Cannabis Ruderalis

Ediciones principales en un artículo Todas las ediciones de un usuario en una página, en orden cronológico.

Artículo Wikipedia talk:Article titles (Registro · Historial de página)
Usuario ErikHaugen (Contador de ediciones· Ediciones principales)
Ediciones totales 52
Ediciones menores 3 (5,8 %)
Ediciones (semi)automatizadas 0 (0 %)
Ediciones revertidas 0 (0 %)
atbe1 51,3
Añadidos (bytes)2 27.844
Borrado (bytes) -190
Ediciones menores · 3 (5,8 %)
Principales ediciones · 49 (94,2 %)
Ediciones (semi)automatizadas · 0 (0 %)
Ediciones manuales · 52 (100 %)
Ediciones revertidas · 0 (0 %)
Ediciones no revertidas · 52 (100 %)
1 Tiempo medio entre ediciones (días)
2 Texto añadido es cualquier adición positiva que no se revirtió (aproximado)
Fecha Enlaces Tamaño Resumen de edición
Diferencias · Historial 1.311 Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course
Diferencias · Historial 811 Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name
Diferencias · Historial 635 Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text.
Diferencias · Historial 361 retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies
Diferencias · Historial 719 reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about?
Diferencias · Historial 1.386 this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't.
Diferencias · Historial 507 PBS: I think you're arguing against something else?
Diferencias · Historial 689 I don't think that's what DL suggested?
Diferencias · Historial 308 Wait what?
Diferencias · Historial 21 unsigned
Diferencias · Historial 265 moving discussion
Diferencias · Historial 289 involved
Diferencias · Historial 626 Sarek, you edit warred too
Diferencias · Historial 199 That's not how it works, Sarek
Diferencias · Historial 321 reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess
Diferencias · Historial 276 oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap
Diferencias · Historial 404 inconsistency does look clowny, it's true
Diferencias · Historial 1.030 I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful...
Diferencias · Historial 701 we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change.
Diferencias · Historial 264 unsigned
Diferencias · Historial 374 suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok
Diferencias · Historial 339 I don't get it, KZ
Diferencias · Historial 419 side comment: PT isn't THAT bad
Diferencias · Historial 678 Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues
Diferencias · Historial 1.626 notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names?
Diferencias · Historial 455 yikes; I'm not helping am I
Diferencias · Historial 1.617 guessing at what we're talking about
Diferencias · Historial -3 fix indent; I was not replying to b2c
Diferencias · Historial 512 KZ: please clarify
Diferencias · Historial 212 not 3rr.
Diferencias · Historial 271 I don't get it
Diferencias · Historial -3 Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar.
Diferencias · Historial 435 lowercase maybe
Diferencias · Historial 647 q about capitalization
Diferencias · Historial 432 answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate"
Diferencias · Historial 308 pointer to discussion
Diferencias · Historial 425 Verifiability is not an issue here
Diferencias · Historial 1.199 trying again?
Diferencias · Historial 1.271 disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles.
Diferencias · Historial 459 agree wtih Tony
Diferencias · Historial 398 what is up with your example?
Diferencias · Historial 781 discussing the propriety of this discussion
Diferencias · Historial 296 pt for devolvement
Diferencias · Historial 643 considering the devolvement case
Diferencias · Historial 363 resolve ec
Diferencias · Historial -184 r to gtb
Diferencias · Historial 324 agree this isn't what AND is about
Diferencias · Historial 370 I don't see it as a referendum either? huh?
Diferencias · Historial 342 separating arguments and nonarguments
Diferencias · Historial 29 clarify
Diferencias · Historial 968 localconsensus vs. policies
Diferencias · Historial 528 the points seem ok to me
Todas las horas están en UTC.

Leave a Reply