Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
< April 4 April 6 >

April 5[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 5, 2022.

On heat[edit]

In heat reasonably targets the same page, but "on heat" does not seem to be a synonym or related phrase, and is likely ambiguous. Suggest deletion to avoid confusion. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wauchula, FL μSA[edit]

Nonsensical search term using Greek letter μ instead of Latin letter U. Senator2029 【talk】 19:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: While on first sight I would agree with the nom, these sorts of redirects were previously subject to RfD and were kept. We would need a compelling argument about how things have changed since the past RfD, or why the reasoning and/or consensus from then was (and still is) incorrect. Note that there appear to be dozens of such redirects, not just these two, and we would need to treat them uniformly. Note that I combined the two nominations with the same rationale into a single discussion Mdewman6 (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment ""μSA" stands for Micropolitan statistical area.

Suiyuan Offensive[edit]

No mention of "Suiyuan" at the target; looking at Suiyuan, it appears to refer to a former administrative region of China that is not particularly close to Tauran. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed. Maybe some kind of strange mixup with the unrelated Suiyuan campaign? --Havsjö (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yevhen Makarenkothe same, as Yevhen Konoplyanka etc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the result of a page move in 2019 by Noel baran that was self-revered two mintues later. I'm presuming this was an error? Yevhen Makarenko redirects to the same target as this redirect, Yevhen Konoplyanka is a different person (they're Ukrainian footballers who share the same/similar first name but that's the only connection I'm immediately seeing). Thryduulf (talk) 14:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This "redirection" is a pure mess. I didn't noticed it (I wanted to make redirection from "Yevhen Makarenko" and don't know how created such thing). If possibly immediatly to remove it, I'll be very grateful. --Noel baran (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is possible, so that makes life simple. Thryduulf (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ulster (occupied)[edit]

Delete, this term is non-neutral and is not established, thus unlikely to be useful. Balkovec (talk) 09:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete blatant violation of NPOV, biased politically motivated redirect that should be deleted. The term doesnt even have widespread use to justify such a redirect in the first place RWB2020 (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irish separatists[edit]

superfluous redirect The Banner talk 17:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not every nationalist is also a separatist (regardles of spelling). Unlikely redirects. The Banner talk 17:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not so strange, you created these superfluous redirects. The Banner talk 17:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utricle (fruit)[edit]

Per the description of "utricle" in the target article, as well as third party search results, it seems the subject of this redirect is a different subject than the target article's subject. For this reason, delete per WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I believe Steel1943 is correct. "Utricles are essentially achenes in which the pericarp is significantly larger than the mature seed" (Simpson, 2010). Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 17:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The problem here is with the self-redirect in the target article, not the redirect itself. Users searching this will be brought to place where WP currently has the most information on the topic. Alternatively, retarget to Glossary_of_botanical_terms#utricle as {{R to list entry}}, but I favor the former. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 18:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kinjiki[edit]

Redirect to Forbidden сolor since this is the original meaning, and the title of the novel is secondary. Balkovec (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FRCP (Lon)[edit]

These redirects are not mentioned in any variant in the target article, leaving the target article unclear on what the redirects are meant to refer. The article does contain some variants of "MRCP" with "(Lond)", but "Lond" and not "Lon". Also, any unstable of "FRCP" in the article is not designated with any type of "Lon" or "Lond" suffix. It does not seem as though readers will find what they are looking for if they use these redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 07:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep FRCP stands for Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians. Once you pass the exam and you become a consultant you can apply for fellowship, once you pass a more difficult exam. FRCP(Lon) is the standard term that is used in documentation, for that process. It is worth keeping. There is an FRCP in Edinburgh as well. So the London part is needed. scope_creepTalk 08:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scleroderma(medicine)[edit]

The disambiguator "(medicine)" seems misleading since the subject is not a medicine but rather a disease. Also, the redirect's title fails WP:RDAB due to a lack of space between the title and the disambiguator; the properly spaced title, Scleroderma (medicine), does not exist, but I do not think it should either per my initial statement. Steel1943 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edge(Tech Fest of Techno India)[edit]

