Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

  • Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).
Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1:
Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.
Step 2:
Create a subpage
For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.


For Delists (or Delist & Replace)

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.


Step 3:
Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

  • Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

  • Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
  • Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
  • Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
  • You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

Gray contrast test image.svg

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Highlight test image.svg

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Colortest.png

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.
To see recent changes, purge the page cache.
FPCs needing feedback


Views of the LHC tunnel sector 3-4, tirage 2.jpg Large Hadron Collider


Northern cardinal female in CP (02035).jpg Northern cardinal


Vermont State House Montpelier October 2021 HDR.jpg Vermont State House

Current nominations[edit]

Alfred Waud[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2022 at 18:13:38 (UTC)

Original – Alfred Waud, artist of Harper's Weekly, sketching at the site of the Battle of Gettysburg during or just after the battle.
Reason
For an outdoor, more-or-less candid shot from 1863, this is stunningly good. In case anyone wonders: The lighter line is above his moustache is exactly, also appears in the other half of the stereoscopic image, so it's real. File:Alfred Waud, full-length portrait, seated, holding a pencil and pad, facing left.jpg, despite its poor quality, does have a slight hint of it. I think it's something to do with very high cheeks.
Articles in which this image appears
Alfred Waud, Battle of Gettysburg, Devil's Den
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
Timothy H. O'Sullivan, restored by Adam Cuerden

Painted stork[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2022 at 10:56:58 (UTC)

Original – Painted stork (Mycteria leucocephala), Bundala National Park, Sri Lanka
Reason
High quality image. Should delist existing FP.
Articles in which this image appears
Painted stork, Stork
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Charlesjsharp

Chestnut-headed bee-eater[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2022 at 10:53:30 (UTC)

Original – Chestnut-headed bee-eater (Merops leschenaulti), Yala National Park, Sri Lanka
Reason
High quality image. FP on Commons. Should delist existing FP.
Articles in which this image appears
Chestnut-headed bee-eater
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Charlesjsharp

Viperine water snake (Natrix maura)[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2022 at 20:57:20 (UTC)

Original – Viperine water snake (Natrix maura), Extremadura, Spain
Reason
Good capture. Was seen on FP candidates on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Natrix maura
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator
Charlesjsharp
  • Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support thanks for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think I'm being stupid, but is that just a little twig he's swimming over a few inches down from the snake's head? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 19:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Delist: Lynching[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 12:51:39 (UTC)

An unnamed person after being lynched in an unknown locale in 1925.
Reason
I think the photographic decisions reinforce a narrative, and it's not one I like: Not photographing the face is a photographic decision that reinforces the dehumanisation of the victim. The hat - seriously, why would he still be wearing a hat after a violent lynching - hides any evidence of beatings prior to the lynching. His neck is hidden by the collar, hiding the actual lynching except for a short bit of chain. His arms are tied, but that isn't possible. It feels like this photograph was staged, the body arranged to lessen the violence, and hide the humanity of the victim.

There's also an extreme lack of documentation for this image. Other than knowing it comes from 1925, we don't know where it happened, we don't know who it happened to. And, I hesitate to say this, but the lack of documentation means we don't even know for certain this was a real hanging: stage rigs for fake-hanging someone aren't particularly complex. (Obviously, lynchings happen, but that would go some way to explaining some of the other features of the image).

Articles this image appears in
Leonidas C. Dyer, Lynching
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lynching
Nominator
Durova


The Cry Of Jazz[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 00:42:18 (UTC)

Original – The Cry of Jazz is a 1959 American documentary film by Ed Bland.
Reason
Very interesting documentary on one of my favorite genres. It is also inducted into the National Film Registry. The quality of the video is also quie good.
Articles in which this image appears
The Cry of Jazz
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator
Ed Bland

Buzk's Gard National Nature Park[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 19:10:24 (UTC)

