Cannabis Ruderalis

Top edits to an article All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FastCode (Log · Page History)
User ErikHaugen (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 20
Minor edits 3 (15%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 0.3
Added (bytes)2 10,497
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 3 (15%)
Major edits · 17 (85%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 20 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 20 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 948 unique/impactful, if verifiable, probably satisfies gng
Diff · History 225 delete them too!
Diff · History 536 why we argue from policies and not from what articles are there already
Diff · History 154 forgot to sign
Diff · History 173 critique of !vote rationale
Diff · History 494 withdrawing redirect !vote
Diff · History 687 discussing sources.
Diff · History 1 clarify indent
Diff · History 365 maybe retitle to FastMM?
Diff · History 1,392 clarify: I do not doubt the motives
Diff · History 658 canvassing, please be careful not to count !votes
Diff · History 839 discussion about independence
Diff · History 296 why do you believe it is notable?
Diff · History 619 point taken, but username violations aren't an issue here in this afd.
Diff · History 1,006 wikipedia cares more about verifiability than about editors' credentials.
Diff · History 377 not removing, just saying they don't establish notability
Diff · History 590 most of those refs are not independent
Diff · History 223 !voting for redirect, nobody seems to want to produce sources to justify a standalone article
Diff · History 2 typo
Diff · History 912 gng vs. "well known" - we need sources
All times are in UTC.

Leave a Reply