Cannabis Ruderalis

Tex (talk | contribs)
(→‎Page Rating: new section)
Jorm (WMF) (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:


What's with the page rating thing at the bottom of the article asking for us to rate the quality, completeness, etc of the article? I've never seen that thing before and I can't tell how it was added to the article. Where can I find more information? [[User:Tex|Tex]] ([[User talk:Tex|talk]]) 21:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
What's with the page rating thing at the bottom of the article asking for us to rate the quality, completeness, etc of the article? I've never seen that thing before and I can't tell how it was added to the article. Where can I find more information? [[User:Tex|Tex]] ([[User talk:Tex|talk]]) 21:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
:This article was selected to be part of the pilot program for the Article Feedback Tool, which was announced [http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/22/article-feedback-pilot-goes-live/ here]. There is a [[mw:Article feedback/Public Policy Pilot/FAQs|FAQ]] (possibly slightly out of date).
:While True Grit is not part of the Public Policy Initiative, the Article Feedback tool has been enabled on several pages that meet various criteria in order to help us gather data about its effectiveness. This article is (almost) perfect for our testing needs: it was a short, near-stub when the tool was introduced and we expect that the article will receive a large amount of traffic (and editing) in the near future (as it is released, and then probably as it enters Oscar season). This life-cycle arc will enable us to see how effective the tool is with measuring quality over time in a more rapid, predictable environment.
:If you want more information, please let me know and I'll answer any questions you may have.--[[User:Jorm (WMF)|Jorm (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jorm (WMF)|talk]]) 23:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:26, 18 November 2010

WikiProject Film / American (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
 
Note icon
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Poster: International v US

I have to admit, I'm not happy with the look of the international poster. The US poster gives the idea of the film which is supposed to be raw. I don't think the character poster gives that impression. It is, in fact, just another character poster. Quentin X (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can we move this discussion to the talk page of the film article?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First let me say thank you for starting discussion and moving it here. However I respectfully disagree, aesthetics aside I feel the international poster better represents the film with the inclusion of the cast and unlike the character posters it does not single out one character. I do like the wanted poster look of the US version so I do not have a strong opinion either way.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page Rating

What's with the page rating thing at the bottom of the article asking for us to rate the quality, completeness, etc of the article? I've never seen that thing before and I can't tell how it was added to the article. Where can I find more information? Tex (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article was selected to be part of the pilot program for the Article Feedback Tool, which was announced here. There is a FAQ (possibly slightly out of date).
While True Grit is not part of the Public Policy Initiative, the Article Feedback tool has been enabled on several pages that meet various criteria in order to help us gather data about its effectiveness. This article is (almost) perfect for our testing needs: it was a short, near-stub when the tool was introduced and we expect that the article will receive a large amount of traffic (and editing) in the near future (as it is released, and then probably as it enters Oscar season). This life-cycle arc will enable us to see how effective the tool is with measuring quality over time in a more rapid, predictable environment.
If you want more information, please let me know and I'll answer any questions you may have.--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply