Cannabis Ruderalis

문서 최상위 편집 단일 사용자가 단일 문서에 기여한 모든 시간순 편집입니다.

일반 문서 Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations (기록 · 문서 역사)
사용자 Geometry guy (편집 분석· 잦은 편집)
총 편집 586
사소한 편집 40 (6.8%)
(반)자동화된 편집 4 (0.7%)
되돌려진 편집 4 (0.7%)
atbe1 4.4
추가됨 (바이트)2 356,313
삭제됨 (바이트) -3,515
사소한 편집 · 40 (6.8%)
중요한 편집 · 546 (93.2%)
(반)자동화된 편집 · 4 (0.7%)
수동 편집 · 582 (99.3%)
되돌려진 편집 · 4 (0.7%)
되돌리지 않은 편집 · 582 (99.3%)
1 편집 간 평균 시간 (일)
2 추가된 문구는 되돌려지지 않고 추가된 긍정적인 내용입니다 (약)
날짜 링크 크기 편집 요약
차이 · 역사 1,226 Another solution? Co-nominations: Amplify idea and potential benefits
차이 · 역사 369 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
차이 · 역사 0 Oppose: fix numbering
차이 · 역사 558 Oppose: Not in spirit of GA: suggest alternative below: co-nominations
차이 · 역사 282 Another solution? Co-nominations: r
차이 · 역사 1,994 Another solution? Co-nominations: new section
차이 · 역사 626 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Failing without a hold is an option that should be used more widely in preference to quickfails
차이 · 역사 242 Harvard citations: Thanks and comment
차이 · 역사 205 Some problems after Chris G's change: GAN error issue
차이 · 역사 135 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Great - watchlisted
차이 · 역사 1,179 Renomination of failed GA with no changes: With tears in my eyes, options for GA, and this article
차이 · 역사 510 Category Splitting: Comment
차이 · 역사 -298 RFC to make FA leaders elected, not appointed: rm
차이 · 역사 450 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Reply to Aircorn
차이 · 역사 1,109 RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Oppose limits on nominations, obviously, and reply to Imzadi, Czarkoff
차이 · 역사 401 30 day limit proposal: Great idea
차이 · 역사 328 30 day limit proposal: Not just needing clarification, but completely wrong-headed
차이 · 역사 262 30 day limit proposal: Bad law makes for bad implementation
차이 · 역사 49 Jerem43's reviews: Hard cases make bad law
차이 · 역사 326 Jerem43's reviews: Er, what?
차이 · 역사 1,817 Is suggestion (review Artcile X by editor A, and he may return the favor by reviewing your article) ok?: It isn't about appearances, but good reviewing
차이 · 역사 2 Withdrawing nominations:
차이 · 역사 339 Withdrawing nominations: Add reminder of GA no-buro principle
차이 · 역사 154 Withdrawing nominations: Done
차이 · 역사 913 Withdrawing nominations: new section
차이 · 역사 246 Reviewing templates: Reply to WAID
차이 · 역사 9 Reviewing templates:
차이 · 역사 294 Reviewing templates: Replies to WAID
차이 · 역사 109 Tony Blair: Hopefully resolved
차이 · 역사 234 Renaming an article while undergoing GA process: Reply
차이 · 역사 1,060 Picture licensing question: Reply
차이 · 역사 161 How to classify a medieval fair?: Suggestion
차이 · 역사 737 Wrongly failed GA's: Use GAR, but make clear that your preferred outcome is restoring the nomination
차이 · 역사 271 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: Fixed
차이 · 역사 783 On a GAN being a candidate for merging: reply
차이 · 역사 192 GAN Statistic: Reply
차이 · 역사 389 Bot glitch: Now fixed, and how to avoid this in future
차이 · 역사 424 Bot glitch: Back "on hold", problem recurs.
