Cannabis Ruderalis

Самые активные правки статьи Все изменения, внесённые на страницу одним пользователем, в хронологическом порядке.

Мәкалә Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations (Журнал · История)
Участник Geometry guy (Счётчик правок· Наибольшее количество правок)
Всего правок 586
Малых правок 40 (6,8 %)
(Полу)автоматических правок 4 (0,7 %)
Откаченных правок 4 (0,7 %)
atbe1 4,4
Добавлено (байт)2 356 313
Удалено (байты) -3 515
Малых правок · 40 (6,8 %)
Немалых правок · 546 (93,2 %)
(Полу)автоматических правок · 4 (0,7 %)
Ручные правки · 582 (99,3 %)
Откаченных правок · 4 (0,7 %)
Неотмёненные редакции · 582 (99,3 %)
1 Среднее время между правками (в днях)
2 Добавленный текст — любое положительное дополнение, которое не было отменено (приблизит.)
Дата Ссылок Размер Описание правок
Изменение · История 1 226 Another solution? Co-nominations: Amplify idea and potential benefits
Изменение · История 369 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
Изменение · История 0 Oppose: fix numbering
Изменение · История 558 Oppose: Not in spirit of GA: suggest alternative below: co-nominations
Изменение · История 282 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
Изменение · История 1 994 Another solution? Co-nominations: new section
Изменение · История 626 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Failing without a hold is an option that should be used more widely in preference to quickfails
Изменение · История 242 Harvard citations: Thanks and comment
Изменение · История 205 Some problems after Chris G's change: GAN error issue
Изменение · История 135 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Great - watchlisted
Изменение · История 1 179 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: With tears in my eyes, options for GA, and this article
Изменение · История 510 Category Splitting: Comment
Изменение · История -298 RFC to make FA leaders elected, not appointed: rm
Изменение · История 450 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Reply to Aircorn
Изменение · История 1 109 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Oppose limits on nominations, obviously, and reply to Imzadi, Czarkoff
Изменение · История 401 30 day limit proposal: Great idea
Изменение · История 328 30 day limit proposal: Not just needing clarification, but completely wrong-headed
Изменение · История 262 30 day limit proposal: Bad law makes for bad implementation
Изменение · История 49 Jerem43's reviews: Hard cases make bad law
Изменение · История 326 Jerem43's reviews: Er, what?
Изменение · История 1 817 Is suggestion (review Artcile X by editor A, and he may return the favor by reviewing your article) ok?: It isn't about appearances, but good reviewing
Изменение · История 2 Withdrawing nominations:
Изменение · История 339 Withdrawing nominations: Add reminder of GA no-buro principle
Изменение · История 154 Withdrawing nominations: Done
Изменение · История 913 Withdrawing nominations: new section
Изменение · История 246 Reviewing templates: Reply to WAID
Изменение · История 9 Reviewing templates:
Изменение · История 294 Reviewing templates: Replies to WAID
Изменение · История 109 Tony Blair: Hopefully resolved
Изменение · История 234 Renaming an article while undergoing GA process: Reply
Изменение · История 1 060 Picture licensing question: Reply
Изменение · История 161 How to classify a medieval fair?: Suggestion
Изменение · История 737 Wrongly failed GA's: Use GAR, but make clear that your preferred outcome is restoring the nomination
Изменение · История 271 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: Fixed
Изменение · История 783 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: reply
Изменение · История 192 GAN Statistic: Reply
Изменение · История 389 Bot glitch: Now fixed, and how to avoid this in future
Изменение · История 424 Bot glitch: Back "on hold", problem recurs.
