sort of fixed
Farq · Tarix 122 Transition to review subpages: Definite improvement, thanks Dr.C
Farq · Tarix 1 502 Transition to review subpages: Three comments
Farq · Tarix 471 Transition to review subpages: Comments on finishing reviews
Farq · Tarix 1 682 Transition to review subpages: new section
Farq · Tarix 217 Are these relevant instructions or just the first draft (section break): Will comment in a new section
Farq · Tarix 385 Subpage implementation (section break): Reply to Ruslik
Farq · Tarix 485 Subpage implementation (section break): Comment
Farq · Tarix 564 Subpage implementation (section break): Outstanding issues and my movements
Farq · Tarix 286 Subpage implementation (section break): Transitional issues
Farq · Tarix 236 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Split off subsection and comment on documentation
Farq · Tarix 0 Have i missed something lol: Typo
Farq · Tarix 2 369 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Templates created; describe process
Farq · Tarix 1 334 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Demonstrate proposed format (or at least a first draft) to see if there is consensus for it
Farq · Tarix 417 Have i missed something lol: Nice one
Farq · Tarix 646 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Need to move in stages
Farq · Tarix 2 183 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Details
Farq · Tarix 209 Alternative: Belated comment
Farq · Tarix 169 Alternative: All very well if there is someone who can do it
Farq · Tarix 1 119 Automation redux: Categories created to track errors, and comments
Farq · Tarix 2 960 Automation redux
Farq · Tarix 94 Help at GAR requested: Add a PS.
Farq · Tarix 1 284 Help at GAR requested: new section
Farq · Tarix 47 Long overdue start of new archive
Farq · Tarix 23 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Clarify
Farq · Tarix 552 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Comment
Farq · Tarix 669 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Link to delisting guidelines, and make suggestion
Farq · Tarix 1 144 Naming convention for a figure briefly in spotlight: Reply to Moni
Farq · Tarix 286 Suggestion:
Farq · Tarix 183 User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/GAN passed spam: Yes, it is a good idea to formalize this
Farq · Tarix 546 Permanent GA reviews: Comment
Farq · Tarix 140 Permanent GA reviews: Read the thread
Farq · Tarix 861 Permanent GA reviews: Accountability
Farq · Tarix 311 Permanent GA reviews: Clarify proposal
Farq · Tarix 2 Permanent GA reviews: Fix typo
Farq · Tarix 1 336 Odd method of reviewing: Talk page reviews are not permanent either
Farq · Tarix 727 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Amplify post ec: each WikiProject reaches its own assessment, not always the same
Farq · Tarix 5 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Fix my temporary dyslexia
Farq · Tarix 629 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Not our job
Farq · Tarix 112 Is this an acceptable GA review:
Farq · Tarix 184 Is this an acceptable GA review: Good luck iMatthew
Farq · Tarix 600 Is this an acceptable GA review: Comment
Farq · Tarix 491 Is this an acceptable GA review: No, and the article needs a lot of work
Farq · Tarix 844 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Explain
Farq · Tarix 562 Advice to article writers: Agree with Malleus and DHMO
Farq · Tarix 770 Gavin Newsom and current political figures in general: Comment and suggestions
Farq · Tarix 334 Can an article be on PR and GAN simultaneously?: It's allowed
Farq · Tarix 343 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Suggestions
Farq · Tarix 638 Can I review this?: Comments
Farq · Tarix 681 "If you're a registered user ...": Consensus?
Farq · Tarix 248 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Judgement is for humans to do, not bots :
Farq · Tarix 264 "If you're a registered user ...": In favour of IP noms
Farq · Tarix 1 481 Combined GAN template: Ready for testing on the road
Farq · Tarix 773 If no central training program, then Task Mentors?: Agree, page set up, but article history is for bots, not humans
Farq · Tarix 658 section break: Suggest {{GAN}}
Farq · Tarix 276 section break: StatisticianBot issue
Farq · Tarix 250 More space saving: Good idea
Farq · Tarix 546 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": September 2007 and the rest of WP
Farq · Tarix 339 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Lightweight
Farq · Tarix 648 Redrafting instructions block: Explain
Farq · Tarix 348 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Backlog elimination may be a good idea, but it didn't appear to work last time
Farq · Tarix 194 Redrafting instructions block: I don't understand what is easy about making three edits instead of one
Farq · Tarix 562 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Link, graph and comment
Farq · Tarix 1 060 Redrafting instructions block: I've tried!