Original – Panorama of an area in the Buzk's Gard National Nature Park, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine.
Reason
Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears
Buzk's Gard National Nature Park
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator
Vian
  • Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A little further down the page than I'd like, but it feels reasonably prominent. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 09:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Stunningly gorgeous photo! --Janke | Talk 19:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Lots of texture. –Sca (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not encyclopaedic. Too much 'artistic' editing including vignetting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vermont State House[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 19:02:36 (UTC)

Original – The Vermont State House, located in Montpelier, is the state capitol of the U.S. state of Vermont.
Reason
High resolution. Good capture. Was seen on FP candidates on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Vermont State House, Vermont General Assembly, List of state and territorial capitols in the United States
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
King of Hearts

Set: Northern cardinal[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 16:54:18 (UTC)

  • Male

  • Female

Reason
Lead images, illustrates article well. Both unanimous features on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Northern cardinal etc.
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Rhododendrites

Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai eruption[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 16:08:09 (UTC)

Original – Himawari-8 satellite images of the 15 January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai.
Reason
Main image that illustrates the largest atmospheric blast ever measured.
Articles in which this image appears
2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai eruption and tsunami, etc.
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others
Creator
Japan Meteorological Agency

Haane Manahi[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 10:17:11 (UTC)

Original – Haane Te Rauawa Manahi, DCM (28 September 1913 – 29 March 1986) was a New Zealand Māori soldier during the Second World War whose gallantry during the Tunisian campaign resulted in a recommendation that he be awarded the Victoria Cross (VC). The subsequent award of the Distinguished Conduct Medal (DCM) disappointed his fellow soldiers who, after his death, advocated greater recognition of his valour. This eventually resulted in a special award in 2007 of an altar cloth for use in a local church, ceremonial sword and a personal letter from Queen Elizabeth II in recognition of his gallantry.
Reason
A fantastic photograph from World War II of a valiant Maori soldier, and the lead image in a featured article. I do like improving the images in featured articles where possible.
Articles in which this image appears
Haane Manahi
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator
George Robert Bull, restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 10:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Should the dark patch in the sky be removed (top right corner)? The top half of his ear is darker than the bottom half, and there is darker shade in the sky as well along a diagonal line. Should it be improved? Bammesk (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Honestly, I presumed he was in or against the wall of a tent or something, and that was a fabric fold. Natural shadows can look a little weird. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 08:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's true, maybe the background isn't sky. Bammesk (talk) 03:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, there is another diagonal line/crease on the left side just starting above his eye. Zawed (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suppose we could crop a bit from the top, though. It's not quite clear if that's natural or an artefact of the camera. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 10:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC) It looked worse.[reply]
Aye, a good guide for this kind of thing is to see if they cross boundaries. The lines behind him (even in the unrestored original) stop instantly when they reach him, which is evidence against them being artefacts. There is a shadow on the ear that does slightly line up, but it's different in appearance. (and, frankly, coincidental lines are ridiculously common in photos). Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 00:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Large Hadron Collider[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2022 at 22:02:58 (UTC)

Original – A section of the Large Hadron Collider
Reason
Quality image of the Large Hadron Collider, actually a section of it, because it is 17 miles long and in an underground tunnel. "The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and highest-energy particle collider. It lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference and as deep as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath the France–Switzerland border near Geneva." [1] The LHC was built approximately 20 years ago, it's currently operational and is used for making discoveries in particle or subatomic physics.
Articles in which this image appears
Large Hadron Collider
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator
Maximilien Brice, CERN
  • Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support I certainly see the value, but I find the depth of field disappointing. Still, the limited access makes me lean support. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 09:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only way to get more DOF is focus stack (this is already at f/16 and a very high quality lens). Not sure focus stack should be the norm at FPC. And not saying DOF isn't a criterion. Bammesk (talk) 12:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • True, but the focus is also quite close, roughly around the ring at the back of the nearest blue section, so most of the image is quite a bit out of focus. Nearer the middle would have let it fall off more elegantly. (and it puts the visual emphasis on the least interesting component). Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 07:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the main subject doesn't fit in the DOF, the rule of thumb is to focus the lens for a sharp nearside, and let the far side drift out of focus (and into the bokeh). The opposite isn't the norm and the opposite generally looks terrible. Same with the mid-section being sharp and the nearside being out of focus. The camera used and the lens tells me the photographer is most likely a pro. IMO this is as good as it gets focus-wise, absent of focus stacking. Bammesk (talk) 02:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddigore revival, 1921[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 May 2022 at 21:14:12 (UTC)