Изменение · История -97 Bot glitch: Still not fixed
Изменение · История 260 Bot glitch: Update reply to Wizardman
Изменение · История 551 Bot glitch: Reply to Wizardman
Изменение · История 438 GAN Statistic: Suggested location
Изменение · История 404 Bot glitch: Bot is adding a blank line
Изменение · История 698 Bot glitch: Possible causes
Изменение · История 550 Abandoned GAR: Fixed - suggested process
Изменение · История 398 Clarification please?: Template name is historical, article history is more clear
Изменение · История 455 Karma system: Data can be helpful, but can also be misused
Изменение · История 153 Taking over a GA review: Thanks for reporting it here
Изменение · История 782 Karma system: GA depends upon its integrity and goal: to list precisely those articles which meet the GA criteria
Изменение · История 622 Good article nominations: Two comments
Изменение · История 458 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: Comment on reevaluation
Изменение · История 906 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: new section
Изменение · История 1 281 10,000 GAs: a time to celebrate and refocus on our mission: new section
Изменение · История 441 Time to limit nominations: And this is the wrong time to decide so
Изменение · История 104 StatisticianBot back up and running: Thanks you again
Изменение · История 946 Are IPs allowed to nominate articles?: Disentangle complicated story
Изменение · История 2 673 Proposal to change the broadness criteria: Long comment
Изменение · История 304 Since this is automated: Done long ago: here's the link
Изменение · История 281 Editors are still doing things manually: Comment
Изменение · История 403 Glitch on the project page: Precedent
Изменение · История 345 New bot and Template:ArticleHistory: Good question, partial answer
Изменение · История 445 Operation Paula: Heads up
Изменение · История 356 Operation Paula: Not nominated - try again
Изменение · История 278 automated GAN updates: Availability
Изменение · История 287 automated GAN updates: Suggest start date/time
Изменение · История 725 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
Изменение · История 39 224 Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Edge3
Изменение · История -39 814 (отмена произведена)  Propose live trial
Изменение · История 590 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
Изменение · История 157 Page numbers for magazine articles: Added lines at WP:GACN
Изменение · История 721 Page numbers for magazine articles: Comment based on GA criteria
Изменение · История 1 261 Backlog = cap?: Comments on this topic and proposal
Изменение · История 1 079 Section break: Relative status of various pages
Изменение · История 587 Section break: Ideas so far
Изменение · История 1 310 Approval from GA Director: Two replies
Изменение · История 1 017 Approval from GA Director: Reply re GA-Class
Изменение · История 1 049 Approval from GA Director: Replies in 3 places
Изменение · История 1 458 Approval from GA Director: Agree with two ideas
Изменение · История 1 336 Approval from GA Director: Explanations of processes and comments
Изменение · История 642 GAN backlog drive: Another motivation: 10000 GAs
Изменение · История 41 Add archive box link
Изменение · История 189 Ann Romney nomination reopened without prejudice
Изменение · История 475 GAR for September 11 attacks: new section
Изменение · История 1 010 Community GAR reminder: new section
Изменение · История 138 Frequently Asked Questions infobox: Updated
Изменение · История 429 Review closing bot: Reply To Xtzou
Изменение · История 1 504 Review closing bot: Remarks and a question about automating WP:GAN
Изменение · История 170 Review requested: Done and thanks
Изменение · История 14 Collapse FAQ as reviewers primarily need to get to the TOC easily
Изменение · История 405 WP:Good article reassessment/Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)/2: new section
Изменение · История 115 Troubling trend?: WP:RGA
Изменение · История 519 Criterion 2b: Comment
Изменение · История 1 678 Criterion 2b: Comment
Изменение · История 1 398 Is this an article or a list?: eligibility vs passableness
Изменение · История 495 Is this an article or list?: Quote
Изменение · История 1 143 Is this an article or list?: Reply to dabomb
Изменение · История 226 Some strange GA reviews: PS to request
Изменение · История 403 Some strange GA reviews: Fixes, and request to check I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song); review page Talk:I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)/GA1
Изменение · История 273 Some strange GA reviews: What you do have to check
Изменение · История 313 Report bot: GAN/Status
Изменение · История 7 Some strange GA reviews: Brad Follmer returned to the nominations list and the review moved to /GA1/archive
Изменение · История 645 Some strange GA reviews: Concur plus comments
Изменение · История 423 Comment on new subtopics and current GAs
Изменение · История 133 GA Review transcluding multiple times: Blocked
Изменение · История 905 Bot is almost there: Page to watchlist and comment on
Изменение · История 223 Reviewer instructions on review page's edit box: Will do
Изменение · История 815 Things that still need to be accomplished: Comment
Изменение · История 1 Post-automation guidelines draft: Typo
Изменение · История 1 073 Post-automation guidelines draft: Support and flexibility for reviewers is the key
Изменение · История 581 Premature GAN: Comment
Изменение · История 629 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Suggest a back-up operation
Изменение · История 200 Further issues: That would help - good luck with the challenge!
Изменение · История 514 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment on templates
Изменение · История 364 Review by consensus: We don't need more of this, we need less of this
Изменение · История 1 141 Further issues: Edit summaries
Изменение · История 90 Green boxes: Agree with Diderot's dreams
Изменение · История 489 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Trim comment and start subsection on other issues
Изменение · История 2 203 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies
Изменение · История 268 another major issue with automated the GAN page: Different issue but would also be helpful
Изменение · История 621 Green boxes: Agree
Изменение · История 1 912 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies to Dr. Cash
Изменение · История 322 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment
Изменение · История 983 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Reply
Изменение · История 0 Update archive number
Изменение · История 998 Review by consensus: Comments
Изменение · История 805 Retitle and reply
Изменение · История 1 530 Bot is ready to take over: Further comments and issues
Изменение · История 763 Bot is ready to take over: Replies
Изменение · История 648 Bot is ready to take over: Benefit worth the effort
Изменение · История 173 Bot is ready to take over: Reply
Изменение · История 893 Review by consensus: 2.5 million articles are still crap; we need to fix them, not more bureaucracy
Изменение · История 574 Something to bring up when we reconsider putting the GA sign on article pages: Comment
Изменение · История 34 Link to new archive
Изменение · История 975 Bot is ready to take over: Comments
Изменение · История 636 Order of reviewing articles: Reply
Изменение · История 434 Order of reviewing articles: Encouraging editors who work on older nominations
Изменение · История 693 Neutral title and reply
Изменение · История 696 Question about recent quick fail: Looks like the workings of the anti-Pastafarian cabal to me
Изменение · История 173 Enforcement of seven day grace periods of articles on hold: FAQ would indeed help
Изменение · История 162 Proposal: Consensus
Изменение · История 156 Nomination restrictions: Refer to FAQ :
Изменение · История 133 Nomination restrictions: With what benefit?
