Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations (Log · Page History) |
| User | Geometry guy (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 586 |
| Minor edits | 40 (6.8%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 4 (0.7%) |
| Reverted edits | 4 (0.7%) |
| atbe1 | 4.4 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 356,313 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -3,515 |
Minor edits
·
40 (6.8%)
Major edits
·
546 (93.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
4 (0.7%)
Manual edits
·
582 (99.3%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (0.7%)
Unreverted edits
·
582 (99.3%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-08-04 22:03 | Diff · History | 1,226 | →Another solution? Co-nominations: Amplify idea and potential benefits |
| 2014-08-03 21:56 | Diff · History | 369 | →Another solution? Co-nominations: r |
| 2014-08-03 21:50 | Diff · History | 0 | →Oppose: fix numbering |
| 2014-08-03 21:49 | Diff · History | 558 | →Oppose: Not in spirit of GA: suggest alternative below: co-nominations |
| 2014-08-03 21:42 | Diff · History | 282 | →Another solution? Co-nominations: r |
| 2014-08-03 21:15 | Diff · History | 1,994 | →Another solution? Co-nominations: new section |
| 2012-01-28 02:07 | Diff · History | 626 | →Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Failing without a hold is an option that should be used more widely in preference to quickfails |
| 2012-01-26 01:17 | Diff · History | 242 | →Harvard citations: Thanks and comment |
| 2012-01-20 18:37 | Diff · History | 205 | →Some problems after Chris G's change: GAN error issue |
| 2012-01-19 09:46 | Diff · History | 135 | →Renomination of failed GA with no changes: Great - watchlisted |
| 2012-01-18 01:22 | Diff · History | 1,179 | →Renomination of failed GA with no changes: With tears in my eyes, options for GA, and this article |
| 2012-01-10 23:43 | Diff · History | 510 | →Category Splitting: Comment |
| 2012-01-08 06:41 | Diff · History | -298 | →RFC to make FA leaders elected, not appointed: rm |
| 2012-01-08 01:53 | Diff · History | 450 | →RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Reply to Aircorn |
| 2012-01-07 21:19 | Diff · History | 1,109 | →RfC: Proposal to limit excessive GA nominations: Oppose limits on nominations, obviously, and reply to Imzadi, Czarkoff |
| 2011-12-03 21:48 | Diff · History | 401 | →30 day limit proposal: Great idea |
| 2011-12-03 04:38 | Diff · History | 328 | →30 day limit proposal: Not just needing clarification, but completely wrong-headed |
| 2011-12-03 04:24 | Diff · History | 262 | →30 day limit proposal: Bad law makes for bad implementation |
| 2011-12-03 04:00 | Diff · History | 49 | →Jerem43's reviews: Hard cases make bad law |
| 2011-12-03 03:57 | Diff · History | 326 | →Jerem43's reviews: Er, what? |
| 2011-06-26 01:17 | Diff · History | 1,817 | →Is suggestion (review Artcile X by editor A, and he may return the favor by reviewing your article) ok?: It isn't about appearances, but good reviewing |
| 2011-04-04 20:36 | Diff · History | 2 | →Withdrawing nominations: |
| 2011-04-04 20:35 | Diff · History | 339 | →Withdrawing nominations: Add reminder of GA no-buro principle |
| 2011-04-03 17:55 | Diff · History | 154 | →Withdrawing nominations: Done |
| 2011-04-02 21:53 | Diff · History | 913 | →Withdrawing nominations: new section |
| 2011-04-02 21:39 | Diff · History | 246 | →Reviewing templates: Reply to WAID |
| 2011-03-29 21:22 | Diff · History | 9 | →Reviewing templates: |
| 2011-03-29 21:20 | Diff · History | 294 | →Reviewing templates: Replies to WAID |
| 2011-03-01 00:39 | Diff · History | 109 | →Tony Blair: Hopefully resolved |
| 2011-02-19 01:11 | Diff · History | 234 | →Renaming an article while undergoing GA process: Reply |
| 2011-02-18 20:40 | Diff · History | 1,060 | →Picture licensing question: Reply |
| 2011-02-14 08:11 | Diff · History | 161 | →How to classify a medieval fair?: Suggestion |
| 2011-01-27 01:59 | Diff · History | 737 | →Wrongly failed GA's: Use GAR, but make clear that your preferred outcome is restoring the nomination |
| 2010-12-23 13:09 | Diff · History | 271 | →On a GAN being a candidate for merging: Fixed |
| 2010-12-21 19:03 | Diff · History | 783 | →On a GAN being a candidate for merging: reply |
| 2010-11-23 01:04 | Diff · History | 192 | →GAN Statistic: Reply |
| 2010-11-21 23:33 | Diff · History | 389 | →Bot glitch: Now fixed, and how to avoid this in future |
| 2010-11-21 21:35 | Diff · History | 424 | →Bot glitch: Back "on hold", problem recurs. |
| 2010-11-21 19:53 | Diff · History | -97 | →Bot glitch: Still not fixed |
| 2010-11-21 19:16 | Diff · History | 260 | →Bot glitch: Update reply to Wizardman |
| 2010-11-21 19:08 | Diff · History | 551 | →Bot glitch: Reply to Wizardman |
| 2010-11-21 16:29 | Diff · History | 438 | →GAN Statistic: Suggested location |
| 2010-11-21 13:46 | Diff · History | 404 | →Bot glitch: Bot is adding a blank line |
| 2010-11-21 13:14 | Diff · History | 698 | →Bot glitch: Possible causes |
| 2010-11-08 20:54 | Diff · History | 550 | →Abandoned GAR: Fixed - suggested process |
| 2010-11-07 20:52 | Diff · History | 398 | →Clarification please?: Template name is historical, article history is more clear |
| 2010-11-06 01:23 | Diff · History | 455 | →Karma system: Data can be helpful, but can also be misused |
| 2010-11-06 01:13 | Diff · History | 153 | →Taking over a GA review: Thanks for reporting it here |
| 2010-11-05 00:41 | Diff · History | 782 | →Karma system: GA depends upon its integrity and goal: to list precisely those articles which meet the GA criteria |
| 2010-11-02 23:25 | Diff · History | 622 | →Good article nominations: Two comments |
| 2010-10-24 23:37 | Diff · History | 458 | →Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: Comment on reevaluation |
| 2010-10-16 20:25 | Diff · History | 906 | →Feedback/reevaluation of the GA bot automation of WP:GAN: new section |
| 2010-10-09 00:18 | Diff · History | 1,281 | →10,000 GAs: a time to celebrate and refocus on our mission: new section |
| 2010-09-29 20:41 | Diff · History | 441 | →Time to limit nominations: And this is the wrong time to decide so |
| 2010-09-28 15:30 | Diff · History | 104 | →StatisticianBot back up and running: Thanks you again |
| 2010-09-26 22:18 | Diff · History | 946 | →Are IPs allowed to nominate articles?: Disentangle complicated story |
| 2010-09-25 23:33 | Diff · History | 2,673 | →Proposal to change the broadness criteria: Long comment |
| 2010-09-23 22:21 | Diff · History | 304 | →Since this is automated: Done long ago: here's the link |
| 2010-09-22 22:06 | Diff · History | 281 | →Editors are still doing things manually: Comment |
| 2010-09-21 22:52 | Diff · History | 403 | →Glitch on the project page: Precedent |
| 2010-09-20 20:39 | Diff · History | 345 | →New bot and Template:ArticleHistory: Good question, partial answer |
| 2010-09-19 20:21 | Diff · History | 445 | →Operation Paula: Heads up |
| 2010-09-19 19:58 | Diff · History | 356 | →Operation Paula: Not nominated - try again |
| 2010-09-10 21:06 | Diff · History | 278 | →automated GAN updates: Availability |
| 2010-09-09 19:36 | Diff · History | 287 | →automated GAN updates: Suggest start date/time |
| 2010-09-08 21:20 | Diff · History | 725 | →automated GAN updates: Propose live trial |
| 2010-09-08 21:17 | Diff · History | 39,224 | Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Edge3 |
| 2010-09-08 21:17 | Diff · History | -39,814 | (reverted) Propose live trial |