차이 · 역사 -97 Bot glitch: Still not fixed
차이 · 역사 260 Bot glitch: Update reply to Wizardman
차이 · 역사 551 Bot glitch: Reply to Wizardman
차이 · 역사 438 GAN Statistic: Suggested location
차이 · 역사 404 Bot glitch: Bot is adding a blank line
차이 · 역사 698 Bot glitch: Possible causes
차이 · 역사 550 Abandoned GAR: Fixed - suggested process
차이 · 역사 398 Clarification please?: Template name is historical, article history is more clear
차이 · 역사 455 Karma system: Data can be helpful, but can also be misused
차이 · 역사 153 Taking over a GA review: Thanks for reporting it here
차이 · 역사 782 Karma system: GA depends upon its integrity and goal: to list precisely those articles which meet the GA criteria
차이 · 역사 622 Good article nominations: Two comments
차이 · 역사 458 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: Comment on reevaluation
차이 · 역사 906 Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: new section
차이 · 역사 1,281 10,000 GAs: a time to celebrate and refocus on our mission: new section
차이 · 역사 441 Time to limit nominations: And this is the wrong time to decide so
차이 · 역사 104 StatisticianBot back up and running: Thanks you again
차이 · 역사 946 Are IPs allowed to nominate articles?: Disentangle complicated story
차이 · 역사 2,673 Proposal to change the broadness criteria: Long comment
차이 · 역사 304 Since this is automated: Done long ago: here's the link
차이 · 역사 281 Editors are still doing things manually: Comment
차이 · 역사 403 Glitch on the project page: Precedent
차이 · 역사 345 New bot and Template:ArticleHistory: Good question, partial answer
차이 · 역사 445 Operation Paula: Heads up
차이 · 역사 356 Operation Paula: Not nominated - try again
차이 · 역사 278 automated GAN updates: Availability
차이 · 역사 287 automated GAN updates: Suggest start date/time
차이 · 역사 725 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
차이 · 역사 39,224 Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Edge3
차이 · 역사 -39,814 (되돌려짐)  Propose live trial
차이 · 역사 590 automated GAN updates: Propose live trial
차이 · 역사 157 Page numbers for magazine articles: Added lines at WP:GACN
차이 · 역사 721 Page numbers for magazine articles: Comment based on GA criteria
차이 · 역사 1,261 Backlog = cap?: Comments on this topic and proposal
차이 · 역사 1,079 Section break: Relative status of various pages
차이 · 역사 587 Section break: Ideas so far
차이 · 역사 1,310 Approval from GA Director: Two replies
차이 · 역사 1,017 Approval from GA Director: Reply re GA-Class
차이 · 역사 1,049 Approval from GA Director: Replies in 3 places
차이 · 역사 1,458 Approval from GA Director: Agree with two ideas
차이 · 역사 1,336 Approval from GA Director: Explanations of processes and comments
차이 · 역사 642 GAN backlog drive: Another motivation: 10000 GAs
차이 · 역사 41 Add archive box link
차이 · 역사 189 Ann Romney nomination reopened without prejudice
차이 · 역사 475 GAR for September 11 attacks: new section
차이 · 역사 1,010 Community GAR reminder: new section
차이 · 역사 138 Frequently Asked Questions infobox: Updated
차이 · 역사 429 Review closing bot: Reply To Xtzou
차이 · 역사 1,504 Review closing bot: Remarks and a question about automating WP:GAN
차이 · 역사 170 Review requested: Done and thanks
차이 · 역사 14 Collapse FAQ as reviewers primarily need to get to the TOC easily
차이 · 역사 405 WP:Good article reassessment/Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)/2: new section
차이 · 역사 115 Troubling trend?: WP:RGA
차이 · 역사 519 Criterion 2b: Comment
차이 · 역사 1,678 Criterion 2b: Comment
차이 · 역사 1,398 Is this an article or a list?: eligibility vs passableness
차이 · 역사 495 Is this an article or list?: Quote
차이 · 역사 1,143 Is this an article or list?: Reply to dabomb
차이 · 역사 226 Some strange GA reviews: PS to request
차이 · 역사 403 Some strange GA reviews: Fixes, and request to check I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song); review page Talk:I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)/GA1
차이 · 역사 273 Some strange GA reviews: What you do have to check
차이 · 역사 313 Report bot: GAN/Status
차이 · 역사 7 Some strange GA reviews: Brad Follmer returned to the nominations list and the review moved to /GA1/archive
차이 · 역사 645 Some strange GA reviews: Concur plus comments
차이 · 역사 423 Comment on new subtopics and current GAs
차이 · 역사 133 GA Review transcluding multiple times: Blocked
차이 · 역사 905 Bot is almost there: Page to watchlist and comment on
차이 · 역사 223 Reviewer instructions on review page's edit box: Will do
차이 · 역사 815 Things that still need to be accomplished: Comment
차이 · 역사 1 Post-automation guidelines draft: Typo
차이 · 역사 1,073 Post-automation guidelines draft: Support and flexibility for reviewers is the key
차이 · 역사 581 Premature GAN: Comment
차이 · 역사 629 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Suggest a back-up operation
차이 · 역사 200 Further issues: That would help - good luck with the challenge!
차이 · 역사 514 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment on templates
차이 · 역사 364 Review by consensus: We don't need more of this, we need less of this
차이 · 역사 1,141 Further issues: Edit summaries
차이 · 역사 90 Green boxes: Agree with Diderot's dreams
차이 · 역사 489 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Trim comment and start subsection on other issues
차이 · 역사 2,203 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies
차이 · 역사 268 another major issue with automated the GAN page: Different issue but would also be helpful
차이 · 역사 621 Green boxes: Agree
차이 · 역사 1,912 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies to Dr. Cash
차이 · 역사 322 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment
차이 · 역사 983 Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Reply
차이 · 역사 0 Update archive number
차이 · 역사 998 Review by consensus: Comments
차이 · 역사 805 Retitle and reply
차이 · 역사 1,530 Bot is ready to take over: Further comments and issues
차이 · 역사 763 Bot is ready to take over: Replies
차이 · 역사 648 Bot is ready to take over: Benefit worth the effort
차이 · 역사 173 Bot is ready to take over: Reply
차이 · 역사 893 Review by consensus: 2.5 million articles are still crap; we need to fix them, not more bureaucracy
차이 · 역사 574 Something to bring up when we reconsider putting the GA sign on article pages: Comment
차이 · 역사 34 Link to new archive
차이 · 역사 975 Bot is ready to take over: Comments
차이 · 역사 636 Order of reviewing articles: Reply
차이 · 역사 434 Order of reviewing articles: Encouraging editors who work on older nominations
차이 · 역사 693 Neutral title and reply
차이 · 역사 696 Question about recent quick fail: Looks like the workings of the anti-Pastafarian cabal to me
차이 · 역사 173 Enforcement of seven day grace periods of articles on hold: FAQ would indeed help
차이 · 역사 162 Proposal: Consensus
차이 · 역사 156 Nomination restrictions: Refer to FAQ :
차이 · 역사 133 Nomination restrictions: With what benefit?