Original – Two-page spread in The Sphere of the first revival of Gilbert and Sullivan's Ruddigore


Reason
Some theatrical works have their reputation focus on their première. Ruddigore, however, was a relative failure on its first run, and then entered the canon on the back of the first revival (which started as a touring production in 1920, and then had its London run in the 1921-22 season (pictured). This also has a lot of other strengths. I believe this is the highest-resolution image I've ever restored, and it's a compelling, full colour image. It's by a notable artist, and one of only two of his illustrations in his article, and far more detailed than the, admittedly iconic, but relatively simple poster for The Sorcerer. Not to say you won't see the other eventually.
Articles in which this image appears
Ruddigore, H. M. Brock, Geoffrey Toye
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
H. M. Brock, restored by Adam Cuerden, with stitching assistance by Colin

Set:Monsoon in Western Ghats[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 May 2022 at 00:22:31 (UTC)

Original – Western Ghats near Matheran in Maharashtra, during the dry season in late May (above) and during peak monsoon season in late August (below)
Cropped Alt – Western Ghats near Matheran in Maharashtra, during the dry season in late May (above) and during peak monsoon season in late August (below)
Cropped to remove the un-fixable cloning and stitching errors
Reason
What happens when the monsoon hits the Western Ghats? Well, this. Good quality and very high EV when seen side by side.
Articles in which this image appears
Monsoon of South Asia, Monsoon, Season
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Creator
Arne Hückelheim
Support Alt — UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support While the quality of it isn't perfect, the comparison between them is fantastic. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 01:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Sorry, MER-C is right. The top one isn't too bad, but the bottom one is really quite appalling in the lower left corner and less so (but stil bad) in the lower right, with some very bad stitching (?) errors on top of it. Reluctant oppose. Perhaps we could crop the sides? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since you did a great job so far, can you look at the lower left corner of the rain season one, where where's still a small stitching error? Support alt otherwise. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 22:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done :) UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt. providing that cloning errors are eliminated or at least improved. Top EV for the pair! --Janke | Talk 11:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Very captivating image. Well done.Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 00:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Taxin609: Due to errors in the original, a cropped alt has been uploaded, please update your vote accordingly. UnpetitproleX (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I stuck my support vote. I had not seen the stitch lines on the bottom image. Also the top image has dark patches along its top and bottom edge (artifact of stitching). These can be fixed/improved with some careful cloning, and I would support if that's done. Oppose as is. Bammesk (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I can't overlook the dreadful cloning in the bottom corners of both images. MER-C 18:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'll try to fix the stitching errors of the top and the cloning problems in the bottom tomorrow. UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I’ve attempted to fix them. @Adam Cuerden and Bammesk: Should something else/more be done? Or perhaps these just aren’t FP. UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • On the bottom image, the lower left corner is still too obvious (going from the darker grass to the lighter grass). It may be hard to fix. You can also renominate these at a later time, if you care to spend time on them. The top image still has two dark patched on its bottom edge (you may have to zoom in to see them). Bammesk (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think, as Adam Cuerden suggested above, slight cropping on the sides and bottom of the monsoon image might be better. The dry one is easier to fix. UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I’ll upload the cropped versions and renominate. UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Aye, just crop them both the same, which probably means dropping the rainy season one to remove the weird green blob, then taking the same off dry season. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 20:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Södermanland Runic Inscription 113[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 22:32:23 (UTC)