| 2010-09-08 21:08 | Diff · History | 590 | →automated GAN updates: Propose live trial |
| 2010-08-24 22:56 | Diff · History | 157 | →Page numbers for magazine articles: Added lines at WP:GACN |
| 2010-08-24 22:24 | Diff · History | 721 | →Page numbers for magazine articles: Comment based on GA criteria |
| 2010-08-23 21:38 | Diff · History | 1,261 | →Backlog = cap?: Comments on this topic and proposal |
| 2010-08-09 20:52 | Diff · History | 1,079 | →Section break: Relative status of various pages |
| 2010-08-08 21:36 | Diff · History | 587 | →Section break: Ideas so far |
| 2010-08-08 21:26 | Diff · History | 1,310 | →Approval from GA Director: Two replies |
| 2010-08-08 20:04 | Diff · History | 1,017 | →Approval from GA Director: Reply re GA-Class |
| 2010-08-08 18:40 | Diff · History | 1,049 | →Approval from GA Director: Replies in 3 places |
| 2010-08-08 17:37 | Diff · History | 1,458 | →Approval from GA Director: Agree with two ideas |
| 2010-08-08 15:47 | Diff · History | 1,336 | →Approval from GA Director: Explanations of processes and comments |
| 2010-07-28 20:03 | Diff · History | 642 | →GAN backlog drive: Another motivation: 10000 GAs |
| 2010-07-20 18:47 | Diff · History | 41 | Add archive box link |
| 2010-07-04 01:05 | Diff · History | 189 | Ann Romney nomination reopened without prejudice |
| 2010-06-14 21:28 | Diff · History | 475 | →GAR for September 11 attacks: new section |
| 2010-06-07 22:28 | Diff · History | 1,010 | →Community GAR reminder: new section |
| 2010-06-07 22:19 | Diff · History | 138 | →Frequently Asked Questions infobox: Updated |
| 2010-05-31 18:07 | Diff · History | 429 | →Review closing bot: Reply To Xtzou |
| 2010-05-31 17:00 | Diff · History | 1,504 | →Review closing bot: Remarks and a question about automating WP:GAN |
| 2010-05-10 19:32 | Diff · History | 170 | →Review requested: Done and thanks |
| 2010-04-10 20:35 | Diff · History | 14 | Collapse FAQ as reviewers primarily need to get to the TOC easily |
| 2010-03-23 19:54 | Diff · History | 405 | →WP:Good article reassessment/Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)/2: new section |
| 2010-03-16 00:31 | Diff · History | 115 | →Troubling trend?: WP:RGA |
| 2010-01-22 22:11 | Diff · History | 519 | →Criterion 2b: Comment |
| 2010-01-22 21:43 | Diff · History | 1,678 | →Criterion 2b: Comment |
| 2009-12-21 21:05 | Diff · History | 1,398 | →Is this an article or a list?: eligibility vs passableness |
| 2009-12-05 22:29 | Diff · History | 495 | →Is this an article or list?: Quote |
| 2009-12-05 21:53 | Diff · History | 1,143 | →Is this an article or list?: Reply to dabomb |
| 2009-12-02 07:19 | Diff · History | 226 | →Some strange GA reviews: PS to request |
| 2009-12-02 06:47 | Diff · History | 403 | →Some strange GA reviews: Fixes, and request to check I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song); review page Talk:I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)/GA1 |
| 2009-11-30 23:05 | Diff · History | 273 | →Some strange GA reviews: What you do have to check |
| 2009-11-30 22:18 | Diff · History | 313 | →Report bot: GAN/Status |
| 2009-11-30 22:14 | Diff · History | 7 | →Some strange GA reviews: Brad Follmer returned to the nominations list and the review moved to /GA1/archive |
| 2009-11-30 20:23 | Diff · History | 645 | →Some strange GA reviews: Concur plus comments |
| 2009-11-17 00:06 | Diff · History | 423 | Comment on new subtopics and current GAs |
| 2009-11-09 18:15 | Diff · History | 133 | →GA Review transcluding multiple times: Blocked |
| 2009-11-03 22:08 | Diff · History | 905 | →Bot is almost there: Page to watchlist and comment on |
| 2009-10-25 00:09 | Diff · History | 223 | →Reviewer instructions on review page's edit box: Will do |
| 2009-10-14 20:50 | Diff · History | 815 | →Things that still need to be accomplished: Comment |
| 2009-10-13 22:26 | Diff · History | 1 | →Post-automation guidelines draft: Typo |
| 2009-10-13 22:24 | Diff · History | 1,073 | →Post-automation guidelines draft: Support and flexibility for reviewers is the key |
| 2009-10-07 09:30 | Diff · History | 581 | →Premature GAN: Comment |
| 2009-10-05 20:11 | Diff · History | 629 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Suggest a back-up operation |
| 2009-10-04 22:13 | Diff · History | 200 | →Further issues: That would help - good luck with the challenge! |
| 2009-10-04 22:09 | Diff · History | 514 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment on templates |
| 2009-10-04 22:04 | Diff · History | 364 | →Review by consensus: We don't need more of this, we need less of this |
| 2009-10-04 20:24 | Diff · History | 1,141 | →Further issues: Edit summaries |
| 2009-10-04 13:01 | Diff · History | 90 | →Green boxes: Agree with Diderot's dreams |
| 2009-10-04 13:00 | Diff · History | 489 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Trim comment and start subsection on other issues |
| 2009-10-04 11:39 | Diff · History | 2,203 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies |
| 2009-10-02 22:09 | Diff · History | 268 | →another major issue with automated the GAN page: Different issue but would also be helpful |
| 2009-10-02 20:20 | Diff · History | 621 | →Green boxes: Agree |
| 2009-10-02 20:13 | Diff · History | 1,912 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Replies to Dr. Cash |
| 2009-10-01 08:17 | Diff · History | 322 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Comment |
| 2009-10-01 08:06 | Diff · History | 983 | →Automatic listing of nominees at WP:GAN: Reply |
| 2009-09-30 08:36 | Diff · History | 0 | Update archive number |
| 2009-09-29 22:57 | Diff · History | 998 | →Review by consensus: Comments |
| 2009-09-28 22:37 | Diff · History | 805 | Retitle and reply |
| 2009-09-28 22:19 | Diff · History | 1,530 | →Bot is ready to take over: Further comments and issues |
| 2009-09-28 07:56 | Diff · History | 763 | →Bot is ready to take over: Replies |
| 2009-09-27 23:56 | Diff · History | 648 | →Bot is ready to take over: Benefit worth the effort |
| 2009-09-27 23:31 | Diff · History | 173 | →Bot is ready to take over: Reply |
| 2009-09-27 23:24 | Diff · History | 893 | →Review by consensus: 2.5 million articles are still crap; we need to fix them, not more bureaucracy |
| 2009-09-27 23:09 | Diff · History | 574 | →Something to bring up when we reconsider putting the GA sign on article pages: Comment |
| 2009-09-27 23:00 | Diff · History | 34 | Link to new archive |
| 2009-09-27 22:19 | Diff · History | 975 | →Bot is ready to take over: Comments |
| 2009-09-23 23:27 | Diff · History | 636 | →Order of reviewing articles: Reply |
| 2009-09-23 21:34 | Diff · History | 434 | →Order of reviewing articles: Encouraging editors who work on older nominations |
| 2009-09-23 08:17 | Diff · History | 693 | Neutral title and reply |
| 2009-09-20 22:30 | Diff · History | 696 | →Question about recent quick fail: Looks like the workings of the anti-Pastafarian cabal to me |
| 2009-09-16 21:41 | Diff · History | 173 | →Enforcement of seven day grace periods of articles on hold: FAQ would indeed help |
| 2009-09-16 21:40 | Diff · History | 162 | →Proposal: Consensus |
| 2009-09-11 00:41 | Diff · History | 156 | →Nomination restrictions: Refer to FAQ : |
| 2009-09-11 00:23 | Diff · History | 133 | →Nomination restrictions: With what benefit? |
| 2009-09-10 23:23 | Diff · History | 186 | →Nomination restrictions: Evidence please |
| 2009-09-06 22:31 | Diff · History | 184 | →Nomination restrictions: May be a good idea; wikilink suitable page |
| 2009-09-06 21:50 | Diff · History | 2,177 | →Nomination restrictions: Standard reasons and explanations |