Farq · Tarix 544 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Comfort for the regulars does not attract new reviewers, and they are what GAN needs
Farq · Tarix 157 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Another option is "engineering"
Farq · Tarix 479 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Suggest Geography as an alternative
Farq · Tarix 1 315 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": I agree, even though I favour putting articles on hold, and having second reviewers
Farq · Tarix 481 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: Agree and clarify
Farq · Tarix 192 The universe has exploded!: Rumours of the backlog being eliminated have been greatly exaggerated ;
Farq · Tarix 341 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: I agree: add a couple of links
Farq · Tarix 1 757 New proposal of guide for nominators: Comments
Farq · Tarix 791 WP:GAN header: Er, people don't read instructions
Farq · Tarix 627 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 9/2/2008: Eh, where's the banter? Add some :
Farq · Tarix 143 LONG: Done
Farq · Tarix 652 LONG: Over 32KB, but what is the point?
Farq · Tarix 368 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Explain point of review
Farq · Tarix 531 GA On Hold: Be flexible, I say
Farq · Tarix 51 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Improve sentence about delisting and clarify timescale
Farq · Tarix 1 542 Proposal: Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept
Farq · Tarix 353 GAR reviewers needed: Once every week or two would be enough
Farq · Tarix 1 563 GAR reviewers needed: new section
Farq · Tarix 540 Article History Template: GAR/ templates. Do same at GAN?
Farq · Tarix 266 Article History Template: Clarified: please use five tildes in the templates
Farq · Tarix 390 Plan of action: My understanding of the idea
Farq · Tarix 187 No TOC on this page?: __NOTOC__ on this page, to be precise: fixed
Farq · Tarix 0 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Remove transclusion of guidelines containing a __NOTOC__
Farq · Tarix 809 Suggestion for backlog: Another backlog elimination drive would help, but is not a long term solution
Farq · Tarix 16 Query re holds and GA requests: clarify: formalities of renomination
Farq · Tarix 258 Query re holds and GA requests: Formalities preferable, but you can pass it quite quickly if it meets the standard
Farq · Tarix 184 Article History Template: Please clarify
Farq · Tarix 246 Article History Template: Not yet
Farq · Tarix 102 Article failed by a major contributor: Thanks VT
Farq · Tarix 144 Article failed by a major contributor: renominate, but GAR is waiting ready if you need it
Farq · Tarix 682 Article History Template: Leave it to the bots
Farq · Tarix 412 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Reply to Pete
Farq · Tarix 284 Can nominators review?: No, it seems
Farq · Tarix 1 588 Can nominators review?: Comment
Farq · Tarix 209 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: You could use GAList/check
Farq · Tarix 341 Can nominators review?: Re Epbr's suggestion
Farq · Tarix 0 Can nominators review?: Fix typo
Farq · Tarix 1 577 Can nominators review?: new section
Farq · Tarix 183 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Fix my incorrect comment
Farq · Tarix 418 Image licensing issue: On image page suffices
Farq · Tarix 727 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Looks good so far
Farq · Tarix 452 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Great idea!
