Edmund Hillary Fellowship[edit]

Edmund Hillary Fellowship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Lack of notability. Could not find anything about this award save for run-of-the -mill listings. TheLongTone (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and New Zealand. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• It's an important fellowship that has sponsored many famous personalities and hence, definitely noteworthy.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisha3107 (talk • contribs) 26 February 2022 (UTC)
  • fame and importance were rejected as criteria in 2004. Uncle G (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (or even Speedy delete as A7) — I cannot find a single source that comes anywhere near to satisfying WP:GNG. If the creating editor is convinced this is notable, kindly point to the evidence. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Simply doesn't doesn't meet WP:GNG, let along WP:NORG. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep tom much of a stub to tell the story - a quick look on Google and it is covered in several national newspapers, along with announcements of a partnership with the New Zealand Government Immigration department. Absolutely agree it needs a lot of work to show all this, and may have a go at it shortly, but not tonight. NealeWellington (talk) 10:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Thanks Neale. I will work on adding more content to it soon too. This page is mentioned in several famous personalities' pages like Naval Ravikant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisha3107 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Alisha3107. --Vaco98 (talk) 04:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage in independent WP:RS. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep A credible fellowship many notable members. Not sure if it meets WP:NORG due to lack of citations from independent WP:RS but seems to meet WP:GNG. UphillAthlete (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lack of independent reliable sources is how something fails to meet that criterion. That said: are you going solely by what's in the article, without looking to see what sources are available? Uncle G (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]