| 2009-08-24 22:23 | Diff · History | -85 | →Question on procedure, and perhaps templates: Fix double sig typo |
| 2009-08-20 23:13 | Diff · History | 1,096 | →Any registered editor?: Summary: excellent advice above on when to ignore the rules |
| 2009-08-18 20:49 | Diff · History | 1,705 | →Question - Theatre: Current set-up and general replies |
| 2009-08-15 16:30 | Diff · History | 159 | →Question - Theatre: Problem? |
| 2009-08-12 23:49 | Diff · History | 674 | →How short may a GA be?: Suggestions on TNA Legends Championship |
| 2009-08-10 11:01 | Diff · History | 217 | I agree. Move along please... |
| 2009-08-07 23:16 | Diff · History | 322 | →milestone reached: Reply to Dr C |
| 2009-08-06 22:07 | Diff · History | 207 | →milestone reached: Point of fact |
| 2009-08-06 21:54 | Diff · History | 509 | →milestone reached: WP:GA/S |
| 2009-08-05 22:32 | Diff · History | 887 | →milestone reached: Comments |
| 2009-08-02 23:13 | Diff · History | 210 | →Reviewing guidelines: new section |
| 2009-08-02 22:57 | Diff · History | 509 | →protection and stability.: Comment |
| 2009-08-02 22:49 | Diff · History | 963 | →GA Process: Explain role of GA and its motivations |
| 2009-08-02 22:29 | Diff · History | 190 | →GA1 template: If there is demand |
| 2009-07-20 21:58 | Diff · History | 86 | →Any mathematicians about?: No probs |
| 2009-07-09 21:59 | Diff · History | 424 | →Get on Your Boots withdrawing: Advantage of ArticleHistory |
| 2009-06-22 00:15 | Diff · History | 426 | →Stability of section headings: new section |
| 2009-06-21 22:29 | Diff · History | 786 | →Any reason why the peer review bot isn't reviewing GAN?: Comment |
| 2009-06-15 21:10 | Diff · History | 187 | Sweeps running gag : |
| 2009-06-14 21:57 | Diff · History | 146 | →Content noticeboard: Not much |
| 2009-06-11 23:09 | Diff · History | 1,085 | Focus on main issues and provide some resources |
| 2009-06-07 21:09 | Diff · History | 1,003 | →Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Improving the encyclopedia |
| 2009-06-06 21:49 | Diff · History | 131 | →Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Strong point |
| 2009-06-06 20:36 | Diff · History | 386 | →Homosexual transsexual: Reply |
| 2009-06-06 17:41 | Diff · History | 1,444 | →Can non-contributors to an article nominate it for GAN?: Yes |
| 2009-06-06 14:36 | Diff · History | 1,253 | →Homosexual transsexual: Suggestion |
| 2009-05-31 11:18 | Diff · History | 301 | →Good articles which are found wanting at FAC: new section |
| 2009-05-18 09:34 | Diff · History | 362 | →Reassessment: point of GAN |
| 2009-05-17 17:00 | Diff · History | -176 | Oops my bad |
| 2009-05-17 16:59 | Diff · History | 176 | (reverted) →Fatbeard (South Park): GAN |
| 2009-05-14 22:11 | Diff · History | 310 | →7 minute review: Comment on GAR |
| 2009-05-07 21:46 | Diff · History | 86 | →An underused resource: No worries |
| 2009-05-07 21:31 | Diff · History | 109 | →An underused resource: Transclusion |
| 2009-05-07 21:18 | Diff · History | 243 | →An underused resource: Go for it |
| 2009-05-07 20:22 | Diff · History | 493 | →An underused resource: new section |
| 2009-05-06 22:55 | Diff · History | 166 | →What has happened with GA reviewing?: Pride for high quality reviews |
| 2009-05-02 22:04 | Diff · History | 812 | →California Proposition 8 (2008): Link to similar recent case and similar solution |
| 2009-05-02 21:30 | Diff · History | 44 | New archive needed |
| 2009-04-18 11:23 | Diff · History | 1,126 | →Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics: Comments and suggestion |
| 2009-04-16 19:35 | Diff · History | 635 | →Quality of reviews: One review is not the end of the story |
| 2009-03-21 22:51 | Diff · History | 240 | →Reviewing articles that you've reviewed before: Fine, the main issue is significant prior contribution to the article |
| 2009-03-16 00:37 | Diff · History | -1,055 | I said, enough |
| 2009-03-16 00:35 | Diff · History | 1,055 | (reverted) Reverted edits by Geometry guy (talk) to last version by Pyrotec |
| 2009-03-16 00:33 | Diff · History | -1,055 | (reverted) Undid revision 277528672 by Pyrotec (talk) |
| 2009-03-15 23:07 | Diff · History | 1,009 | →Using inappropriate criteria for quick fail reviews: Enough |
| 2009-03-01 23:08 | Diff · History | 483 | →What should I do if an article I'm reviewing doesn't satisfy notability?: Reply |
| 2009-03-01 20:30 | Diff · History | 1,143 | →Curious: |
| 2009-03-01 19:49 | Diff · History | 178 | →Asking advice for GA category: Look to WP:GA |
| 2009-02-23 21:29 | Diff · History | 324 | →Proposal to merge GAN & PR: Comment |
| 2009-02-22 11:01 | Diff · History | 168 | →Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ruth Martin (Lassie)/1: Community reassessment - comments appreciated |
| 2009-02-18 08:57 | Diff · History | 164 | →Being "broad", even when there are no references: a copy of raw data is still a primary source |
| 2009-02-18 00:22 | Diff · History | 1,428 | →Being "broad", even when there are no references: Comment and address real issue |
| 2009-02-15 13:30 | Diff · History | 345 | →Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Suggest individual reassessment |
| 2009-02-15 13:11 | Diff · History | 608 | →Kohlberg Kravis Roberts: Agree |
| 2009-02-09 17:22 | Diff · History | 192 | →award for backlog cleaning: |
| 2009-02-09 08:34 | Diff · History | 383 | →Is this a list?: "Should this be a list" is actually a better question |
| 2009-02-06 18:01 | Diff · History | 615 | →Slow/unresponsive reviewer: Timescales |
| 2009-02-06 01:04 | Diff · History | 178 | →Subst error with a GAR subpage?: |
| 2009-02-05 23:49 | Diff · History | 1 | →Subst error with a GAR subpage?: |
| 2009-02-05 23:49 | Diff · History | 186 | →Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Transclusion onto talk page may have been the problem |
| 2009-02-05 23:41 | Diff · History | 213 | →Subst error with a GAR subpage?: Comment |
| 2009-02-04 23:43 | Diff · History | 229 | →This process is broken: Add point of information |
| 2009-02-04 22:29 | Diff · History | 612 | →This process is broken: Please slow down |
| 2009-02-04 21:31 | Diff · History | 0 | →Break: Serious thought needed (typo) |
| 2009-02-04 21:30 | Diff · History | 392 | →Break: Serious thought needed |
| 2009-02-04 20:54 | Diff · History | 3,092 | →Break: Add to copy |
| 2009-02-04 00:48 | Diff · History | 249 | →Problematic review: Please provide links, thanks |
| 2009-02-03 22:50 | Diff · History | 950 | →Problematic review: Three short comments |
| 2009-02-02 23:17 | Diff · History | 608 | →Problematic review: Replies |
| 2009-02-02 23:06 | Diff · History | 13 | →How to handle the cricket nominations?: My own comment was unclear |
| 2009-02-02 23:04 | Diff · History | 212 | →How to handle the cricket nominations?: Been meaning to comment on this, but too busy! SFB has the clearest answer for JRP! |
| 2009-02-02 20:34 | Diff · History | 3 | →Problematic review: |
| 2009-02-02 20:32 | Diff · History | 58 | →Problematic review: |
| 2009-02-02 20:30 | Diff · History | 1,161 | →Problematic review: Then we need a proper review |
| 2009-02-01 22:04 | Diff · History | 1,669 | →Is there a limit to how many noms you have?: Replies |
| 2009-02-01 21:33 | Diff · History | 1,143 | →Question about offering tit for tat incentive: Helping the helpful is part of collegiate editing, but tit for tat is dangerous ground |
| 2009-02-01 01:03 | Diff · History | 206 | →Just playing Devil's advocate: Best practice like this needs to encourage others |
