Shadowdeathss, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Shadowdeathss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Average human height by country, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Transcendence (talk) 06:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

November 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 14:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• Admin note: account is obsessed with height and edit-warring; its history shows it was created for that specific purpose. Who the master is is not clear yet, but undoubtedly that will follow--even without such evidence (including CU evidence), it's clear that this is not an editor who wishes to thrive in a collaborative environment. Drmies (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shadowdeathss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I firmly believe I have done nothing wrong. Yes, height is my one and only interest, which is why I created this account. I put in many credible sources, just for a certain user to remove them for no reason. Why should he remove my sources unfairly, and I cannot stop him? I provided solid evidence and explanation on why my sources should be allowed, yet he just ignores and goes with his bias, despite me and everyone else on the page disagreeing with him. Yet I am blocked, and accused of being a sock, which is outrageous. This is also my one and only account, thank you very much Shadowdeathss (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Leaving aside the likely socking, it's clear that you aren't interested in collaboration. Please read WP:NOTTHEM before making another request. 331dot (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shadowdeathss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason for me being a sock? Why am I getting accused for that? I'm offended that people think that way. As for collaboration, the other person was the one who didn't want to collaborate with me or other users on that page, just look through the history. I'm definitely willing to collaborate, what would you want me to do?

Decline reason:

Only one appeal at a time please.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Shadowdeathss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Blocking administrator: 331dot (talk)

Reviewing administrator: Euryalus (talk)

Request reason:

Alright. So I'm wrong for spam editing without explanation, and I will provide more explanation to other users in the future, and won't do it again. Please unblock me.

Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=Alright. So I'm wrong for spam editing without explanation, and I will provide more explanation to other users in the future, and won't do it again. Please unblock me.|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=Alright. So I'm wrong for spam editing without explanation, and I will provide more explanation to other users in the future, and won't do it again. Please unblock me.|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}

Thanks for your unblock request. Some questions when you have a moment:

• What is your association with User:Dazaif?
• What is your understanding of collaborative editing on Wikipedia? Can you see why WP:NOTTHEM is relevant to your edit history? How will you avoid this issue if unblocked?

Not looking for an essay on the above, just a few sentences to give some idea that you understand the issue that led to the block. If you really want to continue editing it will need to be with a more collaborative approach; otherwise the block is likely to persist.

331dot I feel like I'm pinging you a lot today, sorry about that. Any views welcome on the answers to these questions if/when they arrive. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Drmies is the blocking admin, not me. 331dot (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry about that. Drmies, a ping for you. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

This height obsession is really pathetic. But Euryalus, I don't see any evidence of socking and no connection with Dazaif (whom I just blocked...for socking...). Anyway, this user just doesn't get it: it wasn't "spamming without explanation" or whatever. I'll leave it up to you. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)