The target section doesn't exist, and neither does the redirect's title's properly-spaced variant Edge (Tech Fest of Techno India). (In 2014, this redirect was an article for less than 5 minutes before being subject to a WP:BLAR.) Steel1943 (talk) 06:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minister(Government)[edit]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the title and the disambiguator. However, though the properly-spaced variant, Minister (Government), does not exist, the version with a lower case "g", Minister (government), exists and targets the same page as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 06:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foot length[edit]

A related redirect Foot (length) seems to helpfully target the nominated redirect's target page; however, without "length" as a disambiguator (such as it is in the nominated redirect), a reader could be looking up this term expecting to find the article Shoe size. I'm not sure if the best option here would be to retarget to shoe size, or just hatnote the current target and call it a day. Steel1943 (talk) 06:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The length of a foot" does indeed have a double meaning in English. It can refer to the length of any human foot, or to the length of the metrological unit known as a foot. I think that the length of the standard foot (the unit) should be the most useful to redirect to. "Shoe size" can also refer to foot width in addition to foot length, so is more ambiguous. Nicole Sharp (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have revised the hatnote at target to offer a link to Shoe size rather than unhelpfully linking to the primary topic Foot. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crooked Cop Air[edit]

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article's subject unclear. In addition, third party search engines seem to return results for both the target subject and skateboarding; it seems to be a trick of some sort, but the name doesn't seem to be exclusive to either sport. Steel1943 (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The King (2008 film)[edit]

None of the "film" subjects at the target disambiguation page were released in 2008. Steel1943 (talk) 05:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per WP:CSD#R2. Looks like this is a {{R from move}} from a draftification by the nom. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yep, it was an old draft that I restored and moved to the draft namespace in the event it gets worked on to a state where it can be brought back to the article namespace. And ... I just realized that I could have moved the article to the draft namespace, then tagged this nominated redirect for {{Db-r2}} instead of retargeting it back to the disambiguation page, as stated. (I used to be more active with this process ... I think my head isn't working with a full set of marbles at the moment, but thankfully I'm acquiring them again.) Steel1943 (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hole (golf)[edit]

The redirect targeting its current target could potentially be a WP:SURPRISE. The use of "hole" in golf itself is apparently ambiguous: Does or refer to the hole which the ball is hit into, or the segment of the course that has the aforementioned hole? I'm thinking a solution here would be to retarget to Golf#Play of the game where both concepts seem to be mentioned together. Steel1943 (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Ford (activist)[edit]

No mention at target, Libertarian Party of Rhode Island. —Bagumba (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He was the former Chair of the Libertarian Party of Rhode Island at the time I made the redirect. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Urens[edit]

This presently targets the dab page at Uren, but none of the articles listed there (plaecs and peopel with the surname) reasonably take a plural. Until 2018 it targetted to Myrmecia urens, search results indicate there are other genuses with a species called "Urens" so redirecting to one of them would be WP:XY. I'm not sure whether it best to disambiguate the species (I'm not immediately seeing any other uses) or to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete species names never stand alone in any formal/encyclopedic context. There is no need to disambiguate them. Species names may occasionally stand alone in informal (usually conversational, not written) contexts between biologists when the context of the genus has already been established. That is a classic partial title match scenario, just as a much as if I agree to meet a friend from my city at "the zoo" (our shared city of residence establishing the context of the only zoo in that city). Plantdrew (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Plantdrew. For a discussion of specific epithets on DAB pages, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristis (2nd nomination) (the consensus was: they don't belong there.) Narky Blert (talk) 11:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the people with the surname is obviously a list of Urens, so if you were looking for people by that surname, the plural form would be a logical search term -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man 2 3[edit]

Highly unusual and confusing way to call these two films, extremely unlikely to be used a search term. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Other Wiki[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Fastily per G7. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard Wikipedia being called "The Other Wiki", plus this name is not mentioned in the article. I dug a little deeper, and it appears this was an accepted AFC request based on an obscure TV Tropes page, which is not enough to justify this redirect. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Without an official non-WP:NEO-creating source, any wiki could be "The Other Wiki", leaving this redirect helplessly circular in its references. Steel1943 (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Foppington's Law[edit]

See [1] [2]. Funny and accurate, but not mentioned at target and unlikely to be mentioned in the near future. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This was mentioned back in 2018--2019 at the draft, but the draft staled out and hasn't been recovered since. Okay to delete. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: not mentioned at the target, and there's no encyclopedic potential for the term. — Bilorv (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220409121232/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_5

Leave a Reply