| 2009-01-31 23:41 | Diff · History | 608 | →Just playing Devil's advocate: When you are the lead reviewer, it is your call |
| 2009-01-31 23:10 | Diff · History | 170 | →Just playing Devil's advocate: Even if it doesn't happen, there is no harm in encouraging it |
| 2009-01-31 23:06 | Diff · History | 942 | →WP:Notability (fiction): Issue |
| 2009-01-31 22:19 | Diff · History | 700 | →Just playing Devil's advocate: This is a nice idea in the context of open review |
| 2009-01-31 14:00 | Diff · History | 639 | →WP:Notability (fiction): new section |
| 2009-01-29 21:59 | Diff · History | 289 | →Mac OS X: Concise comment |
| 2009-01-29 00:22 | Diff · History | 783 | →Question on comprehensiveness: Reply |
| 2009-01-28 23:46 | Diff · History | 621 | →Question on comprehensiveness: This is a serious issue |
| 2009-01-28 23:13 | Diff · History | 610 | →Question on comprehensiveness: WP:BLP |
| 2009-01-28 20:44 | Diff · History | 1,661 | →Is there a limit to how many times this thread crops up?: Number of articles at GAN is irrelevant - indeed it provides reviewers with more choice - need to encourage more nominators to review |
| 2009-01-27 20:16 | Diff · History | 282 | →GA guides: Links |
| 2009-01-22 23:57 | Diff · History | 829 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: Failing without a hold, but with a review should be encouraged |
| 2009-01-22 22:09 | Diff · History | 885 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: Comment |
| 2009-01-22 00:21 | Diff · History | 188 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Ukraine and Slovakia |
| 2009-01-22 00:01 | Diff · History | -7 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia |
| 2009-01-22 00:00 | Diff · History | 291 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: cf Prussia |
| 2009-01-21 21:52 | Diff · History | 950 | →Articles where sources are in foreign language: Anacronisms |
| 2009-01-20 23:40 | Diff · History | 88 | →GA review not updating on article Talk page: WP:PURGE would be the usual answer |
| 2009-01-20 20:23 | Diff · History | 1,313 | →As a review: Comment on reviewer levels and flexibility |
| 2009-01-20 20:02 | Diff · History | 1,778 | →Poor quality articles: |
| 2009-01-19 23:19 | Diff · History | 756 | →Poor quality articles: Reply |
| 2009-01-19 19:14 | Diff · History | 703 | →Poor quality articles: Comment |
| 2009-01-18 23:24 | Diff · History | 546 | Request re section titles |
| 2009-01-18 23:13 | Diff · History | 826 | →Drive-by fail: Simpler solution |
| 2009-01-18 22:44 | Diff · History | 903 | →Drive by promotion of Zarqa River: Reply |
| 2009-01-18 13:54 | Diff · History | 288 | →Drive-by nomination: |
| 2009-01-16 21:05 | Diff · History | 356 | →Drive-by nomination: Reply |
| 2009-01-16 20:46 | Diff · History | 889 | →Drive-by nomination: Done, but add general comment on quick-failing, administrative removal and failing without a hold |
| 2009-01-16 10:07 | Diff · History | 580 | →Biology and medicine: Explain levels |
| 2009-01-15 20:20 | Diff · History | 1,527 | →Criticism, not review: Confusion, query, and comment |
| 2009-01-15 19:41 | Diff · History | 756 | →Biology and medicine: Reply and comment |
| 2009-01-12 22:57 | Diff · History | 295 | →Model GA reviews: Request for more |
| 2009-01-08 22:25 | Diff · History | 462 | →Model GA reviews: new section |
| 2009-01-06 10:43 | Diff · History | 153 | →Question on how to disengage: Welcome, as responses demonstrate |
| 2009-01-04 22:47 | Diff · History | 903 | →Quid pro quo and backlog: Comments |
| 2009-01-04 22:35 | Diff · History | 211 | →Closing of nomination page: Set-up |
| 2009-01-04 20:57 | Diff · History | 304 | →Quid pro quo and backlog: Agree |
| 2009-01-04 19:56 | Diff · History | 360 | →Closing of nomination page: Comment |
| 2009-01-04 18:48 | Diff · History | 250 | →GA and peer review: Fine |
| 2009-01-03 20:37 | Diff · History | 476 | GAN reviewer of the month, graph and comment |
| 2008-12-17 23:43 | Diff · History | 949 | →Support: Support with comments |
| 2008-12-17 23:23 | Diff · History | 399 | →Neutral: Comment |
| 2008-12-17 23:14 | Diff · History | 304 | →Questions: Those cases were not typical |
| 2008-12-17 20:55 | Diff · History | 246 | Will add my own views in due course |
| 2008-12-17 20:51 | Diff · History | 544 | →Questions: GAR can cope |
| 2008-12-17 20:42 | Diff · History | 470 | →Neutral: Comment on reviewer numbers |
| 2008-12-17 20:31 | Diff · History | 446 | →Oppose: Comment: I think this actually reduces instruction creep |
| 2008-12-16 23:45 | Diff · History | 217 | →Please help with the ASCB workshop: What can we do to help? |
| 2008-12-16 20:55 | Diff · History | 978 | →Plagiarism and reliable sources: new section |
| 2008-12-14 19:21 | Diff · History | 52 | new archive started; restructure slightly; 7->10d archiving |
| 2008-12-14 19:01 | Diff · History | 0 | →A broken process?: Sigh, I should know how to sigh |
| 2008-12-14 18:25 | Diff · History | 586 | →A broken process?: Nostalgia and elimination drives |
| 2008-12-13 18:55 | Diff · History | 141 | →Please help with the ASCB workshop: UTC |
| 2008-12-13 13:19 | Diff · History | 615 | →Limiting nominations?: Statistics |
| 2008-12-13 02:14 | Diff · History | 118 | →Please help with the ASCB workshop: Count me in. UTC times would be helpful |
| 2008-12-03 21:16 | Diff · History | 180 | →Community GAR reminder: Pretty please, and maybe alternative meaning of GAR would not meet with universal approval : |
| 2008-12-03 21:11 | Diff · History | 167 | →User:Dr pda/Good article statistics: Reply |
| 2008-12-01 21:31 | Diff · History | 301 | →Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: Community reassessment opened |
| 2008-12-01 20:48 | Diff · History | 1,094 | →Community GAR reminder: new section |
| 2008-11-30 22:00 | Diff · History | 367 | →Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: Reply |
| 2008-11-30 19:05 | Diff · History | 1,169 | →Apologies for disruption to GAN subpages; normal service now resumed: new section |
| 2008-11-29 15:12 | Diff · History | 563 | →Rule to make only established editors review for GA status?: Nothing to see here : |
| 2008-11-29 14:49 | Diff · History | 1,401 | →Rejecting an article on its subject not merit: I fail to see any signs of instability and not reviewing it goes against basic GA principles and considerable precedent |
| 2008-11-25 19:19 | Diff · History | 215 | →Pressure of work: Reply |
| 2008-11-19 22:40 | Diff · History | 70 | →Backlog update: Add |
| 2008-11-19 22:38 | Diff · History | 149 | →Backlog update: |
| 2008-11-19 22:09 | Diff · History | 545 | →Backlog update: new section |
| 2008-11-18 20:56 | Diff · History | 255 | →Moving up nominations: New (albeit experimental) resource |
| 2008-11-15 21:45 | Diff · History | 161 | →Withdraw a GAN - how to handle - Talk:Article/GA1: Agree |
| 2008-10-22 20:25 | Diff · History | 200 | →Icons!: Confuses WikiProject ratings and community assessments |
| 2008-10-17 20:56 | Diff · History | 2 | →Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Fix link to featured topic criteria |
| 2008-10-17 20:53 | Diff · History | 5 | →Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: copyedit replies |
| 2008-10-17 20:52 | Diff · History | 492 | →Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Broadness and structural weaknesses |
| 2008-10-17 20:43 | Diff · History | 423 | →Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: The FTC need to be fixed methinks |