Изменение · История 186 Nomination restrictions: Evidence please
Изменение · История 184 Nomination restrictions: May be a good idea; wikilink suitable page
Изменение · История 2 177 Nomination restrictions: Standard reasons and explanations
Изменение · История -85 Question on procedure, and perhaps templates: Fix double sig typo
Изменение · История 1 096 Any registered editor?: Summary: excellent advice above on when to ignore the rules
Изменение · История 1 705 Question - Theatre: Current set-up and general replies
Изменение · История 159 Question - Theatre: Problem?
Изменение · История 674 How short may a GA be?: Suggestions on TNA Legends Championship
Изменение · История 217 I agree. Move along please...
Изменение · История 322 milestone reached: Reply to Dr C
Изменение · История 207 milestone reached: Point of fact
Изменение · История 509 milestone reached: WP:GA/S
Изменение · История 887 milestone reached: Comments
Изменение · История 210 Reviewing guidelines: new section
Изменение · История 509 protection and stability.: Comment
Изменение · История 963 GA Process: Explain role of GA and its motivations
Изменение · История 190 GA1 template: If there is demand
Изменение · История 86 Any mathematicians about?: No probs
Изменение · История 424 Get on Your Boots withdrawing: Advantage of ArticleHistory
Изменение · История 426 Stability of section headings: new section
Изменение · История 786 Any reason why the peer review bot isn't reviewing GAN?: Comment
Изменение · История 187 Sweeps running gag :
Изменение · История 146 Content noticeboard: Not much
Изменение · История 1 085 Focus on main issues and provide some resources
Изменение · История 1 003 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Improving the encyclopedia
Изменение · История 131 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Strong point
Изменение · История 386 Homosexual transsexual: Reply
Изменение · История 1 444 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Yes
Изменение · История 1 253 Homosexual transsexual: Suggestion
Изменение · История 301 Good articles which are found wanting at FAC: new section
Изменение · История 362 Reassessment: point of GAN
Изменение · История -176 Oops my bad
Изменение · История 176 (отмена произведена)  Fatbeard (South Park): GAN
Изменение · История 310 7 minute review: Comment on GAR
Изменение · История 86 An underused resource: No worries
Изменение · История 109 An underused resource: Transclusion
Изменение · История 243 An underused resource: Go for it
Изменение · История 493 An underused resource: new section
Изменение · История 166 What has happened with GA reviewing?: Pride for high quality reviews
Изменение · История 812 California Proposition 8 (2008): Link to similar recent case and similar solution
Изменение · История 44 New archive needed
Изменение · История 1 126 Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics: Comments and suggestion
Изменение · История 635 Quality of reviews: One review is not the end of the story
Изменение · История 240 Reviewing articles that you've reviewed before: Fine, the main issue is significant prior contribution to the article
Изменение · История -1 055 I said, enough
Изменение · История 1 055 (отмена произведена)  Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Pyrotec
Изменение · История -1 055 (отмена произведена)  Undid revision 277528672 by Pyrotec (talk)
Изменение · История 1 009 Using inappropriate criteria for quick fail reviews: Enough
Изменение · История 483 What should I do if an article I'm reviewing doesn't satisfy notability?: Reply
Изменение · История 1 143 Curious:
Изменение · История 178 Asking advice for GA category: Look to WP:GA
Изменение · История 324 Proposal to merge GAN & PR: Comment
Изменение · История 168 Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ruth Martin (Lassie)/1: Community reassessment - comments appreciated
Изменение · История 164 Being "broad", even when there are no references: a copy of raw data is still a primary source
Изменение · История 1 428 Being "broad", even when there are no references: Comment and address real issue
Изменение · История 345 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Suggest individual reassessment
Изменение · История 608 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Agree
Изменение · История 192 award for backlog cleaning:
Изменение · История 383 Is this a list?: "Should this be a list" is actually a better question
Изменение · История 615 Slow/unresponsive reviewer: Timescales
Изменение · История 178 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
Изменение · История 1 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
Изменение · История 186 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Transclusion onto talk page may have been the problem
Изменение · История 213 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Comment
Изменение · История 229 This process is broken: Add point of information
Изменение · История 612 This process is broken: Please slow down
Изменение · История 0 Break: Serious thought needed (typo)
Изменение · История 392 Break: Serious thought needed
Изменение · История 3 092 Break: Add to copy
Изменение · История 249 Problematic review: Please provide links, thanks
Изменение · История 950 Problematic review: Three short comments
Изменение · История 608 Problematic review: Replies
Изменение · История 13 How to handle the cricket nominations?: My own comment was unclear
Изменение · История 212 How to handle the cricket nominations?: Been meaning to comment on this, but too busy! SFB has the clearest answer for JRP!