Original – Södermanland Runic Inscription 113, during the time it was owned by runologist Otto von Friesen
Reason
I think this is a fine image. High quality, attractive background, and rather easier to read than the modern photograph.
Articles in which this image appears
Södermanland Runic Inscription 113, Otto von Friesen
FP category for this image
It doesn't have an obvious category. Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others? Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture?
Creator
Otto von Friesen, restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 22:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support quality (t · c) buidhe 03:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. There's some damage still remaining in the grass on the left side about 85% of the way down. MER-C 18:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • The black scratch? Got it. Sorry, that grass does my head in a bit when I was looking for damage in it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • There were quite a few black spots too. MER-C 15:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • @MER-C: Went over and did a full pass of the image. That should have gotten it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 19:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support High quality and high ev. Spongie555 (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations — to be closed[edit]

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users[edit]

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure[edit]

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
    • Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
    Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Add the image to:
  3. Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
    The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
  4. Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
  5. Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
  6. If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
  7. Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
  8. If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the May archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure[edit]

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

  1. Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
  2. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  3. Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
    • Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
  4. Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
  5. Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations[edit]

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Delist: Northern mockingbird[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 11:28:56 (UTC)

Northern Mockingbird, Mimus polyglottos, Humber Bay Park (West), Toronto, Canada
Not for delisting: the newly promoted FP
Reason
Replaced by newly promoted FP File:Mockingbird in Bay Ridge (85082).jpg.
Articles this image appears in
Residual uses, can be replaced.
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mimus-polyglottos-002 edit.jpg
Nominator
MER-C

Delisted --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Stellate puffer[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 11:24:01 (UTC)

Original – Stellate puffer (Arothron stellatus), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt.
Reason
Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears
Arothron stellatus
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator
Diego Delso

Promoted File:Pez globo (Arothron stellatus), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheij, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD, DD 119.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Navy Yard[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 01:56:45 (UTC)

Original – Brooklyn Navy Yard in 1918
Reason
Just a gorgeous aerial photo, and I'd say quite an achievement for 1918.
Articles in which this image appears
Brooklyn Navy Yard
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Urban
Creator
Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 01:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. MER-C 11:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Well executed, especially for its time, and very high EV as it depicts how one of the most important military shipyards in the world at the time was set out. Nick-D (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Nick! Saw this - can't remember what I was looking for at the time - and knew Wikipedia absolutely had to have it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 06:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Navy Yard, Brooklyn. New York. 1918 - NH 117794.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 14:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sagittarius A*[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 19:09:05 (UTC)

Original – Sagittarius A* imaged by the Event Horizon Telescope in 2022
Reason
Nothing to see here, move along.
Historic image of an important astronomical object. We already have an EHT image of a black hole. Both are notable in their own right: the other is the first image of a black hole, this one is in and a key part of our Galaxy.
Articles in which this image appears
Sagittarius A*, Milky Way etc.
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator
Event Horizon Telescope

Promoted File:EHT Saggitarius A black hole.tif --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kinner Kailash range and Kalpa[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 May 2022 at 04:37:03 (UTC)

