Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49

Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived.

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Discretionary sanctions (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes

Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Cyclones closed[edit]

Original announcement

• Just a question of clarification; what precipitated remedy #10 given that findings of fact #1 & 2 already showed that best practices were in place at the relevant off-wiki forum and still did not prevent problems? Best practices are great and all, but a) they were in place and b) it didn't matter to the case at hand... Curious as to the intent of including it as a remedy... --Jayron32 14:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jayron32 there was a bunch of evidence that "There is active moderation to enforce the rules and expectations. The moderation team is made up of trusted members and is sufficiently large for the size of the platform/channel." didn't happen in meaningful ways in that server. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I take it the moderator-pinned warning was considered insufficient to the purpose here? --Jayron32 14:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The warning didn't come from a moderator. It came from an outside uninvolved administrator (and Arb as it so happens). Pinning a rule would be a passive moderation technique. Stopping things that happen in the moment is active and while there were some messages as things occurred, those messages were inconsistent and somewhat undercut by the mod in question also doing that behavior. The most forceful attempts to stop canvassing came, from the evidence I saw, from Hurricane Noah and not a mod. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• As a nit, when I read, "MarioProtIV & NAC", it took me a while to figure out that was referring to WP:NAC. Could it be linked in the original? -- RoySmith (talk) 17:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]