Shortcut WP:AFD/T
Purge

8 April 2022

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Purge server cache

Hecatoncheires (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

Hecatoncheires (Dungeons & Dragons) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Article fails WP:GNG with a total lack of WP:SIGCOV. Reception is based on trivial mentions in lists. A minor monster that is not notable enough for its own article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your PC Protector[edit]

Your PC Protector (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Early 2010s malware that appears to be non-notable as no significant media coverage sufficient to meet GNG exists as far as I can tell. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

County Road T (Saguache County, Colorado)[edit]

County Road T (Saguache County, Colorado) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Quite simply, this fails WP:GNG. County roads are rarely notable, and we don't keep them unless they meet GNG, which this won't. Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WazirX[edit]

WazirX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

End-to-end WP:PROMO, WP:ADMASQ (once again). Fails WP:SIGCOV, and WP:ORGIND/WP:CORPDEPTH. WP:SPA ID used to revert the changes made by User:MER-C. The page is repeatedly attempted, so there is no doubt about WP:COI/WP:UPE involvement. In last AfD closure, redirection was the best suitable option which was chosen by the closing admin. But, this time, I would recommend WP:SALT if similar attempt is carried out in near future. - Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oomba[edit]

Oomba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Startup that does not seem to have ever reached a scale to meet WP:NCORP. BD2412 T 04:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and California. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Interestings[edit]

The Interestings – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

The Interestings was never picked up for by Amazon Prime. The show only aired a pilot and the page only has three references. The show does not meet wikipedia's standards for notability and should be deleted. Mannysoloway (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Meg Wolitzer and very, very selectively merge the content. An author's story getting a TV pilot which received three fairly in-depth reviews from mainstream publications is worth noting in that author's biography. I doubt it needs more than a line or two, though. XOR'easter (talk) 00:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because only the pilot was aired doesn't mean it can't be notable. The pilot has received significant in depth coverage in reliable sources. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Children of Tsunami: No More Tears[edit]

Children of Tsunami: No More Tears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Documentary that appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing in a BEFORE convinced me that this is notable. Previous AfD was no consensus in 2015. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, there is no evidence that it addresses the requirements of WP:NFILM. Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maven Research[edit]

Maven Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

non-notable company - believe it or not, not every org or company nasa does business with is notable or even noteworthy and this doesn't appear to be an exception. CUPIDICAE💕 01:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, California, and New Hampshire. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This mainspace article was created just minutes after Draft:Maven Research was moved to draftspace. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trooper Clerks[edit]

Trooper Clerks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non notable fan film. Appears to fail WP: NFILM. Previous nomination resulted in redirect/merge. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am not so sure about the non notable. This PhD thesis has a decent-sized paragraph on the film, and there are a number of short mentions in the Google books hits. Unfortunately, I cannot see what's about the film in the essay by Jenkins and the PhD thesis by McDaniel. Can anyone else? Daranios (talk) 11:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It looks like the name refers to two things: a live action parody trailer and the animated film based on said trailer. Most of what I'm finding so far looks to be more about the LA trailer, so if the article is kept it should be about both the trailer and the animation. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Found it: In addition to the mentioned PhD thesis, there is a short paragraph discussig the film here on p. 468-469/here on p. 169. Together with short mentions like here and here, and with the award it got, I think this film is notable after all. Like ReaderofthePack suggested, I think the trailer and animated films should all be treated here collectively. Daranios (talk) 14:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't think the award is notable, making the film non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 22:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Oaktree b: Did you mean notable as used on Wikipedia or notable as in an important award? Anyway, I think in general if a film get's a major award, that in itself makes it notable, but if it does not, that does not make it non-notable. Rather, we get back to the basic criterion of "is talked about in secondary sources", right? Which I think is the case here, just enough to fullfill WP:WHYN. The fact that it got a not-so-major(?) award in my view is just an additional point towards notability. Daranios (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foam (organization)[edit]

