Cannabis Ruderalis

Research: 'Sticky' rubber...[edit]

Hi,

this may seem like an unusual request, but do you still have any contacts with the Consumer Reports people?

I am asking because in trying to find out how to cure a problem with 'sticky' rubber surfaces in a mid 1990's construction toy set, I had in a cupboard, I'm finding some anecdotal accounts of other products with rubberised components becoming 'sticky' or degrading.

I was therefore interested in determining if this is indeed a widespread but known issue, and given you previous connections with CR I felt I should ask if you knew where might hold relevant articles.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: I have not worked with Consumer Reports since 2018 but I may be able to ask questions or identify relevant articles.
Are you trying to fix a sticky mess, repair failing glue, or respond to degrading solid rubber?
Consumer Reports typically focuses on conventional use of consumer products. 90s toys are probably out of scope, but tell me more and let me see if I can find publications.
Also, this is kind of a mess, but I think Internet Archive now has scans of almost every Consumer Reports publication. See their gallery. Navigating Internet Archive is still difficult, but as a long term solution, the Internet Archive could be the channel by means of which we eventually surface CR content and all other magazines. They are doing this independently of Consumer Reports partnership. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally clean up some old model tyres which were sticky to the touch, but not actually deformed yet (so most likely the third of the options you give_. I was wanting to determine if this was a widespread issue with certain types of plastic/rubber. It wasn't unexpected, as I've had other things degrade over time, like scroll wheels on mice, and a rubber pad on an old laptop ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News[edit]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 23: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC[edit]

February 23, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Wikimedia New York City logo.svg
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 19:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Inactive WikiProject Open/Open access task force[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your thanks! As I was looking at neighboring WikiProjects to WP:FOSS I found quite a lot related projects abandoned. I hope I haven't assumed wrongly the activity of the Open access task force. It seems you have been active there in the past - can you tell me some about how it declined there? And where most of the communication happened on the task force? Was it on it's talk page? GavriilaDmitriev (talk • they/them) 17:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GavriilaDmitriev: Most people who are interested in openness want to put their interest into practice, not discuss the philosophy of it. WikiProject Open and the related WikiProject Open Access are about the philosophy.
Wikidata's most popular project in count of contributors and depth of engagement is meta:WikiCite and d:Wikidata:WikiProject Source Metadata. In both of those projects, cataloging open access research is a priority, and doing data modeling for related research tools is very popular also. There are hundreds of people engaged in this through multiple unrelated projects. A large project with several hundred contributors is d:Wikidata:WikiProject PCC Wikidata Pilot/Participants.
You marked the English Wikipedia WikiProject Open Access as inactive. It is correct that there is no active community there, but if there were a way to mark that the activity has moved to Wikidata, then that would be more accurate. I do not know how to communicate that. There is activity on Wikipedia but it takes forms which are hard to see. Bluerasberry (talk) 17:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Asquith Xavier on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mar 27: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn[edit]

March 27, 11am-2pm: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn
Wiki-Tent Brunch location, Sahadi’s – Courtyard 3/4 in Industry City.
Wikimedia New York City logo.svg

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering between the local Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation at Sahadi's tent in Brooklyn's Industry City.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

11:00am - 2:00 pm
(Industry City, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Leave a Reply