Original – Kinnaur Kailash range and the town of Kalpa, Himachal Pradesh
Reason
Majestic view of the Kinnaur Kailash range of the Greater Himalaya, and the town of Kalpa in Himachal Pradesh at dawn. Rare picture on commons showing a panaroma of the whole range.
Articles in which this image appears
Kalpa, Kinnaur district
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator
Anubhav Agarwal
  • Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given the lighting, a little graininess is expected, and it's a stunning photo. Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 16:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated to nomination; tangential commentary
*:‘’’Comment’’’ I only recently became aware of the nominator when they appeared on the Talk:Delhi page politely but insistently preferring what I thought were certain types of pictures of Delhi in the info box. They argued their points reasonably well but I had the sense that they preferred pictures where the poverty, the littered streets, the crowds, the filth were not visible. India ‘’is’’ a poor country. As someone who has been editing the FA India for nearly 16 years, where we generally prefer FPs, but ones that have encyclopedic information over vanilla prettiness of the long view, I would like to suggest that these pictures not be cut extra slack because South Asia is under represented in Featured Pictures.
  • You may also view other India-related FPs on my user talk page. I am not here vote, and I understand that FPC like FAC has its rules, but am concerned that the featured pictures be representative, that the nominator not appear at the India page tomorrow making the case that these pretty Himalayan or panoramic pictures are better representatives of India as a result of being featured than the more realistic ones, whether featured or not that are in place.
    You must know there are editors such as Yann or Muhammad Mahdi Karim who have taken beautiful and encyclopedic pictures. Summing up standards here should not be lowered because South Asia is underrepresented or that a nominator (not necessarily the nominator of this picture) has seemingly boned up on Wikipedia rules and are prepared to argue their point. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • So your point, if I understand correctly, is that the pictures be judged by FP standards, right? I fully agree with you, and in none of my nominations have I argued that standards be lowered for my nominations due to underrepresentation or any other reason. You can look at all of my nominations to confirm (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and the current). I do know Yann and Karim, or for that matter also Tagooty, Satdeep, Subrajyoti and others, all of whose works I admire. I wish to one day emulate it and possibly have FPs of my own.
    Also, It’s getting a bit absurd now. Stalking my contributions and then reverting them, now coming here on FPC, assuming motivations and making accusations based on that. What’s next? This obsessive policing bordering on harassment is not appreciated. And I would highly recommend using FPC talk page for discussions unrelated to the nominations. UnpetitproleX (talk) 11:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I’m not following you from page to page. You yourself mentioned the FPC submissions and came here to your work. My concern is genuine. Yann’s submissions don’t veer away from poor people or the disregarded such as tribals. We have his pictures on the India page for that reason. We had his picture of children eating puri and kheer in school on the India page for years; we still have his pictures in politics and sports, of girls playing hopscotch; they expose the reality, not cover it. It is the same with Karim he finds beauty in many forms and sizes from the three-striped squirrels to the Lucknow imambara. In your instance, though, from my brief experience with what you prefer in pictures, there seems to be a bias away from the nitty gritty reality to the broad vistas in which details can’t be seen.
    I’m not suggesting there is anything wrong with your pictures; they have their place; but if other editors are giving easier passes to these pictures because the region is underrepresented, then they should be aware that generally unrepresentative pictures, which such pictures become in large numbers, don’t make a region better represented. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fowler&fowler: A picture of a heap of garbage is not going to become FP unless it is exceptionally high in encyclopaedic value. For Commons:FP it will need to be artistically exceptional, and be among the best of pictures available there. In a recent nomination, trash flowing in a moat had to be cloned out for it to become FP. Such clean-ups are routine. My nominations so far have been of buildings and landscapes, I have yet to get to people or street photography. Please understand that everything need not have an ulterior motive. Do you realise how out of place this whole discussion looks to any uninvolved editor? I’m willing to cut you some slack given your circumstances at the moment, and I really do sympathise with you, but there is a limit. I am collapsing this wall of text. I will recommend you copy-paste it to FPC talk if you wish to continue. And you are welcome to vote here on this or any other nomination, based on its individual merit, support or oppose, or even comment—if the comment is about the actual nomination. UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC) @TrangaBellam: Thank you for your support, it is appreciated, but could you strike out the latter part of your comment? I would like for this nomination to still stay on track and not become a debate on things unrelated, thanks UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Adam and in part, due to F&f's ridiculously orientalist arguments — lacking basis in any policy — which would have put Naipaul to shame. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I note that at the moment of writing TrangsBellam supports the picture in part they say because they oppose my arguments, but I have not voted Fowler&fowler«Talk» 23:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This picture has been edited from another one, apparently to remove some text naming the peaks. I find that unobjectionable. But there are other editing artifacts that show up as well. The one it was edited from had what looks like a stitching artifact where the mountain background was brighter on one side of a pole in the lower left than on the other side; this has been reduced but not eliminated. And all of the mountain ridgetops have heavy black outlines, probably from too much unsharp mask. The nominator speaks above about blithely cloning out objects visible in scenes (unobjectionable when the subject is a person and the cloning is something irrelevant in background, but more problematic when the subject is the scene itself). Some odd bright red stains on the lower left edge have been replaced with odd grey-brown stains that are harder to spot. It makes me wonder how much more manipulation there is that I am not seeing. But it also makes me skeptical that this image is GA quality. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the input. The image has also had some red and blue chromatic aberrations removed, all edits performed by me. I’d just like to point out that removing objects that distract from the scene, correcting stitching errors, etc are routine, uncontroversial fixes. Especially in FP nominations, such fixes are frequently requested by the voters themselves. I can point to several nominations on both Commons:FPC and here where this is the case. UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, the cloning out remark was in reference to a particular previous nomination, not a “blithe” suggestion to indiscriminately clone out objects visible in scenes. :) UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Sorry but the composition doesn't work IMO. With all the sky on top, the village looks squeezed in the bottom (the framing looks unbalanced). The lighting and the bright sky makes everything look dark. Also, I am not sure about the pinkish sky, it looks a bit overdone or unnatural. Bammesk (talk) 02:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phyang monastery, Ladakh[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 May 2022 at 02:09:43 (UTC)