Изменение · История 3 Problematic review:
Изменение · История 58 Problematic review:
Изменение · История 1 161 Problematic review: Then we need a proper review
Изменение · История 1 669 Is there a limit to how many noms you have?: Replies
Изменение · История 1 143 Question about offering tit for tat incentive: Helping the helpful is part of collegiate editing, but tit for tat is dangerous ground
Изменение · История 206 Just playing Devil's advocate: Best practice like this needs to encourage others
Изменение · История 608 Just playing Devil's advocate: When you are the lead reviewer, it is your call
Изменение · История 170 Just playing Devil's advocate: Even if it doesn't happen, there is no harm in encouraging it
Изменение · История 942 WP:Notability (fiction): Issue
Изменение · История 700 Just playing Devil's advocate: This is a nice idea in the context of open review
Изменение · История 639 WP:Notability (fiction): new section
Изменение · История 289 Mac OS X: Concise comment
Изменение · История 783 Question on comprehensiveness: Reply
Изменение · История 621 Question on comprehensiveness: This is a serious issue
Изменение · История 610 Question on comprehensiveness: WP:BLP
Изменение · История 1 661 Is there a limit to how many times this thread crops up?: Number of articles at GAN is irrelevant - indeed it provides reviewers with more choice - need to encourage more nominators to review
Изменение · История 282 GA guides: Links
Изменение · История 829 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Failing without a hold, but with a review should be encouraged
Изменение · История 885 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Comment
Изменение · История 188 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Ukraine and Slovakia
Изменение · История -7 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
Изменение · История 291 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
Изменение · История 950 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Anacronisms
Изменение · История 88 GA review not updating on article Talk page: WP:PURGE would be the usual answer
Изменение · История 1 313 As a review: Comment on reviewer levels and flexibility
Изменение · История 1 778 Poor quality articles:
Изменение · История 756 Poor quality articles: Reply
Изменение · История 703 Poor quality articles: Comment
Изменение · История 546 Request re section titles
Изменение · История 826 Drive-by fail: Simpler solution
Изменение · История 903 Drive by promotion of Zarqa River: Reply
Изменение · История 288 Drive-by nomination:
Изменение · История 356 Drive-by nomination: Reply
Изменение · История 889 Drive-by nomination: Done, but add general comment on quick-failing, administrative removal and failing without a hold
Изменение · История 580 Biology and medicine: Explain levels
Изменение · История 1 527 Criticism, not review: Confusion, query, and comment
Изменение · История 756 Biology and medicine: Reply and comment
Изменение · История 295 Model GA reviews: Request for more
Изменение · История 462 Model GA reviews: new section
Изменение · История 153 Question on how to disengage: Welcome, as responses demonstrate
Изменение · История 903 Quid pro quo and backlog: Comments
Изменение · История 211 Closing of nomination page: Set-up
Изменение · История 304 Quid pro quo and backlog: Agree
Изменение · История 360 Closing of nomination page: Comment
Изменение · История 250 GA and peer review: Fine
Изменение · История 476 GAN reviewer of the month, graph and comment
Изменение · История 949 Support: Support with comments
Изменение · История 399 Neutral: Comment
Изменение · История 304 Questions: Those cases were not typical
Изменение · История 246 Will add my own views in due course
Изменение · История 544 Questions: GAR can cope
Изменение · История 470 Neutral: Comment on reviewer numbers
Изменение · История 446 Oppose: Comment: I think this actually reduces instruction creep
Изменение · История 217 Please help with the ASCB workshop: What can we do to help?
Изменение · История 978 Plagiarism and reliable sources: new section
Изменение · История 52 new archive started; restructure slightly; 7->10d archiving
Изменение · История 0 A broken process?: Sigh, I should know how to sigh
Изменение · История 586 A broken process?: Nostalgia and elimination drives
Изменение · История 141 Please help with the ASCB workshop: UTC
Изменение · История 615 Limiting nominations?: Statistics
Изменение · История 118 Please help with the ASCB workshop: Count me in. UTC times would be helpful
Изменение · История 180 Community GAR reminder: Pretty please, and maybe alternative meaning of GAR would not meet with universal approval :
Изменение · История 167 User:Dr pda/Good article statistics: Reply
Изменение · История 301 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: Community reassessment opened
Изменение · История 1 094 Community GAR reminder: new section
Изменение · История 367 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: Reply
Изменение · История 1 169 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: new section
Изменение · История 563 Rule to make only established editors review for GA status?: Nothing to see here :
Изменение · История 1 401 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: I fail to see any signs of instability and not reviewing it goes against basic GA principles and considerable precedent
Изменение · История 215 Pressure of work: Reply
Изменение · История 70 Backlog update: Add
Изменение · История 149 Backlog update:
Изменение · История 545 Backlog update: new section
Изменение · История 255 Moving up nominations: New (albeit experimental) resource
Изменение · История 161 Withdraw a GAN - how to handle - Talk:Article/GA1: Agree
Изменение · История 200 Icons!: Confuses WikiProject ratings and community assessments
Изменение · История 2 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Fix link to featured topic criteria
Изменение · История 5 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: copyedit replies
Изменение · История 492 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Broadness and structural weaknesses
Изменение · История 423 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: The FTC need to be fixed methinks
Изменение · История 1 133 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Merge or even nominate for deletion!