차이 · 역사 186 Nomination restrictions: Evidence please
차이 · 역사 184 Nomination restrictions: May be a good idea; wikilink suitable page
차이 · 역사 2,177 Nomination restrictions: Standard reasons and explanations
차이 · 역사 -85 Question on procedure, and perhaps templates: Fix double sig typo
차이 · 역사 1,096 Any registered editor?: Summary: excellent advice above on when to ignore the rules
차이 · 역사 1,705 Question - Theatre: Current set-up and general replies
차이 · 역사 159 Question - Theatre: Problem?
차이 · 역사 674 How short may a GA be?: Suggestions on TNA Legends Championship
차이 · 역사 217 I agree. Move along please...
차이 · 역사 322 milestone reached: Reply to Dr C
차이 · 역사 207 milestone reached: Point of fact
차이 · 역사 509 milestone reached: WP:GA/S
차이 · 역사 887 milestone reached: Comments
차이 · 역사 210 Reviewing guidelines: new section
차이 · 역사 509 protection and stability.: Comment
차이 · 역사 963 GA Process: Explain role of GA and its motivations
차이 · 역사 190 GA1 template: If there is demand
차이 · 역사 86 Any mathematicians about?: No probs
차이 · 역사 424 Get on Your Boots withdrawing: Advantage of ArticleHistory
차이 · 역사 426 Stability of section headings: new section
차이 · 역사 786 Any reason why the peer review bot isn't reviewing GAN?: Comment
차이 · 역사 187 Sweeps running gag :
차이 · 역사 146 Content noticeboard: Not much
차이 · 역사 1,085 Focus on main issues and provide some resources
차이 · 역사 1,003 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Improving the encyclopedia
차이 · 역사 131 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Strong point
차이 · 역사 386 Homosexual transsexual: Reply
차이 · 역사 1,444 Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Yes
차이 · 역사 1,253 Homosexual transsexual: Suggestion
차이 · 역사 301 Good articles which are found wanting at FAC: new section
차이 · 역사 362 Reassessment: point of GAN
차이 · 역사 -176 Oops my bad
차이 · 역사 176 (되돌려짐)  Fatbeard (South Park): GAN
차이 · 역사 310 7 minute review: Comment on GAR
차이 · 역사 86 An underused resource: No worries
차이 · 역사 109 An underused resource: Transclusion
차이 · 역사 243 An underused resource: Go for it
차이 · 역사 493 An underused resource: new section
차이 · 역사 166 What has happened with GA reviewing?: Pride for high quality reviews
차이 · 역사 812 California Proposition 8 (2008): Link to similar recent case and similar solution
차이 · 역사 44 New archive needed
차이 · 역사 1,126 Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics: Comments and suggestion
차이 · 역사 635 Quality of reviews: One review is not the end of the story
차이 · 역사 240 Reviewing articles that you've reviewed before: Fine, the main issue is significant prior contribution to the article
차이 · 역사 -1,055 I said, enough
차이 · 역사 1,055 (되돌려짐)  Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Pyrotec
차이 · 역사 -1,055 (되돌려짐)  Undid revision 277528672 by Pyrotec (talk)
차이 · 역사 1,009 Using inappropriate criteria for quick fail reviews: Enough
차이 · 역사 483 What should I do if an article I'm reviewing doesn't satisfy notability?: Reply
차이 · 역사 1,143 Curious:
차이 · 역사 178 Asking advice for GA category: Look to WP:GA
차이 · 역사 324 Proposal to merge GAN & PR: Comment
차이 · 역사 168 Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ruth Martin (Lassie)/1: Community reassessment - comments appreciated
차이 · 역사 164 Being "broad", even when there are no references: a copy of raw data is still a primary source
차이 · 역사 1,428 Being "broad", even when there are no references: Comment and address real issue
차이 · 역사 345 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Suggest individual reassessment
차이 · 역사 608 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Agree
차이 · 역사 192 award for backlog cleaning:
차이 · 역사 383 Is this a list?: "Should this be a list" is actually a better question
차이 · 역사 615 Slow/unresponsive reviewer: Timescales
차이 · 역사 178 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
차이 · 역사 1 Subst error with a GAR subpage?:
차이 · 역사 186 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Transclusion onto talk page may have been the problem
차이 · 역사 213 Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Comment
차이 · 역사 229 This process is broken: Add point of information
차이 · 역사 612 This process is broken: Please slow down
차이 · 역사 0 Break: Serious thought needed (typo)
차이 · 역사 392 Break: Serious thought needed
차이 · 역사 3,092 Break: Add to copy
차이 · 역사 249 Problematic review: Please provide links, thanks
차이 · 역사 950 Problematic review: Three short comments
차이 · 역사 608 Problematic review: Replies
차이 · 역사 13 How to handle the cricket nominations?: My own comment was unclear
차이 · 역사 212 How to handle the cricket nominations?: Been meaning to comment on this, but too busy! SFB has the clearest answer for JRP!