Original – The Phyang Monastery in Ladakh, India
Reason
A great composition and good quality image of the Phyang Monastery, showcasing both the Buddhist architecture of Ladakh and its rugged landscape, as well as how these two interact with each other such that buildings almost become part of the landscape.
Articles in which this image appears
Phyang Monastery
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Bernard Gagnon
  • Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 02:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Could be a little sharper, but it's pretty good, and in an area that's heavily underrepresented so I'm willing to give it that tiny bit more benefit of the doubt. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 16:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Adam - increasing coverage of underrepresented topics is a good motivation to feature. TSP (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 02:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddygore[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 13:32:05 (UTC)

Original – Illustration of scenes from Gilbert and Sullivan's Ruddygore (later renamed Ruddigore) in the original 1887 production.
Reason
Really good documentation of the original production, including scenes cut later on in the run (and occasionally restored today). Doing great on Commons. Shows a lot of information in a compact way. Hopefully we're through the dead spot as regards voting on here, but I think I have a little time as my wrist was hurting after my last restoration (I'm like five behind on nominations here), so I'm going to stop restoring for a week.
Articles in which this image appears
Ruddigore, Amédée Forestier
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
Amédée Forestier, restored by Adam Cuerden

Promoted File:Amédée Forestier - Illustrated London News - Gilbert and Sullivan - Ruddygore (Ruddigore).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mango[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 11:00:43 (UTC)

Original – Mango fruits – single and halved
Reason
Was seen on Commons FPC a week ago, where it was featured unanimously.
Articles in which this image appears
Mango
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
Creator
Ivar Leidus
  • Support as nominator – MER-C 11:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Bammesk (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support UnpetitproleX (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Haiiya (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ‘’’Comment’’’ I am not here to vote but to note that the mango in the picture is a mango grown in Brazil similar to the ones I find the local supermarket in the New World’s northern continent. I would submit that encyclopedic precision and due weight in nomenclature would be better served if the unadorned name “mango” is reserved for the mangoes of South Asia, the region in which the fruit was domesticated and where there are dozens if not hundreds of cultivars. This picture should be called “Mango grown in Brazil.” The picture does not belong to the lead of mango either. It should be moved to another section. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mangos - single and halved.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 14:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Delist: Shuffle[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 02:46:18 (UTC)

A riffle shuffle being performed during a game of poker.
Reason
Noticed that this image fails the second criterion as its 1,024 × 731 pixels, being much too small for the minimum.
Articles this image appears in
Shuffling
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shuffle delist
Nominator
GamerPro64
  • Delist — GamerPro64 02:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist While I don't think we should delist historic FPs just because they're of resolutions too low for modern FPs, this hits a number of problems beyond that, like the unneccessary black and white. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 16:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist. With no historical significance to this particular image, it would be easily replaced by a new image of appropriate quality. A different version of the same image appears to be available at double the resolution at File:Deuces Wild (44276782).jpeg but that is still low by modern standards and doesn't affect the other issues. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust The Homunculus 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • While the discussion is bellow qourum, this unused image can't retain its featured picture status and is delisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Trabala vishnou guttata[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 May 2022 at 15:59:56 (UTC)