Изменение · История 1 194 GAN - GA links
Изменение · История 302 Citation styles - MoS question: Beautifully formatted unreliable sources do not a GA make
Изменение · История 325 Links and reports: Well spotted
Изменение · История 365 Time for a purge: Provide member info from cats
Изменение · История 308 Time for a purge: Try asking Giggy
Изменение · История 379 Time for a purge: Advertising needed
Изменение · История 201 Review Page: Testing
Изменение · История 180 Review Page: Links added (new reviews only)
Изменение · История 1 273 Time for a purge: Comments and graph
Изменение · История 88 Strange transclusion problem: WP:PURGE
Изменение · История 186 Time for a purge: Link to previous drives
Изменение · История 429 "Featured short articles": Proposal added to encourage cross-process thinking
Изменение · История 218 GA review of Horse: Comment
Изменение · История 191 Confusing redirect question: Comment
Изменение · История 90 Confusing redirect question: Fixed
Изменение · История 164 5000 GAs! Congratulations to all
Изменение · История 402 A-Class: No hey banda
Изменение · История 362 0.7 DVD: Oh ye of little faith :
Изменение · История 538 0.7 DVD: Please help if you can
Изменение · История 834 Information is always a good thing, so I've updated the graphs :
Изменение · История 566 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: EC
Изменение · История 580 Help!: Reviewers have different styles; plus mention Template:GATable
Изменение · История 802 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: Issues and fixes: are there other examples?
Изменение · История 446 Screw up article talk page: All help with instructions is most welcome
Изменение · История 315 Screw up article talk page: Fixed, but are the instructions clear enough?
Изменение · История 428 GA review pages: Thought of that - comments?
Изменение · История 765 GA review pages: Comments
Изменение · История 1 518 Individual reassessment: new section
Изменение · История 469 Unappropriate delist: Comment on changes in process
Изменение · История 443 Backlog under 100: Good work, and request for help at WP:GAR
Изменение · История 323 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Another clue :
Изменение · История 453 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Attention folks... :
Изменение · История 243 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Coward! :
Изменение · История 203 GAN for 4X: Moved comments
Изменение · История 53 New archive and improve format
Изменение · История 774 How long is the backlog, typically?: Replies
Изменение · История 463 How long is the backlog, typically?: Float right updated backlog, and comment
Изменение · История 446 How long is the backlog, typically?: Don't see the point of GAN directors
Изменение · История 331 How long is the backlog, typically?: Something to watchlist
Изменение · История 347 Article history: Don't waste time with oldids
Изменение · История 126 Article history: Subpage system should help
Изменение · История 429 Article history: Yes, or maybe no
Изменение · История 313 New system: Clarifications always welcome
Изменение · История 96 New system: Reply to Peanut4
Изменение · История 193 New system: Reply to Peanut4
Изменение · История 160 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Okay in principle
Изменение · История -79 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Shorter reply
Изменение · История 582 Sphinx Head was removed from the nomination in an out-of-process manner.: All GAN actions need a permanently linkable review, however brief
Изменение · История 396 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Unnecessary
Изменение · История 18 Review page headers: Indent
Изменение · История 348 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
Изменение · История 1 235 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
Изменение · История 1 416 New system: Reply to VT
Изменение · История 201 new GA review programme.: Comment
Изменение · История 119 Template maintenance...: Asked
Изменение · История 36 new GA review programme.: Add that Gwinva is the main user applying the first technique
Изменение · История 956 new GA review programme.: Reply ec, and post ec
Изменение · История 1 052 Template maintenance...: Replies
Изменение · История 1 029 Request: don't make up subpage names: Comment on plans to improve the quality of individual reassessment reviews
Изменение · История 437 Request: don't make up subpage names: Reply to Malleus
Изменение · История 15 Request: don't make up subpage names: Tweak for clarity
Изменение · История 1 427 Request: don't make up subpage names: new section
Изменение · История 0 Transition to review subpages: Fix redlink
Изменение · История 0 Transition to review subpages: Typo
Изменение · История 294 Transition to review subpages: Not a fan but don't object as long as it is not required
Изменение · История 350 Subpage problem: Sort of fixed
Изменение · История 122 Transition to review subpages: Definite improvement, thanks Dr.C
Изменение · История 1 502 Transition to review subpages: Three comments
Изменение · История 471 Transition to review subpages: Comments on finishing reviews
Изменение · История 1 682 Transition to review subpages: new section
Изменение · История 217 Are these relevant instructions or just the first draft (section break): Will comment in a new section
Изменение · История 385 Subpage implementation (section break): Reply to Ruslik
Изменение · История 485 Subpage implementation (section break): Comment
Изменение · История 564 Subpage implementation (section break): Outstanding issues and my movements
Изменение · История 286 Subpage implementation (section break): Transitional issues
Изменение · История 236 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Split off subsection and comment on documentation
Изменение · История 0 Have i missed something lol: Typo
Изменение · История 2 369 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Templates created; describe process
Изменение · История 1 334 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Demonstrate proposed format (or at least a first draft) to see if there is consensus for it
Изменение · История 417 Have i missed something lol: Nice one
Изменение · История 646 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Need to move in stages
Изменение · История 2 183 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Details
Изменение · История 209 Alternative: Belated comment
Изменение · История 169 Alternative: All very well if there is someone who can do it
Изменение · История 1 119 Automation redux: Categories created to track errors, and comments
Изменение · История 2 960 Automation redux
Изменение · История 94 Help at GAR requested: Add a PS.