차이 · 역사 3 Problematic review:
차이 · 역사 58 Problematic review:
차이 · 역사 1,161 Problematic review: Then we need a proper review
차이 · 역사 1,669 Is there a limit to how many noms you have?: Replies
차이 · 역사 1,143 Question about offering tit for tat incentive: Helping the helpful is part of collegiate editing, but tit for tat is dangerous ground
차이 · 역사 206 Just playing Devil's advocate: Best practice like this needs to encourage others
차이 · 역사 608 Just playing Devil's advocate: When you are the lead reviewer, it is your call
차이 · 역사 170 Just playing Devil's advocate: Even if it doesn't happen, there is no harm in encouraging it
차이 · 역사 942 WP:Notability (fiction): Issue
차이 · 역사 700 Just playing Devil's advocate: This is a nice idea in the context of open review
차이 · 역사 639 WP:Notability (fiction): new section
차이 · 역사 289 Mac OS X: Concise comment
차이 · 역사 783 Question on comprehensiveness: Reply
차이 · 역사 621 Question on comprehensiveness: This is a serious issue
차이 · 역사 610 Question on comprehensiveness: WP:BLP
차이 · 역사 1,661 Is there a limit to how many times this thread crops up?: Number of articles at GAN is irrelevant - indeed it provides reviewers with more choice - need to encourage more nominators to review
차이 · 역사 282 GA guides: Links
차이 · 역사 829 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Failing without a hold, but with a review should be encouraged
차이 · 역사 885 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Comment
차이 · 역사 188 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Ukraine and Slovakia
차이 · 역사 -7 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
차이 · 역사 291 Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia
차이 · 역사 950 Articles where sources are in foreign language: Anacronisms
차이 · 역사 88 GA review not updating on article Talk page: WP:PURGE would be the usual answer
차이 · 역사 1,313 As a review: Comment on reviewer levels and flexibility
차이 · 역사 1,778 Poor quality articles:
차이 · 역사 756 Poor quality articles: Reply
차이 · 역사 703 Poor quality articles: Comment
차이 · 역사 546 Request re section titles
차이 · 역사 826 Drive-by fail: Simpler solution
차이 · 역사 903 Drive by promotion of Zarqa River: Reply
차이 · 역사 288 Drive-by nomination:
차이 · 역사 356 Drive-by nomination: Reply
차이 · 역사 889 Drive-by nomination: Done, but add general comment on quick-failing, administrative removal and failing without a hold
차이 · 역사 580 Biology and medicine: Explain levels
차이 · 역사 1,527 Criticism, not review: Confusion, query, and comment
차이 · 역사 756 Biology and medicine: Reply and comment
차이 · 역사 295 Model GA reviews: Request for more
차이 · 역사 462 Model GA reviews: new section
차이 · 역사 153 Question on how to disengage: Welcome, as responses demonstrate
차이 · 역사 903 Quid pro quo and backlog: Comments
차이 · 역사 211 Closing of nomination page: Set-up
차이 · 역사 304 Quid pro quo and backlog: Agree
차이 · 역사 360 Closing of nomination page: Comment
차이 · 역사 250 GA and peer review: Fine
차이 · 역사 476 GAN reviewer of the month, graph and comment
차이 · 역사 949 Support: Support with comments
차이 · 역사 399 Neutral: Comment
차이 · 역사 304 Questions: Those cases were not typical
차이 · 역사 246 Will add my own views in due course
차이 · 역사 544 Questions: GAR can cope
차이 · 역사 470 Neutral: Comment on reviewer numbers
차이 · 역사 446 Oppose: Comment: I think this actually reduces instruction creep
차이 · 역사 217 Please help with the ASCB workshop: What can we do to help?
차이 · 역사 978 Plagiarism and reliable sources: new section
차이 · 역사 52 new archive started; restructure slightly; 7->10d archiving
차이 · 역사 0 A broken process?: Sigh, I should know how to sigh
차이 · 역사 586 A broken process?: Nostalgia and elimination drives
차이 · 역사 141 Please help with the ASCB workshop: UTC
차이 · 역사 615 Limiting nominations?: Statistics
차이 · 역사 118 Please help with the ASCB workshop: Count me in. UTC times would be helpful
차이 · 역사 180 Community GAR reminder: Pretty please, and maybe alternative meaning of GAR would not meet with universal approval :
차이 · 역사 167 User:Dr pda/Good article statistics: Reply
차이 · 역사 301 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: Community reassessment opened
차이 · 역사 1,094 Community GAR reminder: new section
차이 · 역사 367 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: Reply
차이 · 역사 1,169 Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: new section
차이 · 역사 563 Rule to make only established editors review for GA status?: Nothing to see here :
차이 · 역사 1,401 Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: I fail to see any signs of instability and not reviewing it goes against basic GA principles and considerable precedent
차이 · 역사 215 Pressure of work: Reply
차이 · 역사 70 Backlog update: Add
차이 · 역사 149 Backlog update:
차이 · 역사 545 Backlog update: new section
차이 · 역사 255 Moving up nominations: New (albeit experimental) resource
차이 · 역사 161 Withdraw a GAN - how to handle - Talk:Article/GA1: Agree
차이 · 역사 200 Icons!: Confuses WikiProject ratings and community assessments
차이 · 역사 2 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Fix link to featured topic criteria
차이 · 역사 5 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: copyedit replies
차이 · 역사 492 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Broadness and structural weaknesses
차이 · 역사 423 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: The FTC need to be fixed methinks
차이 · 역사 1,133 Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Merge or even nominate for deletion!