| 2008-10-16 20:11 | Diff · History | 1,133 | →Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy: Merge or even nominate for deletion! |
| 2008-10-06 21:50 | Diff · History | 1,194 | GAN - GA links |
| 2008-10-06 20:34 | Diff · History | 302 | →Citation styles - MoS question: Beautifully formatted unreliable sources do not a GA make |
| 2008-10-06 18:23 | Diff · History | 325 | →Links and reports: Well spotted |
| 2008-10-06 00:03 | Diff · History | 365 | →Time for a purge: Provide member info from cats |
| 2008-10-04 21:36 | Diff · History | 308 | →Time for a purge: Try asking Giggy |
| 2008-10-04 21:11 | Diff · History | 379 | →Time for a purge: Advertising needed |
| 2008-10-04 21:06 | Diff · History | 201 | →Review Page: Testing |
| 2008-10-04 09:27 | Diff · History | 180 | →Review Page: Links added (new reviews only) |
| 2008-10-03 21:36 | Diff · History | 1,273 | →Time for a purge: Comments and graph |
| 2008-10-02 19:44 | Diff · History | 88 | →Strange transclusion problem: WP:PURGE |
| 2008-10-02 18:49 | Diff · History | 186 | →Time for a purge: Link to previous drives |
| 2008-10-01 21:28 | Diff · History | 429 | →"Featured short articles": Proposal added to encourage cross-process thinking |
| 2008-09-24 22:06 | Diff · History | 218 | →GA review of Horse: Comment |
| 2008-09-18 23:42 | Diff · History | 191 | →Confusing redirect question: Comment |
| 2008-09-18 23:20 | Diff · History | 90 | →Confusing redirect question: Fixed |
| 2008-09-18 22:22 | Diff · History | 164 | 5000 GAs! Congratulations to all |
| 2008-09-18 09:54 | Diff · History | 402 | →A-Class: No hey banda |
| 2008-09-17 23:11 | Diff · History | 362 | →0.7 DVD: Oh ye of little faith : |
| 2008-09-17 20:17 | Diff · History | 538 | →0.7 DVD: Please help if you can |
| 2008-09-07 10:54 | Diff · History | 834 | Information is always a good thing, so I've updated the graphs : |
| 2008-08-27 21:52 | Diff · History | 566 | →Reformatting GA comments on talk page: EC |
| 2008-08-27 20:52 | Diff · History | 580 | →Help!: Reviewers have different styles; plus mention Template:GATable |
| 2008-08-27 20:43 | Diff · History | 802 | →Reformatting GA comments on talk page: Issues and fixes: are there other examples? |
| 2008-08-22 18:52 | Diff · History | 446 | →Screw up article talk page: All help with instructions is most welcome |
| 2008-08-22 18:24 | Diff · History | 315 | →Screw up article talk page: Fixed, but are the instructions clear enough? |
| 2008-08-07 23:34 | Diff · History | 428 | →GA review pages: Thought of that - comments? |
| 2008-08-07 22:18 | Diff · History | 765 | →GA review pages: Comments |
| 2008-07-13 12:18 | Diff · History | 1,518 | →Individual reassessment: new section |
| 2008-07-13 12:01 | Diff · History | 469 | →Unappropriate delist: Comment on changes in process |
| 2008-07-08 20:01 | Diff · History | 443 | →Backlog under 100: Good work, and request for help at WP:GAR |
| 2008-07-06 12:20 | Diff · History | 323 | →Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Another clue : |
| 2008-07-06 11:39 | Diff · History | 453 | →Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Attention folks... : |
| 2008-07-05 21:54 | Diff · History | 243 | →Stuck between a rock and an en-dash: Coward! : |
| 2008-07-04 03:05 | Diff · History | 203 | →GAN for 4X: Moved comments |
| 2008-06-30 22:15 | Diff · History | 53 | New archive and improve format |
| 2008-06-28 19:56 | Diff · History | 774 | →How long is the backlog, typically?: Replies |
| 2008-06-28 15:19 | Diff · History | 463 | →How long is the backlog, typically?: Float right updated backlog, and comment |
| 2008-06-28 10:29 | Diff · History | 446 | →How long is the backlog, typically?: Don't see the point of GAN directors |
| 2008-06-28 08:54 | Diff · History | 331 | →How long is the backlog, typically?: Something to watchlist |
| 2008-06-23 14:14 | Diff · History | 347 | →Article history: Don't waste time with oldids |
| 2008-06-19 22:54 | Diff · History | 126 | →Article history: Subpage system should help |
| 2008-06-19 22:24 | Diff · History | 429 | →Article history: Yes, or maybe no |
| 2008-06-14 17:44 | Diff · History | 313 | →New system: Clarifications always welcome |
| 2008-06-14 17:34 | Diff · History | 96 | →New system: Reply to Peanut4 |
| 2008-06-14 17:01 | Diff · History | 193 | →New system: Reply to Peanut4 |
| 2008-06-13 19:16 | Diff · History | 160 | →Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Okay in principle |
| 2008-06-13 08:07 | Diff · History | -79 | →Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Shorter reply |
| 2008-06-13 08:05 | Diff · History | 582 | →Sphinx Head was removed from the nomination in an out-of-process manner.: All GAN actions need a permanently linkable review, however brief |
| 2008-06-13 08:00 | Diff · History | 396 | →Adding "is a list" to Quick-fail criteria: Unnecessary |
| 2008-06-11 21:26 | Diff · History | 18 | →Review page headers: Indent |
| 2008-06-11 21:25 | Diff · History | 348 | →Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene |
| 2008-06-11 20:07 | Diff · History | 1,235 | →Review page headers: Reply to EyeSerene |
| 2008-06-09 21:07 | Diff · History | 1,416 | →New system: Reply to VT |
| 2008-06-06 19:35 | Diff · History | 201 | →new GA review programme.: Comment |
| 2008-06-04 09:56 | Diff · History | 119 | →Template maintenance...: Asked |
| 2008-06-03 19:23 | Diff · History | 36 | →new GA review programme.: Add that Gwinva is the main user applying the first technique |
| 2008-06-03 19:17 | Diff · History | 956 | →new GA review programme.: Reply ec, and post ec |
| 2008-06-03 19:03 | Diff · History | 1,052 | →Template maintenance...: Replies |
| 2008-05-31 23:04 | Diff · History | 1,029 | →Request: don't make up subpage names: Comment on plans to improve the quality of individual reassessment reviews |
| 2008-05-30 23:33 | Diff · History | 437 | →Request: don't make up subpage names: Reply to Malleus |
| 2008-05-30 23:19 | Diff · History | 15 | →Request: don't make up subpage names: Tweak for clarity |
| 2008-05-30 22:45 | Diff · History | 1,427 | →Request: don't make up subpage names: new section |
| 2008-05-30 09:32 | Diff · History | 0 | →Transition to review subpages: Fix redlink |
| 2008-05-30 00:30 | Diff · History | 0 | →Transition to review subpages: Typo |
| 2008-05-30 00:10 | Diff · History | 294 | →Transition to review subpages: Not a fan but don't object as long as it is not required |
| 2008-05-29 22:59 | Diff · History | 350 | →Subpage problem: Sort of fixed |
| 2008-05-28 18:18 | Diff · History | 122 | →Transition to review subpages: Definite improvement, thanks Dr.C |
| 2008-05-27 20:18 | Diff · History | 1,502 | →Transition to review subpages: Three comments |
| 2008-05-27 10:30 | Diff · History | 471 | →Transition to review subpages: Comments on finishing reviews |
| 2008-05-26 18:07 | Diff · History | 1,682 | →Transition to review subpages: new section |
| 2008-05-26 17:32 | Diff · History | 217 | →Are these relevant instructions or just the first draft (section break): Will comment in a new section |
| 2008-05-25 16:18 | Diff · History | 385 | →Subpage implementation (section break): Reply to Ruslik |
| 2008-05-25 10:54 | Diff · History | 485 | →Subpage implementation (section break): Comment |
| 2008-05-25 00:07 | Diff · History | 564 | →Subpage implementation (section break): Outstanding issues and my movements |
| 2008-05-24 22:56 | Diff · History | 286 | →Subpage implementation (section break): Transitional issues |
| 2008-05-24 20:41 | Diff · History | 236 | →GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Split off subsection and comment on documentation |
