Cannabis Ruderalis

单个页面编辑次数最多 以时间顺序列出某用户对某页面的编辑

页面 Wikipedia talk:Article titles (日志 · 页面历史)
用户 ErikHaugen (编辑计数器· 热门编辑)
总编辑数 52
小编辑 3 (5.8%)
(半)自动编辑数 0 (0%)
被回退编辑数 0 (0%)
atbe1 51.3
已添加(字节)2 27,844
已删除(字节) -190
小编辑 · 3 (5.8%)
大编辑 · 49 (94.2%)
(半)自动编辑数 · 0 (0%)
手动编辑 · 52 (100%)
被回退编辑数 · 0 (0%)
未回退编辑 · 52 (100%)
1 平均编辑间隔时间(天)
2 已添加文本是指未被回退的有效添加文本 (近似)
日期 链接 大小 编辑摘要
差异 · 历史 1,311 Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course
差异 · 历史 811 Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name
差异 · 历史 635 Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text.
差异 · 历史 361 retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies
差异 · 历史 719 reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about?
差异 · 历史 1,386 this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't.
差异 · 历史 507 PBS: I think you're arguing against something else?
差异 · 历史 689 I don't think that's what DL suggested?
差异 · 历史 308 Wait what?
差异 · 历史 21 unsigned
差异 · 历史 265 moving discussion
差异 · 历史 289 involved
差异 · 历史 626 Sarek, you edit warred too
差异 · 历史 199 That's not how it works, Sarek
差异 · 历史 321 reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess
差异 · 历史 276 oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap
差异 · 历史 404 inconsistency does look clowny, it's true
差异 · 历史 1,030 I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful...
差异 · 历史 701 we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change.
差异 · 历史 264 unsigned
差异 · 历史 374 suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok
差异 · 历史 339 I don't get it, KZ
差异 · 历史 419 side comment: PT isn't THAT bad
差异 · 历史 678 Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues
差异 · 历史 1,626 notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names?
差异 · 历史 455 yikes; I'm not helping am I
差异 · 历史 1,617 guessing at what we're talking about
差异 · 历史 -3 fix indent; I was not replying to b2c
差异 · 历史 512 KZ: please clarify
差异 · 历史 212 not 3rr.
差异 · 历史 271 I don't get it
差异 · 历史 -3 Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar.
差异 · 历史 435 lowercase maybe
差异 · 历史 647 q about capitalization
差异 · 历史 432 answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate"
差异 · 历史 308 pointer to discussion
差异 · 历史 425 Verifiability is not an issue here
差异 · 历史 1,199 trying again?
差异 · 历史 1,271 disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles.
差异 · 历史 459 agree wtih Tony
差异 · 历史 398 what is up with your example?
差异 · 历史 781 discussing the propriety of this discussion
差异 · 历史 296 pt for devolvement
差异 · 历史 643 considering the devolvement case
差异 · 历史 363 resolve ec
差异 · 历史 -184 r to gtb
差异 · 历史 324 agree this isn't what AND is about
差异 · 历史 370 I don't see it as a referendum either? huh?
差异 · 历史 342 separating arguments and nonarguments
差异 · 历史 29 clarify
差异 · 历史 968 localconsensus vs. policies
差异 · 历史 528 the points seem ok to me
均采用UTC时间。

Leave a Reply