차이 · 역사 1,194 GAN - GA links
차이 · 역사 302 Citation styles - MoS question: Beautifully formatted unreliable sources do not a GA make
차이 · 역사 325 Links and reports: Well spotted
차이 · 역사 365 Time for a purge: Provide member info from cats
차이 · 역사 308 Time for a purge: Try asking Giggy
차이 · 역사 379 Time for a purge: Advertising needed
차이 · 역사 201 Review Page: Testing
차이 · 역사 180 Review Page: Links added (new reviews only)
차이 · 역사 1,273 Time for a purge: Comments and graph
차이 · 역사 88 Strange transclusion problem: WP:PURGE
차이 · 역사 186 Time for a purge: Link to previous drives
차이 · 역사 429 "Featured short articles": Proposal added to encourage cross-process thinking
차이 · 역사 218 GA review of Horse: Comment
차이 · 역사 191 Confusing redirect question: Comment
차이 · 역사 90 Confusing redirect question: Fixed
차이 · 역사 164 5000 GAs! Congratulations to all
차이 · 역사 402 A-Class: No hey banda
차이 · 역사 362 0.7 DVD: Oh ye of little faith :
차이 · 역사 538 0.7 DVD: Please help if you can
차이 · 역사 834 Information is always a good thing, so I've updated the graphs :
차이 · 역사 566 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: EC
차이 · 역사 580 Help!: Reviewers have different styles; plus mention Template:GATable
차이 · 역사 802 Reformatting GA comments on talk page: Issues and fixes: are there other examples?
차이 · 역사 446 Screw up article talk page: All help with instructions is most welcome
차이 · 역사 315 Screw up article talk page: Fixed, but are the instructions clear enough?
차이 · 역사 428 GA review pages: Thought of that - comments?
차이 · 역사 765 GA review pages: Comments
차이 · 역사 1,518 Individual reassessment: new section
차이 · 역사 469 Unappropriate delist: Comment on changes in process
차이 · 역사 443 Backlog under 100: Good work, and request for help at WP:GAR
차이 · 역사 323 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Another clue :
차이 · 역사 453 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Attention folks... :
차이 · 역사 243 Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Coward! :
차이 · 역사 203 GAN for 4X: Moved comments
차이 · 역사 53 New archive and improve format
차이 · 역사 774 How long is the backlog, typically?: Replies
차이 · 역사 463 How long is the backlog, typically?: Float right updated backlog, and comment
차이 · 역사 446 How long is the backlog, typically?: Don't see the point of GAN directors
차이 · 역사 331 How long is the backlog, typically?: Something to watchlist
차이 · 역사 347 Article history: Don't waste time with oldids
차이 · 역사 126 Article history: Subpage system should help
차이 · 역사 429 Article history: Yes, or maybe no
차이 · 역사 313 New system: Clarifications always welcome
차이 · 역사 96 New system: Reply to Peanut4
차이 · 역사 193 New system: Reply to Peanut4
차이 · 역사 160 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Okay in principle
차이 · 역사 -79 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Shorter reply
차이 · 역사 582 Sphinx Head was removed from the nomination in an out-of-process manner.: All GAN actions need a permanently linkable review, however brief
차이 · 역사 396 Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Unnecessary
차이 · 역사 18 Review page headers: Indent
차이 · 역사 348 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
차이 · 역사 1,235 Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene
차이 · 역사 1,416 New system: Reply to VT
차이 · 역사 201 new GA review programme.: Comment
차이 · 역사 119 Template maintenance...: Asked
차이 · 역사 36 new GA review programme.: Add that Gwinva is the main user applying the first technique
차이 · 역사 956 new GA review programme.: Reply ec, and post ec
차이 · 역사 1,052 Template maintenance...: Replies
차이 · 역사 1,029 Request: don't make up subpage names: Comment on plans to improve the quality of individual reassessment reviews
차이 · 역사 437 Request: don't make up subpage names: Reply to Malleus
차이 · 역사 15 Request: don't make up subpage names: Tweak for clarity
차이 · 역사 1,427 Request: don't make up subpage names: new section
차이 · 역사 0 Transition to review subpages: Fix redlink
차이 · 역사 0 Transition to review subpages: Typo
차이 · 역사 294 Transition to review subpages: Not a fan but don't object as long as it is not required
차이 · 역사 350 Subpage problem: Sort of fixed
차이 · 역사 122 Transition to review subpages: Definite improvement, thanks Dr.C
차이 · 역사 1,502 Transition to review subpages: Three comments
차이 · 역사 471 Transition to review subpages: Comments on finishing reviews
차이 · 역사 1,682 Transition to review subpages: new section
차이 · 역사 217 Are these relevant instructions or just the first draft (section break): Will comment in a new section
차이 · 역사 385 Subpage implementation (section break): Reply to Ruslik
차이 · 역사 485 Subpage implementation (section break): Comment
차이 · 역사 564 Subpage implementation (section break): Outstanding issues and my movements
차이 · 역사 286 Subpage implementation (section break): Transitional issues
차이 · 역사 236 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Split off subsection and comment on documentation
차이 · 역사 0 Have i missed something lol: Typo
차이 · 역사 2,369 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Templates created; describe process
차이 · 역사 1,334 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Demonstrate proposed format (or at least a first draft) to see if there is consensus for it
차이 · 역사 417 Have i missed something lol: Nice one
차이 · 역사 646 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Need to move in stages
차이 · 역사 2,183 GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Details
차이 · 역사 209 Alternative: Belated comment
차이 · 역사 169 Alternative: All very well if there is someone who can do it
차이 · 역사 1,119 Automation redux: Categories created to track errors, and comments
차이 · 역사 2,960 Automation redux
차이 · 역사 94 Help at GAR requested: Add a PS.
