![]() |
---|
31 August 2022 |
alternative account name[edit]
Three inactive alternative Userpage/names instances WP:ALTACCN :
Wikipedia:Babel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Search user languages |
small script notes template[edit]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ...npr.→ list of Lists-related deletion discussions ... itd. --౪ Santa ౪99° 22:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
warning temp.[edit]
- == Edit warring and breaking 3-revert rule (3RR) ==
Your recent editing history at some article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing important content (ref-notes) back to how you think it should be (you are removing them altogether), without any explanation (WP:FIES; in edit summary or talk page) or attempt to resolve the issue (WP:DR) by attempting to reach a consensus (WP:CONS) on article Talk Page, when you can see that other editor(s) disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--౪ Santa ౪99° 16:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
sig[edit]
s a n t a | t a l k | v a u l t
s a n t a | t a ✩ l k | v a u l t
sig2[edit]
- Kiss me up & down!
- Kiss me up & down!
- observe → process → act
Nera[edit]
This user supports the preservation of the Neretva river.
- Pages that link to "Template:User Neretva"
- User:Bizutage supports Protect Neretva proposition
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina/User Box
my tools[edit]
sig3[edit]
¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ | t a l k | ? ? ? ? ♣ ♣ ♣ ♣
⋊((̃((˞°> | t a l k | <°)̃̃)))>{
'b l a h-b l a h | ⓢⓐⓝⓣⓐ | it's full of sh...tars
'b l a h-b l a h | ⓢⓐⓝⓣⓐ | it's full of sh...tars
ⓢⓐⓝⓣⓐ pit
santasa99(talk)
santa(99) pit
/* sig3 */
icn[edit]
sym[edit]
♜♞♝♚♛♝♞♜ ♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟
♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙
♖♘♗♔♕♗♘♖
ℂℍℕℙℚℝℤℵ⋊
██
Estonia
Please specify a rating.
consensus is queer oppression | argue | contribs
con[edit]
Talk
About me
Rant
Templates
Help
Subpages
Tools
Open soc
E-go
E-go
kiss me up & down
S0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5 Istambul history template
S6 WP:BALKAN template message
S7 Turkish Croatia merger proposal
S8 Meatpuppetry/Canvasing: Soliciting help from hr.wikipedia (for support and voting)
S9 Infobox historic subdivision
S10 Hum (historic region)
S11 Template:current members small
S12 Template:current members section
S14 icons 4 GA review progress
S15 Bosnian genocide series templates
S16 Note templates
S17 Infobox river - template - za Neretvu
s18 literature
img[edit]
|