Cannabis Ruderalis

NCdave (talk | contribs)
Jorm (talk | contribs)
(Undid revision 898829247 by NCdave (talk) Not your forum)
Tag: Undo
Line 26: Line 26:


:I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A|2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A]] ([[User talk:2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A#top|talk]]) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A|2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A]] ([[User talk:2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A#top|talk]]) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::I agree, this article is one great big [[Thumbing the nose|nose-thumb]] at the very concept of [[Wp:Neutral_point_of_view|NPOV]]. I'm sure there's no point in trying to fix that -- it's what Wikipedia is infamous for, after all -- but I did go ahead and add external links to the organization's official websites. [[User:NCdave|NCdave]] ([[User talk:NCdave|talk]]) 04:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


== Image size ==
== Image size ==

Revision as of 04:53, 26 May 2019

What is their agenda?

I came to this page wondering what this group's agenda is after they were mentioned in a news article: what do they support? what do they believe? what is their platform? After reading about halfway in I started skimming, after three-quarters I abandoned the article as it doesn't really tell us anything about the group. Can anyone knowledgeable add at least 1 section that describes anything about what the group represents or what its purpose is (even if that is to say they don't have one)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.173.36 (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@192.91.173.36: Being racist, basically. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image size

@Beyond My Ken: Why do you insist on having images displayed larger than necessary? Can't we just use the default setting instead of your personal preference? ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So people can see them, of course. Postage stamp-sized images do not help anyone, and do not enhance an article. What do you image the ability to size images is there for? Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's a reason we have a standard thumb size. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, so that if someone doesn't put in a size, the image will have a default size to display at. But it's a default size, not a "standard" size. Nowhere does policy or guidelines say that the default size is the preferred size. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your personal preference is not more important than the default setting. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again, DEFAULT -- i.e. what to do if nothing's specified -- NOT "standard". If you don't like getting the same results all the time, then stop doing the same thing all the time. Edit constructively, instead. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piped wikilinks

Hello Moredps, I'm not interested in an edit war, but your insertion of a wikilink to Christian Identity, renamed Hell Shaking Street Preachers is misleading and constitutes an EASTEREGG. The target article includes no mention of Hell Shaking Street Preachers. If you want to edit Christian Identity and add a properly referenced mention of Hell Shaking Street Preachers, have at it. Until then, the piped wikilink needs to go. Rhadow (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the alternative, you could create an article on Hell Shaking Street Preachers. Rhadow (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes I'm not intrested in an edit war either that's why i put this down as minor, I'm not sure if they even need a page they are a small group of white nationalist Christians I'd like to encourage others to read christian identity/Groups, as there isn't really much about them but they can be recognized through common traits.--Moredps (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for trying to delete this so many times we fixed the piped link so I didn't think it was necessary to keep this around but while it's here I may as well ask if people think the Hell shaking street preachers wikilink would look better next to the proud boys at the top of the article.--Moredps (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)moredps[reply]

Leave a Reply