차이 · 역사 1,284 Help at GAR requested: new section
차이 · 역사 47 Long overdue start of new archive
차이 · 역사 23 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Clarify
차이 · 역사 552 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Comment
차이 · 역사 669 White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Link to delisting guidelines, and make suggestion
차이 · 역사 1,144 Naming convention for a figure briefly in spotlight: Reply to Moni
차이 · 역사 286 Suggestion:
차이 · 역사 183 User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/GAN passed spam: Yes, it is a good idea to formalize this
차이 · 역사 546 Permanent GA reviews: Comment
차이 · 역사 140 Permanent GA reviews: Read the thread
차이 · 역사 861 Permanent GA reviews: Accountability
차이 · 역사 311 Permanent GA reviews: Clarify proposal
차이 · 역사 2 Permanent GA reviews: Fix typo
차이 · 역사 1,336 Odd method of reviewing: Talk page reviews are not permanent either
차이 · 역사 727 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Amplify post ec: each WikiProject reaches its own assessment, not always the same
차이 · 역사 5 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Fix my temporary dyslexia
차이 · 역사 629 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Not our job
차이 · 역사 112 Is this an acceptable GA review:
차이 · 역사 184 Is this an acceptable GA review: Good luck iMatthew
차이 · 역사 600 Is this an acceptable GA review: Comment
차이 · 역사 491 Is this an acceptable GA review: No, and the article needs a lot of work
차이 · 역사 844 Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Explain
차이 · 역사 562 Advice to article writers: Agree with Malleus and DHMO
차이 · 역사 770 Gavin Newsom and current political figures in general: Comment and suggestions
차이 · 역사 334 Can an article be on PR and GAN simultaneously?: It's allowed
차이 · 역사 343 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Suggestions
차이 · 역사 638 Can I review this?: Comments
차이 · 역사 681 "If you're a registered user ...": Consensus?
차이 · 역사 248 Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Judgement is for humans to do, not bots :
차이 · 역사 264 "If you're a registered user ...": In favour of IP noms
차이 · 역사 1,481 Combined GAN template: Ready for testing on the road
차이 · 역사 773 If no central training program, then Task Mentors?: Agree, page set up, but article history is for bots, not humans
차이 · 역사 658 section break: Suggest {{GAN}}
차이 · 역사 276 section break: StatisticianBot issue
차이 · 역사 250 More space saving: Good idea
차이 · 역사 546 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": September 2007 and the rest of WP
차이 · 역사 339 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Lightweight
차이 · 역사 648 Redrafting instructions block: Explain
차이 · 역사 348 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Backlog elimination may be a good idea, but it didn't appear to work last time
차이 · 역사 194 Redrafting instructions block: I don't understand what is easy about making three edits instead of one
차이 · 역사 562 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Link, graph and comment
차이 · 역사 1,060 Redrafting instructions block: I've tried!
차이 · 역사 544 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Comfort for the regulars does not attract new reviewers, and they are what GAN needs
차이 · 역사 157 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Another option is "engineering"
차이 · 역사 479 WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Suggest Geography as an alternative
차이 · 역사 1,315 Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": I agree, even though I favour putting articles on hold, and having second reviewers
차이 · 역사 481 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: Agree and clarify
차이 · 역사 192 The universe has exploded!: Rumours of the backlog being eliminated have been greatly exaggerated ;
차이 · 역사 341 Inviting active projects to help with backlog: I agree: add a couple of links
차이 · 역사 1,757 New proposal of guide for nominators: Comments
차이 · 역사 791 WP:GAN header: Er, people don't read instructions
차이 · 역사 627 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 9/2/2008: Eh, where's the banter? Add some :
차이 · 역사 143 LONG: Done
차이 · 역사 652 LONG: Over 32KB, but what is the point?
