Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Template:Paraphilias (Log · Page History) |
| User | Flyer22 Frozen (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 16 |
| Minor edits | 6 (37.5%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 4 (25%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (6.2%) |
| atbe1 | 255.3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 540 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -163 |
Minor edits
·
6 (37.5%)
Major edits
·
10 (62.5%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
4 (25%)
Manual edits
·
12 (75%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (6.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
15 (93.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-01 02:47 | Diff · History | -14 | Stick to better known. Similar goes for using "lust murder" instead of "erotophonophilia." But only concerned with one for now. |
| 2019-08-27 22:40 | Diff · History | -1 | Taken to your talk page. This is not about protecting people's feelings. It's about accuracy. |
| 2019-08-27 22:34 | Diff · History | 170 | Undid revision 912787515 by *Treker (talk) They do. Read the articles. |
| 2019-08-07 21:59 | Diff · History | 5 | Additional comment: But then again, in simple terms, a paraphilia is an atypical/unusual sexual interest. If enough reliable sources (and I don't mean sources at the time it was being proposed to be added to the DSM-5) call hebephilia a paraphilia, I would support its addition on this template. The sources should be WP:MEDRS-compliant. |
| 2019-08-07 21:24 | Diff · History | 117 | In my previous edit summary, I meant "at least," not "at east," of course. Added different note about hebpehilia; I know people don't like all the debate that went on regarding it, since we know how vulnerable pubescents can be, but the topic has been hotly debated by researchers (as its Wikipedia article shows). I won't re-add pygophilia for now since mazophilia (breast partialism) currently isn't on the template, but researchers don't mean general interest; they mean the atypical. |
| 2019-08-07 21:05 | Diff · History | -2 | Comment: And, as a reminder, ephebophilia covers attraction to mid-to-late teenagers, including those who are legal adults. The Age of consent commonly includes those ages, and the age of majority usually includes people who are at east age 18. And as far attraction to the buttocks or breasts, researchers mean specific attraction focused on those bodies parts. It is partialism. |
| 2019-08-07 20:50 | Diff · History | 66 | Undid revision 909820185 by *Treker (talk) It actually is. |
| 2019-08-07 20:49 | Diff · History | -16 | Per the article and debate noted there, hebephilia is not supported. |
| 2018-06-13 04:50 | Diff · History | -70 | Reverted edits by Feliciapulo (talk) to last version by Frietjes |
| 2015-07-11 00:42 | Diff · History | -11 | The Infantophilia link should stay as it is since it links to a section of the Pedophilia article (well, it will again once I fix the link); also see WP:NOTBROKEN. |
| 2013-12-13 22:31 | Diff · History | -19 | Undid revision 585970157 by Sage94 (talk) Re-redirected article, per no WP:MEDRS-compliant sources in the article. And WordPress.com is not a WP:Reliable source at all. And WP:AfD'd. |
| 2013-01-05 20:08 | Diff · History | 1 | Another WP:Dummy edit: I also left two hidden notes about that in this template, back in December of last year. |
| 2013-01-05 20:05 | Diff · History | -1 | (reverted) WP:Dummy edit: I agree with James about leaving hebephilia and ephebophilia out of this template; it does appear that hebephilia is not considered a paraphilia or mental disorder by most researchers. Ephebophilia especially isn't. |
| 2012-12-07 05:56 | Diff · History | -8 | In my previous edit summary, I meant that I was only removing one listing, not "categories." Moved other note higher. |
| 2012-12-07 05:50 | Diff · History | 181 | Going ahead removing the paraphilia categories, per the American Psychiatric Association's rejection. Not only is it not considered a mental disorder by most psychologists, but not a paraphilia by most of them either. Added hidden notes. |
| 2009-03-26 18:29 | Diff · History | -22 | Removed until settled on Ephebophilia talk page. It's not usually listed as a paraphilia. When should we consider it one, when the teenager is under 18 and the older adult is obsessed? |
All times are in UTC.