| 2008-05-24 20:35 | Diff · History | 0 | →Have i missed something lol: Typo |
| 2008-05-24 19:12 | Diff · History | 2,369 | →GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Templates created; describe process |
| 2008-05-23 20:58 | Diff · History | 1,334 | →GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Demonstrate proposed format (or at least a first draft) to see if there is consensus for it |
| 2008-05-23 20:14 | Diff · History | 417 | →Have i missed something lol: Nice one |
| 2008-05-22 21:54 | Diff · History | 646 | →GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Need to move in stages |
| 2008-05-22 20:31 | Diff · History | 2,183 | →GA reviews in multiple section headers on talk pages: Details |
| 2008-05-15 21:02 | Diff · History | 209 | →Alternative: Belated comment |
| 2008-05-09 08:23 | Diff · History | 169 | →Alternative: All very well if there is someone who can do it |
| 2008-05-08 18:26 | Diff · History | 1,119 | →Automation redux: Categories created to track errors, and comments |
| 2008-05-07 14:39 | Diff · History | 2,960 | Automation redux |
| 2008-05-05 15:09 | Diff · History | 94 | →Help at GAR requested: Add a PS. |
| 2008-05-05 15:03 | Diff · History | 1,284 | →Help at GAR requested: new section |
| 2008-05-05 14:48 | Diff · History | 47 | Long overdue start of new archive |
| 2008-05-02 21:19 | Diff · History | 23 | →White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Clarify |
| 2008-05-02 21:18 | Diff · History | 552 | →White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Comment |
| 2008-05-01 15:24 | Diff · History | 669 | →White Mountain art was GAR, failed, restored, and has multiple problems: Link to delisting guidelines, and make suggestion |
| 2008-04-26 11:36 | Diff · History | 1,144 | →Naming convention for a figure briefly in spotlight: Reply to Moni |
| 2008-04-14 09:39 | Diff · History | 286 | →Suggestion: |
| 2008-04-06 22:40 | Diff · History | 183 | →User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/GAN passed spam: Yes, it is a good idea to formalize this |
| 2008-04-03 10:18 | Diff · History | 546 | →Permanent GA reviews: Comment |
| 2008-04-03 09:37 | Diff · History | 140 | →Permanent GA reviews: Read the thread |
| 2008-04-02 09:46 | Diff · History | 861 | →Permanent GA reviews: Accountability |
| 2008-04-02 07:14 | Diff · History | 311 | →Permanent GA reviews: Clarify proposal |
| 2008-04-01 20:33 | Diff · History | 2 | →Permanent GA reviews: Fix typo |
| 2008-04-01 20:15 | Diff · History | 1,336 | →Odd method of reviewing: Talk page reviews are not permanent either |
| 2008-03-31 20:58 | Diff · History | 727 | →Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Amplify post ec: each WikiProject reaches its own assessment, not always the same |
| 2008-03-31 19:43 | Diff · History | 5 | →Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Fix my temporary dyslexia |
| 2008-03-31 19:40 | Diff · History | 629 | →Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Not our job |
| 2008-03-30 09:06 | Diff · History | 112 | →Is this an acceptable GA review: |
| 2008-03-29 22:36 | Diff · History | 184 | →Is this an acceptable GA review: Good luck iMatthew |
| 2008-03-29 22:21 | Diff · History | 600 | →Is this an acceptable GA review: Comment |
| 2008-03-29 21:39 | Diff · History | 491 | →Is this an acceptable GA review: No, and the article needs a lot of work |
| 2008-03-29 15:30 | Diff · History | 844 | →Simultaneously GA and A-class?: Explain |
| 2008-03-24 11:34 | Diff · History | 562 | →Advice to article writers: Agree with Malleus and DHMO |
| 2008-03-16 18:03 | Diff · History | 770 | →Gavin Newsom and current political figures in general: Comment and suggestions |
| 2008-03-10 10:44 | Diff · History | 334 | →Can an article be on PR and GAN simultaneously?: It's allowed |
| 2008-03-09 23:47 | Diff · History | 343 | →Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Suggestions |
| 2008-03-09 23:43 | Diff · History | 638 | →Can I review this?: Comments |
| 2008-03-04 19:26 | Diff · History | 681 | →"If you're a registered user ...": Consensus? |
| 2008-03-04 19:15 | Diff · History | 248 | →Auto-fail hold > 7 days: Judgement is for humans to do, not bots : |
| 2008-03-03 10:11 | Diff · History | 264 | →"If you're a registered user ...": In favour of IP noms |
| 2008-03-02 13:31 | Diff · History | 1,481 | →Combined GAN template: Ready for testing on the road |
| 2008-03-02 10:43 | Diff · History | 773 | →If no central training program, then Task Mentors?: Agree, page set up, but article history is for bots, not humans |
| 2008-03-01 17:43 | Diff · History | 658 | →section break: Suggest {{GAN}} |
| 2008-03-01 11:59 | Diff · History | 276 | →section break: StatisticianBot issue |
| 2008-03-01 11:55 | Diff · History | 250 | →More space saving: Good idea |
| 2008-02-27 21:07 | Diff · History | 546 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": September 2007 and the rest of WP |
| 2008-02-27 20:45 | Diff · History | 339 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Lightweight |
| 2008-02-27 20:41 | Diff · History | 648 | →Redrafting instructions block: Explain |
| 2008-02-27 20:34 | Diff · History | 348 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Backlog elimination may be a good idea, but it didn't appear to work last time |
| 2008-02-27 20:21 | Diff · History | 194 | →Redrafting instructions block: I don't understand what is easy about making three edits instead of one |
| 2008-02-27 20:17 | Diff · History | 562 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Link, graph and comment |
| 2008-02-27 20:10 | Diff · History | 1,060 | →Redrafting instructions block: I've tried! |
| 2008-02-27 19:42 | Diff · History | 544 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": Comfort for the regulars does not attract new reviewers, and they are what GAN needs |
| 2008-02-27 19:36 | Diff · History | 157 | →WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Another option is "engineering" |
| 2008-02-27 19:34 | Diff · History | 479 | →WP:GAN#Natural_sciences — subheadings: Suggest Geography as an alternative |
| 2008-02-27 19:29 | Diff · History | 1,315 | →Dropping "On hold" and "Second opinion": I agree, even though I favour putting articles on hold, and having second reviewers |
| 2008-02-25 19:33 | Diff · History | 481 | →Inviting active projects to help with backlog: Agree and clarify |
| 2008-02-25 00:14 | Diff · History | 192 | →The universe has exploded!: Rumours of the backlog being eliminated have been greatly exaggerated ; |
| 2008-02-24 23:50 | Diff · History | 341 | →Inviting active projects to help with backlog: I agree: add a couple of links |
| 2008-02-15 21:36 | Diff · History | 1,757 | →New proposal of guide for nominators: Comments |
| 2008-02-12 20:33 | Diff · History | 791 | →WP:GAN header: Er, people don't read instructions |
| 2008-02-10 22:46 | Diff · History | 627 | →GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 9/2/2008: Eh, where's the banter? Add some : |
| 2008-02-04 18:38 | Diff · History | 143 | →LONG: Done |
| 2008-02-04 09:24 | Diff · History | 652 | →LONG: Over 32KB, but what is the point? |
| 2008-01-31 00:35 | Diff · History | 368 | →Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Explain point of review |
| 2008-01-31 00:25 | Diff · History | 531 | →GA On Hold: Be flexible, I say |
| 2008-01-30 22:12 | Diff · History | 51 | →Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept: Improve sentence about delisting and clarify timescale |