차이 · 역사 368 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Explain point of review
차이 · 역사 531 GA On Hold: Be flexible, I say
차이 · 역사 51 Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Improve sentence about delisting and clarify timescale
차이 · 역사 1,542 Proposal: Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept
차이 · 역사 353 GAR reviewers needed: Once every week or two would be enough
차이 · 역사 1,563 GAR reviewers needed: new section
차이 · 역사 540 Article History Template: GAR/ templates. Do same at GAN?
차이 · 역사 266 Article History Template: Clarified: please use five tildes in the templates
차이 · 역사 390 Plan of action: My understanding of the idea
차이 · 역사 187 No TOC on this page?: __NOTOC__ on this page, to be precise: fixed
차이 · 역사 0 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Remove transclusion of guidelines containing a __NOTOC__
차이 · 역사 809 Suggestion for backlog: Another backlog elimination drive would help, but is not a long term solution
차이 · 역사 16 Query re holds and GA requests: clarify: formalities of renomination
차이 · 역사 258 Query re holds and GA requests: Formalities preferable, but you can pass it quite quickly if it meets the standard
차이 · 역사 184 Article History Template: Please clarify
차이 · 역사 246 Article History Template: Not yet
차이 · 역사 102 Article failed by a major contributor: Thanks VT
차이 · 역사 144 Article failed by a major contributor: renominate, but GAR is waiting ready if you need it
차이 · 역사 682 Article History Template: Leave it to the bots
차이 · 역사 412 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Reply to Pete
차이 · 역사 284 Can nominators review?: No, it seems
차이 · 역사 1,588 Can nominators review?: Comment
차이 · 역사 209 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: You could use GAList/check
차이 · 역사 341 Can nominators review?: Re Epbr's suggestion
차이 · 역사 0 Can nominators review?: Fix typo
차이 · 역사 1,577 Can nominators review?: new section
차이 · 역사 183 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Fix my incorrect comment
차이 · 역사 418 Image licensing issue: On image page suffices
차이 · 역사 727 Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Looks good so far
차이 · 역사 452 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Great idea!
차이 · 역사 199 Quality vs quantity: Agree 100%
차이 · 역사 388 Quality vs quantity: Which template + addition to guidelines
차이 · 역사 115 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Another option for Pete
차이 · 역사 877 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to Pete: Use GAList, etc., but leave pass/fail blank until you make your decision
차이 · 역사 157 Quick Failing an Aricticle due to nominator inactivity: Sure, but it is not a quick fail
차이 · 역사 426 Wikilinking dates: Not a GA criterion
차이 · 역사 523 Quality vs quantity: What is undemocratic? I'm curious
차이 · 역사 13 Theatre, film and drama: Correct name of FA cat
차이 · 역사 -1 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Bad typo day :
차이 · 역사 -1 Quality vs quantity: Fix (very un-Freudian) typo! :
차이 · 역사 862 Quality vs quantity: Ask Peanut4?
차이 · 역사 257 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Graph
차이 · 역사 207 Backlog and automation: "A bot failed my article!" - probably not a good idea :
차이 · 역사 19 Quality vs quantity: Link editor
차이 · 역사 2,503 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Two schools
차이 · 역사 636 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on architecture
차이 · 역사 1,480 Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to VT
차이 · 역사 56 Backlog and automation: It seems to me that we need a section break here: feel free to retitle it
차이 · 역사 264 Theatre, film and drama: Comment on subdividing
차이 · 역사 1,621 Backlog and automation: Reply to CP
차이 · 역사 -2 Backlog and automation: this->it
차이 · 역사 620 Backlog and automation: Reply to Ruhrfisch
차이 · 역사 447 Theatre, film and drama: new section
차이 · 역사 1,255 Backlog and automation: Reply to DHMO
차이 · 역사 3,299 Backlog and automation: new section
차이 · 역사 116 Just Checking: No, it's updated regularly by a bot
차이 · 역사 75 Just Checking: Wikilink guidelines: it is not a conflict of interest to fix problems with an article under review
차이 · 역사 875 Just Checking: It is not a conflict of interest to copyedit during a review
차이 · 역사 521 A-Class nominations: Reply
차이 · 역사 190 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 15/12/2007: Wishful thinking?
차이 · 역사 94 Templates: Thanks Pete
차이 · 역사 576 On hold and second opinion: We lost another potential reviewer
차이 · 역사 345 Templates: Its just technobabble for different ways of using templates
차이 · 역사 333 Templates: Subst
차이 · 역사 260 On hold and second opinion: Insight and wisdom
차이 · 역사 859 On hold and second opinion: Comments
차이 · 역사 382 Question about fail: Is it a reliable source?
차이 · 역사 575 On hold and second opinion: Reply to VT and comment on redlinks
차이 · 역사 2,584 On hold and second opinion: new section
차이 · 역사 709 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Right idea, wrong template?