Изменение · История 1 284 Help at GAR requested: new section
Изменение · История 47 Long overdue start of new archive
Изменение · История 23 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Clarify
Изменение · История 552 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Comment
Изменение · История 669 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Link to delisting guidelines, and make suggestion
Изменение · История 1 144 Naming convention for a figure briefly in spotlight: Reply to Moni
Изменение · История 286 Suggestion:
Изменение · История 183 User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/GAN passed spam: Yes, it is a good idea to formalize this
Изменение · История 546 Permanent GA reviews: Comment
Изменение · История 140 Permanent GA reviews: Read the thread
Изменение · История 861 Permanent GA reviews: Accountability
Изменение · История 311 Permanent GA reviews: Clarify proposal
Изменение · История 2 Permanent GA reviews: Fix typo
Изменение · История 1 336 Odd method of reviewing: Talk page reviews are not permanent either
Изменение · История 727 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Amplify post ec: each WikiProject reaches its own assessment, not always the same
Изменение · История 5 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Fix my temporary dyslexia
Изменение · История 629 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Not our job
Изменение · История 112 Is this an acceptable GA review:
Изменение · История 184 Is this an acceptable GA review: Good luck iMatthew
Изменение · История 600 Is this an acceptable GA review: Comment
Изменение · История 491 Is this an acceptable GA review: No, and the article needs a lot of work
Изменение · История 844 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Explain
Изменение · История 562 Advice to article writers: Agree with Malleus and DHMO
Изменение · История 770 Gavin Newsom and current political figures in general: Comment and suggestions
Изменение · История 334 Can an article be on PR and GAN simultaneously?: It's allowed
Изменение · История 343 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Suggestions
Изменение · История 638 Can I review this?: Comments
Изменение · История 681 "If you're a registered user ...": Consensus?
Изменение · История 248 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Judgement is for humans to do, not bots :
Изменение · История 264 "If you're a registered user ...": In favour of IP noms
Изменение · История 1 481 Combined GAN template: Ready for testing on the road
Изменение · История 773 If no central training program, then Task Mentors?: Agree, page set up, but article history is for bots, not humans
Изменение · История 658 section break: Suggest {{GAN}}
Изменение · История 276 section break: StatisticianBot issue
Изменение · История 250 More space saving: Good idea
Изменение · История 546 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": September 2007 and the rest of WP
Изменение · История 339 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Lightweight
Изменение · История 648 Redrafting instructions block: Explain
Изменение · История 348 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Backlog elimination may be a good idea, but it didn't appear to work last time
Изменение · История 194 Redrafting instructions block: I don't understand what is easy about making three edits instead of one
Изменение · История 562 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Link, graph and comment
Изменение · История 1 060 Redrafting instructions block: I've tried!
Изменение · История 544 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Comfort for the regulars does not attract new reviewers, and they are what GAN needs
Изменение · История 157 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Another option is "engineering"
Изменение · История 479 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Suggest Geography as an alternative
Изменение · История 1 315 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": I agree, even though I favour putting articles on hold, and having second reviewers
Изменение · История 481 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: Agree and clarify
Изменение · История 192 The universe has exploded!: Rumours of the backlog being eliminated have been greatly exaggerated ;
Изменение · История 341 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: I agree: add a couple of links
Изменение · История 1 757 New proposal of guide for nominators: Comments
Изменение · История 791 WP:GAN header: Er, people don't read instructions
Изменение · История 627 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 9/2/2008: Eh, where's the banter? Add some :
Изменение · История 143 LONG: Done
Изменение · История 652 LONG: Over 32KB, but what is the point?