Farq · Tarix 199 Quality vs quantity: Agree 100%
Farq · Tarix 388 Quality vs quantity: Which template + addition to guidelines
Farq · Tarix 115 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Another option for Pete
Farq · Tarix 877 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to Pete: Use GAList, etc., but leave pass/fail blank until you make your decision
Farq · Tarix 157 Quick Failing an Aricticle due to nominator inactivity: Sure, but it is not a quick fail
Farq · Tarix 426 Wikilinking dates: Not a GA criterion
Farq · Tarix 523 Quality vs quantity: What is undemocratic? I'm curious
Farq · Tarix 13 Theatre, film and drama: Correct name of FA cat
Farq · Tarix -1 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Bad typo day :
Farq · Tarix -1 Quality vs quantity: Fix (very un-Freudian) typo! :
Farq · Tarix 862 Quality vs quantity: Ask Peanut4?
Farq · Tarix 257 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Graph
Farq · Tarix 207 Backlog and automation: "A bot failed my article!" - probably not a good idea :
Farq · Tarix 19 Quality vs quantity: Link editor
Farq · Tarix 2 503 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Two schools
Farq · Tarix 636 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on architecture
Farq · Tarix 1 480 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to VT
Farq · Tarix 56 Backlog and automation: It seems to me that we need a section break here: feel free to retitle it
Farq · Tarix 264 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on subdividing
Farq · Tarix 1 621 Backlog and automation: Reply to CP
Farq · Tarix -2 Backlog and automation: this->it
Farq · Tarix 620 Backlog and automation: Reply to Ruhrfisch
Farq · Tarix 447 Theatre, film and drama: new section
Farq · Tarix 1 255 Backlog and automation: Reply to DHMO
Farq · Tarix 3 299 Backlog and automation: new section
Farq · Tarix 116 Just Checking: No, it's updated regularly by a bot
Farq · Tarix 75 Just Checking: Wikilink guidelines: it is not a conflict of interest to fix problems with an article under review
Farq · Tarix 875 Just Checking: It is not a conflict of interest to copyedit during a review
Farq · Tarix 521 A-Class nominations: Reply
Farq · Tarix 190 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 15/12/2007: Wishful thinking?
Farq · Tarix 94 Templates: Thanks Pete
Farq · Tarix 576 On hold and second opinion: We lost another potential reviewer
Farq · Tarix 345 Templates: Its just technobabble for different ways of using templates
Farq · Tarix 333 Templates: Subst
Farq · Tarix 260 On hold and second opinion: Insight and wisdom
Farq · Tarix 859 On hold and second opinion: Comments
Farq · Tarix 382 Question about fail: Is it a reliable source?
Farq · Tarix 575 On hold and second opinion: Reply to VT and comment on redlinks
Farq · Tarix 2 584 On hold and second opinion: new section
Farq · Tarix 709 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Right idea, wrong template?
Farq · Tarix 178 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Done
Farq · Tarix -631 If you review an article...: Remove duplicate comment apparently in wrong section: Twigboy, revert me if this was your intention
Farq · Tarix 384 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Agree/reply
Farq · Tarix 1 765 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Both tenses are used
Farq · Tarix 488 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Multiple reviewers in series
Farq · Tarix 676 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Agree with goal, but not approach + note of realism (over ec)
Farq · Tarix 510 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: WP:OWN is about mainspace, but otherwise, Ling has a point
Farq · Tarix 138 Alphabet: More topical joke? :
Farq · Tarix 399 Alphabet: Order of top-level is used in multiple places
Farq · Tarix 479 Alphabet: This glitch was caused by a recent split
Farq · Tarix 490 Subsubtopics: Issues raised about e.g. "Music"
Farq · Tarix 859 Green: Various replies
Farq · Tarix 699 Tefillin, 17 days on hold: Removed "OnHold"
Farq · Tarix 342 Green: Lighter background adopted, plus attempt to fix first panel
Farq · Tarix 343 Subsubtopics: Done
Farq · Tarix 142 Subsubtopics: Will do
Farq · Tarix 466 Green: Explain cyan: also I tried a lighter colour at WP:WGA
Farq · Tarix 607 Pro Wrestling WikiProject: Not a conflict of interest, but thanks for commenting here
Farq · Tarix 509 Green: The delicate balance between lime and cyan :
Farq · Tarix 396 Green: Try to clarify question in order to understand answers
Farq · Tarix 905 Green: Questions
Farq · Tarix 187 GAList3 is now available: Sorted
Farq · Tarix 401 I will try: Biographies are not listed separately, but within each subject (apologies that no one replied to you sooner)
Farq · Tarix 356 Subsubtopics: new section
Farq · Tarix 301 GAList3 is now available: Deleted: good luck with Balzac!
