在條目上的最多編輯
由一位使用者對頁面做出的所有編輯，依時間排序。
| 條目 | Wikipedia talk:Article titles (日誌 · 頁面歷史) |
| 使用者 | ErikHaugen (編輯計數器· 最多編輯) |
| 總編輯數 | 52 |
| 小修改 | 3 (5.8%) |
| （半）自動編輯數 | 0 (0%) |
| 被回退編輯數 | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 51.3 |
| 已新增（位元組）2 | 27,844 |
| 刪除（位元組） | -190 |
小修改
·
3 (5.8%)
大修改
·
49 (94.2%)
（半）自動編輯數
·
0 (0%)
手動編輯數
·
52 (100%)
被回退編輯數
·
0 (0%)
撤銷回退編輯數
·
52 (100%)
1 平均編輯間隔時間（天）
2 添加文字是指未被回退的增加內容 (大致估計)
| 日期 | 連結 | 內容大小 | 編輯摘要 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-30 19:31 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,311 | →Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course |
| 2015-01-02 16:38 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 811 | →Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name |
| 2014-12-19 17:09 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 635 | →Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text. |
| 2013-01-11 06:17 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 361 | retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies |
| 2013-01-10 17:18 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 719 | reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about? |
| 2013-01-09 08:36 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,386 | this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't. |
| 2013-01-07 21:58 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 507 | PBS: I think you're arguing against something else? |
| 2013-01-04 16:43 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 689 | I don't think that's what DL suggested? |
| 2013-01-04 16:21 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 308 | Wait what? |
| 2013-01-04 15:52 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 21 | unsigned |
| 2013-01-03 17:15 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 265 | moving discussion |
| 2013-01-03 17:11 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 289 | involved |
| 2013-01-03 16:52 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 626 | Sarek, you edit warred too |
| 2013-01-03 16:35 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 199 | That's not how it works, Sarek |
| 2012-08-29 17:30 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 321 | reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess |
| 2012-08-17 20:08 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 276 | oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap |
| 2012-06-22 22:22 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 404 | inconsistency does look clowny, it's true |
| 2012-02-03 22:31 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,030 | I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful... |
| 2012-01-28 00:46 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 701 | we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change. |
| 2012-01-27 17:36 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 264 | unsigned |
| 2012-01-27 06:50 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 374 | suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok |
| 2012-01-27 00:57 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 339 | I don't get it, KZ |
| 2012-01-26 17:35 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 419 | side comment: PT isn't THAT bad |
| 2012-01-25 21:56 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 678 | Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues |
| 2012-01-25 18:04 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,626 | notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names? |
| 2012-01-25 06:22 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 455 | yikes; I'm not helping am I |
| 2012-01-24 17:49 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,617 | guessing at what we're talking about |
| 2012-01-24 04:53 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -3 | fix indent; I was not replying to b2c |
| 2012-01-24 01:33 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 512 | KZ: please clarify |
| 2012-01-13 06:38 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 212 | not 3rr. |
| 2012-01-04 22:08 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 271 | I don't get it |
| 2012-01-04 22:06 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -3 | Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar. |
| 2012-01-04 19:54 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 435 | lowercase maybe |
| 2011-12-20 16:18 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 647 | q about capitalization |
| 2011-12-20 02:09 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 432 | answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate" |
| 2011-12-20 02:02 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 308 | pointer to discussion |
| 2011-12-16 20:22 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 425 | Verifiability is not an issue here |
| 2011-12-15 22:52 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,199 | trying again? |
| 2011-12-15 19:41 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 1,271 | disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles. |
| 2011-12-15 15:30 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 459 | agree wtih Tony |
| 2011-12-15 08:12 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 398 | what is up with your example? |
| 2011-10-25 17:24 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 781 | discussing the propriety of this discussion |
| 2011-10-14 18:10 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 296 | pt for devolvement |
| 2011-10-14 17:19 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 643 | considering the devolvement case |
| 2011-10-13 17:58 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 363 | resolve ec |
| 2011-10-13 17:57 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | -184 | r to gtb |
| 2011-10-13 05:32 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 324 | agree this isn't what AND is about |
| 2011-08-12 18:51 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 370 | I don't see it as a referendum either? huh? |
| 2011-08-12 16:44 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 342 | separating arguments and nonarguments |
| 2011-08-11 23:32 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 29 | clarify |
| 2011-08-11 23:30 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 968 | localconsensus vs. policies |
| 2011-08-11 19:15 | 差異 · 修訂紀錄 | 528 | the points seem ok to me |
所有時間為 UTC 標準。