Изменение · История 368 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Explain point of review
Изменение · История 531 GA On Hold: Be flexible, I say
Изменение · История 51 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Improve sentence about delisting and clarify timescale
Изменение · История 1 542 Proposal: Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept
Изменение · История 353 GAR reviewers needed: Once every week or two would be enough
Изменение · История 1 563 GAR reviewers needed: new section
Изменение · История 540 Article History Template: GAR/ templates. Do same at GAN?
Изменение · История 266 Article History Template: Clarified: please use five tildes in the templates
Изменение · История 390 Plan of action: My understanding of the idea
Изменение · История 187 No TOC on this page?: __NOTOC__ on this page, to be precise: fixed
Изменение · История 0 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Remove transclusion of guidelines containing a __NOTOC__
Изменение · История 809 Suggestion for backlog: Another backlog elimination drive would help, but is not a long term solution
Изменение · История 16 Query re holds and GA requests: clarify: formalities of renomination
Изменение · История 258 Query re holds and GA requests: Formalities preferable, but you can pass it quite quickly if it meets the standard
Изменение · История 184 Article History Template: Please clarify
Изменение · История 246 Article History Template: Not yet
Изменение · История 102 Article failed by a major contributor: Thanks VT
Изменение · История 144 Article failed by a major contributor: renominate, but GAR is waiting ready if you need it
Изменение · История 682 Article History Template: Leave it to the bots
Изменение · История 412 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Reply to Pete
Изменение · История 284 Can nominators review?: No, it seems
Изменение · История 1 588 Can nominators review?: Comment
Изменение · История 209 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: You could use GAList/check
Изменение · История 341 Can nominators review?: Re Epbr's suggestion
Изменение · История 0 Can nominators review?: Fix typo
Изменение · История 1 577 Can nominators review?: new section
Изменение · История 183 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Fix my incorrect comment
Изменение · История 418 Image licensing issue: On image page suffices
Изменение · История 727 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Looks good so far
Изменение · История 452 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Great idea!
Изменение · История 199 Quality vs quantity: Agree 100%
Изменение · История 388 Quality vs quantity: Which template + addition to guidelines
Изменение · История 115 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Another option for Pete
Изменение · История 877 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to Pete: Use GAList, etc., but leave pass/fail blank until you make your decision
Изменение · История 157 Quick Failing an Aricticle due to nominator inactivity: Sure, but it is not a quick fail
Изменение · История 426 Wikilinking dates: Not a GA criterion
Изменение · История 523 Quality vs quantity: What is undemocratic? I'm curious
Изменение · История 13 Theatre, film and drama: Correct name of FA cat
Изменение · История -1 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Bad typo day :
Изменение · История -1 Quality vs quantity: Fix (very un-Freudian) typo! :
Изменение · История 862 Quality vs quantity: Ask Peanut4?
Изменение · История 257 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Graph
Изменение · История 207 Backlog and automation: "A bot failed my article!" - probably not a good idea :
Изменение · История 19 Quality vs quantity: Link editor
Изменение · История 2 503 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Two schools
Изменение · История 636 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on architecture
Изменение · История 1 480 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to VT
Изменение · История 56 Backlog and automation: It seems to me that we need a section break here: feel free to retitle it
Изменение · История 264 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on subdividing
Изменение · История 1 621 Backlog and automation: Reply to CP
Изменение · История -2 Backlog and automation: this->it
Изменение · История 620 Backlog and automation: Reply to Ruhrfisch
Изменение · История 447 Theatre, film and drama: new section
Изменение · История 1 255 Backlog and automation: Reply to DHMO
Изменение · История 3 299 Backlog and automation: new section
Изменение · История 116 Just Checking: No, it's updated regularly by a bot
Изменение · История 75 Just Checking: Wikilink guidelines: it is not a conflict of interest to fix problems with an article under review
Изменение · История 875 Just Checking: It is not a conflict of interest to copyedit during a review
Изменение · История 521 A-Class nominations: Reply
Изменение · История 190 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 15/12/2007: Wishful thinking?
Изменение · История 94 Templates: Thanks Pete
Изменение · История 576 On hold and second opinion: We lost another potential reviewer
Изменение · История 345 Templates: Its just technobabble for different ways of using templates
Изменение · История 333 Templates: Subst
Изменение · История 260 On hold and second opinion: Insight and wisdom
Изменение · История 859 On hold and second opinion: Comments
Изменение · История 382 Question about fail: Is it a reliable source?
Изменение · История 575 On hold and second opinion: Reply to VT and comment on redlinks
Изменение · История 2 584 On hold and second opinion: new section
Изменение · История 709 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Right idea, wrong template?
