Cannabis Ruderalis

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

مضمون Wikipedia talk:Article titles (نوشتہ · Page History)
صارف ErikHaugen (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 52
Minor edits 3 (5.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 51.3
اضافہ (بائٹس)2 27,844
Deleted (bytes) ‎-190
Minor edits · 3 (5.8%)
بڑی ترامیم · 49 (94.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 52 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 52 (100%)
1 ترامیم کے درمیان اوسط وقت (دنوں میں)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (تقریباً)
تاریخ روابط حجم Edit summary
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,311 Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course
Diff · تاریخچہ 811 Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name
Diff · تاریخچہ 635 Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text.
Diff · تاریخچہ 361 retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies
Diff · تاریخچہ 719 reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about?
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,386 this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't.
Diff · تاریخچہ 507 PBS: I think you're arguing against something else?
Diff · تاریخچہ 689 I don't think that's what DL suggested?
Diff · تاریخچہ 308 Wait what?
Diff · تاریخچہ 21 unsigned
Diff · تاریخچہ 265 moving discussion
Diff · تاریخچہ 289 involved
Diff · تاریخچہ 626 Sarek, you edit warred too
Diff · تاریخچہ 199 That's not how it works, Sarek
Diff · تاریخچہ 321 reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess
Diff · تاریخچہ 276 oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap
Diff · تاریخچہ 404 inconsistency does look clowny, it's true
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,030 I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful...
Diff · تاریخچہ 701 we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change.
Diff · تاریخچہ 264 unsigned
Diff · تاریخچہ 374 suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok
Diff · تاریخچہ 339 I don't get it, KZ
Diff · تاریخچہ 419 side comment: PT isn't THAT bad
Diff · تاریخچہ 678 Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,626 notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names?
Diff · تاریخچہ 455 yikes; I'm not helping am I
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,617 guessing at what we're talking about
Diff · تاریخچہ ‎-3 fix indent; I was not replying to b2c
Diff · تاریخچہ 512 KZ: please clarify
Diff · تاریخچہ 212 not 3rr.
Diff · تاریخچہ 271 I don't get it
Diff · تاریخچہ ‎-3 Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar.
Diff · تاریخچہ 435 lowercase maybe
Diff · تاریخچہ 647 q about capitalization
Diff · تاریخچہ 432 answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate"
Diff · تاریخچہ 308 pointer to discussion
Diff · تاریخچہ 425 Verifiability is not an issue here
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,199 trying again?
Diff · تاریخچہ 1,271 disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles.
Diff · تاریخچہ 459 agree wtih Tony
Diff · تاریخچہ 398 what is up with your example?
Diff · تاریخچہ 781 discussing the propriety of this discussion
Diff · تاریخچہ 296 pt for devolvement
Diff · تاریخچہ 643 considering the devolvement case
Diff · تاریخچہ 363 resolve ec
Diff · تاریخچہ ‎-184 r to gtb
Diff · تاریخچہ 324 agree this isn't what AND is about
Diff · تاریخچہ 370 I don't see it as a referendum either? huh?
Diff · تاریخچہ 342 separating arguments and nonarguments
Diff · تاریخچہ 29 clarify
Diff · تاریخچہ 968 localconsensus vs. policies
Diff · تاریخچہ 528 the points seem ok to me
سبھی وقت یو ٹی سی ميں ہیں۔

Leave a Reply