Foam (organization) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG. Article is full of primary sources, I could not find third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Organizations, and Belgium. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe these could establish notability?:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05pn3t4

https://news.asu.edu/20191003-sun-devil-athletics-launches-legacy-brick-program

https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2014/jun/16/diy-labs-exciting-alternative-university-science-research Rlink2 (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I cannot find any secondary sources on this organization. Above are a passing mention in the BBC article and the ASU article, the Guardian article is written by a a scientific adviser for FoAM Kernow, but not about Foam. Description as "de facto new-media think tank" doesn't make sense. Neither does "In 2001, FoAM became an independent, distributed entity with cells in Brussels and Amsterdam." Fails WP:GNG. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Sadique[edit]

Muhammad Sadique (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:NCRIC. Has played just one game in 2017 Inter-Provincial Trophy. This competition is not deemed notable as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cricket/Official_cricket#Men's_Competitions_with_First-class/List_A/T20_status_that_we_don't_deem_notable. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, Pakistan, and Ireland. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bigfoot Presents: Meteor and the Mighty Monster Trucks[edit]

Bigfoot Presents: Meteor and the Mighty Monster Trucks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable show, no sourcing found. Apparently prodded in March according to main editor's talk page, but I couldn't find the prod in edit history Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Night After Night with Allan Havey[edit]

Night After Night with Allan Havey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Very short-lived TV series. Zero sourcing found. Deprodded with a very WP:NPA edit summary claiming that IMDb is enough for notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

McKinnon Airpark[edit]

McKinnon Airpark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Couldn't prod since one had been removed before under the mistaken impression "We have a low inclusion bar for train stations, probably also for small airports". This isn't an airport with facilities for public access or regular flights, it's some rich person's private property with a strip of clear field on which their small private planes can land. No significant coverage; see also essay Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports/Notability#Private_airports_tend_not_to_be_notable_on_their_own Reywas92^Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Some rich person's airstrip isn't worth inclusion unless it meets GNG, which this clearly does not. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing found to satisfy WP:GEOFEAT or WP:GNG. The airfield gets incidental mention in local news media for a 2017 crash there, but nothing substantial about the facility. • Gene93k (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails to meet notability guidelines. Even the local newspapers have few usable results, mostly revolving around an annual Kiwanis Club event. SounderBruce 04:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Pacific 4451[edit]

Southern Pacific 4451 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This is an unremarkable SD9 that fails GNG by a mile. It is sourced exclusively to self-published railfan sites and one museum which at one point owned the locomotive. Much of this article is just a duplication of Southern Pacific 4450 which I have also nominated for deletion. "They were favorites of railfans and usually worked together" does not confer notability. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Pacific 4450[edit]

Southern Pacific 4450 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This is literally just a random SD9 that isn't remarkable in any way. Fails GNG by a mile, with what isn't straight up original research sourced only to one dude's self published railfan site and a single museum which once owned the locomotive. This isn't even a preserved locomotive. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Maguire[edit]

Mike Maguire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Suburban mayor fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:NPOL and no sources beyond passing mentions exist, meaning he also fails WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 04:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine genocide[edit]

Ukraine genocide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This term is being thrown-around, but it is just political rhetoric at this point. This dab should be returned to the prior redirect to Holodomor, a true genocide. MB 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MB 01:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree and some commentary. I do agree with the nominator, that we should avoid incorrectly labelling things a genocide, or implying the war is a genocide, without that being a verifiable statement. I searched WP:MoS before commenting and the most relevant policy I could find was WP:NPOVTITLE which directs to guide article titles neutrally. Is WP:CRIM relevant here, as to call it a genocide is to call it a crime....I'm not sure. I think the crime guidance here tends to assume crimes done by civilians. But I also wonder if this is a AfD discussion, you're not proposing to delete, are you, you are proposing to change a redirect. I feel this is an important issue, and might warrant more eyes on it than just the AfD viewers. Suggesting something is a genocide is a big deal and we need to be very careful about that. CT55555 (talk) 01:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I am suggesting restoring the prior redirect. Redirecting is a common outcome at AFD; I thought about just reverting to restore the redirect but instead brought it here for discussion. MB 02:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]