Cannabis Ruderalis

مضمون ۾ مک سنوارون All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

مضمون Wikipedia talk:Article titles (لاگ · صفحي جي سوانح)
واپرائيندڙ ErikHaugen (سنوارون ڳڻيندڙ· مک سنوارون)
ڪُل سنوارون ٥٢
معمولي سنوارون ٣ (٥٫٨٪؜)
(اڌ)پاڻمراديون سنوارون ٠ (٠٪؜)
موٽايل سنوارون ٠ (٠٪؜)
atbe1 ٥١٫٣
(بائيٽون) وڌيون2 ٢٧٬٨٤٤
Deleted (bytes) ؜-١٩٠
معمولي سنوارون · ٣ (٥٫٨٪؜)
مکيہ سنوارون · ٤٩ (٩٤٫٢٪؜)
(اڌ)پاڻمراديون سنوارون · ٠ (٠٪؜)
Manual edits · ٥٢ (١٠٠٪؜)
موٽايل سنوارون · ٠ (٠٪؜)
اڻموٽايل سنوارون · ٥٢ (١٠٠٪؜)
1 سنوارن جي وچ ۾ سراسري وقت (ڏينھن)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (لڳ ڀڳ)
تاريخ ڳنڍڻا ماپَ سنوار جو تَتُ
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٣١١ Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course
تفاوت · سوانح ٨١١ Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٣٥ Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text.
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٦١ retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies
تفاوت · سوانح ٧١٩ reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about?
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٣٨٦ this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't.
تفاوت · سوانح ٥٠٧ PBS: I think you're arguing against something else?
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٨٩ I don't think that's what DL suggested?
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٠٨ Wait what?
تفاوت · سوانح ٢١ unsigned
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٦٥ moving discussion
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٨٩ involved
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٢٦ Sarek, you edit warred too
تفاوت · سوانح ١٩٩ That's not how it works, Sarek
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٢١ reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٧٦ oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٠٤ inconsistency does look clowny, it's true
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٠٣٠ I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful...
تفاوت · سوانح ٧٠١ we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change.
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٦٤ unsigned
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٧٤ suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٣٩ I don't get it, KZ
تفاوت · سوانح ٤١٩ side comment: PT isn't THAT bad
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٧٨ Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٦٢٦ notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names?
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٥٥ yikes; I'm not helping am I
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٦١٧ guessing at what we're talking about
تفاوت · سوانح ؜-٣ fix indent; I was not replying to b2c
تفاوت · سوانح ٥١٢ KZ: please clarify
تفاوت · سوانح ٢١٢ not 3rr.
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٧١ I don't get it
تفاوت · سوانح ؜-٣ Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar.
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٣٥ lowercase maybe
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٤٧ q about capitalization
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٣٢ answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate"
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٠٨ pointer to discussion
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٢٥ Verifiability is not an issue here
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬١٩٩ trying again?
تفاوت · سوانح ١٬٢٧١ disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles.
تفاوت · سوانح ٤٥٩ agree wtih Tony
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٩٨ what is up with your example?
تفاوت · سوانح ٧٨١ discussing the propriety of this discussion
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٩٦ pt for devolvement
تفاوت · سوانح ٦٤٣ considering the devolvement case
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٦٣ resolve ec
تفاوت · سوانح ؜-١٨٤ r to gtb
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٢٤ agree this isn't what AND is about
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٧٠ I don't see it as a referendum either? huh?
تفاوت · سوانح ٣٤٢ separating arguments and nonarguments
تفاوت · سوانح ٢٩ clarify
تفاوت · سوانح ٩٦٨ localconsensus vs. policies
تفاوت · سوانح ٥٢٨ the points seem ok to me
سڀ وقت يو.ٽي.سي مطابق.

Leave a Reply