Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Wikipedia talk:Red link (Log · Page History) |
| User | Francis Schonken (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 114 |
| Minor edits | 24 (21.1%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 2 (1.8%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 18.8 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 52,168 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -3,882 |
Minor edits
·
24 (21.1%)
Major edits
·
90 (78.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
2 (1.8%)
Manual edits
·
112 (98.2%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
114 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-09 06:51 | Diff · History | 312 | →Status: |
| 2021-05-08 06:53 | Diff · History | 144 | →Status: not a consensus |
| 2021-05-07 22:03 | Diff · History | 154 | →Status: no consensus either |
| 2021-04-23 06:49 | Diff · History | 203 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: replied elsewhere |
| 2021-03-27 17:43 | Diff · History | 469 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: misreading silence... |
| 2021-03-22 07:32 | Diff · History | -8 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: oops |
| 2021-03-22 07:30 | Diff · History | 1 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: indent |
| 2021-03-22 07:30 | Diff · History | 770 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: rply |
| 2021-03-18 15:47 | Diff · History | 235 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: |
| 2021-03-18 07:14 | Diff · History | 152 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: not really |
| 2021-03-14 08:06 | Diff · History | 200 | →Refactoring: keep this together in the archive |
| 2021-03-13 16:01 | Diff · History | 310 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: new subsection about refactoring |
| 2021-03-13 15:59 | Diff · History | -20 | Undid revision 1011916275 by Butwhatdoiknow (talk) You've been asked not to refactor *anything* on this talk page, while time and again (like also this time) it is disruptive |
| 2021-03-13 15:51 | Diff · History | 158 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: note about regrouping |
| 2021-03-13 15:49 | Diff · History | 4 | Undid revision 1011915231 by Butwhatdoiknow (talk) refactored |
| 2021-03-13 05:58 | Diff · History | 1,325 | rply; grouping all sections about this same topic |
| 2021-03-12 05:45 | Diff · History | 501 | →Resuming "be allowed to" discussion: no improvement, on the contrary, a slight deterioration |
| 2021-03-04 19:03 | Diff · History | 150 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: |
| 2021-03-04 17:35 | Diff · History | 1 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: typo |
| 2021-03-04 17:33 | Diff · History | 10 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: clearer |
| 2021-03-04 17:31 | Diff · History | 867 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: can we get past procedural matters? |
| 2021-03-04 17:15 | Diff · History | 283 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: rply |
| 2021-03-04 16:56 | Diff · History | 412 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: link to guidance on the matter |
| 2021-03-04 16:45 | Diff · History | 269 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: no, that's not what refactoring is about |
| 2021-03-04 16:30 | Diff · History | 365 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: undid refactoring (a new one) |
| 2021-03-04 10:39 | Diff · History | 2,062 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: trying to explain the practical difference |
| 2021-03-01 16:13 | Diff · History | 719 | undid refactoring |
| 2021-02-28 07:05 | Diff · History | 2,565 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: rply |
| 2021-02-28 05:48 | Diff · History | 124 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: unexplained proposal, seeing no benefit |
| 2021-02-27 20:26 | Diff · History | 446 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: different topic |
| 2021-02-27 09:09 | Diff · History | 498 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: |
| 2021-02-27 08:34 | Diff · History | 675 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: perfectly valid reasoning |
| 2021-02-27 07:33 | Diff · History | 699 | →Proposed copy edit re plausibly sustain sentence: *current* intent is expressed by the *current* wording: neither wording nor intent need to be changed |
| 2021-02-25 15:57 | Diff · History | 9 | →Do we agree on what guideline intends?: "portions" |
| 2021-02-25 15:41 | Diff · History | -1 | →Do we agree on what guideline intends?: outdent |
| 2021-02-25 15:41 | Diff · History | 1,772 | →Do we agree on what guideline intends?: no, illustrated with examples |
| 2021-02-25 09:36 | Diff · History | 341 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: no, these explanations were given |
| 2021-02-25 09:28 | Diff · History | 6 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: clarity |
| 2021-02-25 09:27 | Diff · History | 584 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: no, the 2 January 2021 edits (by CapnZapp) lack consensus, and denying reality on that point is rather unhepful in this discussion. |
| 2021-02-25 08:00 | Diff · History | 142 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: anyhow first introduced 16 January 2021 |
| 2021-02-25 07:52 | Diff · History | -1 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: parens |
| 2021-02-25 07:51 | Diff · History | -1 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: typo |
| 2021-02-25 07:51 | Diff · History | 2 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: oops |
| 2021-02-25 07:50 | Diff · History | 1,072 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: explaining that I reverted to the stable version |
| 2021-02-25 07:20 | Diff · History | 356 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: expand earlier comment, current guidance is equal whether the redlink occurs in appendices or end matter |