Farq · Tarix 451 GAList3 is now available: FGAN and PGAN? I can help if you like
Farq · Tarix 307 GAList3 is now available: Clarify, I hope ;
Farq · Tarix 212 Slipping: Nice idea
Farq · Tarix 386 GAList3 is now available: Great, but why the new template name?
Farq · Tarix 462 Slipping: That is what I meant, thanks EyeSerene :
Farq · Tarix 829 Slipping: We need some simplification and automation in my opinion
Farq · Tarix 972 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Reply to Moni3
Farq · Tarix 585 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Remove image
Farq · Tarix 535 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 27/10/2007: Criteria are fairly simple ;
Farq · Tarix 153 Homeopathy nomination: Yu
Farq · Tarix 387 Homeopathy nomination: Check out the talk page maybe?
Farq · Tarix 94 Homeopathy nomination: Which topic?
Farq · Tarix 288 More trouble than it's worth?: If nominators wrongly categorize, recategorize!
Farq · Tarix 83 More trouble than it's worth?: Agree
Farq · Tarix 239 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 13/10/2007: Procedural error? ;
Farq · Tarix 259 Scalability: Discuss automation further at WP:WGA?
Farq · Tarix 664 Scalability: Automation and quality checking
Farq · Tarix 469 Backlog: Wishful thinking
Farq · Tarix 1 Update name
Farq · Tarix 449 Scalability: Two replies
Farq · Tarix 116 Chicago Marathon: Not a serious concern
Farq · Tarix 146 Chicago Marathon: Looks like it fails criterion 5 to me ;
Farq · Tarix 3 250 Scalability: Replies and further thoughts
Farq · Tarix 1 Scalability: tense
Farq · Tarix 52 Scalability: Clarify a few statistical points
Farq · Tarix 2 963 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Making this process scalable
Farq · Tarix 1 404 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: A few replies
Farq · Tarix 359 LONG: It's radical stuff indeed
Farq · Tarix 366 Review workshop: Argued against this, but good luck
Farq · Tarix -139 Update archive
Farq · Tarix 264 LONG: It is just one click awaty
Farq · Tarix 558 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: It aint about tidying, it is about efficiency
Farq · Tarix 202 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?:
Farq · Tarix 245 LONG: new section
Farq · Tarix 696 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Replies and clarifications
Farq · Tarix 1 998 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: new section
Farq · Tarix -944 Undid revision 161837928 by Derek.cashman (talk) Return GA talk page query to original location
Farq · Tarix 189 Streamlining: More minor changes
Farq · Tarix 639 Streamlining: new section
Farq · Tarix 18 Option 2: Nominations: Page moved and redirects fixed
Farq · Tarix 6 Update archive links
Farq · Tarix 144 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Nice one
Farq · Tarix 0 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Noun not verb, sorryu
Farq · Tarix 315 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Best practise?
Farq · Tarix 106 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?:
Farq · Tarix 129 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: GAList
Farq · Tarix 347 Option 2: Nominations: Admin needed
Farq · Tarix 455 References in the lead section: Footnotes and citations in the lead are permissible but not required
Farq · Tarix 591 Option 2: Nominations: Definitions and practicalities
Farq · Tarix 545 Option 2: Nominations: GAR and nominee/nomination
Farq · Tarix 3 149 A rose by any other name: new section
Farq · Tarix 309 Wikiproject logic exists, should a Logic category exist also?: I think it is unnecessary and unhelpful
Farq · Tarix 522 {{tl|ArticleHistory}}: Fixed
Barcha vaqtlar UTCʼda koʻrsatilgan.

Leave a Reply