Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Članak | Wikipedia talk:Article titles (Zapisnik · Historija stranice) |
| Korisnik | ErikHaugen (Brojač izmjena· Top Edits) |
| Ukupno izmjena | 52 |
| Manje izmjene | 3 (5,8 %) |
| (Polu)automatske izmjene | 0 (0 %) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0 %) |
| atbe1 | 51,3 |
| Dodano (bajtova)2 | 27.844 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -190 |
Manje izmjene
·
3 (5,8 %)
Major edits
·
49 (94,2 %)
(Polu)automatske izmjene
·
0 (0 %)
Manual edits
·
52 (100 %)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0 %)
Unreverted edits
·
52 (100 %)
1 Prosječno vrijeme između izmjena (u danima)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (približno)
| Datum | Linkovi | Veličina | Sažetak izmjene |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-30 19:31 | Razl · Historija | 1.311 | →Clarifying that UCRN is not a style policy: support; of course |
| 2015-01-02 16:38 | Razl · Historija | 811 | →Back to the original question: we aren't talking about whether style is part of the name |
| 2014-12-19 17:09 | Razl · Historija | 635 | →Stylization of the "common name": support proposed wording, there is no difference between article title styling and styling in running text. |
| 2013-01-11 06:17 | Razl · Historija | 361 | retract careless comment about topic ban; my apologies |
| 2013-01-10 17:18 | Razl · Historija | 719 | reply to wikid; what do you think this rfc is about? |
| 2013-01-09 08:36 | Razl · Historija | 1.386 | this RFC is not a debate about "consistent style" vs. "use style found in sources". It just isn't. |
| 2013-01-07 21:58 | Razl · Historija | 507 | PBS: I think you're arguing against something else? |
| 2013-01-04 16:43 | Razl · Historija | 689 | I don't think that's what DL suggested? |
| 2013-01-04 16:21 | Razl · Historija | 308 | Wait what? |
| 2013-01-04 15:52 | Razl · Historija | 21 | unsigned |
| 2013-01-03 17:15 | Razl · Historija | 265 | moving discussion |
| 2013-01-03 17:11 | Razl · Historija | 289 | involved |
| 2013-01-03 16:52 | Razl · Historija | 626 | Sarek, you edit warred too |
| 2013-01-03 16:35 | Razl · Historija | 199 | That's not how it works, Sarek |
| 2012-08-29 17:30 | Razl · Historija | 321 | reply to DS: should->must is ok with me, I guess |
| 2012-08-17 20:08 | Razl · Historija | 276 | oppose change to RM requirement—why not advertise there. it's cheap |
| 2012-06-22 22:22 | Razl · Historija | 404 | inconsistency does look clowny, it's true |
| 2012-02-03 22:31 | Razl · Historija | 1.030 | I think this might really be about MUSICSERIES, Greg. this time. still, you're right that examples are useful... |
| 2012-01-28 00:46 | Razl · Historija | 701 | we sentence case our titles. it's weird. it's also probably not going to change. |
| 2012-01-27 17:36 | Razl · Historija | 264 | unsigned |
| 2012-01-27 06:50 | Razl · Historija | 374 | suggesting names? I think pre-disambiguation is ok |
| 2012-01-27 00:57 | Razl · Historija | 339 | I don't get it, KZ |
| 2012-01-26 17:35 | Razl · Historija | 419 | side comment: PT isn't THAT bad |
| 2012-01-25 21:56 | Razl · Historija | 678 | Thanks Milkunderwood; there are indeed many issues |
| 2012-01-25 18:04 | Razl · Historija | 1.626 | notice of species naming proposal: all scientific (binomial) names? |
| 2012-01-25 06:22 | Razl · Historija | 455 | yikes; I'm not helping am I |
| 2012-01-24 17:49 | Razl · Historija | 1.617 | guessing at what we're talking about |
| 2012-01-24 04:53 | Razl · Historija | -3 | fix indent; I was not replying to b2c |
| 2012-01-24 01:33 | Razl · Historija | 512 | KZ: please clarify |
| 2012-01-13 06:38 | Razl · Historija | 212 | not 3rr. |
| 2012-01-04 22:08 | Razl · Historija | 271 | I don't get it |
| 2012-01-04 22:06 | Razl · Historija | -3 | Undoing Blueboar's mangling of the indents. We weren't replying to you, Blueboar. |
| 2012-01-04 19:54 | Razl · Historija | 435 | lowercase maybe |
| 2011-12-20 16:18 | Razl · Historija | 647 | q about capitalization |
| 2011-12-20 02:09 | Razl · Historija | 432 | answer to B2C about what to do with the base name if we "pre-disambiguate" |
| 2011-12-20 02:02 | Razl · Historija | 308 | pointer to discussion |
| 2011-12-16 20:22 | Razl · Historija | 425 | Verifiability is not an issue here |
| 2011-12-15 22:52 | Razl · Historija | 1.199 | trying again? |
| 2011-12-15 19:41 | Razl · Historija | 1.271 | disambiguation among topics when there aren't any other articles. |
| 2011-12-15 15:30 | Razl · Historija | 459 | agree wtih Tony |
| 2011-12-15 08:12 | Razl · Historija | 398 | what is up with your example? |
| 2011-10-25 17:24 | Razl · Historija | 781 | discussing the propriety of this discussion |
| 2011-10-14 18:10 | Razl · Historija | 296 | pt for devolvement |
| 2011-10-14 17:19 | Razl · Historija | 643 | considering the devolvement case |
| 2011-10-13 17:58 | Razl · Historija | 363 | resolve ec |
| 2011-10-13 17:57 | Razl · Historija | -184 | r to gtb |
| 2011-10-13 05:32 | Razl · Historija | 324 | agree this isn't what AND is about |
| 2011-08-12 18:51 | Razl · Historija | 370 | I don't see it as a referendum either? huh? |
| 2011-08-12 16:44 | Razl · Historija | 342 | separating arguments and nonarguments |
| 2011-08-11 23:32 | Razl · Historija | 29 | clarify |
| 2011-08-11 23:30 | Razl · Historija | 968 | localconsensus vs. policies |
| 2011-08-11 19:15 | Razl · Historija | 528 | the points seem ok to me |
Sva vremena su po UTC-u.