| 2021-02-25 05:30 | Diff · History | 508 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: not OK |
| 2021-02-25 05:13 | Diff · History | 200 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: see further explanation in subsection |
| 2021-02-25 05:05 | Diff · History | 1,047 | long standing version needs to be restored before discussion continues |
| 2021-02-24 17:37 | Diff · History | 697 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: both "body" and "article content" are phrasings that are going nowhere |
| 2021-02-24 17:00 | Diff · History | 332 | →Proposed edit re nomenclature: |
| 2021-02-24 16:55 | Diff · History | 508 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: |
| 2021-02-24 12:56 | Diff · History | 484 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: |
| 2021-02-24 07:14 | Diff · History | 331 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: if I understand Walter correctly... |
| 2021-02-18 06:46 | Diff · History | 334 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: well, apparently you're still not seeing the essential part you removed |
| 2021-02-18 05:55 | Diff · History | 862 | →Rationale for Francis Schonken reversions?: explained |
| 2021-01-07 07:52 | Diff · History | 339 | →Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2021: no, there apparently is no consensus for this currently |
| 2020-05-16 12:57 | Diff · History | -567 | rv, no request |
| 2017-09-02 23:21 | Diff · History | 90 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 23:19 | Diff · History | 235 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 22:50 | Diff · History | 0 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 22:49 | Diff · History | 564 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 22:34 | Diff · History | 5 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 22:33 | Diff · History | 1,099 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-02 09:43 | Diff · History | 869 | →Proposal re plausibility of red links: |
| 2017-09-01 09:19 | Diff · History | 403 | →Time to update the guideline: |
| 2016-11-17 15:14 | Diff · History | -605 | rv promotion |
| 2016-01-31 09:58 | Diff · History | -2,628 | rv, self-promotion |
| 2015-07-10 04:53 | Diff · History | 8 | adapting some header levels so that this doesn't get split on archiving |
| 2015-06-30 12:26 | Diff · History | 383 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-28 10:33 | Diff · History | 391 | →What do we actually have consensus on?: |
| 2015-06-27 07:11 | Diff · History | 753 | →Closing redlinks-in-navboxes discussions: |
| 2015-06-26 12:50 | Diff · History | 641 | →Closing redlinks-in-navboxes discussions: |
| 2015-06-26 11:10 | Diff · History | 407 | →Closing redlinks-in-navboxes discussions: |
| 2015-06-26 08:56 | Diff · History | 505 | →Proposal regarding redlinks in navigation templates: added subsection |
| 2015-06-26 07:36 | Diff · History | 770 | closure |
| 2015-06-25 22:11 | Diff · History | 2 | →Super-simple proposal: layout |
| 2015-06-25 22:05 | Diff · History | 106 | →Super-simple proposal: preciser |
| 2015-06-25 21:40 | Diff · History | 1,280 | →Super-simple proposal: |
| 2015-06-25 11:38 | Diff · History | 784 | →Updated proposal: |
| 2015-06-25 10:41 | Diff · History | 968 | →Super-simple proposal: |
| 2015-06-25 08:41 | Diff · History | 253 | →Super-simple proposal: |
| 2015-06-25 06:00 | Diff · History | 3 | group two RfC's on the same |
| 2015-06-24 13:54 | Diff · History | 735 | →Proposal regarding redlinks in navigation templates: |
| 2015-06-24 12:30 | Diff · History | 1 | →Updated proposal: |
| 2015-06-24 12:29 | Diff · History | 188 | →Updated proposal: |
| 2015-06-24 12:20 | Diff · History | 1,325 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-24 12:03 | Diff · History | 651 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 11:40 | Diff · History | 314 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-24 11:31 | Diff · History | 280 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 11:23 | Diff · History | 707 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 11:04 | Diff · History | 186 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-24 10:14 | Diff · History | 388 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 09:54 | Diff · History | 109 | →Examples: oops |
| 2015-06-24 09:39 | Diff · History | 1,259 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 08:55 | Diff · History | 498 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-24 06:09 | Diff · History | 643 | →Examples: |
| 2015-06-22 16:03 | Diff · History | 15 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 15:57 | Diff · History | 666 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 15:06 | Diff · History | 3,254 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 12:55 | Diff · History | 668 | →Proposal regarding redlinks in navigation templates: |
| 2015-06-22 11:51 | Diff · History | 0 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:50 | Diff · History | 1 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:50 | Diff · History | 143 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:44 | Diff · History | 3 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:42 | Diff · History | 30 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:37 | Diff · History | -1 | →Other approach: typo |
| 2015-06-22 11:36 | Diff · History | -47 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 11:33 | Diff · History | 1,742 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 10:42 | Diff · History | 631 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 10:06 | Diff · History | 718 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 09:23 | Diff · History | 532 | →Other approach: |
| 2015-06-22 08:54 | Diff · History | -3 | →Other approach: or speedied |
| 2015-06-22 08:46 | Diff · History | 28 | →Other approach: rephrase |
| 2015-06-22 08:30 | Diff · History | 925 | →Arbitrary break 3: |
All times are in UTC.