| 2008-01-30 22:07 | Diff · History | 1,542 | →Proposal: Ca existe. Misunderstandings of the GA concept |
| 2008-01-27 14:47 | Diff · History | 353 | →GAR reviewers needed: Once every week or two would be enough |
| 2008-01-26 20:16 | Diff · History | 1,563 | →GAR reviewers needed: new section |
| 2008-01-19 13:56 | Diff · History | 540 | →Article History Template: GAR/ templates. Do same at GAN? |
| 2008-01-19 13:26 | Diff · History | 266 | →Article History Template: Clarified: please use five tildes in the templates |
| 2008-01-18 10:07 | Diff · History | 390 | →Plan of action: My understanding of the idea |
| 2008-01-16 16:47 | Diff · History | 187 | →No TOC on this page?: __NOTOC__ on this page, to be precise: fixed |
| 2008-01-16 16:44 | Diff · History | 0 | →Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Remove transclusion of guidelines containing a __NOTOC__ |
| 2008-01-15 22:40 | Diff · History | 809 | →Suggestion for backlog: Another backlog elimination drive would help, but is not a long term solution |
| 2008-01-15 18:50 | Diff · History | 16 | →Query re holds and GA requests: clarify: formalities of renomination |
| 2008-01-15 18:49 | Diff · History | 258 | →Query re holds and GA requests: Formalities preferable, but you can pass it quite quickly if it meets the standard |
| 2008-01-14 08:20 | Diff · History | 184 | →Article History Template: Please clarify |
| 2008-01-14 07:20 | Diff · History | 246 | →Article History Template: Not yet |
| 2008-01-13 22:03 | Diff · History | 102 | →Article failed by a major contributor: Thanks VT |
| 2008-01-13 21:51 | Diff · History | 144 | →Article failed by a major contributor: renominate, but GAR is waiting ready if you need it |
| 2008-01-13 13:34 | Diff · History | 682 | →Article History Template: Leave it to the bots |
| 2008-01-12 20:08 | Diff · History | 412 | →Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Reply to Pete |
| 2008-01-12 19:56 | Diff · History | 284 | →Can nominators review?: No, it seems |
| 2008-01-11 20:51 | Diff · History | 1,588 | →Can nominators review?: Comment |
| 2008-01-11 19:50 | Diff · History | 209 | →Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: You could use GAList/check |
| 2008-01-11 19:45 | Diff · History | 341 | →Can nominators review?: Re Epbr's suggestion |
| 2008-01-11 18:21 | Diff · History | 0 | →Can nominators review?: Fix typo |
| 2008-01-11 18:20 | Diff · History | 1,577 | →Can nominators review?: new section |
| 2008-01-11 11:02 | Diff · History | 183 | →Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Fix my incorrect comment |
| 2008-01-11 10:44 | Diff · History | 418 | →Image licensing issue: On image page suffices |
| 2008-01-11 10:41 | Diff · History | 727 | →Revision/simplification of templates, etc.: Looks good so far |
| 2008-01-09 22:17 | Diff · History | 452 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Great idea! |
| 2008-01-09 21:51 | Diff · History | 199 | →Quality vs quantity: Agree 100% |
| 2008-01-09 20:56 | Diff · History | 388 | →Quality vs quantity: Which template + addition to guidelines |
| 2008-01-09 20:52 | Diff · History | 115 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Another option for Pete |
| 2008-01-08 18:57 | Diff · History | 877 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to Pete: Use GAList, etc., but leave pass/fail blank until you make your decision |
| 2008-01-08 18:28 | Diff · History | 157 | →Quick Failing an Aricticle due to nominator inactivity: Sure, but it is not a quick fail |
| 2008-01-07 13:07 | Diff · History | 426 | →Wikilinking dates: Not a GA criterion |
| 2008-01-06 20:04 | Diff · History | 523 | →Quality vs quantity: What is undemocratic? I'm curious |
| 2008-01-06 19:03 | Diff · History | 13 | →Theatre, film and drama: Correct name of FA cat |
| 2008-01-06 19:01 | Diff · History | -1 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Bad typo day : |
| 2008-01-06 18:59 | Diff · History | -1 | →Quality vs quantity: Fix (very un-Freudian) typo! : |
| 2008-01-06 18:57 | Diff · History | 862 | →Quality vs quantity: Ask Peanut4? |
| 2008-01-06 16:09 | Diff · History | 257 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Graph |
| 2008-01-06 16:07 | Diff · History | 207 | →Backlog and automation: "A bot failed my article!" - probably not a good idea : |
| 2008-01-06 15:08 | Diff · History | 19 | →Quality vs quantity: Link editor |
| 2008-01-06 15:06 | Diff · History | 2,503 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Two schools |
| 2008-01-06 13:16 | Diff · History | 636 | →Theatre, film and drama: Comment on architecture |
| 2008-01-06 13:10 | Diff · History | 1,480 | →Why is there a backlog and/or lack of reviewers?: Reply to VT |
| 2008-01-05 22:21 | Diff · History | 56 | →Backlog and automation: It seems to me that we need a section break here: feel free to retitle it |
| 2008-01-05 22:05 | Diff · History | 264 | →Theatre, film and drama: Comment on subdividing |
| 2008-01-05 22:00 | Diff · History | 1,621 | →Backlog and automation: Reply to CP |
| 2008-01-05 21:44 | Diff · History | -2 | →Backlog and automation: this->it |
| 2008-01-05 21:43 | Diff · History | 620 | →Backlog and automation: Reply to Ruhrfisch |
| 2008-01-05 21:30 | Diff · History | 447 | →Theatre, film and drama: new section |
| 2008-01-05 19:32 | Diff · History | 1,255 | →Backlog and automation: Reply to DHMO |
| 2008-01-04 22:55 | Diff · History | 3,299 | →Backlog and automation: new section |
| 2007-12-29 19:06 | Diff · History | 116 | →Just Checking: No, it's updated regularly by a bot |
| 2007-12-28 22:51 | Diff · History | 75 | →Just Checking: Wikilink guidelines: it is not a conflict of interest to fix problems with an article under review |
| 2007-12-28 22:47 | Diff · History | 875 | →Just Checking: It is not a conflict of interest to copyedit during a review |
| 2007-12-28 17:35 | Diff · History | 521 | →A-Class nominations: Reply |
| 2007-12-17 00:04 | Diff · History | 190 | →GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 15/12/2007: Wishful thinking? |
| 2007-12-16 15:17 | Diff · History | 94 | →Templates: Thanks Pete |
| 2007-12-16 15:16 | Diff · History | 576 | →On hold and second opinion: We lost another potential reviewer |
| 2007-12-15 23:44 | Diff · History | 345 | →Templates: Its just technobabble for different ways of using templates |
| 2007-12-15 23:12 | Diff · History | 333 | →Templates: Subst |
| 2007-12-15 14:12 | Diff · History | 260 | →On hold and second opinion: Insight and wisdom |
| 2007-12-13 11:20 | Diff · History | 859 | →On hold and second opinion: Comments |
| 2007-12-12 23:43 | Diff · History | 382 | →Question about fail: Is it a reliable source? |
| 2007-12-12 22:57 | Diff · History | 575 | →On hold and second opinion: Reply to VT and comment on redlinks |
| 2007-12-12 21:04 | Diff · History | 2,584 | →On hold and second opinion: new section |
| 2007-12-12 20:26 | Diff · History | 709 | →an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Right idea, wrong template? |
| 2007-12-12 19:53 | Diff · History | 178 | →If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Done |
| 2007-12-12 19:32 | Diff · History | -631 | →If you review an article...: Remove duplicate comment apparently in wrong section: Twigboy, revert me if this was your intention |
| 2007-12-10 22:56 | Diff · History | 384 | →If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Agree/reply |
| 2007-12-10 20:01 | Diff · History | 1,765 | →If you review an article, put it on hold and fix some of the issues yourself, can you pass the article?: Both tenses are used |