Изменение · История 178 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Done
Изменение · История -631 If you review an article...: Remove duplicate comment apparently in wrong section: Twigboy, revert me if this was your intention
Изменение · История 384 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Agree/reply
Изменение · История 1 765 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Both tenses are used
Изменение · История 488 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Multiple reviewers in series
Изменение · История 676 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Agree with goal, but not approach + note of realism (over ec)
Изменение · История 510 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: WP:OWN is about mainspace, but otherwise, Ling has a point
Изменение · История 138 Alphabet: More topical joke? :
Изменение · История 399 Alphabet: Order of top-level is used in multiple places
Изменение · История 479 Alphabet: This glitch was caused by a recent split
Изменение · История 490 Subsubtopics: Issues raised about e.g. "Music"
Изменение · История 859 Green: Various replies
Изменение · История 699 Tefillin, 17 days on hold: Removed "OnHold"
Изменение · История 342 Green: Lighter background adopted, plus attempt to fix first panel
Изменение · История 343 Subsubtopics: Done
Изменение · История 142 Subsubtopics: Will do
Изменение · История 466 Green: Explain cyan: also I tried a lighter colour at WP:WGA
Изменение · История 607 Pro Wrestling WikiProject: Not a conflict of interest, but thanks for commenting here
Изменение · История 509 Green: The delicate balance between lime and cyan :
Изменение · История 396 Green: Try to clarify question in order to understand answers
Изменение · История 905 Green: Questions
Изменение · История 187 GAList3 is now available: Sorted
Изменение · История 401 I will try: Biographies are not listed separately, but within each subject (apologies that no one replied to you sooner)
Изменение · История 356 Subsubtopics: new section
Изменение · История 301 GAList3 is now available: Deleted: good luck with Balzac!
Изменение · История 451 GAList3 is now available: FGAN and PGAN? I can help if you like
Изменение · История 307 GAList3 is now available: Clarify, I hope ;
Изменение · История 212 Slipping: Nice idea
Изменение · История 386 GAList3 is now available: Great, but why the new template name?
Изменение · История 462 Slipping: That is what I meant, thanks EyeSerene :
Изменение · История 829 Slipping: We need some simplification and automation in my opinion
Изменение · История 972 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Reply to Moni3
Изменение · История 585 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Remove image
Изменение · История 535 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 27/10/2007: Criteria are fairly simple ;
Изменение · История 153 Homeopathy nomination: Yu
Изменение · История 387 Homeopathy nomination: Check out the talk page maybe?
Изменение · История 94 Homeopathy nomination: Which topic?
Изменение · История 288 More trouble than it's worth?: If nominators wrongly categorize, recategorize!
Изменение · История 83 More trouble than it's worth?: Agree
Изменение · История 239 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 13/10/2007: Procedural error? ;
Изменение · История 259 Scalability: Discuss automation further at WP:WGA?
Изменение · История 664 Scalability: Automation and quality checking
Изменение · История 469 Backlog: Wishful thinking
Изменение · История 1 Update name
Изменение · История 449 Scalability: Two replies
Изменение · История 116 Chicago Marathon: Not a serious concern
Изменение · История 146 Chicago Marathon: Looks like it fails criterion 5 to me ;
Изменение · История 3 250 Scalability: Replies and further thoughts
Изменение · История 1 Scalability: tense
Изменение · История 52 Scalability: Clarify a few statistical points
Изменение · История 2 963 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Making this process scalable
Изменение · История 1 404 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: A few replies
Изменение · История 359 LONG: It's radical stuff indeed
Изменение · История 366 Review workshop: Argued against this, but good luck
Изменение · История -139 Update archive
Изменение · История 264 LONG: It is just one click awaty
Изменение · История 558 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: It aint about tidying, it is about efficiency
Изменение · История 202 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?:
Изменение · История 245 LONG: new section
Изменение · История 696 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Replies and clarifications
Изменение · История 1 998 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: new section
Изменение · История -944 Undid revision 161837928 by Derek.cashman (talk) Return GA talk page query to original location
Изменение · История 189 Streamlining: More minor changes
Изменение · История 639 Streamlining: new section
Изменение · История 18 Option 2: Nominations: Page moved and redirects fixed
Изменение · История 6 Update archive links
Изменение · История 144 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Nice one
Изменение · История 0 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Noun not verb, sorryu
Изменение · История 315 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Best practise?
Изменение · История 106 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?:
Изменение · История 129 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: GAList
Изменение · История 347 Option 2: Nominations: Admin needed
Изменение · История 455 References in the lead section: Footnotes and citations in the lead are permissible but not required
Изменение · История 591 Option 2: Nominations: Definitions and practicalities
Изменение · История 545 Option 2: Nominations: GAR and nominee/nomination
Изменение · История 3 149 A rose by any other name: new section
Изменение · История 309 Wikiproject logic exists, should a Logic category exist also?: I think it is unnecessary and unhelpful
Изменение · История 522 {{tl|ArticleHistory}}: Fixed
Часовой пояс: UTC.

Leave a Reply