차이 · 역사 178 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Done
차이 · 역사 -631 If you review an article...: Remove duplicate comment apparently in wrong section: Twigboy, revert me if this was your intention
차이 · 역사 384 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Agree/reply
차이 · 역사 1,765 If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Both tenses are used
차이 · 역사 488 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Multiple reviewers in series
차이 · 역사 676 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Agree with goal, but not approach + note of realism (over ec)
차이 · 역사 510 an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: WP:OWN is about mainspace, but otherwise, Ling has a point
차이 · 역사 138 Alphabet: More topical joke? :
차이 · 역사 399 Alphabet: Order of top-level is used in multiple places
차이 · 역사 479 Alphabet: This glitch was caused by a recent split
차이 · 역사 490 Subsubtopics: Issues raised about e.g. "Music"
차이 · 역사 859 Green: Various replies
차이 · 역사 699 Tefillin, 17 days on hold: Removed "OnHold"
차이 · 역사 342 Green: Lighter background adopted, plus attempt to fix first panel
차이 · 역사 343 Subsubtopics: Done
차이 · 역사 142 Subsubtopics: Will do
차이 · 역사 466 Green: Explain cyan: also I tried a lighter colour at WP:WGA
차이 · 역사 607 Pro Wrestling WikiProject: Not a conflict of interest, but thanks for commenting here
차이 · 역사 509 Green: The delicate balance between lime and cyan :
차이 · 역사 396 Green: Try to clarify question in order to understand answers
차이 · 역사 905 Green: Questions
차이 · 역사 187 GAList3 is now available: Sorted
차이 · 역사 401 I will try: Biographies are not listed separately, but within each subject (apologies that no one replied to you sooner)
차이 · 역사 356 Subsubtopics: new section
차이 · 역사 301 GAList3 is now available: Deleted: good luck with Balzac!
차이 · 역사 451 GAList3 is now available: FGAN and PGAN? I can help if you like
차이 · 역사 307 GAList3 is now available: Clarify, I hope ;
차이 · 역사 212 Slipping: Nice idea
차이 · 역사 386 GAList3 is now available: Great, but why the new template name?
차이 · 역사 462 Slipping: That is what I meant, thanks EyeSerene :
차이 · 역사 829 Slipping: We need some simplification and automation in my opinion
차이 · 역사 972 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Reply to Moni3
차이 · 역사 585 GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Remove image
차이 · 역사 535 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 27/10/2007: Criteria are fairly simple ;
차이 · 역사 153 Homeopathy nomination: Yu
차이 · 역사 387 Homeopathy nomination: Check out the talk page maybe?
차이 · 역사 94 Homeopathy nomination: Which topic?
차이 · 역사 288 More trouble than it's worth?: If nominators wrongly categorize, recategorize!
차이 · 역사 83 More trouble than it's worth?: Agree
차이 · 역사 239 GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 13/10/2007: Procedural error? ;
차이 · 역사 259 Scalability: Discuss automation further at WP:WGA?
차이 · 역사 664 Scalability: Automation and quality checking
차이 · 역사 469 Backlog: Wishful thinking
차이 · 역사 1 Update name
차이 · 역사 449 Scalability: Two replies
차이 · 역사 116 Chicago Marathon: Not a serious concern
차이 · 역사 146 Chicago Marathon: Looks like it fails criterion 5 to me ;
차이 · 역사 3,250 Scalability: Replies and further thoughts
차이 · 역사 1 Scalability: tense
차이 · 역사 52 Scalability: Clarify a few statistical points
차이 · 역사 2,963 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Making this process scalable
차이 · 역사 1,404 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: A few replies
차이 · 역사 359 LONG: It's radical stuff indeed
차이 · 역사 366 Review workshop: Argued against this, but good luck
차이 · 역사 -139 Update archive
차이 · 역사 264 LONG: It is just one click awaty
차이 · 역사 558 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: It aint about tidying, it is about efficiency
차이 · 역사 202 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?:
차이 · 역사 245 LONG: new section
차이 · 역사 696 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Replies and clarifications
차이 · 역사 1,998 Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: new section
차이 · 역사 -944 Undid revision 161837928 by Derek.cashman (talk) Return GA talk page query to original location
차이 · 역사 189 Streamlining: More minor changes
차이 · 역사 639 Streamlining: new section
차이 · 역사 18 Option 2: Nominations: Page moved and redirects fixed
차이 · 역사 6 Update archive links
차이 · 역사 144 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Nice one
차이 · 역사 0 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Noun not verb, sorryu
차이 · 역사 315 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Best practise?
차이 · 역사 106 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?:
차이 · 역사 129 How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: GAList
차이 · 역사 347 Option 2: Nominations: Admin needed
차이 · 역사 455 References in the lead section: Footnotes and citations in the lead are permissible but not required
차이 · 역사 591 Option 2: Nominations: Definitions and practicalities
차이 · 역사 545 Option 2: Nominations: GAR and nominee/nomination
차이 · 역사 3,149 A rose by any other name: new section
차이 · 역사 309 Wikiproject logic exists, should a Logic category exist also?: I think it is unnecessary and unhelpful
차이 · 역사 522 {{tl|ArticleHistory}}: Fixed
모든 시간대는 UTC입니다.

Leave a Reply