| 2007-12-09 12:41 | Diff · History | 488 | →an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Multiple reviewers in series |
| 2007-12-09 12:35 | Diff · History | 676 | →an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: Agree with goal, but not approach + note of realism (over ec) |
| 2007-12-09 11:16 | Diff · History | 510 | →an idea that truly blows goat chunks.. {{tl|GAReview}} templates!: WP:OWN is about mainspace, but otherwise, Ling has a point |
| 2007-12-06 22:02 | Diff · History | 138 | →Alphabet: More topical joke? : |
| 2007-11-28 19:51 | Diff · History | 399 | →Alphabet: Order of top-level is used in multiple places |
| 2007-11-28 19:07 | Diff · History | 479 | →Alphabet: This glitch was caused by a recent split |
| 2007-11-27 20:50 | Diff · History | 490 | →Subsubtopics: Issues raised about e.g. "Music" |
| 2007-11-26 18:58 | Diff · History | 859 | →Green: Various replies |
| 2007-11-26 18:44 | Diff · History | 699 | →Tefillin, 17 days on hold: Removed "OnHold" |
| 2007-11-25 21:56 | Diff · History | 342 | →Green: Lighter background adopted, plus attempt to fix first panel |
| 2007-11-25 21:52 | Diff · History | 343 | →Subsubtopics: Done |
| 2007-11-25 11:08 | Diff · History | 142 | →Subsubtopics: Will do |
| 2007-11-25 11:06 | Diff · History | 466 | →Green: Explain cyan: also I tried a lighter colour at WP:WGA |
| 2007-11-25 10:58 | Diff · History | 607 | →Pro Wrestling WikiProject: Not a conflict of interest, but thanks for commenting here |
| 2007-11-24 14:54 | Diff · History | 509 | →Green: The delicate balance between lime and cyan : |
| 2007-11-24 14:08 | Diff · History | 396 | →Green: Try to clarify question in order to understand answers |
| 2007-11-24 11:58 | Diff · History | 905 | →Green: Questions |
| 2007-11-22 23:02 | Diff · History | 187 | →GAList3 is now available: Sorted |
| 2007-11-22 22:59 | Diff · History | 401 | →I will try: Biographies are not listed separately, but within each subject (apologies that no one replied to you sooner) |
| 2007-11-22 22:55 | Diff · History | 356 | →Subsubtopics: new section |
| 2007-11-17 23:27 | Diff · History | 301 | →GAList3 is now available: Deleted: good luck with Balzac! |
| 2007-11-17 21:45 | Diff · History | 451 | →GAList3 is now available: FGAN and PGAN? I can help if you like |
| 2007-11-17 21:10 | Diff · History | 307 | →GAList3 is now available: Clarify, I hope ; |
| 2007-11-17 19:28 | Diff · History | 212 | →Slipping: Nice idea |
| 2007-11-17 19:24 | Diff · History | 386 | →GAList3 is now available: Great, but why the new template name? |
| 2007-11-16 21:51 | Diff · History | 462 | →Slipping: That is what I meant, thanks EyeSerene : |
| 2007-11-15 20:03 | Diff · History | 829 | →Slipping: We need some simplification and automation in my opinion |
| 2007-11-10 11:26 | Diff · History | 972 | →GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Reply to Moni3 |
| 2007-11-04 21:50 | Diff · History | 585 | →GA review for To Kill a Mockingbird: Remove image |
| 2007-10-29 23:55 | Diff · History | 535 | →GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 27/10/2007: Criteria are fairly simple ; |
| 2007-10-22 22:54 | Diff · History | 153 | →Homeopathy nomination: Yu |
| 2007-10-22 22:40 | Diff · History | 387 | →Homeopathy nomination: Check out the talk page maybe? |
| 2007-10-22 22:18 | Diff · History | 94 | →Homeopathy nomination: Which topic? |
| 2007-10-20 09:41 | Diff · History | 288 | →More trouble than it's worth?: If nominators wrongly categorize, recategorize! |
| 2007-10-19 19:42 | Diff · History | 83 | →More trouble than it's worth?: Agree |
| 2007-10-15 00:30 | Diff · History | 239 | →GAN Reviewer of the Week - w/e 13/10/2007: Procedural error? ; |
| 2007-10-15 00:11 | Diff · History | 259 | →Scalability: Discuss automation further at WP:WGA? |
| 2007-10-07 16:39 | Diff · History | 664 | →Scalability: Automation and quality checking |
| 2007-10-07 16:03 | Diff · History | 469 | →Backlog: Wishful thinking |
| 2007-10-07 13:50 | Diff · History | 1 | Update name |
| 2007-10-05 14:21 | Diff · History | 449 | →Scalability: Two replies |
| 2007-10-04 21:11 | Diff · History | 116 | →Chicago Marathon: Not a serious concern |
| 2007-10-04 20:51 | Diff · History | 146 | →Chicago Marathon: Looks like it fails criterion 5 to me ; |
| 2007-10-04 19:25 | Diff · History | 3,250 | →Scalability: Replies and further thoughts |
| 2007-10-03 22:54 | Diff · History | 1 | →Scalability: tense |
| 2007-10-03 20:48 | Diff · History | 52 | →Scalability: Clarify a few statistical points |
| 2007-10-03 20:42 | Diff · History | 2,963 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Making this process scalable |
| 2007-10-03 19:51 | Diff · History | 1,404 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: A few replies |
| 2007-10-03 18:25 | Diff · History | 359 | →LONG: It's radical stuff indeed |
| 2007-10-03 18:20 | Diff · History | 366 | →Review workshop: Argued against this, but good luck |
| 2007-10-03 17:49 | Diff · History | -139 | Update archive |
| 2007-10-03 06:48 | Diff · History | 264 | →LONG: It is just one click awaty |
| 2007-10-02 23:40 | Diff · History | 558 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: It aint about tidying, it is about efficiency |
| 2007-10-02 23:18 | Diff · History | 202 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: |
| 2007-10-02 23:13 | Diff · History | 245 | →LONG: new section |
| 2007-10-02 22:38 | Diff · History | 696 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: Replies and clarifications |
| 2007-10-02 20:53 | Diff · History | 1,998 | →Simplifying GAN: do we need to keep articles under review on this page?: new section |
| 2007-10-02 20:16 | Diff · History | -944 | Undid revision 161837928 by Derek.cashman (talk) Return GA talk page query to original location |
| 2007-09-30 23:24 | Diff · History | 189 | →Streamlining: More minor changes |
| 2007-09-30 18:12 | Diff · History | 639 | →Streamlining: new section |
| 2007-09-25 20:51 | Diff · History | 18 | →Option 2: Nominations: Page moved and redirects fixed |
| 2007-09-25 20:41 | Diff · History | 6 | Update archive links |
| 2007-09-25 19:05 | Diff · History | 144 | →How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Nice one |
| 2007-09-25 18:21 | Diff · History | 0 | →How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Noun not verb, sorryu |
| 2007-09-25 18:20 | Diff · History | 315 | →How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: Best practise? |
| 2007-09-25 17:52 | Diff · History | 106 | →How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: |
| 2007-09-25 17:42 | Diff · History | 129 | →How about using {{Y}} and {{N}} in GA Fails so future reviewers know what to look for?: GAList |
| 2007-09-24 20:10 | Diff · History | 347 | →Option 2: Nominations: Admin needed |
| 2007-09-24 19:39 | Diff · History | 455 | →References in the lead section: Footnotes and citations in the lead are permissible but not required |
| 2007-09-20 23:07 | Diff · History | 591 | →Option 2: Nominations: Definitions and practicalities |
| 2007-09-20 10:00 | Diff · History | 545 | →Option 2: Nominations: GAR and nominee/nomination |
| 2007-09-19 21:39 | Diff · History | 3,149 | →A rose by any other name: new section |
| 2007-09-19 20:59 | Diff · History | 309 | →Wikiproject logic exists, should a Logic category exist also?: I think it is unnecessary and unhelpful |
| 2007-07-25 15:12 | Diff · History | 522 | →{{tl|ArticleHistory}}: Fixed |
All times are in UTC.