- User talk:Ahechtbot redirects here. User:Ahechtbot is a legitimate alternative bot account of Ahecht. Please use this page for all discussion of that bot account.
- User talk:Ahect redirects here. User:Ahect is a doppelgänger account, so if you see that user mentioned, it's probably a misspelling of User:Ahecht.
transclusion count wikisource[edit]
Hello, i am thinking of making a bot request for a bot that runs your script [[User:Ahechtbot/transclusioncount.py|transclusioncount.py}} on Wikisource, however i thought it would make sense to ask you if you would be interested in running your script on wikisource before going to the effort of doing it myself. i understand if you are not interested. Serprinss (talk) please ping on reply. 09:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- sorry looks like you've already started. ps. there's another template called s:Template:High-risk that does the same thing as s:template:High-use (both on wikisource)--Serprinss (talk) please ping on reply. 09:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Serprinss I don't really have the time to personally support learning the process of getting approval to run the bot on Wikisource, but if third party bot requests are allowed, I would be able to run the bot once it has been approved. If not, you can either use s:Template:High-risk/s:template:High-use (those should really be merged into a single template) with manually entered usage counts, or run the bot yourself (see User_talk:Ahecht/Archive_14#Ahechtbot_on_SqWiki, where I helped another user get it set up on another wiki). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)- it tried to run it and it didnt make any edits and did this
Executing query1 at Fri Jan 21 01:59:00 2022...
Executing query2 at Fri Jan 21 01:56:13 2022...
Success at Fri Jan 21 01:56:16 2022!
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:17 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:17 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:18 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:18 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:18 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:18 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:19 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:19 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:19 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:19 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:20 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:20 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:20 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:20 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:21 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:21 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:21 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:21 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:22 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:22 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:22 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:22 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:23 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:23 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:23 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:23 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Error at Fri Jan 21 01:56:24 2022: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable
Done at Fri Jan 21 01:56:24 2022!
it works in debug mode Serprinss (talk) please ping on reply. 02:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)- @Serprinss Looks like the error is occurring when writing to the wiki, if it works fine in debug mode. My guess is that pywikibot either isn't installed or isn't configured correctly. Did you follow the instructions at wikitech:Help:Toolforge/Pywikibot to add pywikibot to the PYTHONPATH and generate the config files? You can test to make sure it's working correctly by running
python3 /data/project/shared/pywikibot/stable/scripts/login.py--Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 03:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Serprinss Looks like the error is occurring when writing to the wiki, if it works fine in debug mode. My guess is that pywikibot either isn't installed or isn't configured correctly. Did you follow the instructions at wikitech:Help:Toolforge/Pywikibot to add pywikibot to the PYTHONPATH and generate the config files? You can test to make sure it's working correctly by running
- it tried to run it and it didnt make any edits and did this
- @Serprinss I don't really have the time to personally support learning the process of getting approval to run the bot on Wikisource, but if third party bot requests are allowed, I would be able to run the bot once it has been approved. If not, you can either use s:Template:High-risk/s:template:High-use (those should really be merged into a single template) with manually entered usage counts, or run the bot yourself (see User_talk:Ahecht/Archive_14#Ahechtbot_on_SqWiki, where I helped another user get it set up on another wiki). --Ahecht (TALK
Nomination for deletion of Template:Trimc[edit]
Template:Trimc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 14:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Infobox help (again)[edit]
A while back you helped with getting the "Defunct" status to appear as "Removed" at {{Infobox roller coaster}}. Unfortunately, this is impacting another template, {{Infobox amusement park}}, where we actually would want "Defunct" to show. While the "Removed" status makes sense for an attraction or a roller coaster, it doesn't necessarily make as much sense for a park. I updated some of the parameters on the template, but didn't see a way to modify that. Thought I'd reach out, thanks! --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- @GoneIn60 As of last November, the status display for the two templates is completely separate. The park one can be modified at Template:Infobox amusement park/status. However, I would get consensus on the talk page before modifying it. Would you want to replace both "Closed" and "Removed" with "Defunct"? There certainly are parks, like Six Flags Astroworld, where "Removed" would make sense. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Been a while since we had a discussion, so perhaps a follow-up is warranted, but the last consensus was established here. Reading the details of that discussion closely, it appears to only cover attraction articles, not amusement parks (and your comments there about what you were modifying at the time only seemed to pertain to "attractions"). I was thinking along the lines of Six Flags New Orleans or LeSourdsville Lake Amusement Park, where remnants of a park might remain standing years or even decades after the park was abandoned. While "Closed" would technically work, the spirit of that debate considers that status more along the lines of "could reopen" and "not permanent". So instead of having a status like "Removed", for parks especially, it would seem to make sense to go with "Defunct" as a one-stop shop that covers both "Removed" and "Permanently closed". That would be helpful in situations where buildings/rides were left behind and remain standing.I'll get a new discussion going at the WikiProject. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Began the discussion at WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Status field for Amusement Park infoboxes. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Saw you made a recent change at the template, and then I noticed an open-ended bracket in the infobox status at LeSourdsville. Not sure if the two are related, but just a heads up. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Fixed --Discussion that concerns you[edit]
Dronebogus (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Sorry if I was rude earlier[edit]
Just please don’t deletion-nominate files that have been in use for a long time before they’ve been removed from use by consensus. Even in good faith it comes across as disruptive and overly aggressive. Dronebogus (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)