Original – A resting male rose-myrtle lappet moth, Shoushan, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Reason
High quality and large image. Used in infobox.
Articles in which this image appears
Trabala vishnou
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator
Tiouraren
  • Support as nominator – Tiouraren (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey, um, there's a couple what I think are focus stack errors. It's a brilliant image besides that. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 17:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Aerial View of Edinburgh"[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 21:01:47 (UTC)

Original – Alfred Buckham's c. 1920 "Aerial View of Edinburgh".
Reason
A stunning photo by a daredevil pilot. Gives a stunning overview of Edinburgh in 1920 which, because it's Edinburgh, is still pretty darn accurate to this day. Bit of mist around Arthur's Seat, which is typical enough. This is facing roughly east.
Articles in which this image appears
Alfred Buckham, Edinburgh
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator
Alfred Buckham, restored by Adam Cuerden

Promoted File:Aerial View of Edinburgh, by Alfred Buckham, from about 1920.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 02:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch atop a Skyscraper[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 19:26:38 (UTC)

Original – Lunch atop a Skyscraper, 1932
Alt 1 - Grabbed from the Washington Post
Reason
Iconic picture from the 1930s. High resolution.
Articles in which this image appears
Lunch atop a Skyscraper, others
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator
Charles Clyde Ebbets
  • Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @TheFreeWorld: An alternative image was added to the nomination. Could you update your vote to indicate which version(s) you support? Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 20:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Is that really the best quality print of it? It looks upscaled. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 21:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Certainly appears to be! The original is only 1,458 × 1,123. --Janke | Talk 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good find! Support Alt 1 --Janke | Talk 09:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt 1 --UnpetitproleX (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments: I re-wrote the article and nominated it for GAN. Few issues: the "creator" is unknown, with most crediting to Charles C. Ebbets, but the true identity is not known. See Lunch Atop a Skyscraper#Photographer. Also, more seriously, this source says "... Corbis, the company that owns the rights to the photo ...". Are we sure it does not have any copyright/copyright was not renewed? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • And now someone's found an even higher resolution image, which was uploaded over the original. Support whichever is the highest resolution, provided the copyright status is OK. MER-C 10:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @MER-C: the trouble with the original is it's clearly just an upscale. There's more detail in the alt, despite pixel counts. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 11:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    True that, plus the original is cropped. Support alt 1. MER-C 11:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lunch atop a Skyscraper - Charles Clyde Ebbets.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Key Monastery, Spiti Valley, India[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 May 2022 at 21:36:59 (UTC)

Original – Key Monastery under snow in winters, in the Spiti valley of Himachal Pradesh, India
Reason
Good quality image of the monastery in winter. Was featured on commons recently. The monastery is the largest in Spiti valley, a remote valley lying in the shadow of the Himalayas formed by the Spiti river.
Articles in which this image appears
Key Monastery, Spiti valley, Himachal Pradesh
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Ksuryawanshi (edited by Aristeas)

Promoted File:Kee monastery Spiti Valley (edited).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 02:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surgeon Placing Suture[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 16:56:40 (UTC)

Original – A physician closing a wound on a person's thumb with sutures
Reason
This is a high quality image of a basic medical procedure. This image was previously listed and was not promoted, in part due to failing criterion #5 at that time.
Articles in which this image appears
Surgical suture, Wound
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator
Jake Wartenberg
  • Support as nominator – Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per last time. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 17:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - This looks like a great image showing suturing. Though I doubt it would make it on the front page. GamerPro64 03:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – As others noted last time, this image does not show the suturing process well. It's obscured by the bloody mess. Doesn't meet Criterion 3, IMO. – Sca (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – As before. --Janke | Talk 12:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended nominations[edit]

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.

source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220218015024/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FPC

Leave a Reply